Art van Bodegraven was, among other roles, chief design officer for the DES Leadership Academy. He passed away on June 18, 2017. He will be greatly missed.
Most supply chain professionals don't need a panel of experts to point out the importance of infrastructure to smooth-running supply operations. They've seen the evidence firsthand in the protracted freight backups caused by congestion at West Coast ports in 2004 or freight stranded by road flooding after Hurricane Katrina.
What they might not always consider is just how wide-ranging that critical supply chain infrastructure really is. There's more to it than just roads and bridges. There's the telecommunications network, for instance, and the electric power grid. Not to mention the people who take charge of the operations. What follows is a rundown of some of those elements—what we like to call the hardware, the software and the middleware.
The "hardware" side
To most people,the term"infrastructure" means the physical transportation infrastructure—the roads, rail track, airports, subways and so forth that serve as channels for both people and freight. But as we see it, the "hardware" also includes some elements that aren't quite so obvious. Let's take a closer look at some of the components:
Roads. That's obvious, right? But consider the variety of roadways that fall into this category. They include:
Motorways: Typically called interstate highways in the United States, these are the limited-access, sometimes toll (but usually toll-free), multi-lane, long-distance—often transcontinental—routes that connect major population centers.
Other primary highways: The free-access, generally four-lane and often long-distance (even transcontinental) routes between—and sometimes through—major and intermediate population centers.
Secondary and tertiary roads: The free-access, usually two-lane, paved and maintained routes connecting cities and towns of all sizes. (Few, if any, supply chain operations in the United States and Canada make use of the gravel or dirt roads found in remote rural areas.)
Other streets and roadways: The network of city streets, highway access roads, beltways, spurs and other ancillary components of the total surface transport system.
Bridges: Bridges may span water, other roadways or rail track. (Regardless of type, they're all said to be in desperate need of upgrade and repair in the United States.)
Railroads. The network of tracks crisscrossing the United States. (For purposes of this discussion, we consider light rail, commuter, and passenger rail to be components of another infrastructure.)
Inland waterways. Though we tend to dismiss them as a relic of the 19th century, barges continue to ply the nation's inland waterways, hauling iron ore to steel-making centers and logs to paper mills. Water transport (over rivers, canals and lakes) also remains important in Europe and other parts of the world.
Ports. The nation's port infrastructure includes both seaports (along with their docks, cranes, distribution facilities, rail trackage and access roads) and airports (and their associated storage, distribution and processing facilities).
Land. Though often overlooked in discussions of transportation infrastructure, land—specifically its availability and cost—holds heavy sway in supply chain decisionmaking. Many times, real estate considerations end up dictating facility footprint size, degree of mechanization and even supply chain network design.
We should also note that the ability to leverage the physical infrastructure to the fullest assumes that we have adequate fleets: trucks of all varieties and sizes, planes, boats and barges, and railcars and power units.
The "software" side of infrastructure The physical structures represent just one part of the supply chain infrastructure. There's also what we like to call "software"—the intellectual infrastructure. This, too, has a number of components. They include the following:
Workforce. The supply of skilled workers; that is, people who are educated in the basics of computation and communication, who are flexible and trainable, and who demonstrate both a strong work ethic and a desire to succeed.
Practitioners. A pool of seasoned managers—people who have acquired the hands-on knowledge and practical experience needed to guide and direct the efforts of others.
Support resources. These include—dare we say it?—consultants, who can help spread the word about best practices and offer experienced counsel on ways to solve specific problems.
Technology support staff. The software designers and developers and the material handling system designers who conceive and generate information and handling solutions, and can advise customers and clients in their application and implementation.
Education and research facilities. Not just colleges and universities that can turn out competent graduates, but also institutions that conduct research in the logistics and supply chain management field. And by that, we don't mean a lone faculty member synthesizing the results of other people's studies; we refer to advanced research institutions dedicated to promoting leading- edge theory and practice.
Government. As sensitive a topic as this might be, there's no question that national and local governments can either promote or hamper a supply chain's operation. A local government that's willing to build roads or shore up bridges, for example, can provide invaluable assistance to any supply chain enterprise.
Linking it all together
Beyond all that, there is a category we might call "middleware," if that's not stretching the hardware/software analogy too far.Without these elements to tie everything together, the supply chain would collapse. These elements include:
Communications and connectivity. The land lines, fiber-optic cables, and satellite and mobile communications networks we rely on to transmit the data that are so essential to day-to-day commerce. If these aren't infrastructure elements, we don't know what else to call them.
The electric power grid. We learned a few things about the connection between electricity and the smooth functioning of supply chains—not to mention, society— the hard way a couple of years ago when the Northeastern United States and large chunks of Canada went dark unexpectedly. Just imagine, there are parts of the world that experience this on a regular basis.
For instance, think about Cuba, in which a 100-year-old power plant can't provide enough power to keep the lights on for more than an hour without failing. Consider Istanbul, a 21st century city in which periodic power outages add to the quaint charm of the Eurasian experience. Imagine trying to meet 24/7 operating requirements in a country that shuts off the power at 10 every night.
Standards. You might not have thought of standards as an element of infrastructure, but consider the chaos if suppliers, wholesalers, carriers and customers used incompatible bar codes or RFID tags. Or if trade partners attempted to exchange data electronically without the benefit of agreed-upon EDI message standards.
For companies rushing headlong into the global marketplace, standards are something they can no longer ignore. Each time a prospective trading partner presents itself, they have to determine whether it adheres to the same standards they do and if not, how to fix the problem. The people who work daily with these issues—and work them out—are unsung heroes of modern commerce and supply chain management.
So, in the world of supply chain management, "infrastructure" isn't merely a term to throw into the conversation in order to appear erudite. It's important. It's complex. And it has enormous implications for how— and how well—supply chains work.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
The overall national industrial real estate vacancy rate edged higher in the fourth quarter, although it still remains well below pre-pandemic levels, according to an analysis by Cushman & Wakefield.
Vacancy rates shrunk during the pandemic to historically low levels as e-commerce sales—and demand for warehouse space—boomed in response to massive numbers of people working and living from home. That frantic pace is now cooling off but real estate demand remains elevated from a long-term perspective.
“We've witnessed an uptick among firms looking to lease larger buildings to support their omnichannel fulfillment strategies and maintain inventory for their e-commerce, wholesale, and retail stock. This trend is not just about space, but about efficiency and customer satisfaction,” Jason Tolliver, President, Logistics & Industrial Services, said in a release. “Meanwhile, we're also seeing a flurry of activity to support forward-deployed stock models, a strategy that keeps products closer to the market they serve and where customers order them, promising quicker deliveries and happier customers.“
The latest figures show that industrial vacancy is likely nearing its peak for this cooling cycle in the coming quarters, Cushman & Wakefield analysts said.
Compared to the third quarter, the vacancy rate climbed 20 basis points to 6.7%, but that level was still 30 basis points below the 10-year, pre-pandemic average. Likewise, overall net absorption in the fourth quarter—a term for the amount of newly developed property leased by clients—measured 36.8 million square feet, up from the 33.3 million square feet recorded in the third quarter, but down 20% on a year-over-year basis.
In step with those statistics, real estate developers slowed their plans to erect more buildings. New construction deliveries continued to decelerate for the second straight quarter. Just 85.3 million square feet of new industrial product was completed in the fourth quarter, down 8% quarter-over-quarter and 48% versus one year ago.
Likewise, only four geographic markets saw more than 20 million square feet of completions year-to-date, compared to 10 markets in 2023. Meanwhile, as construction starts remained tempered overall, the under-development pipeline has continued to thin out, dropping by 36% annually to its lowest level (290.5 million square feet) since the third quarter of 2018.
Despite the dip in demand last quarter, the market for industrial space remains relatively healthy, Cushman & Wakefield said.
“After a year of hesitancy, logistics is entering a new, sustained growth phase,” Tolliver said. “Corporate capital is being deployed to optimize supply chains, diversify networks, and minimize potential risks. What's particularly encouraging is the proactive approach of retailers, wholesalers, and 3PLs, who are not just reacting to the market, but shaping it. 2025 will be a year characterized by this bias for action.”
Under terms of the deal, Sick and Endress+Hauser will each hold 50% of a joint venture called "Endress+Hauser SICK GmbH+Co. KG," which will strengthen the development and production of analyzer and gas flow meter technologies. According to Sick, its gas flow meters make it possible to switch to low-emission and non-fossil energy sources, for example, and the process analyzers allow reliable monitoring of emissions.
As part of the partnership, the product solutions manufactured together will now be marketed by Endress+Hauser, allowing customers to use a broader product portfolio distributed from a single source via that company’s global sales centers.
Under terms of the contract between the two companies—which was signed in the summer of 2024— around 800 Sick employees located in 42 countries will transfer to Endress+Hauser, including workers in the global sales and service units of Sick’s “Cleaner Industries” division.
“This partnership is a perfect match,” Peter Selders, CEO of the Endress+Hauser Group, said in a release. “It creates new opportunities for growth and development, particularly in the sustainable transformation of the process industry. By joining forces, we offer added value to our customers. Our combined efforts will make us faster and ultimately more successful than if we acted alone. In this case, one and one equals more than two.”
According to Sick, the move means that its current customers will continue to find familiar Sick contacts available at Endress+Hauser for consulting, sales, and service of process automation solutions. The company says this approach allows it to focus on its core business of factory and logistics automation to meet global demand for automation and digitalization.
Sick says its core business has always been in factory and logistics automation, which accounts for more than 80% of sales, and this area remains unaffected by the new joint venture. In Sick’s view, automation is crucial for industrial companies to secure their productivity despite limited resources. And Sick’s sensor solutions are a critical part of industrial automation, which increases productivity through artificial intelligence and the digital networking of production and supply chains.