It was never love at first sight. But freight brokers and less-than-truckload carriers may find that arranged marriages could end up being profitable ones.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Jett McCandless and Tommy Skinner believe they have gone where no transportation folk have gone before. McCandless is
founder and president of a Chicago-based consultancy called CarrierDirect. Skinner is vice president of Shift Freight, based
in Santa Fe Springs, Calif. CarrierDirect is the primary sales channel for Shift, which operates a range of less-than-truckload
(LTL) services from the West Coast into the Midwest and the Northeast through an outsourced network of carriers.
Shift isn't the lowest-cost provider. Yet in 10 months in business, it has established itself as a reliable player that sticks
to its hauling commitments even if it means carrying the load at a loss. What is different about CarrierDirect and Shift is they
are believed to have formed the first LTL model built to work only with brokers and third-party logistics providers (3PLs).
So far, Shift's early life has been mostly free of the usual growing pains. It has quadrupled its revenue year-on-year. It
recently announced a 30-percent expansion of its coverage area. And it seems to have found a receptive audience. McCandless, who
consults with LTL carriers to help them penetrate the broker universe and who sits on Shift's board, calls the company the "future
of LTL carriers."
Whether Shift fulfills that lofty expectation remains to be seen. What is evident, though, is that brokers and 3PLs—
especially those living in the "transactional" world that matches loads with trucks—are increasingly interested in doing business
with LTL carriers. And LTL carriers are returning the eye contact.
BUILDING ON A SOLID FOUNDATION
LTL carriers and intermediaries are no strangers to each other. Many shippers would rather work through their 3PLs than directly
with the carriers, said Bill Crowe, vice president, corporate sales for LTL carrier YRC Worldwide Inc. About 40 percent of all LTL
shipments are today billed through a 3PL, according to data from the American Trucking Associations (ATA) and the Georgia Center
of Innovation for Logistics.
Old Dominion Freight Line Inc., widely considered the country's top LTL carrier, gets about one-quarter of its annual revenue from 3PLs, J. Wes Frye, Old Dominion's CFO, said on a recent conference call with analysts. Virtually all of Old Dominion's business with intermediaries comes from "strategic 3PLs," big firms that offer warehousing and distribution and other services that extend beyond transactional activities, said C. Thomas Barnes, president of Con-way Multimodal, a brokerage operating under the banner of Menlo Worldwide Logistics, a large 3PL that does a lot of work with the carrier.
Today, about three-fourths of all LTL business with intermediaries is considered "strategic," with the rest seen as
"transactional," Barnes said. Yet the transactional side is growing faster than the strategic side, an ironic twist given the
carriers' general distaste for working with transactional brokers and 3PLs, Barnes said.
If projections for LTL growth are accurate, there might be more opportunities for 3PL-LTL collaborations. LTL revenue will grow
by 8.1 percent a year through 2018, and will double to $103 billion a year by 2024 from $51.5 billion in 2012, according to ATA
and the Georgia Center data. That would be faster than the projected growth rate for either truckload or private fleet operations.
(Several experts interviewed for this story say that the 2012 numbers are overstated and that total LTL revenue today is actually
closer to $35 billion a year.)
Crowe, who presented the data at an April conference of the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), said demand for
LTL services will continue to grow as improved supply chain technology allows shippers to build smaller-size shipments that move
in shorter-haul ground networks. This reduces inventory-carrying costs by shortening the time a shipper's cash is tied up in the
goods, he said.
Carriers, for their part, see brokers and 3PLs as a source of new shipper business. A growing number of small to mid-size
shippers now work with third parties, and carriers see intermediaries as the best way to tap that shipper market. According to
the consulting firm Armstrong & Associates, about 80 percent of the 100 smallest Fortune 500 companies used 3PLs to some
extent in 2012, up from 65 percent in 2008. About 81 percent of the companies comprising the Fortune 300 to 400 reported
using a 3PL in 2012, up from 71 percent in 2008. Those rates of growth were faster than for companies at the higher end of the
Fortune 500 scale, according to Armstrong.
DIFFERENCES AND DISTINCTIONS
Not all freight is alike, however, and experts caution that brokers and 3PLs accustomed to working with truckload carriers will
need a separate playbook if they take to the LTL field.
Brokering a truckload shipment is relatively simple: Freight moves in a linear fashion from point A to point B. A typical LTL
shipment, by contrast, involves multiple stops and numerous human touches, and carrier tariffs can be tricky to navigate. In
addition, LTL freight must be classified under specific, and sometimes obtuse, commodity codes that are based on various product
characteristics. In short, LTL is everything that truckload isn't.
Experts on a TIA panel said brokers can successfully handle LTL if they understand that LTL's complexity makes it nearly
impossible for brokers and 3PLs to manage each shipment without draining their margins. "LTL is a fantastic niche opportunity. It
is not a [good] niche opportunity if you have to touch every load," Andy Berke, vice president, strategic development for
Riverview, Fla.-based 3PL BlueGrace Logistics, told brokers. Following that path—that is, manually managing each individual LTL
shipment—would result in a broker only making about $30 to $50 a load, Berke said.
The good news, Berke said, is that brokers can "automate the heck out of LTL." Although tools like rate and routing engines can
be expensive to develop and implement, they can yield enormous benefits if done right, he said. "If you can crack the code where
the customer is tendering [the freight] and selecting your provider through you, you are making money in your sleep," Berke told
the group.
Brokers also must know the details of a shipper's products because, unlike truckload, LTL shipments are governed by a phalanx
of classification codes. Carriers reweigh every shipment they receive, and any misclassification identified during that process
means the broker or 3PL must go back to the shipper for more money. Matt Williams, president of Pro Star Logistics, a Salt Lake
City-based 3PL, said the goal is to make it easy for the carrier to execute a shipment and to avoid classification problems. "You
have to understand your shipper's commodity better than when you're shipping via truckload," he said.
YRC, for example, relies heavily on its 3PL partners to ensure the freight they receive is properly classified, Crowe said.
"Intermediaries know exactly what we know about the classification" of freight upon tender, he said. It is the third-party's
responsibility to educate the customer in how to properly classify a shipment, he added.
A CHANGED CLIMATE
Brokers and 3PLs looking to expand into LTL must also recognize that the marketplace has changed dramatically. Four years ago,
with the U.S. economy digging out from the Great Recession and with LTL carriers undercutting each other to grab market share,
space was relatively plentiful and was priced cheaply. The carriers then embarked on a multiyear program of network and equipment
rationalization. Today, truck capacity has tightened, predatory pricing is history, and rates have increased and could go higher
still. Carriers now have little tolerance for potential partners whose commitment doesn't extend beyond searching for the lowest
rate du jour.
"The true kind of price reseller is in trouble," Jack Holmes, president of UPS Freight, the LTL unit of Atlanta-based UPS Inc.,
told attendees of the National Strategic Shippers Transportation Council (NASSTRAC) annual conference in mid-April. Brokers and
3PLs that "don't have relationships [with LTL carriers] will suffer," especially as tightening capacity allows carriers to be more
selective about who they work with, Holmes said.
Even Skinner of Shift recognizes the inherent risks in getting deeply involved with the transactional broker crowd. "You can't
let them beat you up," he said in an interview at the NASSTRAC conference.
At this point, brokers and 3PLs need LTL carriers more than the other way around. The big truckload carriers are building
substantial brokerage operations, a strategy that impacts all brokers but especially those who earn their living through
transactional activity. Even the traditional parcel carriers have gotten into the act. UPS Freight is expanding its truckload and
intermodal brokerage operations as well as an asset-based, dedicated contract carriage service that uses a hybrid of owned and
outsourced equipment.
As big companies muscle in on brokerage in a bid to capture more of a shipper's total spend, many brokers, especially those who
do little more than provide domestic dry van services, may be in trouble if they can't expand their value proposition. Opening up
the LTL channel could be a way for intermediaries to do just that.
“The past year has been unprecedented, with extreme weather events, heightened geopolitical tension and cybercrime destabilizing supply chains throughout the world. Navigating this year’s looming risks to build a secure supply network has never been more critical,” Corey Rhodes, CEO of Everstream Analytics, said in the firm’s “2025 Annual Risk Report.”
“While some risks are unavoidable, early notice and swift action through a combination of planning, deep monitoring, and mitigation can save inventory and lives in 2025,” Rhodes said.
In its report, Everstream ranked the five categories by a “risk score metric” to help global supply chain leaders prioritize planning and mitigation efforts for coping with them. They include:
Drowning in Climate Change – 90% Risk Score. Driven by shifting climate patterns and record-high temperatures, extreme weather events are a dominant risk to the supply chain due to concerns such as flooding and elevated ocean temperatures.
Geopolitical Instability with Increased Tariff Risk – 80% Risk Score. These threats could disrupt trade networks and impact economies worldwide, including logistics, transportation, and manufacturing industries. The following major geopolitical events are likely to impact global trade: Red Sea disruptions, Russia-Ukraine conflict, Taiwan trade risks, Middle East tensions, South China Sea disputes, and proposed tariff increases.
More Backdoors for Cybercrime – 75% Risk Score. Supply chain leaders face escalating cybersecurity risks in 2025, driven by the growing reliance on AI and cloud computing within supply chains, the proliferation of IoT-connected devices, vulnerabilities in sub-tier supply chains, and a disproportionate impact on third-party logistics providers (3PLs) and the electronics industry.
Rare Metals and Minerals on Lockdown – 65% Risk Score. Between rising regulations, new tariffs, and long-term or exclusive contracts, rare minerals and metals will be harder than ever, and more expensive, to obtain.
Crackdown on Forced Labor – 60% Risk Score. A growing crackdown on forced labor across industries will increase pressure on companies who are facing scrutiny to manage and eliminate suppliers violating human rights. Anticipated risks in 2025 include a push for alternative suppliers, a cascade of legislation to address lax forced labor issues, challenges for agri-food products such as palm oil and vanilla.
That number is low compared to widespread unemployment in the transportation sector which reached its highest level during the COVID-19 pandemic at 15.7% in both May 2020 and July 2020. But it is slightly above the most recent pre-pandemic rate for the sector, which was 2.8% in December 2019, the BTS said.
For broader context, the nation’s overall unemployment rate for all sectors rose slightly in December, increasing 0.3 percentage points from December 2023 to 3.8%.
On a seasonally adjusted basis, employment in the transportation and warehousing sector rose to 6,630,200 people in December 2024 — up 0.1% from the previous month and up 1.7% from December 2023. Employment in transportation and warehousing grew 15.1% in December 2024 from the pre-pandemic December 2019 level of 5,760,300 people.
The largest portion of those workers was in warehousing and storage, followed by truck transportation, according to a breakout of the total figures into separate modes (seasonally adjusted):
Warehousing and storage rose to 1,770,300 in December 2024 — up 0.1% from the previous month and up 0.2% from December 2023.
Truck transportation fell to 1,545,900 in December 2024 — down 0.1% from the previous month and down 0.4% from December 2023.
Air transportation rose to 578,000 in December 2024 — up 0.4% from the previous month and up 1.4% from December 2023.
Transit and ground passenger transportation rose to 456,000 in December 2024 — up 0.3% from the previous month and up 5.7% from December 2023.
Rail transportation remained virtually unchanged in December 2024 at 150,300 from the previous month but down 1.8% from December 2023.
Water transportation rose to 74,300 in December 2024 — up 0.1% from the previous month and up 4.8% from December 2023.
Pipeline transportation rose to 55,000 in December 2024 — up 0.5% from the previous month and up 6.2% from December 2023.
Parcel carrier and logistics provider UPS Inc. has acquired the German company Frigo-Trans and its sister company BPL, which provide complex healthcare logistics solutions across Europe, the Atlanta-based firm said this week.
According to UPS, the move extends its UPS Healthcare division’s ability to offer end-to-end capabilities for its customers, who increasingly need temperature-controlled and time-critical logistics solutions globally.
UPS Healthcare has 17 million square feet of cGMP and GDP-compliant healthcare distribution space globally, supporting services such as inventory management, cold chain packaging and shipping, storage and fulfillment of medical devices, and lab and clinical trial logistics.
More specifically, UPS Healthcare said that the acquisitions align with its broader mission to provide end-to-end logistics for temperature-sensitive healthcare products, including biologics, specialty pharmaceuticals, and personalized medicine. With 80% of pharmaceutical products in Europe requiring temperature-controlled transportation, investments like these ensure UPS Healthcare remains at the forefront of innovation in the $82 billion complex healthcare logistics market, the company said.
Additionally, Frigo-Trans' presence in Germany—the world's fourth-largest healthcare manufacturing market—strengthens UPS's foothold and enhances its support for critical intra-Germany operations. Frigo-Trans’ network includes temperature-controlled warehousing ranging from cryopreservation (-196°C) to ambient (+15° to +25°C) as well as Pan-European cold chain transportation. And BPL provides logistics solutions including time-critical freight forwarding capabilities.
Terms of the deal were not disclosed. But it fits into UPS' long term strategy to double its healthcare revenue from $10 billion in 2023 to $20 billion by 2026. To get there, it has also made previous acquisitions of companies like Bomi and MNX. And UPS recently expanded its temperature-controlled fleet in France, Italy, the Netherlands, and Hungary.
"Healthcare customers increasingly demand precision, reliability, and adaptability—qualities that are critical for the future of biologics and personalized medicine. The Frigo-Trans and BPL acquisitions allow us to offer unmatched service across Europe, making logistics a competitive advantage for our pharma partners," says John Bolla, President, UPS Healthcare.
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.