Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Let the professionals and the markets sort out the flows.

It’s not the port, Mr. President.

It is a balance of trade problem. It’s a network problem. It is a port capacity problem all over the world.

On October 13, the New York Times reported, “President Biden announced Wednesday that the Port of Los Angeles will operate around the clock and major companies including Walmart, UPS and FedEx would expand their working hours as his administration struggles to relieve growing backlogs in the global supply chains that deliver critical goods to the United States.”

The port is a node in a system with physical constraints, Mr. President, with issues like labor availability, berth capacity, leading to through put limitations.


On October 26, CNBC reported, “The Biden administration is hopeful new fines imposed on carriers at the nation’s busiest port complex will abate the intensifying logjam of cargo ships. The twin ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach announced Monday that containers moved by trucks will have nine days before fines start accruing and containers scheduled to move by rail will have three days.”

This is a carrier and driver shortage, Mr. President, not resistance.

In their cover story, “Instant Economics,” published on October 23, The Economist asks, “Does anybody understand what is going on in the world economy?”  According to The Economist, there still are “fleets of container ships waiting outside Californian and Chinese ports.” By focusing on a node – the Port of Los Angeles and Long Beach – rather than the collective constraints interacting across the physical network, the President and the federal government have proven that they don’t get it.

On October 29, U.S. Today fact checked descriptions of the bottleneck in California ports. They found, “108 container ships were waiting to dock at the Los Angeles and Long Beach ports, according to an Oct. 21 anchorage report by the Marine Exchange of Southern California. Of those, 79 were at anchor or in holding areas, and 29 were at berth.”

Port congestion is not getting any better, because it is a network flow dislocation, not the port capacity problem. Resolution of the network problem – not just in California, but around the country – is a balance of trade problem. In March of 2020 according to the Census Bureau, just before the pandemic rearranged world trade for us, our trade deficit was $19.8 billion. In August 0f 2021, as reported by the Census Bureau, our trade we imported just under $43 billion.

We have more than doubled out trade deficit with China in a little over a year. More full containers are coming our way, which means that there is a growing backlog at the ports. Empty containers return to China, creating logjams on the other end. This post-pandemic trade imbalance exists around the global chain, not just ports in California and the United States.

Please stay out of real world logistics,, Mr. President. We weren't impressed with the U.S. exit from Afghanistan. We haven't seen much leadership coming out of Washington in the global trade wars. Let the professionals and the markets sort out the flows.

The Latest

More Stories

5 scary thoughts about disasters and disaster relief

It’s almost Halloween, and if your town is anything like mine, your neighbors’ yards are already littered with ghosts, witches and tombstones. 

Clearly some of us enjoy giving other people a scare. Just as clearly, some of us enjoy getting a scare.  

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

Keep a clear focus on enterprise priorities.

"Spot solutions are needed to help a company get through a sudden shock, but the only way to ensure agility and resilience going forward is by addressing systemic issues in a way that is intentional and focused on the long term and brings together clear priorities, well-designed repeatable processes, robust governance, and a skilled team." - Harvard Business Review

From Low Cost to Best Cost

An article published by McKinsey & Co. in August observed, “over the past year, many companies have made structural changes to their supply networks by implementing dual or multiple sourcing strategies for critical materials and moving from global to regional networks.”

This structural change pivots on the difference between low cost and best cost.  The shift extends through Tier 1 Suppliers through lower tiers.  The intent of a low-cost supply chain strategy is to present a low price to customers. A best-cost strategy adds factors beyond cost to the equation, like risk, lead time, and responsiveness.

Keep ReadingShow less

Digital Freight Execution: Making Win-Win Connections

As global supply chains become increasingly complicated, there are now more digital connections and business collaborations in the global shipping industry than ever before. Holding freight data in opaque, disconnected silos and relying on outdated methods of communication is not just inefficient - it’s unsustainable.

The global supply chain is no longer a linear process. Whereas before it was simply about moving freight from point A to B, now there is now a multitude of options for transporting that freight, each with its own unique set of capabilities and constraints. 

Keep ReadingShow less

No wonder we are short of labor in the supply chain.

America’s posture in world trade, and the underlying supply chains, are more than robust.  According to the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, the United States balance of trade in goods and services deficit dropped to $70.6 billion in July.  Exports hit the highest level in real dollars since tracking began over 70 years ago.  During the recovery from Covid,, with reshoring and shifting market demands, are holding imports flat..

This success is happening despite the global disruption caused by Ukraine.  Expect our labor shortages to continue.  Expect wage pressure to continue.  Expect inflationary pressures across the supply chain to continue.

Keep ReadingShow less