Inventory cycle counting appears to be on the verge of a tech revolution. But there are still some steps you can take now to improve your recordkeeping before the real action begins.
Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
Inventory management is an age-old practice on the verge of a serious technology upgrade. For as long as people have stored goods in buildings, they’ve kept a careful count of the total. And today more than ever, that’s a critical part of any warehousing fulfillment operation. Accurate counts enable top performance in stocking, slotting, throughput, replenishment, lean operations, next-day delivery, risk management, and other areas. But in recent years, that job has gotten tougher, under pressure from trends like the surge in e-commerce, the proliferation of stock-keeping units (SKUs), demand for value-added services like kitting and packaging, and the rise of omnichannel fulfillment.
And yet, in 2024 there are still huge disparities in the ways that different warehouses perform cycle counts. At the slow end of the scale, a company might shut down a distribution center once a month so armies of employees can walk through with pencils and clipboards conducting a multiday count. In the mid-range, some operations use their warehouse management system (WMS) to conduct rolling counts throughout the week by keeping track every time a bin is marked empty or is refilled. And on the fast end, some cutting-edge warehouses are experimenting with autonomous drones that fly over the aisles every day, producing gigabytes of real-time digital data that flows seamlessly into their WMS or enterprise resource planning (ERP) software.
But whatever approach DCs are using to manage their inventory, there is definitely room for improvement. A consumer survey by third-party logistics service provider (3PL) Radial shows that many retailers struggle to meet challenges like the annual winter holiday peak and ongoing supply chain instability. The resulting inventory shortages create lingering frustrations for consumers. Radial’s research found “out-of-stock items” was the top holiday shopping challenge for 68% of consumers this past peak season. In addition, 44% of shoppers surveyed said they simply did not order items that would not arrive by a specific date.
There’s a lot at stake: Many of those shoppers won’t give a retailer that disappoints them a second chance. If a smaller store can’t deliver, consumers will often shop with competitors who have inventory available and are able to deliver it on time. Radial’s survey found that big-box retailers tended to be favored when item availability was a concern—64% of consumers chose to purchase holiday items from Amazon due to the availability of items, for instance, and 47% chose to purchase holiday items from Walmart or Target for the same reason.
The problem is particularly painful for small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs), according to a recent “State of Small Business Report” from Verizon Business. That research found that 40% of retail SMB owners say they are worried about not having enough inventory to meet demand, even as 36% say they are worried about having too much. Either problem is painful, with stockouts leading to lost sales and excess goods driving up storage fees.
Fortunately, there are ways companies can get a better handle on their inventory. These include the dazzling tech tools that seem to be hitting the market daily. But those tools aren’t the only solution. Experts say that in some cases, simple low-tech process improvements in certain areas of the warehouse can deliver big gains in accuracy. What follows is a look at a few of the options.
THE NEED FOR SPEED
On the tech tools front, developers continue to roll out solutions that incorporate robotics and other advanced technologies—like artificial intelligence (AI) and digital twins—that are aimed at boosting inventory accuracy and optimizing inventory levels. One such company is Dexory, a British startup that specializes in autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) that are outfitted with mast-mounted sensors that scan stock and are backed by AI-powered analytics software.
Dexory says its robots can record up to 10,000 pallet locations per hour, gathering data with cameras, scanners, and LiDAR (light detection and ranging) technology while rolling down warehouse aisles at walking speed. But its most powerful product is the digital twin the system creates with that information, allowing Dexory to compare real-world data with the records stored in WMS and ERP systems.
The resulting visibility delivers more than just accurate counts, since users can also inspect markings like the barcodes, logos, or expiration dates on each item. And third-party service providers can use the data to meet their service level agreements (SLAs) to provide cycle counts at the extra-high frequencies demanded by customers that produce valuable items like electronics or pharmaceuticals, says Oana Jinga, Dexory’s co-founder and chief commercial and product officer.
Like other providers of inventory-counting bots and drones, the young firm has delivered its technology to only a small percentage of the players in the warehouse market so far, but it is growing fast. Dexory raised $19 million of venture capital funding in 2023 and has deployed its robots this year at logistics facilities operated by DB Schenker and Yusen Logistics.
WATCH THE SPEED BUMPS
Fast counts are great, but automation can’t solve every inventory-counting challenge. That’s partly because a busy DC is often a chaotic DC, where the daily rush to fill orders produces piles of discarded wrapping, packaging, and pull sheets.
While that may not be much of a problem in static bulk storage areas, it can be a real challenge in parts of the warehouse that handle high volumes or see a lot of high-touch transactions, according to Nate Rosier, senior vice president of consulting at enVista, an Indiana-based supply chain consulting firm.
For example, accuracy tends to take a hit in situations where workers are slotting multiple SKUs in a single location, or where they’re picking fast-moving “A-level” goods as opposed to slower-moving B- or C-level items.
“High-velocity pick locations are messy,” Rosier says. “There are boxes and stickers everywhere.”
Another trouble spot when it comes to tracking inventory is the delivery dock, where stock may be on hand but not yet “available.” “You have goods that are somewhere between receiving and putaway. Or their status could be “in-transit.” So you don’t want to pick items directly out of receiving,” he says.
A third danger zone with respect to inaccurate counts is a busy picking location with the potential to “run dry” in the middle of a shift, Rosier says. “If they run out of inventory, a lot of workers will do a workaround, they’ll get creative. In the beverage industry, it’s called ‘shagging’ because people will say, ‘I’m short a case for this order; go shag it from somewhere else in the building.’ And then your count doesn’t add up the next day.”
But there are at least a couple of ways to address that, according to Rosier.
“You can’t count ’em all, so smart warehouse managers will prioritize,” he explains. For instance, “they’ll see that their pickers are all done picking for the day, so they’ll tell them, ‘Go cycle-count all the A-level items before you finish replenishment. That way, you’re ready for the next shift.’”
Another strategy is to assign ownership of busy locations to the supervisors who manage those areas, he adds. “The people who run those spots know where the risks are,” he explains. “So talk to your workers and your supervisors. Tell them, ‘You’re responsible for your whole area—not just for shipping stuff out the door, but replenishment too.’”
For DC leaders facing mounting inventory challenges, the takeaway is this: Whether high-tech or low, creative solutions for managing inventory abound—and they can help warehouses of all shapes and sizes get a better handle on their storage and fulfillment operations.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."