Stuck in neutral: Stubborn freight recession has truckers searching for an upshift
A post-pandemic hangover of excess capacity coupled with tepid industrial production is dampening demand and short-circuiting a return to growth for truckers. A bright spot: Inflation is moderating, and consumers keep spending. And maybe the Fed will finally cut interest rates.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
Jason Seidl has been in the trucking business for the better part of 30 years, first working on the front lines in freight operations, then moving to the investment community, where today he’s managing director and senior transportation analyst for investment firm TD Cowen. Through all that time and all the different business cycles he’s experienced, he hasn’t witnessed anything like the current market cycle. “I’ve never seen a downturn that’s lasted this long,” Seidl says.
Part of the reason, he believes, is the “crazy period” the markets lived through during the pandemic and post-pandemic cycles, and the supply chain crises that resulted.
“A ton of carriers rushed in [to the truckload market] and would have left earlier, but they are hanging in longer because of an infusion of government stimulus money,” which helped shore up their balance sheets and enabled them to weather the downturn.
The other piece: “There are more brokers in the market today with better technology, and that has provided [truckload] carriers with other options to find freight, all of which has kept them in the market longer than they normally would have [stayed].”
Andy Dyer, president of transportation management for nonasset-based third-party service provider AFS Logistics, agrees. “We lived through a post-pandemic demand bubble the likes of which most of us had never seen,” he says, recalling a time when trucks were so scarce, he was posting loads at $9 a mile. “The bubble hit, capacity surged to meet it, and even though demand is starting to normalize, we are still oversupplied.”
He echoes Seidl’s point about the rising role of brokers and other nonasset-based intermediaries. “Back in the 1990s, brokering in the freight space accounted for 5% of transactions,” he says. “Post-pandemic, that’s now over 20%. I am convinced that absent a seismic demand event, we will not get corrected on the price side until we have a meaningful and sustained supply side correction.”
It’s a sluggish market where industrial production is weak, with the monthly ISM (Institute for Supply Management) report in June again going negative, marking 19 out of the last 20 months with a score of under 50, which is considered in contraction territory. Yet “the consumer looks OK … for now,” says Seidl.
CAUTIOUS OPTIMISM
Interviews with fleet operators confirm that they’re essentially all facing those challenges but also reveal some cautious optimism that the bottom has been reached and the market is about to turn. “For the truckload segment, demand has yet to truly break out, and further attrition of excess capacity is still needed,” said Adam Miller, chief executive officer at Knight-Swift Holdings Inc., the nation’s largest truckload carrier, in the company’s recent second-quarter earnings call.
And while he noted that the company has a long way to go to return to its target performance levels, Miller sees reason for hope. “It is starting to feel like the bottom is behind us for this cycle,” he said, adding “if trends over the past few months continue, we should see demand building as we exit the third quarter and some return of seasonal activity for the fourth quarter for the first time in years.”
It has been a tough economy for truckers, yet at less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL), the news isn’t all bad. “We are managing to grow our market share, and we do that by providing what customers perceive as solid value for their transportation dollar,” says Greg Plemmons, ODFL’s executive vice president and chief operating officer. “We have established a premium offering, and the good news is there is always a market for quality service,” he adds.
The toughest task? Managing in an environment where costs across the board continue to rise. “We feel the same inflationary pressures as our customers—and we all—do,” Plemmons says. Nevertheless, he notes that as the year has proceeded, ODFL has been able to secure “modest” rate increases—“maybe a bit less in 2024 in terms of percentage with our contract customers, but still solid.”
And while it’s always difficult to call a market turn, “we feel like we are bottoming out as an industry,” with growth returning “to something we’re more accustomed to” in the second half of the year and into 2025, Plemmons adds. “My crystal ball is a little fuzzy right now, but if conversations we’re having with customers are any indication, they are feeling more optimistic [today] than they have in the past year and a half.”
ODFL isn’t letting its foot off the investment gas pedal, either. Its CapEx for this year will come in at around $750 million between rolling stock, facilities, IT, freight handling equipment, and other needs, according to Plemmons. This year, the company is opening six new service centers, ending the year with 261 terminals, which represents an increase of about 9% in capacity for the network. It also has some 100 real estate projects under way or on the drawing board. “It’s never a dull moment” on the real estate side, he says. “You can’t wait around until you need them; you have to start well in advance.”
Plemmons says ODFL strives to maintain “about 25% excess capacity [now closer to 30%], so maybe we are the best positioned to handle a turn in the economy when it comes—and it certainly will come.”
A “MODEST” RECOVERY ON THE HORIZON?
With economic headlines providing a mixed bag of news—signs of the economy’s resilience, the prospect of weaker employment and wage growth, and the likelihood of a larger and earlier Fed rate cut—these economic issues are inevitably entering more conversations, notes Avery Vise, vice president of trucking for FTR Transportation Intelligence.
“Putting aside the headlines, our overall forecast is for a pretty modest recovery this year,” with 2024 volumes up 1.6% year over year—“solid but nothing to be excited about,” Vise says. He adds that he sees next year shaping up to be a bit stronger, with growth on the order of 2.4%.
The big issue, as it has been for the past two years, continues to be overcapacity. “We still have something on the order of 95,000 more for-hire carriers [primarily truckload operators with no more than two trucks] today than before the pandemic, about 37% more.” That increase in the carrier population also accounts for “the majority of the roughly 250,000 more drivers in the market today versus prepandemic,” Vise adds. “There is still a lot of excess capacity to match up against increasing freight demand.”
Yet he believes “we are in the mechanics of recovery.” He cites FTR’s estimates of “active” utilization (i.e., the utilization of trucks with drivers), which is FTR’s core metric for assessing market tightness and which represents a measure of the number of trucks needed to haul the freight that’s available. “That’s coming off a trough [last year] and has been trending up most of this year,” he notes.
He expects that by this year’s fourth quarter, “we will be in line with the 10-year average for utilization of 92%.” Vise further projects that in the first and second quarters of 2025, active utilization industrywide will reach 95%. “And that is when you get significant upward pressure on rates,” he notes.
STRUCTURAL CHANGES UPENDING THE MARKET
Then there are the effects of structural factors that are changing the market long term, what Vise calls “a permanent shift in capacity from larger to smaller carriers operating in the spot market on behalf of brokers.” It’s a fundamental change in how the market operates, he says, adding “it’s not just that we have overcapacity but why?”
A lot of that has to do with the rise of intermediaries—brokers and freight forwarders—using flexible and more sophisticated digital freight platforms. “They have visibility they’ve never had before into where those small carriers are, what hours of service they have available and when, their preferred routes and loads, and where they want to go next.”
Vise cites as well some revealing data on empty miles from the annual truck costing report published by ATRI (the American Transportation Research Institute). “The average empty mile percentage for the entire for-hire industry was somewhere between 14% and 15%,” he notes. “But empty miles for smaller carriers was lower, 10%.”
“That’s counterintuitive. Technology has changed that,” he’s observed. “You [the small one- or two-truck carrier] can program in your ‘wish list’ of loads, which then pop up [on your smartphone] based on the preferences you set up and the algorithms behind the app.”
These digital planning and execution tools are not just conveniently available on a driver’s smartphone, they’re also extremely effective at quickly and accurately matching loads to trucks in near real time. “Drivers have more ability to find the loads they want faster. If you can get one or two more loads a week and cut down on empty miles, that can offset the impact of stagnant rates,” Vise says.
All in all, planning and forecasting for truckers has become that much more fluid and difficult, fraught with more uncertainty than ever, Vise says. “Everyone wants to analyze the market based on what’s happened in the past, but that’s not working,” he explains. “There have been so many structural changes that people have not dealt with before; that makes relying on historical norms inaccurate, if not downright dangerous.”
GETTING AHEAD OF THE CURVE
Two other carriers that aren’t letting the stubborn freight recession curtail their expansion plans are LTL truckers A. Duie Pyle and Estes Express Lines.
“Rates are relatively stable, and there is decent pricing discipline in the market,” notes John Luciani, chief operating officer of LTL solutions for Pyle, adding that over the first half of the year, the carrier’s shipment count per day was up about 11%. “Retail is probably driving a lot of the activity right now. Shipment size is down, while bill [of lading] count is up. [Retailers are] buying [and shipping] in smaller quantities as inventory levels continue to contract.”
At the same time, “customers are clawing back some of the accessorial [charges] and are really focused on minimizing costs where they can,” Luciani adds. And they are testing the market. “Customers who have volume are leveraging that. We are seeing some rate pressure from customers taking their business out to bid,” he notes.
That’s not stopping Pyle from growing its network. The Northeast-focused carrier has added 77 doors at its Maspeth, New York, facility to complement capacity at its New York City terminal in the Bronx. It also bought new terminal properties in Camp Hill and Erie, Pennsylvania; Rochester, New York; and Bridgeport, West Virginia. It will end the year with 34 terminals, and a workforce of 1,200 pickup and delivery drivers and 400 linehaul drivers serving the Northeast U.S.
Webb Estes, president and chief operating officer at LTL carrier Estes Express Lines, has a simple definition of a freight recession: “when freight [volume] is less than it was the year before.”
In the current environment, “it feels more like we just came off a mountaintop of demand. We were on a really big high for a couple of years,” he recalls. Now, Estes is dealing with a market where “we are trying to figure out what the new normal is.”
The last two years have brought unprecedented challenges for a company Webb’s great grandfather founded four generations ago, in 1931. “After [living] through the Covid onslaught, then a booming market, then YRC going out of business, and then a cyberattack, we feel we can handle whatever comes our way,” he notes. “We have built a gritty and resilient team that thrives on challenge.”
Estes was a big participant in the auction for YRC’s assets. The company ended up acquiring (by purchase or lease assumption) 36 terminal properties as well as purchasing 6,800 YRC trailers, which have nearly all been rebranded with Estes livery.
The company has added 24% more dock doors to its network over the past three years. So far this year, Estes has brought online an additional 452 doors and plans to get that number up to 1,430 by the end of the year. That’s from building and acquiring new terminals as well as expansions at existing facilities.
“We have been able to create the capacity we needed to respond to customers in the post-YRC environment,” Estes notes. The company will end the year with a network of 280 terminals supporting 22,000 employees operating 10,400 tractors and 40,000 trailers.
As for peak season, “the only nuance about this peak season is that it will be shorter,” Estes says. “Thanksgiving is on the 28th, so we have five fewer days [between Thanksgiving and Christmas] than last year. This year will have the shortest window between [the two holidays].”
LOOK AHEAD, NOT BACK
All downcycles eventually flip. Yet in the view of Jim Fields, chief operating officer for LTL carrier Pitt Ohio, the key is “to look forward, not back, regardless of what is happening to the economy.”
Fields and his team are focused on two primary objectives to improve the business and cement the support of Pitt Ohio’s customers: strategically applying technology that further digitizes the business—particularly automating back-office functions and eliminating wasteful manual work like rekeying data or scanning documents—and hiring and retaining the best team of people possible.
Even with technology increasingly automating many parts of trucking, “this is still a people business,” emphasizes Fields. “We want the best, most professional, safest drivers. Dock workers who take care of the freight as if it were their own. Managers and supervisors who help our employees grow and succeed, and who treat them with respect.
“We want to take advantage of the different skill sets of our employees to advance the capabilities of the company and the services we provide to customers,” Fields adds. “When we’re successful at that, we all win.”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."