Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Explore Possible Energy Cost Reductions Through LED Lighting Retrofits and Other Clean Energy Services

The fallout from the global pandemic lowered occupancy and usage for some large facilities, yet energy bills didn’t necessarily decrease at the same pace to alleviate the cost burdens of maintaining base operations and systems. As the economy recovers, this makes now an ideal time to consider energy efficiency measures as a means of cost management.

Supply chain organizations are naturally focused on efficient processes, and Energy Efficiency-as-a-Service (EEaaS) is a newer approach that helps warehouses, delivery hubs and other logistics facilities reduce their energy use while making a positive impact on the health of the planet.  


EEaaS also enables supply chain facilities to conserve their cash for other uses. With the economic pressures of today, most know cash is king—and cost reduction is queen. By using financing, supply chain facilities may benefit from energy efficiency upgrades while avoiding capital outlays.

Defining Energy Efficiency-as-a-Service

What is energy efficiency-as-a-service, and how does it work? EEaaS is a pay-for-performance, off balance sheet financing solution that allows facilities to implement energy, water and other efficiency projects with no upfront capital expenditure, according to the Better Buildings Financing Navigator by the U.S. Department of Energy. (U.S. Department of Energy’s Better Buildings Financing Navigator. https://betterbuildingssolutioncenter.energy.gov/financing-navigator/option/efficiency-a-service)

With EEaaS, the provider pays for project development, construction, and maintenance costs. Once a project is operational, the customer makes service payments based on actual energy savings or other equipment performance metrics, resulting in immediate reduced operating expenses.

The Energy Services Agreement (ESA) is the most common type of arrangement, according to the U.S. Department of Energy, but other models such as lumens-as-a-service and energy subscription agreements are also in use.

The EEaaS opportunity

This overview by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy outlines a list of possible benefits of EEaaS for commercial customers. (American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy’s Emerging Opportunities Series, https://www.aceee.org/sites/default/files/eo-energy-as-service.pdf)  

  • First-cost savings - Under an EEaaS agreement, organizations may pursue energy efficiency without using their own finances because the service provider secures third party funding to pay for all project costs. This means the customer has no upfront expenses or internal capital outlay, preserving their funds for other projects.
  • Off-balance sheet financing - EEaaS offerings are often designed as an off-balance sheet financing solution. The use of service payments allows businesses to shift energy efficiency projects from an expense asset that they must buy, own, maintain and depreciate, to an operating expense, similar to a utility bill or power purchase agreement.
  • Deeper operational and maintenance savings - The cost savings from energy efficiency projects are calculated and guaranteed using agreed-upon measurement and verification protocols. Because the EEaaS paradigm generally relies on the pay-for-performance model, it offers potential operational efficiencies and positive cash flow from energy, water and maintenance cost savings. 

The first place to look for energy savings

Lighting is often one of the costliest budget items for a typical organization, business or facility, and LED lighting—which uses 25% to 80% less energy than conventional light bulbs—can cut energy overhead costs. (T-1 Lighting, https://www.t1-lighting.com/energy-efficient-lighting/)

When it comes to commercial buildings, the Whole Building Design Guide from the National Institute of Building Sciences estimates electric lighting accounts for 35% to 50% of the total electrical energy consumption. (Whole Building Design Guide, “Daylighting,” https://www.wbdg.org/resources/daylighting)

Inefficient lighting can represent a huge part of monthly energy bills. If tight budgets are impacting business progress, cost savings may be found by switching to LED technology.

How much can be saved? A lot. By 2027, the U.S. Department of Energy estimates that LED lighting could conserve up to 348 terawatts of energy, which equates to $30 billion in savings at current pricing levels. (U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Saver consumer website. LED Lighting. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/save-electricity-and-fuel/lighting-choices-save-you-money/led-lighting) With an energy efficiency savings strategy in place, most organizations are capable of saving 20%-40% of their total energy spend.

Supply chain facilities can estimate their own lighting savings with this interactive business estimator. (Key Equipment Finance. “Estimate your lighting savings” https://landing.keyequipmentfinance.com/estimate-your-lighting-savings-key) Organizations are encouraged, however, to seek advice from qualified professionals regarding specific business circumstances and lighting costs.

Other energy savings options

While lighting is a top focus for energy efficiency projects, facilities may find energy cost savings in other areas or add systems for power generation. For example, renewable energy assets that provide distributed generation include solar, energy storage, microgrid, fuel cells, batteries, generators, reciprocating engines, gas and steam turbines. For even great savings and environmental benefits, facilities can consider advanced energy upgrades such as air conditioning, chillers, power resiliency/redundancy, building automation systems and IoT.

Bottom line: Organizations can take a holistic approach whereby they implement a myriad of energy savings projects to meet their organization’s objectives.

These solutions can include design and implementation of energy conservation, energy infrastructure outsourcing, power generation, energy supply and risk management techniques.

Example: Fortune 100 company powers facilities with Energy Efficiency-as-a-Service

Energy efficiency upgrade projects offer plenty of challenges in their own right. But how does a supply chain operation navigate those challenges when they are presented at multiple locations— and with zero capital expenditure?

Here’s an example: A Fortune 100 technology company—which was investing heavily in wind farms and solar rooftops and aimed to power its global infrastructure with 100% renewable energy—knew it needed an innovative solution. That solution was to implement an EEaaS initiative that included new LED lighting and building management systems across their facilities nationwide.

To ensure success, the company turned to an energy efficiency provider that designed and implemented programmatic energy services agreements. These agreements allowed the company to blend the economics of different utility rates across regions to ensure that all sites are able to benefit from the efficiency upgrades. By combining sites where utility rates and operating conditions are more favorable with sites that have less favorable conditions, the projects are economically viable and provide project uniformity across sites.

The project also included an energy savings performance contractor and an equipment finance provider. The contractor provided construction, engineering, installation, measurement and verification for an LED lighting retrofit. The finance company provided a solution that enabled energy efficiency services across multiple sites in multiple states, including high-efficiency LED lights and building management systems.

Under the ESA, the energy efficiency provider would pay for all upfront costs and be paid only when the project achieved actual savings. For the Fortune 100 customer, the projects resulted in a monthly bill—an operating expense, which doesn’t require a capital expenditure. They only pay for the energy they use after the equipment is installed.

The projects were expected to reduce total electricity use by approximately 70%, thereby eliminating 29,917 tons of annual carbon dioxide. 

Pandemic considerations in EEaaS

Business growth and stability pose a dilemma—especially in the midst of uncertainty around accessing desirable capital. There’s no question that leading-edge technology, timing, and scalability play key roles in the assets of a supply chain. However, the ways in which we choose to pay for new equipment may vary according to our business objectives.

Luckily, the marketplace is adapting to new and creative ways to address those objectives.

The impact of financing

More than ever before, the benefits of financing energy efficiency initiatives could have a significant, positive impact on an organization’s goals and success.

To help determine if Energy Efficiency-as-a-Service is a good fit, the U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. Department of Energy’s Better Buildings Financing Navigator. https://betterbuildingssolutioncenter.energy.gov/financing-navigator/option/efficiency-a-service) recommends companies consider whether they:

  • want to pursue retrofits across their portfolios without spending capital;
  • prefer off-balance sheet treatment for the delivery of efficiency services;
  • want a pay-for-performance solution where a third party takes on performance risk and provides project management and maintenance;
  • are looking for a financing mechanism with a contract term ranging from 5 to 15 years, with periodic buy-out options; and,
  • want a new way to procure energy efficient technologies across their portfolios without the hassle of ownership. 

Choosing a finance partner

Before supply chain businesses undertake an EEaaS initiative, they should seek an equipment financing professional who has clean energy solutions expertise, a proven track record in lease structuring, and a clear understanding of their unique business goals. This can help with the formation of a strategy to optimize business assets and opportunities, both today and in the future.

The Latest

More Stories

5 scary thoughts about disasters and disaster relief

It’s almost Halloween, and if your town is anything like mine, your neighbors’ yards are already littered with ghosts, witches and tombstones. 

Clearly some of us enjoy giving other people a scare. Just as clearly, some of us enjoy getting a scare.  

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

Keep a clear focus on enterprise priorities.

"Spot solutions are needed to help a company get through a sudden shock, but the only way to ensure agility and resilience going forward is by addressing systemic issues in a way that is intentional and focused on the long term and brings together clear priorities, well-designed repeatable processes, robust governance, and a skilled team." - Harvard Business Review

From Low Cost to Best Cost

An article published by McKinsey & Co. in August observed, “over the past year, many companies have made structural changes to their supply networks by implementing dual or multiple sourcing strategies for critical materials and moving from global to regional networks.”

This structural change pivots on the difference between low cost and best cost.  The shift extends through Tier 1 Suppliers through lower tiers.  The intent of a low-cost supply chain strategy is to present a low price to customers. A best-cost strategy adds factors beyond cost to the equation, like risk, lead time, and responsiveness.

Keep ReadingShow less

Digital Freight Execution: Making Win-Win Connections

As global supply chains become increasingly complicated, there are now more digital connections and business collaborations in the global shipping industry than ever before. Holding freight data in opaque, disconnected silos and relying on outdated methods of communication is not just inefficient - it’s unsustainable.

The global supply chain is no longer a linear process. Whereas before it was simply about moving freight from point A to B, now there is now a multitude of options for transporting that freight, each with its own unique set of capabilities and constraints. 

Keep ReadingShow less

No wonder we are short of labor in the supply chain.

America’s posture in world trade, and the underlying supply chains, are more than robust.  According to the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, the United States balance of trade in goods and services deficit dropped to $70.6 billion in July.  Exports hit the highest level in real dollars since tracking began over 70 years ago.  During the recovery from Covid,, with reshoring and shifting market demands, are holding imports flat..

This success is happening despite the global disruption caused by Ukraine.  Expect our labor shortages to continue.  Expect wage pressure to continue.  Expect inflationary pressures across the supply chain to continue.

Keep ReadingShow less