"Bullishly skeptical" on Cuba: interview with Rob Kemp
There's great opportunity in supporting U.S. brands that will soon have access to 12 million stuff-starved people. But as Rob Kemp and his colleagues discovered during their Cuba trade mission in March, only the very patient need apply.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Robert Kemp founded DRT Transportation was part of a group that visited Cuba earlier this year.
The day before President Obama's historic March 21 visit to Cuba, a group of 18 U.S. logistics practitioners, accompanied by three executives of the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), arrived on the island for a mission that, while not nearly as symbolic, may be more significant. The group spent five days observing Cuba's infrastructure and gauging the country's ability to handle the potential acceleration of logistics demand to support American businesses if the U.S. trade embargo with Cuba is fully lifted.
One member of the entourage was Robert Kemp, founder and president of DRT Transportation LLC, a third-party logistics service provider (3PL) based in Lebanon, Pa. A natural entrepreneur, Kemp seems right at home in a country where business risk-taking is a daily activity. But Kemp is also a pragmatic businessman responsible for his customers' lifeblood: their goods. Kemp sees the chance to get in on the ground floor of a market of 12 million, many of who will have access to U.S.-made goods for the first time. But he sees Cuba for what it is today: a nation with great potential and with a competitive seaport, but with little else, including the disposable income its consumers will need to buy U.S. exports.
In an interview with Mark B. Solomon, executive editor-news, Kemp talks about his experience, the opportunities, and why he is (in our words, not his) "bullishly skeptical."
Q: Cuba wants to be a cross-dock point for imports moving through the expanded Panama Canal and bound for U.S. markets, especially the New York metro area. That potentially means a lot of cargo headed for Havana. Is that doable?
A: It is, conceptually. The Port of Mariel is a modern facility that has on-dock rail capabilities. We were told it could scale up its capacity without physically expanding. Investors in the port envision it as a cross-dock location for imports coming through the canal and bound for the East Coast and Europe. Miami is the closest U.S. deepwater point, but it is too far from the Northeast's dense populations.
Q: Do you sense that DRT's customers are eager to do business in Cuba? Or is there a reluctance to step into the market?
A: "Eager" is a strong word. We have discussed this with some of our key customers, and the responses have been all over the board. The market opportunity exists. With a population of about 12 million, Cuba is as big as Greater Los Angeles. It would benefit from the modernization that can come with improved trade relations with the U.S. Solving the socioeconomic challenges seems improbable in the short term. Having cruise ships dock in Havana for a day is a long way from total trade.
Q: Virtually no U.S. transport and logistics practitioner has done business in Cuba. If a U.S. company makes the leap, what should it brace itself for?
A: Unfortunately, after Mariel, the infrastructure rapidly deteriorates. The preferred method to move goods across the island is port to port, which illustrates how poor the road infrastructure is. Most containers move on flatbed trucks because there are virtually no available chassis. Container dwell times can hit 21 days, unheard of in the U.S. Yet these challenges represent opportunities for the right companies. Port operator PSA International projected that Mariel could almost triple its current TEU (twenty-foot equivalent unit) capacity without needing to actually expand. We were told that Mariel handled close to 300,000 TEUs in 2015, and as noted earlier, the port was built with a plan to expand its TEU capacity.
Q: What else struck you, positively and negatively, about the condition of Cuba's transport system?
Cuba's famous 1950s-era cars are kept in operating condition with imported parts and metal fabricated on the island.
A: What surprised me was the state of the total infrastructure, not just as it related to freight and logistics movement. Most Cubans use public transportation. Import duties on automobiles make it virtually impossible to own a finished automobile. The classic 1950s cars that seem frozen in time and that many Americans associate with post-revolutionary Cuba are almost exclusively taxis now. They are maintained by an amazing system of imported parts and by metal "artists" that fabricate their own parts. The taxi owners are immensely proud of the condition of their cars. It is a highlight of Havana.
Q: U.S. businesses are lagging behind their counterparts from other countries that never imposed a trade embargo on Cuba. Will U.S. companies find it difficult to dislodge established non-U.S. providers?
A: I don't believe U.S. firms will have difficulty competing in Cuba if the embargo is lifted. The U.S. has a huge nearshoring advantage. It seems that most countries currently trading with Cuba do not have a large presence there. Our collective capabilities should serve us well given that Cuba's energy, civil engineering, and telecommunications ecosystems are stuck in the 1950s.
Q: What advice would you give a U.S. logistics provider that's interested in doing business there?
A: Align yourself with local asset-based partners serving the island. The reason is that there are still countless legal and regulatory questions about doing business there. For example, can U.S. logistics companies open offices in Cuba, or will they be required to use one of the three current government-owned freight forwarders like Transcargo? That's just one of many questions. You want to partner with someone who knows the local ways and means.
U.S. companies also need to understand how the currency works. Foreign companies would deal with the Cuban convertible peso (CUC), while locals would still transact in Cuban pesos. Foreign companies would pay the government in CUC currency, and the government would then pay the employees in Cuban pesos. Essentially, the currency conversion is a tax kept by the government. I know that as the landscape changes, logistics associations like TIA will play an important role in facilitating such an important endeavor.
Q: In your discussions with Cuban officials, did you get any clarity on when the country could be ready to hit the regional or global trade stage?
A: Cuba feels it's ready now. The investments in Mariel and the passing of the "Law of Foreign Investment," which opened up Cuba to foreign investors, are the catalysts. The newly established Mariel Special Development Zone (ZEDM) already has established businesses that have 100 percent foreign investment. A Belgian logistics company handles shipments at the port. We also saw a few warehouses going up that were being built exclusively with foreign capital. Previously, foreign companies looking to serve Cuba had to partner with the government to gain a foothold.
Q: Given the impoverished state of the Cuban economy, how can the Cuban people afford to pay for Western-style goods?
A: With all Cuba's potential, nothing economically sustainable can occur until the income question is addressed. We were told the average Cuban earns about 540 Cuban pesos per month, which is equivalent to about US$20. Prices of most foodstuffs are kept artificially low. But disposable income for consumables is a luxury.
Q: Fidel Castro is an aging figurehead, while his brother, President Raul Castro, is also up in years and has said he will step down in 2018. Do you foresee a liberalization of trade activity once they are gone from the scene and a younger generation of leaders takes their place?
A: Regardless of what government is in power, the key policy issue is and will continue to be how Cuba's debt obligations are served and how its credit standing is addressed. Can the current Cuban government, or its future governments, improve the country's creditworthiness? That issue as well as others that go beyond transportation and logistics are for the governments and international organizations to address. My focus is to understand Cuba's changing landscape and to be prepared to serve DRT's customers if and when the time comes.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
The overall national industrial real estate vacancy rate edged higher in the fourth quarter, although it still remains well below pre-pandemic levels, according to an analysis by Cushman & Wakefield.
Vacancy rates shrunk during the pandemic to historically low levels as e-commerce sales—and demand for warehouse space—boomed in response to massive numbers of people working and living from home. That frantic pace is now cooling off but real estate demand remains elevated from a long-term perspective.
“We've witnessed an uptick among firms looking to lease larger buildings to support their omnichannel fulfillment strategies and maintain inventory for their e-commerce, wholesale, and retail stock. This trend is not just about space, but about efficiency and customer satisfaction,” Jason Tolliver, President, Logistics & Industrial Services, said in a release. “Meanwhile, we're also seeing a flurry of activity to support forward-deployed stock models, a strategy that keeps products closer to the market they serve and where customers order them, promising quicker deliveries and happier customers.“
The latest figures show that industrial vacancy is likely nearing its peak for this cooling cycle in the coming quarters, Cushman & Wakefield analysts said.
Compared to the third quarter, the vacancy rate climbed 20 basis points to 6.7%, but that level was still 30 basis points below the 10-year, pre-pandemic average. Likewise, overall net absorption in the fourth quarter—a term for the amount of newly developed property leased by clients—measured 36.8 million square feet, up from the 33.3 million square feet recorded in the third quarter, but down 20% on a year-over-year basis.
In step with those statistics, real estate developers slowed their plans to erect more buildings. New construction deliveries continued to decelerate for the second straight quarter. Just 85.3 million square feet of new industrial product was completed in the fourth quarter, down 8% quarter-over-quarter and 48% versus one year ago.
Likewise, only four geographic markets saw more than 20 million square feet of completions year-to-date, compared to 10 markets in 2023. Meanwhile, as construction starts remained tempered overall, the under-development pipeline has continued to thin out, dropping by 36% annually to its lowest level (290.5 million square feet) since the third quarter of 2018.
Despite the dip in demand last quarter, the market for industrial space remains relatively healthy, Cushman & Wakefield said.
“After a year of hesitancy, logistics is entering a new, sustained growth phase,” Tolliver said. “Corporate capital is being deployed to optimize supply chains, diversify networks, and minimize potential risks. What's particularly encouraging is the proactive approach of retailers, wholesalers, and 3PLs, who are not just reacting to the market, but shaping it. 2025 will be a year characterized by this bias for action.”
Under terms of the deal, Sick and Endress+Hauser will each hold 50% of a joint venture called "Endress+Hauser SICK GmbH+Co. KG," which will strengthen the development and production of analyzer and gas flow meter technologies. According to Sick, its gas flow meters make it possible to switch to low-emission and non-fossil energy sources, for example, and the process analyzers allow reliable monitoring of emissions.
As part of the partnership, the product solutions manufactured together will now be marketed by Endress+Hauser, allowing customers to use a broader product portfolio distributed from a single source via that company’s global sales centers.
Under terms of the contract between the two companies—which was signed in the summer of 2024— around 800 Sick employees located in 42 countries will transfer to Endress+Hauser, including workers in the global sales and service units of Sick’s “Cleaner Industries” division.
“This partnership is a perfect match,” Peter Selders, CEO of the Endress+Hauser Group, said in a release. “It creates new opportunities for growth and development, particularly in the sustainable transformation of the process industry. By joining forces, we offer added value to our customers. Our combined efforts will make us faster and ultimately more successful than if we acted alone. In this case, one and one equals more than two.”
According to Sick, the move means that its current customers will continue to find familiar Sick contacts available at Endress+Hauser for consulting, sales, and service of process automation solutions. The company says this approach allows it to focus on its core business of factory and logistics automation to meet global demand for automation and digitalization.
Sick says its core business has always been in factory and logistics automation, which accounts for more than 80% of sales, and this area remains unaffected by the new joint venture. In Sick’s view, automation is crucial for industrial companies to secure their productivity despite limited resources. And Sick’s sensor solutions are a critical part of industrial automation, which increases productivity through artificial intelligence and the digital networking of production and supply chains.