Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

The 3 Secrets Freight Brokers Don’t Want You to Know

For decades, the broker market has been a staple of the freighting and logistics industries. However, with that advent of newer technologies, shippers and carriers are no longer beholden strictly to the broker market.

Whether it’s coping with traffic delays or establishing new routes, the freight industry is always in a state of flux and adaptation. Yet for all of the potential uncertainties that can crop up on a daily basis, one thing has remained ever-present in the industry for decades: brokers.

For years, facilitating rejected shipments has been a primary pain point for shippers and carriers alike. And while brokers have played a significant role in helping these shipments get off loading docks and delivered, the broker market is plagued by transparency and cost challenges that can ultimately hurt bottom lines and performance.


With that in mind, here are a few things brokers don’t want shippers and carriers to know.

1. Hidden fees

When dipping into the broker procurement market, shippers are accustomed to shopping around for the lowest broker fees. After all, each percentage point can add up over time. But shippers should be careful in this regard, as the broker fees on the sticker might say one thing, while the total cost of working with a given broker could be much higher. Knowing that shippers are in search of the lowest broker fees available, it’s common for brokers to hide fees elsewhere in the billing process -- resulting in much higher costs than what the upfront price may seem to be. Therefore, shippers must go beyond just the fee pricing level and find out exactly what’s in their invoices when partnering with a broker. Granted, this can be challenging when a time-sensitive shipment is sitting on the loading dock. However, by taking the time to do some deeper due diligence on the true costs associated with each broker, shippers can save millions.

2. Beware of quick pay

Carriers also need to be aware of the true cost of doing business with brokers, as well. As with any business, it’s ideal to receive payment for services rendered in a quick and timely fashion. Unfortunately, when working with brokers, carriers are often forced to wait at least several business days -- and often weeks -- before receiving payment. This can place a huge amount of financial burden on smaller carriers, in particular. With that in mind, brokers have begun rolling out “Quick Pay” options that allow carriers to receive payment much sooner. This is a more attractive option for carriers, but comes with a significant cost. For example, a broker may attach “convenience charges” up to $50 and beyond for “Quick Pay” service. This is a steep price for carriers to pay just so they can have access to their money in a more timely manner.

3. There’s a big technology gap

Despite data science and technology being central to business decisions today, there’s a significant technology gap in today’s freight broker market. For example, many brokers still heavily rely on manual, labor-intensive systems, which are prone to human error. This leads to major inefficiencies occurring in the procurement process. Transparency concerns also compound when a shipper tasks a broker with sourcing quotes or other initiatives, without visibility to the best information available. Additionally, given the lack of modern technology in use, tracking shipments becomes much more challenging and can undermine OTD. Simply put, shippers and carriers both deserve and need the best information possible to make decisions and many brokers are falling flat without the proper technology infrastructure in place.

For decades, the broker market has been a staple of the freighting and logistics industries. However, with that advent of newer technologies, shippers and carriers are no longer beholden strictly to the broker market. Given the long-term negative experience, high costs and lack of transparency, shippers and carriers may start to move away from the brokers market and towards more advanced solutions that give them more power in freight procurement.

 

The Latest

More Stories

5 scary thoughts about disasters and disaster relief

It’s almost Halloween, and if your town is anything like mine, your neighbors’ yards are already littered with ghosts, witches and tombstones. 

Clearly some of us enjoy giving other people a scare. Just as clearly, some of us enjoy getting a scare.  

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

Keep a clear focus on enterprise priorities.

"Spot solutions are needed to help a company get through a sudden shock, but the only way to ensure agility and resilience going forward is by addressing systemic issues in a way that is intentional and focused on the long term and brings together clear priorities, well-designed repeatable processes, robust governance, and a skilled team." - Harvard Business Review

From Low Cost to Best Cost

An article published by McKinsey & Co. in August observed, “over the past year, many companies have made structural changes to their supply networks by implementing dual or multiple sourcing strategies for critical materials and moving from global to regional networks.”

This structural change pivots on the difference between low cost and best cost.  The shift extends through Tier 1 Suppliers through lower tiers.  The intent of a low-cost supply chain strategy is to present a low price to customers. A best-cost strategy adds factors beyond cost to the equation, like risk, lead time, and responsiveness.

Keep ReadingShow less

Digital Freight Execution: Making Win-Win Connections

As global supply chains become increasingly complicated, there are now more digital connections and business collaborations in the global shipping industry than ever before. Holding freight data in opaque, disconnected silos and relying on outdated methods of communication is not just inefficient - it’s unsustainable.

The global supply chain is no longer a linear process. Whereas before it was simply about moving freight from point A to B, now there is now a multitude of options for transporting that freight, each with its own unique set of capabilities and constraints. 

Keep ReadingShow less

No wonder we are short of labor in the supply chain.

America’s posture in world trade, and the underlying supply chains, are more than robust.  According to the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, the United States balance of trade in goods and services deficit dropped to $70.6 billion in July.  Exports hit the highest level in real dollars since tracking began over 70 years ago.  During the recovery from Covid,, with reshoring and shifting market demands, are holding imports flat..

This success is happening despite the global disruption caused by Ukraine.  Expect our labor shortages to continue.  Expect wage pressure to continue.  Expect inflationary pressures across the supply chain to continue.

Keep ReadingShow less