Winning customers and earning their loyalty requires not only excellent products, but a supply chain made up of reliable, flexible, responsive and interconnected business partners.
Ed C. Reel is senior vice president of Peach State Integrated Technologies. He can be reached at (678) 327-2044 or by visiting the company's Web site, www.peachstate.com.
There may have been a time when building a better product was enough to bring the world to your door. But if that time ever was—and it's doubtful—it is no more.
Winning customers and earning their loyalty requires not only excellent products, but a supply chain made up of reliable, flexible, responsive and interconnected business partners. A well-designed supply chain is one that can deliver the "perfect" order—the right product, in the right quantity, to the right location, at the right time—consistently and at the lowest possible cost. At the same time, it must be able to respond to changing market and customer conditions. Though the description makes it sound simple, many companies will attest that putting all the right pieces in place—and in action—is far from simple. And the reality that supply chain excellence is not broadly understood—even in many boardrooms—only makes it harder.
Supply chain performance is too often defined through specific metrics such as customer service, order and inventory accuracy, fill rates and delivery times. Yet these discrete metrics, while important, provide too narrow a view and can mask the supply chain's true potential and the far-reaching benefits it can deliver. Still, as businesses begin deliberating how to achieve supp ly chain excellence, they often overlook the most critical element of them all—linking corporate strategy with logistics strategy.
You can't make that linkage happen without getting the CEO's attention. And the quickest way to do that is to demonstrate the financial improvements that supply chain excellence can provide. For instance, if a core competency of the business is to grow revenue and market share through customer service—delivering the perfect order and responding promptly to changing demands—it's imperative to link the supply chain's design to that goal. Study after study has demonstrated the critical link between supply chain excellence and market share and revenue improvement.
How so? A responsive and efficient supply chain provides customer service that is better and more consistent than the competition's, attracts customers away from the competition, creates tools for penetrating new markets and brings the customer back for more.
Providing excellent customer service is no longer a choice in many business sectors. Companies must be able to meet or exceed their customers' demanding service requirements, epitomized by the service expectations of mass retailers such as Wal-Mart, Target, Home Depot and Lowe's. Manufacturers and distributors of products face pressure to improve supply chain performance to meet these retailers' distribution schedules and strict service requirements. Stumble here and you lose the business. What's critical is to design the supply chain in a way that serves both customers and the company.
One recent high-profile case illustrates what's possible. Unilever completed an extensive supply chain optimization program that truly transformed its distribution network and operations. The impetus for the changes was the daunting task of merging the supply chain operations of three recently acquired companies with three distinct product lines. Each of these companies relied heavily on major retailers to sell its products and faced intense pressure to enhance its supply chain performance to meet its customers' own distribution schedules. Realizing the significant role that customer service played in achieving the financial performance goals, the company focused on upgrading customer service to exceed the industry's standards. Senior executives at Unilever determined that the company needed to build a world-class supply chain to improve its customer service levels and its competitive position. Optimizing its supply chain, they theorized, would eliminate significant inefficiencies across its operations and further contribute to bottom-line savings. However, the plan the company adopted targeted not just operational improvements but strategic imperatives as well. The plan's overriding objectives included enhancing and improving Unilever's top-line growth, operating margins, customer service and shareholder return.
Unilever's existing distribution network consisted of 15 distribution centers spread across North America. The supply chain optimization plan that emerged recommended replacing them with five new mega-distribution centers strategically located in the U.S. Northeast, Southeast, Southwest, Midwest and West. In total, the new network would include approximately 5 million square feet of distribution space in the company 's most strategic distribution markets.
In the end, the efforts generated the results Unilever had sought. Customer service levels improved markedly, with one-day service levels rising by almost 20 percent. Additionally, through eliminating supply chain inefficiencies, the company reduced its total logistics costs by approximately 7 percent. These savings helped the company achieve a payback on its entire project investment in approximately one year's time.
Unilever's experience demonstrates the significant value a supply chain optimization program can have in improving a company's operating and financial performance. As customers' demands and service requirements continue to escalate, it's vital that manufacturing and distribution companies optimize supply chain networks to fulfill these requirements. But as outlined in this article, supply chain excellence is becoming imperative in achieving competitive advantage, growing revenues and market share, and reducing operating costs—all critical in delivering the goods, physical and financial.
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.