Demand for microfulfillment centers has cooled alongside a leveling off of e-grocery sales, but growth opportunities for the technology remain, experts say.
Victoria Kickham started her career as a newspaper reporter in the Boston area before moving into B2B journalism. She has covered manufacturing, distribution and supply chain issues for a variety of publications in the industrial and electronics sectors, and now writes about everything from forklift batteries to omnichannel business trends for DC Velocity.
It wasn’t long ago that the term “microfulfillment center,” or MFC, frequently cropped up in logistics industry conversations. The trend reflected a need for local inventory sources that could fill accelerating demand for last-mile delivery as e-commerce surged during the Covid-19 pandemic, especially in the grocery market.
You hear the term far less frequently today. Demand for MFCs has softened alongside steadying e-grocery sales over the past few years, but experts say the market for microfulfillment remains strong, with emerging opportunities that hold promise for equipment vendors and e-commerce players alike.
“A lot of the growth [in MFCs] pulled forward during the pandemic. Grocers had to service this channel that they hadn’t paid attention to or that was a small portion of their business,” explains Greg Lary, senior sales manager for logistics technology vendor Knapp, which was an early leader in supplying shuttle-based microfulfillment systems to grocers around the world. “Recent data [show that] demand has leveled off. We’re not seeing major spikes like during the pandemic. We expect to see more of a sustained volume [moving forward].”
Indeed, monthly e-grocery sales have softened since the pandemic days, according to data from the Brick Meets Click/Mercatus Grocery Shopping Survey, an independent research project that tracks online grocery trends. Monthly e-grocery sales were $6.5 billion in March of 2020 and hit a peak of $9.3 billion in March of 2021. Monthly sales have declined or been flat since, although they remain well above those 2020 levels—sales fell to $8 billion in March of 2023 and remained there this past March, 23% above where they were at the onset of the pandemic.
“The new behavior of the consumer is becoming more ingrained,” Lary says. “E-grocery is here to stay and should be considered in the growth plans of our grocery customers.”
Lary and others say microfulfillment technology can help companies address those needs in grocery and beyond. They point to growth opportunities across retail, including the pharmacy and even the auto-parts sectors, as the MFC market continues to evolve and businesses seek more efficient ways to serve customers. Here’s a look at some of the latest trends shaping demand for microfulfillment.
THE CASE FOR FLEXIBILITY
An MFC is a small-scale, automated facility used by e-commerce businesses to store inventory closer to the end-consumer, allowing companies to reduce transportation costs and transit times. MFCs often consist of robotic shuttle-based automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RS) with manual or technology-assisted picking stations, but they can also incorporate other technologies, including autonomous mobile robots (AMRs), as part of a goods-to-person picking system. The key is that the systems are smaller in scale than what you’d find in a typical warehouse or fulfillment center and are often located in dense, urban areas. They can also be built inside larger warehouses or in the backrooms or storage areas of retail outlets.
One of the biggest challenges associated with MFCs is return on investment (ROI), says Matt Kelly, director of business development and strategic partnership at automated warehouse solutions provider Hai Robotics, which offers an autonomous case-handling mobile robot (ACR) solution for microfulfillment. Kelly describes that solution, the company’s HaiPick system, as an ACR-driven AS/RS.
“I think [microfulfillment] went through a lot of hype … and now businesses are figuring out if it’s the right decision, because it’s very expensive,” Kelly says, emphasizing the low per-item cost of most grocery merchandise compared to the high cost of installing microfulfillment equipment and technology, especially the infrastructure required in fixed-automation solutions. “ROI is really the issue.”
In light of that, flexibility has become a key attribute in microfulfillment, according to Lary, of Knapp. Modular systems that can be easily expanded or adjusted are often the best way to ensure customers make the most of their investment, he says.
“One of the biggest challenges [early on] was [the customers’] real estate requirements,” Lary says, explaining that Knapp’s early MFC designs featured a single layout that didn’t always fit the customer’s space. “One of the costliest parts [of a system] are the modifications that have to be made to the real estate. We realized we needed to be more flexible.”
Today, Knapp’s shuttle-based microfulfillment AS/RS can be customized to accommodate those differences and scaled to adjust to changing business demands: Customers can mix and match totes, trays, and cartons of various shapes and sizes; add racks when they need more storage capacity; and add shuttles for higher performance. This enables customers to design a system that fits their space requirements and budget. Oftentimes, they start small and add to the system over time.
“[It’s] less about ‘here’s what we have’ and more about fitting and using the space,” Lary explains, adding that the Knapp system can also incorporate AMRs—a technology that’s gaining traction in microfulfillment primarily because of its flexibility.
Hai Robotics’ ACRs are a case in point: The mobile robots consist of a base with a tower or ladder-like structure attached for transporting multiple containers at a time. The ACRs come in various styles and heights, with some capable of reaching as high as 39 feet. The robots retrieve cases or cartons from storage shelves and deliver them to workstations staffed by humans for picking and packing. The system’s software allows the robots to identify and retrieve specific totes or cartons within a storage system rather than moving an entire rack or shelf—differentiating Hai’s system from similar, shelf-to-person AMR solutions. The system allows more flexibility than fixed-infrastructure automation, Kelly explains, adding that, to date, Hai Robotics has implemented microfulfillment solutions for customers in the grocery, cosmetics, and e-commerce apparel industries around the world.
Matt Inbody, vice president, global execution excellence for supply chain automation specialist Dematic, agrees that the move toward AMRs will be a key trend in microfulfillment moving forward.
“The trend is toward efficient and cost-effective solutions. Lower-investment systems, such as AMR shelf-to-person solutions, are gaining popularity due to their appealing balance of automation and cost,” he says. “While many systems are still in development and refining their models, the future looks bright for these innovative solutions.”
Yet despite that generally rosy outlook, the grocery industry still faces one big barrier to microfulfillment ROI: cold storage. Kelly explains that, for many companies, the automated equipment that is the cornerstone of microfulfillment often stops short at the freezer because of the high cost of robotic solutions capable of working in extreme temperatures.
“It’s super expensive—and there’s not a lot of technology that can [operate] in that environment,” he says. “Freezer equipment for that application is substantially more expensive than having human beings walking around.”
NEW MODELS, NEW MARKETS
In-store fulfillment holds promise for the MFC market, according to Kelly and others, who say that turning retail storage areas into minifulfillment centers answers the call for systems that support both click-and-collect business and last-mile delivery—both of which are here to stay despite a return to in-store shopping post-pandemic.
“There is a lot of discussion around in-store fulfillment, which is a form of microfulfillment,” Kelly explains. “[You can] deploy a standard system that works much like a warehouse, but it’s in the store.”
Lary agrees, noting that much of the traditional microfulfillment market was designed for that purpose, whether it meant building standalone MFCs in dense, urban areas or carving out space for them in stores. E-grocery will continue to drive that trend, but other growth areas include convenience stores, pharmacies, general retail, and industrial parts—including parts used in the automotive and HVAC industries. Hub-and-spoke models—in which retailers use warehouses with larger automated systems to supply orders to stores—remain popular as well.
“We are seeing both of those models being applied—especially in denser, affluent areas,” Lary says.
Inbody, of Dematic, agrees, adding that flexibility and simplicity are key to making microfulfillment work at all levels, in all situations.
“Simple, easy-to-interface automation will drive the future of microfulfillment centers, reducing the need for large, fixed-automation units,” he says. “We anticipate continued growth in urban-based high-density systems, especially in [affluent] areas with a high population density. The evolving landscape of urban and suburban office spaces will also play a crucial role in the real estate aspect of urban fulfillment centers.”
The news that e-commerce microfulfillment specialist Takeoff Technologies filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy this past spring raised questions about the strength of the microfulfillment market—but at least one of Takeoff’s business partners says the move is not an indicator of the sector’s strength.
Logistics technology vendor Knapp has partnered with Takeoff Technologies on microfulfillment projects since 2017 and extended that partnership as recently as February, adding a modular product portfolio to provide grocery retailers with right-sized automation for high-, mid-, and low-volume facilities. Greg Lary, senior sales manager at Knapp, said the bankruptcy news was a surprise to Knapp and that future projects with Takeoff are on hold, although Knapp continues to service existing projects the companies developed together.
“We were one of the creditors financially impacted. It was a surprise to the organization for sure,” Lary says, adding, “Our relationship is good, [but] we are not actively pursuing more projects through Takeoff while they figure out how and if they go forward.”
At press time, Takeoff was still pursuing the sale of its assets.
“I think the situation is going to raise concern about the condition of microfulfillment in the industry in general, and I think, at a surface level, I can understand why,” Lary adds. “But I don’t think Knapp, as an organization, sees Takeoff’s situation [as a reflection of] e-grocery [demand] or how Knapp plans to invest. We still see the channel as being viable and grocers invested in it; [and] automation is part of it. The vision still makes sense, even though Takeoff has some challenges at the moment.”
Even as a last-minute deal today appeared to delay the tariff on Mexico, that deal is set to last only one month, and tariffs on the other two countries are still set to go into effect at midnight tonight.
Once new U.S. tariffs go into effect, those other countries are widely expected to respond with retaliatory tariffs of their own on U.S. exports, that would reduce demand for U.S. and manufacturing goods. In the context of that unpredictable business landscape, many U.S. business groups have been pressuring the White House to pull back from the new policy.
Here is a sampling of the reaction to the tariff plan by the U.S. business community:
American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA)
“Tariffs are taxes,” AAPA President and CEO Cary Davis said in a release. “Though the port industry supports President Trump’s efforts to combat the flow of illicit drugs, tariffs will slow down our supply chains, tax American businesses, and increase costs for hard-working citizens. Instead, we call on the Administration and Congress to thoughtfully pursue alternatives to achieving these policy goals and exempt items critical to national security from tariffs, including port equipment.”
Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA)
“We understand the president is working toward an agreement. The leaders of all four nations should come together and work to reach a deal before Feb. 4 because enacting broad-based tariffs will be disruptive to the U.S. economy,” Michael Hanson, RILA’s Senior Executive Vice President of Public Affairs, said in a release. “The American people are counting on President Trump to grow the U.S. economy and lower inflation, and broad-based tariffs will put that at risk.”
National Association of Manufacturers (NAM)
“Manufacturers understand the need to deal with any sort of crisis that involves illicit drugs crossing our border, and we hope the three countries can come together quickly to confront this challenge,” NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons said in a release. “However, with essential tax reforms left on the cutting room floor by the last Congress and the Biden administration, manufacturers are already facing mounting cost pressures. A 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico threatens to upend the very supply chains that have made U.S. manufacturing more competitive globally. The ripple effects will be severe, particularly for small and medium-sized manufacturers that lack the flexibility and capital to rapidly find alternative suppliers or absorb skyrocketing energy costs. These businesses—employing millions of American workers—will face significant disruptions. Ultimately, manufacturers will bear the brunt of these tariffs, undermining our ability to sell our products at a competitive price and putting American jobs at risk.”
American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA)
“Widespread tariff actions on Mexico, Canada, and China announced this evening will inject massive costs into our inflation-weary economy while exposing us to a damaging tit-for-tat tariff war that will harm key export markets that U.S. farmers and manufacturers need,” Steve Lamar, AAFA’s president and CEO, said in a release. “We should be forging deeper collaboration with our free trade agreement partners, not taking actions that call into question the very foundation of that partnership."
Healthcare Distribution Alliance (HDA)
“We are concerned that placing tariffs on generic drug products produced outside the U.S. will put additional pressure on an industry that is already experiencing financial distress. Distributors and generic manufacturers and cannot absorb the rising costs of broad tariffs. It is worth noting that distributors operate on low profit margins — 0.3 percent. As a result, the U.S. will likely see new and worsened shortages of important medications and the costs will be passed down to payers and patients, including those in the Medicare and Medicaid programs," the group said in a statement.
National Retail Federation (NRF)
“We support the Trump administration’s goal of strengthening trade relationships and creating fair and favorable terms for America,” NRF Executive Vice President of Government Relations David French said in a release. “But imposing steep tariffs on three of our closest trading partners is a serious step. We strongly encourage all parties to continue negotiating to find solutions that will strengthen trade relationships and avoid shifting the costs of shared policy failures onto the backs of American families, workers and small businesses.”
Businesses are scrambling today to insulate their supply chains from the impacts of a trade war being launched by the Trump Administration, which is planning to erect high tariff walls on Tuesday against goods imported from Canada, Mexico, and China.
Tariffs are import taxes paid by American companies and collected by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Agency as goods produced in certain countries cross borders into the U.S.
In a last-minute deal announced on Monday, leaders of both countries said the tariffs on goods from Mexico will be delayed one month after that country agreed to send troops to the U.S.-Mexico border in an attempt to stem to flow of drugs such as fentanyl from Mexico, according to published reports.
If the deal holds, it could avoid some of the worst impacts of the tariffs on U.S. manufacturers that rely on parts and raw materials imported from Mexico. That blow would be particularly harsh on companies in the automotive and electrical equipment sectors, according to an analysis by S&P Global Ratings.
However, tariff damage is still on track to occur for U.S. companies with tight supply chain connections to Canada, concentrated in commodity-related processing sectors, the firm said. That disruption would increase if those countries responded with retaliatory tariffs of their own, a move that would slow the export of U.S. goods. Such an event would hurt most for American businesses in the agriculture and fishing, metals, and automotive areas, according to the analysis from Satyam Panday, Chief US and Canada Economist, S&P Global Ratings.
To dull the pain of those events, U.S. business interests would likely seek to cushion the declines in output by looking to factors such as exchange rate movements, availability of substitutes, and the willingness of producers to absorb the higher cost associated with tariffs, Panday said.
Weighing the long-term effects of a trade war
The extent to which increased tariffs will warp long-standing supply chain patterns is hard to calculate, since it is largely dependent on how long these tariffs will actually last, according to a statement from Tony Pelli, director of supply chain resilience, BSI Consulting. “The pause [on tariffs with Mexico] will help reduce the impacts on agricultural products in particular, but not necessarily on the automotive industry given the high degree of integration across all three North American countries,” he said.
“Tariffs on Canada or Mexico will disrupt supply chains beyond just finished goods,” Pelli said. “Some products cross the US, Mexico, and Canada borders four to five times, with the greatest impact on the auto and electronics industries. These supply chains have been tightly integrated for around 30 years, and it will be difficult for firms to simply source elsewhere. There are dense supplier networks along the US border with Mexico and Canada (especially Ontario) that you can’t just pick up and move somewhere else, which would likely slow or even stop auto manufacturing in the US for a time.”
If the tariffs on either Canada or Mexico stay in place for an extended period, the effects will soon become clear, said Hamish Woodrow, head of strategic analytics at Motive, a fleet management and operations platform. “Ultimately, the burden of these tariffs will fall on U.S. consumers and retailers. Prices will rise, and businesses will pass along costs as they navigate increased expenses and uncertainty,” Woodrow said.
But in the meantime, companies with international supply chains are quickly making contingency plans for any of the possible outcomes. “The immediate impact of tariffs on trucking, freight, and supply chains will be muted. Goods already en route, shipments six weeks out on the water, and landed inventory will continue to flow, meaning the real disruption will be felt in Q2 as businesses adjust to the new reality,” Woodrow said.
“By the end of the day, companies will be deploying mitigation strategies—many will delay inventory shipments to later in the year, waiting to see if the policy shifts or exemptions are introduced. Those who preloaded inventory will likely adopt a wait-and-see approach, holding off on further adjustments until the market reacts. In the short term, sourcing alternatives are limited, forcing supply chains to pause and reassess long-term investments while monitoring policy developments,” said Woodrow.
Editor's note: This story was revised on February 3 to add input from BSI and Motive.
Businesses dependent on ocean freight are facing shipping delays due to volatile conditions, as the global average trip for ocean shipments climbed to 68 days in the fourth quarter compared to 60 days for that same quarter a year ago, counting time elapsed from initial booking to clearing the gate at the final port, according to E2open.
Those extended transit times and booking delays are the ripple effects of ongoing turmoil at key ports that is being caused by geopolitical tensions, labor shortages, and port congestion, Dallas-based E2open said in its quarterly “Ocean Shipping Index” report.
The most significant contributor to the year-over-year (YoY) increase is actual transit time, alongside extraordinary volatility that has created a complex landscape for businesses dependent on ocean freight, the report found.
"Economic headwinds, geopolitical turbulence and uncertain trade routes are creating unprecedented disruptions within the ocean shipping industry. From continued Red Sea diversions to port congestion and labor unrest, businesses face a complex landscape of obstacles, all while grappling with possibility of new U.S. tariffs," Pawan Joshi, chief strategy officer (CSO) at e2open, said in a release. "We can expect these ongoing issues will be exacerbated by the Lunar New Year holiday, as businesses relying on Asian suppliers often rush to place orders, adding strain to their supply chains.”
Lunar New Year this year runs from January 29 to February 8, and often leads to supply chain disruptions as massive worker travel patterns across Asia leads to closed factories and reduced port capacity.
That changing landscape is forcing companies to adapt or replace their traditional approaches to product design and production. Specifically, many are changing the way they run factories by optimizing supply chains, increasing sustainability, and integrating after-sales services into their business models.
“North American manufacturers have embraced the factory of the future. Working with service providers, many companies are using AI and the cloud to make production systems more efficient and resilient,” Bob Krohn, partner at ISG, said in the “2024 ISG Provider Lens Manufacturing Industry Services and Solutions report for North America.”
To get there, companies in the region are aggressively investing in digital technologies, especially AI and ML, for product design and production, ISG says. Under pressure to bring new products to market faster, manufacturers are using AI-enabled tools for more efficient design and rapid prototyping. And generative AI platforms are already in use at some companies, streamlining product design and engineering.
At the same time, North American manufacturers are seeking to increase both revenue and customer satisfaction by introducing services alongside or instead of traditional products, the report says. That includes implementing business models that may include offering subscription, pay-per-use, and asset-as-a-service options. And they hope to extend product life cycles through an increasing focus on after-sales servicing, repairs. and condition monitoring.
Additional benefits of manufacturers’ increased focus on tech include better handling of cybersecurity threats and data privacy regulations. It also helps build improved resilience to cope with supply chain disruptions by adopting cloud-based supply chain management, advanced analytics, real-time IoT tracking, and AI-enabled optimization.
“The changes of the past several years have spurred manufacturers into action,” Jan Erik Aase, partner and global leader, ISG Provider Lens Research, said in a release. “Digital transformation and a culture of continuous improvement can position them for long-term success.”
Women are significantly underrepresented in the global transport sector workforce, comprising only 12% of transportation and storage workers worldwide as they face hurdles such as unfavorable workplace policies and significant gender gaps in operational, technical and leadership roles, a study from the World Bank Group shows.
This underrepresentation limits diverse perspectives in service design and decision-making, negatively affects businesses and undermines economic growth, according to the report, “Addressing Barriers to Women’s Participation in Transport.” The paper—which covers global trends and provides in-depth analysis of the women’s role in the transport sector in Europe and Central Asia (ECA) and Middle East and North Africa (MENA)—was prepared jointly by the World Bank Group, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ), the European Investment Bank (EIB), and the International Transport Forum (ITF).
The slim proportion of women in the sector comes at a cost, since increasing female participation and leadership can drive innovation, enhance team performance, and improve service delivery for diverse users, while boosting GDP and addressing critical labor shortages, researchers said.
To drive solutions, the researchers today unveiled the Women in Transport (WiT) Network, which is designed to bring together transport stakeholders dedicated to empowering women across all facets and levels of the transport sector, and to serve as a forum for networking, recruitment, information exchange, training, and mentorship opportunities for women.
Initially, the WiT network will cover only the Europe and Central Asia and the Middle East and North Africa regions, but it is expected to gradually expand into a global initiative.
“When transport services are inclusive, economies thrive. Yet, as this joint report and our work at the EIB reveal, few transport companies fully leverage policies to better attract, retain and promote women,” Laura Piovesan, the European Investment Bank (EIB)’s Director General of the Projects Directorate, said in a release. “The Women in Transport Network enables us to unite efforts and scale impactful solutions - benefiting women, employers, communities and the climate.”