Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
When U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) unveiled its Importer Security Filing (ISF) rule, many people suspected that their business operations were about to change in a big way. Nearly a year after the rule's implementation, it's abundantly clear that their assessment was right on the mark.
The ISF rule, which is intended to help CBP screen incoming ocean containers for security risks, is popularly known as "10+2"—a name derived from the number of data elements importers (10) and ocean carriers (2) must provide to CBP before a U.S.-bound container is loaded on board a ship.
To comply with the rule, which CBP began enforcing in January, importers have been forced to make a number of procedural changes. They must collect more data than before—often from different parties than in the past—and report it to CBP much earlier and in a different format than they used to.
The road to compliance has been a bumpy one; these and many other ISF-related changes have given rise to a host of questions, complications, and procedural errors that have affected almost every importer at some point. Addressing them often requires extremely detailed, technical knowledge, but there are a few general steps you can take to avoid some of the obstacles. In this follow-up to our July 2010 article ("'10+2' + technology = progress"), we share six tips that may make your path to "10+2" compliance a little smoother.
1. Read CBP's "ISF Frequently Asked Questions." This 63-page download is required reading for anyone who's involved in 10+2 compliance—not just those in import operations but also technical staff who are responsible for software modification and data formatting. The document, updated in July 2010, explains what importers should do and how the agency will respond in specific situations. These FAQs can be found on the Importer Security Filing page of CBP's website.
A useful summary of ISF basics is the PowerPoint "10+2 Program: Importer Presentation" located on the same page. This document explains relationships, responsibilities, typical problems encountered, and where to get more information.
2. Get expert assistance. Although some large importers handle their own filings, most importers, large and small, find the details of compliance daunting enough that they seek outside assistance. Many go to their customs brokers for help in managing their filings and keeping abreast of changing policies and procedures. But customs brokers aren't the only source of information. You can also obtain expert advice from trade compliance consultants, global trade management software companies, and specialized organizations like the American Association of Exporters and Importers and the International Compliance Professionals Association.
3. Develop an ISF standard procedures manual. So many procedures and technical requirements have changed that no one can—or should—expect people to figure it out on their own. Having a procedures manual is therefore essential, says Beth Peterson, co-author of two research studies on ISF compliance and president of BPE Global, a San Francisco-based consulting firm that specializes in import/export compliance. An online or printed manual will help you train not only your own employees but also your suppliers' staffs, she says.
4. Build ISF compliance into your supplier contracts and communications. You have no choice but to rely on suppliers and providers of transportation and logistics services to provide some of the ISF data—and to provide it within some very tight windows. One of the best ways to make sure you get what you need when you need it is to write those requirements into contractual agreements and service contracts. Peterson recommends raising the subject during negotiations with suppliers like contract manufacturers, rather than waiting until it's time to ship. "You have to get this done at the time you negotiate the broader contract," she says. "You don't want to go back and tell them after the fact, 'Oh, by the way, you have to give me this information within this time frame.'"
Along those lines, CBP recommends incorporating ISF data requirements into purchase orders and advance shipment notifications. Some importers also mandate that their vendors use an online booking tool that requires them to enter all ISF data before they can obtain a booking confirmation or require their suppliers to undergo training in ISF compliance.
5. Give CBP everything you've got, as soon as you've got it. Sometimes it's simply not possible to obtain every piece of data within the required time frame. "Send what you have, even if you don't have a bill of lading number yet," advises Peterson. "Make sure what you do send is timely. You can update it as soon as you get additional details."
So far, she says, importers that communicate with customs authorities and can demonstrate that they're making an honest effort to get the information and resolve any problems are "not feeling a lot of pressure. ... Customs has been true to its word" that it will take those efforts into consideration when assessing compliance levels.
6. Automate, automate, automate. That's the message from vendors of global trade management (GTM) software. Although they have an obvious interest in promoting automated solutions, they do have a valid point, especially in regard to ISF filings. With so many parties now involved in providing data and with tighter deadlines to meet, using software to standardize data collection and formatting is a huge time saver. It can also promote accuracy, minimize errors, and avoid duplication of effort. On top of that, the software can identify information gaps, provide greater visibility into overseas activities and costs, create a compliance audit trail, and improve data integrity throughout the supply chain.
Don't let your guard down
Since 10+2 has been in effect, importers have experienced numerous glitches, surprises, and holdups, caused mostly by inaccurate, conflicting, missing, or late information. They have also seen their order-to-delivery cycle times stretch by an average of two days, according to a survey conducted late last year by American Shipper magazine and BPE Global.
Thanks to regular communication between the trade community and CBP, and to hard work by organizations like AAEI and CBP's advisory councils, many of those issues have been resolved—or at least they're on the agency's radar screen. In fact, the trade community has done remarkably well in meeting the complex ISF requirements. In a July 23 letter to 15 industry organizations, CBP Commissioner Alan Bersin wrote, "To date, CBP is very satisfied with the compliance levels of the trade community."
Even if you're confident your company merits such praise, that doesn't mean it's safe to let your guard down. Instead, use the six suggestions offered here to make sure that when it comes to ISF compliance, you, your suppliers, and your service providers are all following best practices.
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
The overall national industrial real estate vacancy rate edged higher in the fourth quarter, although it still remains well below pre-pandemic levels, according to an analysis by Cushman & Wakefield.
Vacancy rates shrunk during the pandemic to historically low levels as e-commerce sales—and demand for warehouse space—boomed in response to massive numbers of people working and living from home. That frantic pace is now cooling off but real estate demand remains elevated from a long-term perspective.
“We've witnessed an uptick among firms looking to lease larger buildings to support their omnichannel fulfillment strategies and maintain inventory for their e-commerce, wholesale, and retail stock. This trend is not just about space, but about efficiency and customer satisfaction,” Jason Tolliver, President, Logistics & Industrial Services, said in a release. “Meanwhile, we're also seeing a flurry of activity to support forward-deployed stock models, a strategy that keeps products closer to the market they serve and where customers order them, promising quicker deliveries and happier customers.“
The latest figures show that industrial vacancy is likely nearing its peak for this cooling cycle in the coming quarters, Cushman & Wakefield analysts said.
Compared to the third quarter, the vacancy rate climbed 20 basis points to 6.7%, but that level was still 30 basis points below the 10-year, pre-pandemic average. Likewise, overall net absorption in the fourth quarter—a term for the amount of newly developed property leased by clients—measured 36.8 million square feet, up from the 33.3 million square feet recorded in the third quarter, but down 20% on a year-over-year basis.
In step with those statistics, real estate developers slowed their plans to erect more buildings. New construction deliveries continued to decelerate for the second straight quarter. Just 85.3 million square feet of new industrial product was completed in the fourth quarter, down 8% quarter-over-quarter and 48% versus one year ago.
Likewise, only four geographic markets saw more than 20 million square feet of completions year-to-date, compared to 10 markets in 2023. Meanwhile, as construction starts remained tempered overall, the under-development pipeline has continued to thin out, dropping by 36% annually to its lowest level (290.5 million square feet) since the third quarter of 2018.
Despite the dip in demand last quarter, the market for industrial space remains relatively healthy, Cushman & Wakefield said.
“After a year of hesitancy, logistics is entering a new, sustained growth phase,” Tolliver said. “Corporate capital is being deployed to optimize supply chains, diversify networks, and minimize potential risks. What's particularly encouraging is the proactive approach of retailers, wholesalers, and 3PLs, who are not just reacting to the market, but shaping it. 2025 will be a year characterized by this bias for action.”
The three companies say the deal will allow clients to both define ideal set-ups for new warehouses and to continuously enhance existing facilities with Mega, an Nvidia Omniverse blueprint for large-scale industrial digital twins. The strategy includes a digital twin powered by physical AI – AI models that embody principles and qualities of the physical world – to improve the performance of intelligent warehouses that operate with automated forklifts, smart cameras and automation and robotics solutions.
The partners’ approach will take advantage of digital twins to plan warehouses and train robots, they said. “Future warehouses will function like massive autonomous robots, orchestrating fleets of robots within them,” Jensen Huang, founder and CEO of Nvidia, said in a release. “By integrating Omniverse and Mega into their solutions, Kion and Accenture can dramatically accelerate the development of industrial AI and autonomy for the world’s distribution and logistics ecosystem.”
Kion said it will use Nvidia’s technology to provide digital twins of warehouses that allows facility operators to design the most efficient and safe warehouse configuration without interrupting operations for testing. That includes optimizing the number of robots, workers, and automation equipment. The digital twin provides a testing ground for all aspects of warehouse operations, including facility layouts, the behavior of robot fleets, and the optimal number of workers and intelligent vehicles, the company said.
In that approach, the digital twin doesn’t stop at simulating and testing configurations, but it also trains the warehouse robots to handle changing conditions such as demand, inventory fluctuation, and layout changes. Integrated with Kion’s warehouse management software (WMS), the digital twin assigns tasks like moving goods from buffer zones to storage locations to virtual robots. And powered by advanced AI, the virtual robots plan, execute, and refine these tasks in a continuous loop, simulating and ultimately optimizing real-world operations with infinite scenarios, Kion said.
Following the deal, Palm Harbor, Florida-based FreightCenter’s customers will gain access to BlueGrace’s unified transportation management system, BlueShip TMS, enabling freight management across various shipping modes. They can also use BlueGrace’s truckload and less-than-truckload (LTL) services and its EVOS load optimization tools, stemming from another acquisition BlueGrace did in 2024.
According to Tampa, Florida-based BlueGrace, the acquisition aligns with its mission to deliver simplified logistics solutions for all size businesses.
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but the firms said that FreightCenter will continue to operate as an independent business under its current brand, in order to ensure continuity for its customers and partners.
BlueGrace is held by the private equity firm Warburg Pincus. It operates from nine offices located in transportation hubs across the U.S. and Mexico, serving over 10,000 customers annually through its BlueShip technology platform that offers connectivity with more than 250,000 carrier suppliers.
Under terms of the deal, Sick and Endress+Hauser will each hold 50% of a joint venture called "Endress+Hauser SICK GmbH+Co. KG," which will strengthen the development and production of analyzer and gas flow meter technologies. According to Sick, its gas flow meters make it possible to switch to low-emission and non-fossil energy sources, for example, and the process analyzers allow reliable monitoring of emissions.
As part of the partnership, the product solutions manufactured together will now be marketed by Endress+Hauser, allowing customers to use a broader product portfolio distributed from a single source via that company’s global sales centers.
Under terms of the contract between the two companies—which was signed in the summer of 2024— around 800 Sick employees located in 42 countries will transfer to Endress+Hauser, including workers in the global sales and service units of Sick’s “Cleaner Industries” division.
“This partnership is a perfect match,” Peter Selders, CEO of the Endress+Hauser Group, said in a release. “It creates new opportunities for growth and development, particularly in the sustainable transformation of the process industry. By joining forces, we offer added value to our customers. Our combined efforts will make us faster and ultimately more successful than if we acted alone. In this case, one and one equals more than two.”
According to Sick, the move means that its current customers will continue to find familiar Sick contacts available at Endress+Hauser for consulting, sales, and service of process automation solutions. The company says this approach allows it to focus on its core business of factory and logistics automation to meet global demand for automation and digitalization.
Sick says its core business has always been in factory and logistics automation, which accounts for more than 80% of sales, and this area remains unaffected by the new joint venture. In Sick’s view, automation is crucial for industrial companies to secure their productivity despite limited resources. And Sick’s sensor solutions are a critical part of industrial automation, which increases productivity through artificial intelligence and the digital networking of production and supply chains.