Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Three Criteria to Select a Solutions Provider

Whether looking to improve visibility, solve a specific challenge or reduce costs, there are three initial criteria to consider when searching for a logistics solution provider. These seem simple enough, but if not rigorously applied, trouble often follows.

3 Criteria to Select a Solutions Provider

  1. Puts my interests ahead of theirs.
  2. Is a proven problem solver.
  3. Listens to my unique problems.

Listening Provides Learning

The third criteria—listening to my unique problems—is a critical but often absent trait. In my experience there are many people who are great listeners, but to their own voice. The stereotypical sales person is great talker and can be very entertaining. All of this talk, however, prevents them from learning about the company they are trying to help. Oftentimes I’ve been told that by being quiet you’re not providing any help. Yet I find that by listening more, you not only learn what the real issue is that the company is trying to solve, you can also learn what solutions they’ve tried in the past and why they’ve failed. By listening, it can help you avoid the same pitfalls and failed solutions that have come before you.


Collaborative Conversations Defines Common Goal

When you meet with your prospective provider, the discussion should be a good back-and-forth conversation. I like to say that it should be a collaborative session between the two parties where the common goal is clearly defined—solve the company’s specific issue. The logistics provider should be able to offer clear and concise answers to what the solution is and how it will be implemented. At this point you should also be informed about the resources the company needs to commit. Perhaps the most important part of the conversation surrounds having a very clear and easy to measure return on investment. Without an expected ROI, it will be difficult if not impossible to gauge the success of the solution. With this information, you can have more confidence that your potential provider has accurately diagnosed the underlying problem and is recommending a solution tailored to address your specific challenges.

When Problem Solving Causes More Problems

Without a clear understanding of the common goals and the solution, unintended consequences can often occur. We see many instances where a company implemented software or hired a third-party to solve a problem only to introduce more issues while not solving the original problem. One of the most common issues that I see is a company trying to obtain clean, standardized data to use for decision making. The company buys a solution because they are told that it will deliver data faster and cleaner because it is using the latest technology to obtain the data. What the company finds is that they still don’t have clean standardized data, and the data they do have is a month behind. The provider tells the company that the solution has worked for their other customers and they must be doing something wrong. All of this trouble could be avoided by making sure the provider could pass the first three criteria.

The Latest

More Stories

5 scary thoughts about disasters and disaster relief

It’s almost Halloween, and if your town is anything like mine, your neighbors’ yards are already littered with ghosts, witches and tombstones. 

Clearly some of us enjoy giving other people a scare. Just as clearly, some of us enjoy getting a scare.  

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

Keep a clear focus on enterprise priorities.

"Spot solutions are needed to help a company get through a sudden shock, but the only way to ensure agility and resilience going forward is by addressing systemic issues in a way that is intentional and focused on the long term and brings together clear priorities, well-designed repeatable processes, robust governance, and a skilled team." - Harvard Business Review

From Low Cost to Best Cost

An article published by McKinsey & Co. in August observed, “over the past year, many companies have made structural changes to their supply networks by implementing dual or multiple sourcing strategies for critical materials and moving from global to regional networks.”

This structural change pivots on the difference between low cost and best cost.  The shift extends through Tier 1 Suppliers through lower tiers.  The intent of a low-cost supply chain strategy is to present a low price to customers. A best-cost strategy adds factors beyond cost to the equation, like risk, lead time, and responsiveness.

Keep ReadingShow less

Digital Freight Execution: Making Win-Win Connections

As global supply chains become increasingly complicated, there are now more digital connections and business collaborations in the global shipping industry than ever before. Holding freight data in opaque, disconnected silos and relying on outdated methods of communication is not just inefficient - it’s unsustainable.

The global supply chain is no longer a linear process. Whereas before it was simply about moving freight from point A to B, now there is now a multitude of options for transporting that freight, each with its own unique set of capabilities and constraints. 

Keep ReadingShow less

No wonder we are short of labor in the supply chain.

America’s posture in world trade, and the underlying supply chains, are more than robust.  According to the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, the United States balance of trade in goods and services deficit dropped to $70.6 billion in July.  Exports hit the highest level in real dollars since tracking began over 70 years ago.  During the recovery from Covid,, with reshoring and shifting market demands, are holding imports flat..

This success is happening despite the global disruption caused by Ukraine.  Expect our labor shortages to continue.  Expect wage pressure to continue.  Expect inflationary pressures across the supply chain to continue.

Keep ReadingShow less