It's not just for those in the C-suite. Each and every one of us can benefit from learning and applying leadership behaviors in our work lives and in life in general.
Art van Bodegraven was, among other roles, chief design officer for the DES Leadership Academy. He passed away on June 18, 2017. He will be greatly missed.
With all the palaver about leadership—behaviors, attributes, successes—it is all too easy to imagine that the subject is all about what it takes to be the next CEO, the paladin who rides a white horse at the head of a conquering army. Well, maybe. We do need some CEOs.
We also need CFOs (chief financial officers), CAOs (chief administrative officers), COOs (chief operating officers), CIOs (chief information officers), and CSCOs (chief supply chain officers). But it does seem that not nearly all of these exalted beings have fully internalized the tenets of 21st century leadership.
Everyone needs basic leadership lessons to help them become better managers and take organizations to greater heights, with better—and sustainable—people performance. But CFOs seem to get lost in the numbers, forsaking all other areas of focus. CAOs tend to get bogged down in processes and rigorous execution to the exclusion of expedient deviations and of the incorporation of human concerns in almighty policies.
COOs can jump the tracks of leadership behavior due to a singular focus on getting things done—now! CIOs may struggle with integrating human-level activities, preferences, biases, and imprinted behaviors in new or revised systems, taking refuge in the dispassionate technology that gallops into our previously quiet lives. And CSCOs, who need the leadership skill set as much as anyone—and are frequently so predisposed—too often have to short circuit doing the right thing the right way in order to meet the cascading imperatives imposed by peers and customers.
WHY?
Some of these tendencies may be explained by the variations in how individuals' brains are hard-wired. Some may be reflections of last-century thinking about management. Still others could result from modeling the behaviors of respected—or feared—bosses.
Whatever, cures are possible, as well as desirable. Contrary to conventional wisdom, leaders are made, not born. No one can inherit genuine leadership ability; it must be learned.
AND THE REST OF US?
News flash! Not all of us aspire to the C-suite. And few of us, even those with corporate ambitions, are anywhere near reaching the seats of power. But we all—each and every one—can benefit from learning and applying leadership skills and behaviors in our work lives and in life in general. Even the future CEO does not overnight become a leader simply because of an elevation in status.
A key to success in reaching authentic leadership status lies in repetition. Much like becoming the next Serena Williams, or Brett Favre, or Yo Yo Ma, it's vital to start early. Then, never let up, never stop, never mail it in, and never falter upon running up against the inevitable obstacles.
EVERYDAY LEADERSHIP
Wherever you are in work, in life, in relationships, in the extracurriculars, it's an integral part of the process to demonstrate and refine leadership behaviors. The process? That's the building and layering that evolves into powerful and acknowledged leadership; the embrace and internalization of the precepts that make an individual stand out in accepted and welcomed positive ways.
Embarking on, and staying on, the leadership course is as important in the mailroom as it is in the C-suite. Perhaps it's even more important there because it is where one learns how to fail and recover, how to be real, and what specific things are honest and consistent with one's mental makeup.
Whether or not one is a leader at work, and irrespective of long-term career aspirations, leadership opportunities surround us. We are short-changing ourselves and leaving those around us poorer if we fail to demonstrate and practice the things that attract followers—and improve results.
Church groups, school and charitable organizations, homeless programs, Girl Scouts/Boy Scouts, disaster relief efforts ... the needs are staggering in scope and number. Sure, they all need pairs of hands and warm bodies to get the work done. But none of that comes remotely close to potential without the organization, vision, and direction that leadership brings. And there's no rule that prohibits leaders from pitching in to execute necessary work—in fact, a leader can either gain or lose credibility by his or her willingness to suffer dirty fingernails.
HOW TOUGH IS THIS, REALLY?
To be honest, it's not a slam-dunk. But it's not Olympic-level, either. Training and learning—and practice—are the basics. The components, all of which can be taught, learned, and mastered, have been covered as well as anywhere in previous BasicTrainingcolumns. They are numerous and demand rigor and discipline, but they are not complicated. Maybe they boil down to effective communications, accountability for performance, clear visions, valuing diversity (both visible and invisible), and treating people like human beings.
In general, we undertrain and undereducate. And our focus tends to be on new systems and new processes. But every associate deserves—for the organization's benefit—to learn how to lead, both in general and in specific areas. Periodic refreshers are also vital to keep the commitment alive, to recognize cosmic changes, and to bring new people into the leaders' tent. We tend to do either a poor or nonexistent job in this arena.
CONSEQUENCES
So what happens when everyday people act like leaders? If you have a custodial role, the best moppers and fixers will clamor to change to your shift. If you have a team, you'll get results, and the best and brightest will politick to get assigned to your team(s), leading to even better results. If you have a department, recruiting and retention will disappear as obstacles to consistent performance. If you head an enterprise, your organization will become a target destination for top performers—and that high performance will continue or even tick up a notch, delighting shareholders, customers, and employees.
Not only is business not a zero sum game, but outcomes can genuinely be win-win-win.
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.