As logistics-sector companies go increasingly digital, they face a rising threat from hackers and ransomware attacks. But experts say there are steps they can take to minimize the risk.
Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
Supply chains are becoming more digital by the day, as companies add electronic sensors to everything from pallets and containers to conveyors, forklifts, and dock doors. While all that hyperconnectivity is great for supply chain visibility, connecting every truck and warehouse to the internet of things (IoT) also has a downside: It makes businesses more vulnerable to hackers, who can use those links to steal data or install ransomware—software that freezes a company’s entire network until the victim pays a steep fee.
Fortunately, companies don’t have to go it alone when it comes to security planning. There’s a wealth of information on cybersecurity available online, including protocols developed by government agencies and industry organizations to help businesses lessen their risk (see sidebar).
A COMPLEX PROBLEM
That’s not to say it will be easy. In the logistics sector, keeping track of every online asset can be a complex job, says Sharon Reynolds, chief information security officer (CISO) at the Dallas-based telematics technology vendor Omnitracs. In the transportation sector alone, trucks are rapidly becoming digitalized with internet connections like in-cab devices, IoT sensors, and links for routing and dispatch tracking.
Furthermore, modern supply chains involve complex webs of suppliers, who often share real-time data with each other. “Before, you could screen partners by just checking the financials of the company to make sure they’re reliable, and maybe get references. But with supply chain, even your suppliers have suppliers, so you need to identify your third-party and fourth-party risks. Now, you have to understand your entire cyberthreat exposure, because all the partners are interconnected,” Reynolds says.
That web of connections makes companies more vulnerable to attacks because a network is only as secure as its weakest link, agrees Pal Narayanan, executive vice president and chief information officer–Americas at contract logistics and supply chain services provider Geodis.
“You have partners with partners, and some of those partners operate right within your four walls,” Narayanan says. “That’s because the rising demands of e-commerce require increased automation and mechanization, like robotics, conveyors, or warehouse control systems. They’re all bringing their computer systems inside your [warehouse].”
In Geodis’s case, those connections add up quickly, as the company operates 160 warehouses and partners with 15 automation providers. Narayanan’s challenge is to get all those automated devices to work together and still be secure. “To protect your systems, you need to have security along with nimbleness and flexibility,” he says. “If you’ve got Fort Knox-level security, then you can’t grow your business because nobody’s coming in and nobody’s going out. So you have to find a balance.”
THE PRICE OF FAME
With supply chain, even your suppliers have suppliers, so you need to identify your third-party and fourth-party risks.
Striking a balance between business agility and cybersecurity has become increasingly difficult in an era when hackers are ramping up their attacks on the sector. “In the past, logistics was flying under the radar. Before Amazon, it wasn’t sexy, it wasn’t in the mainstream, so hackers focused on financial, banking, and medical companies,” Narayanan says. “But now, with how important online shopping has become and the impact of Covid, logistics has been thrust onto center stage, and with fame comes a challenge.”
A recent industry report underscores that point. In a study titled Supply Chain Disruptions and Cybersecurity in Logistics, cybersecurity services company BlueVoyant reported that hackers launched three times as many ransomware attacks on shipping and logistics companies in 2020 as in 2019.
Most of the recent attacks resulted from phishing—where hackers posing as legitimate companies persuade employees to disclose their passwords—or access to unprotected network connections called “remote desktop ports,” BlueVoyant said in the report.
But that’s hardly the only threat. Another rapidly growing vulnerability is the spiraling number of IoT connections, which are forecast to grow to 23.6 billion worldwide by 2026 from 8.6 billion in 2021, according to technology advisory firm ABI Research. While that exponential growth will usher in a new era of connectivity and productivity, it will also result in new threat vectors, ABI says.
CLOSING THE SECURITY GAP
The good news for logistics professionals looking to bolster their digital defenses is that, as relative latecomers to the game, they can learn from other industries’ experiences, says Omnitracs’ Reynolds.
For example, many companies suffered painful hacks in past years because manufacturers of IoT-enabled devices like webcams and digital video recorders (DVRs) had originally released their products without basic security requirements like password protection. It wasn’t long before hackers began taking them over as “botnets,” which are collections of private computers that have been hijacked to send out spam and malicious software.
Those botnet attacks can also be launched from home appliances like printers and refrigerators, which connect to residential internet networks that are typically far easier to hack than their office counterparts, says Chris Sandberg, vice president of information security at freight fleet technology specialist Trimble Transportation.
And that botnet threat matters not merely because a hacker might take over your fridge, but because the ubiquitous kitchen appliance is a node on the internet and can be used as a resource to launch attacks on any target worldwide.
That security gap means that many companies have become far more vulnerable over the past year as their employees started working from home offices during the pandemic. “The more people work from home, the larger your attack surface is,” Sandberg says. “If you push a fence out and can’t see it all, you can’t see what cuts through that fence.”
And the same principle applies to trucks that are increasingly wired with connected devices like infotainment systems, manufacturers’ diagnostic sensors, telematics, and electronic logging devices (ELDs), he adds.
ADDING LAYERS OF CYBERARMOR
As for what companies can do to protect themselves, Sandberg recommends starting with policies where you can rack up some easy wins. His advice: Identify critical resources and vendors, create disaster response plans, train employees not to share accounts, urge them to use multifactor authentication, encourage them to create complex passwords and change them frequently, and add cybersecurity awareness to truckers’ pre-trip checklists.
Other security specialists remind companies to conduct frequent data backups across their entire systems, decreasing the chance they’ll have to pay hackers a ransom to get their data back.
Building better cyberdefenses might sound daunting, but corporations can succeed if they approach it as a business problem like any other, says Omnitracs’ Reynolds.
“Complicated business problems are being solved by these companies every day. So, they just need to treat it like risk management. And there are only four things you can do with risk: Avoid it, reduce it, transfer it to someone else, or accept it,” she says.
Given the mounting threats, Reynolds urges logistics professionals to get out ahead of the problem and ensure they have a comprehensive cybersecurity plan in place. “I think you can’t afford not to; this is a part of doing business,” she says. “But we can learn from other groups that have discovered these realities,” Reynolds adds. “This is an incredibly resilient industry, so I don’t think it’s a challenge that’s insurmountable.”
For more information …
Looking to learn more about cyberthreats and ways to minimize your risk? Here are some links to get you started:
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)’s cybersecurity framework at the U.S. Department of Commerce
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.