"Conexus Indiana," the state's private-public economic development partnership, has thrived mainly because the private sector leads and the public sector follows, says David Holt, a Conexus vice president and head of its logistics initiative.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
In August 2010, this magazine wrote about the launch of a program called "Conexus Indiana," which officials at the time called the first statewide initiative to promote logistics opportunities and to integrate logistics with four other economic disciplines, notably workforce development. The latter connection was critical to job creation in a state that was struggling with a 10.2-percent unemployment rate.
Fast forward nearly seven years. What began with 36 logistics executives identifying ways to combine infrastructure needs, workforce development requirements, and public policy imperatives has mushroomed into a small army of 220. Work that originated on a statewide level has expanded into Indiana's regions and counties, with six regional logistics councils. But one thing has remained the same: The state that pioneered the use of logistics to attract business investment and push economic growth is still the only state doing it, according to David Holt, who has headed Conexus' logistics council from the start. Its success, according to Holt, is based on the idea that the private sector leads and the public sector holds back until it is appropriate to follow.
Holt recently spoke with Mark B. Solomon, DCV's executive editor-news, about Conexus' evolution, why other states haven't copied its approach, and how the group communicates the strengths of Indiana's assets—such as having more "pass-through" interstate surface arteries and being closer to the U.S. population's mid-point than any other state.
Q: How did Conexus Indiana get started?
A: We were founded by the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership, which had five economic clusters, one of them being logistics. We were seeded with a $3 million grant from the (Eli) Lilly Endowment. That was used for workforce development and allowed us to begin communicating with logistics executives about the role they could play in helping the state support their companies. I was brought in with a background in transportation and workforce development. I had also worked at the White House and in Congress, so I understood the nuances of the political process and its impact on industry.
In 2008, we created an educational curriculum of logistics and advanced manufacturing, and began connecting with schools to build interest and participation. We divided Indiana into three regions—North, Central, and South—and we partnered with high-level logistics executives around the state. We went to market in 2010 with a statewide logistics plan that basically identified all logistics needs for the next 30 years.
Q: Where is the organization today?
A: The executives we are involved with have always been volunteers, and we have far more of them today. Our expanded roster was vital in helping us begin the next major phase of our work, which was to help coordinate projects on a local level. The six regional logistics councils drafted infrastructure plans that identified road needs of all 92 counties. We delivered the plan to INDOT (the Indiana Department of Transportation), which it funneled to our General Assembly. The General Assembly is now debating mechanisms to fund about $2 billion per year in road infrastructure, maintenance, and new capacity projects.
We have also expanded our efforts in workforce development, especially when it comes to working with universities. We have worked to get high school students and students attending (two-year) junior colleges interested in the field. We have endorsed logistics curriculums at Ball State University and the University of Evansville. We send executives to business schools to talk to students about getting logistics degrees. We will then bus interested students to logistics companies so they can get a feel for the work at these facilities.
Q: You played a role in helping reroute westbound intermodal traffic from the Chicago area to Indiana, where it could be moved via rail faster and more cheaply to the Port of Prince Rupert in Vancouver, B.C. You also helped scotch a state tax rule that would have discouraged companies from relocating to Indiana. Yet you consider Conexus' mission, and the council's role in it, to be that of a catalyst rather than an initiator. How does that square with those two achievements?
A: Those efforts came from the private sector. Conexus is more of a connecting point. We come up with ideas, and the private sector drives the work. We connect the ideas to the right people. If you build, design, and make available the assets so our economic developers can support our companies, then the state can attract new companies because we have what they need. For example, when a transport funding bill was up for debate, the chairman of the House transportation committee asked Conexus to identify people to testify. We asked a real estate developer, who testified about what would be needed to attract warehouse and distribution center development to the state.
We don't have any hard data to illustrate how our work has generated economic benefits. Any data would come from the Indiana Economic Development Corp. (IEDC), which does the deals. Sometimes IEDC will bring us in, but most deals have confidentiality agreements, and we are not privy to the information in them.
Q: Why haven't other states replicated your efforts?
A: I've visited a number of states, and they ask me how we've done it. I tell them that our state made the decision to let the private sector lead and that it would follow up with the necessary implementation that only government can do. States have this idea that economic development needs to run through the government. But that throws up a roadblock. The private sector has a skeptical view of government's lead role. As a result, it will be reluctant to share information. Our experience has been that when the private sector leads, it will be more willing to share ideas, resources, and best practices. In our state, it comes down to the private sector getting together and saying with a collective voice, "This is what we need to make it happen."
That said, we've had tremendous backing during the past seven years from governors Mitch Daniels and (current Vice President) Mike Pence. Both administrations understood the value of Indiana's location on the map and were extraordinarily engaged in making logistics work for the state's economy and its people.
Q: So what is your message to other states?
A: That the private sector, when brought together, can solve a lot of problems. It does take leadership to bring them together, and that's where an organization like Conexus, which has long experience working with the public and private sectors, can be a valuable asset. We have people who can connect with executives, who understand the industries they work in, and who can demonstrate how logistics activities benefit their companies and the state. The key is getting the private sector's commitment. If they grasp the benefits for their company, you will get great engagement.
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.