Faced with slumping demand, parcel carriers are casting their nets wide for new sources of revenue. Some of their strategies—like expanding their returns services and going after new e-commerce players—look promising; others—such as imposing new surcharges and accessorial fees—not so much.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
Two years ago, parcel express carriers were flooded with business. Some prognosticators predicted annual growth of 20+ percent. E-commerce was on fire. Capacity was exceptionally tight.
Fast forward to today. The economy continues to grow, albeit at a slow but steady pace. Inflation, while still painfully high, has moderated and fallen below last year’s highs. Employment is at record levels, unemployment at 20-year lows, wages are on the rise, and consumers keep spending but with a discerning eye for bargains.
Yet that’s not translating into a rising tide for parcel carriers.
UPS is cutting back, closing facilities and laying off staff. FedEx with its Drive initiative is in the midst of perhaps the biggest restructuring in its history. Added to the mix are regional parcel carriers, which are expanding coast to coast. In addition, new players are entering the market—and carving out profitable niches—with lower-cost, high-quality services and flexible business models built on leading-edge technology platforms. And then there’s Amazon—and its record-breaking parcel volumes—which has eclipsed UPS and FedEx as the largest nongovernment delivery service in the nation.
What’s on the horizon for parcel express carriers, and how should parcel shippers be refining their strategies? If first-quarter earnings reports are any indication, flat demand, excess capacity, rate pressures, retrenchment, and cost-cutting all are troublesome issues that will continue to challenge the parcel express market throughout 2024.
SLACK DEMAND, YET A FEW BRIGHT SPOTS
Shippers and carriers both continue to contend with a slump in parcel demand, driven by shifting consumer spending habits, an intense focus on price and shipping costs, and a market where operators, product and service mix, technology, and revenue strategies continue to evolve. UPS provides a window into these trends. Its average daily volume in 2024’s first quarter was down 3.2% year over year. U.S. domestic revenue at $14.2 billion was down 5%. Revenue per piece was relatively flat.
“We continue to see a shift from air to ground as customers prioritize cost savings over transit times by taking advantage of our ground services,” said Brian Newman, UPS’s CFO, in the company’s first-quarter earnings call (UPS subsequently announced that Newman is leaving the company this month). On the cost side, the company closed 18 sort centers, lowered block hours (aircraft operating hours) by 15.2%, cut 5,400 management and support staff jobs, and reduced purchased transportation by 17%.
A bright spot: UPS’s returns business. “We like the return business a lot,” said Carol Tomé, UPS’s chief executive officer, in the earnings call. She noted that these returns are typically B2B (business-to-business) shipments where customers bring packages into a UPS store to be sent back to the original shipper. Using its largest customer as an example, Tomé said, “We take in thousands of returns for that customer and package [them] into one consolidated return that goes back to them. That’s good business for us … and the margins are very attractive.”
Ryan Kelly, vice president of marketing for FedEx Services, has been through a few boom-and-bust cycles in his time. One current trend on which he agrees with his largest competitor: the challenge—and opportunity—of giving shippers a simple, pain-free return experience.
“We’re seeing some interesting changes, especially around returns,” Kelly notes. “Consumers are redefining what convenience and quality mean to them,” he explains. “It’s not just about speed anymore; people want flexibility. Many are willing to engage more deeply with brands—in exchange for perks such as free shipping,” which places a premium on the carrier providing cost-effective, consistent, superior-quality service.
And whereas in pre-e-commerce days, dealing with returns was an annoying afterthought for retailers, today that experience can mean the difference between retaining and growing a customer, or losing it entirely.
“It’s all about balance, right? Unsatisfactory return policies, high fees, and strict return windows just aren’t cutting it anymore,” says Kelly. “These are all significant deterrents that can stop [customers] from doing business with a brand altogether. It’s up to retailers now to rethink their strategies to better align with customer expectations.”
There is no doubt that e-commerce will continue to grow, if only in the short term and at more muted rates. Staying competitive and relevant as a carrier will require not only flawless operational blocking and tackling but also continual improvement in and evolution of technologies that support the business—and create simplicity, ease of use, and lower costs for shippers.
“Innovation is in our DNA,” Kelly says. “We operate at the intersection of the physical and digital, and we’re unlocking the power of this intelligence to transform our business, provide better customer service, and move up the customer’s e-commerce value chain.”
A FOCUS ON THE FUNDAMENTALS
Regardless of market conditions, there are core fundamentals of running a parcel carrier and providing the service that will always endure—and be top of mind with shippers, notes Greg Hewitt, chief executive officer at DHL Express U.S.
What is the biggest “ask” he gets from shippers today? While price is always part of the discussion, particularly in times of soft demand and weak volumes, “quality is No. 1,” he says. “Efficient and reliable delivery service, making sure the customer’s goods reach them on time and in great condition. Reliable transit time and tracking,” with regular progress updates and visibility into the shipment through the last mile and confirmation of delivery.
“And it has to be cost-effective. The shipping cost cannot outweigh the value of the goods.” He stresses as well the need to be proactive with shippers and “help them find alternative means where they can get value [and consistency] at a lower cost.”
Parcel service providers also have to recognize they can be a critical factor in the growth plans of businesses, particularly in the fast-paced, ever-changing, and constantly shifting world of e-commerce. As new e-commerce businesses seek a path to growth, “they need flexibility and scalability” from their parcel carriers, Hewitt stresses.
“Today’s small e-commerce player is tomorrow’s giant,” he notes, adding that new businesses just out of the gate typically are focused on product development and expanding their market. Shipping and logistics, while certainly critical to success, aren’t necessarily a core focus, or where they want to spend precious development dollars. “So, as a parcel carrier,” Hewitt says, “we have to grow with them as they grow,” demonstrating flexibility and agility to effectively plan for and accommodate surges in volume stemming from peak season demand, big sales events, or new product introductions.
Moreover, as their business evolves and needs change, “they might even want other services like warehousing, product handling, fulfillment, or a custom solution. We have to be prepared for all that,” he adds.
The other area where Hewitt is seeing not only increased interest but also more formal conversations and requests is around sustainability. Today, formalized sustainability programs “are part of [the customer’s] ethos, value statement, and shareholder commitment. [They] want a partner aligned with those values” and able to help them meet goals and objectives, he notes.
DHL Express’s U.S. network has 120 facilities that operate some 3,500 routes per day, with 8,000 pickup and delivery drivers and another 4,000 workers at its hub in Cincinnati. The company operates 300 flights a day connecting its depots, and through its DHL eCommerce division, partners with the U.S. Postal Service to complete local last-mile parcel deliveries.
THE BIGGEST COMPLAINT
In a flat market, parcel carriers are looking for any and all opportunities to generate revenue. One area that continues to draw the ire of shippers: surcharges and accessorials. “When the market was imbalanced and demand [was] exceeding capacity, I could understand peak surcharges,” notes Satish Jindel, principal at freight data analytics firm ShipMatrix. “But today with industry capacity at 120 million yet volume running only 80 million, why [would you] have a peak surcharge?” he asks.
Jindel adds that the pain is exacerbated by a proliferation of new and revised surcharges hitting shipper pocketbooks. One example: recalibrating certain ZIP codes, which previously had no extra charge, in order to apply a “rural route” or other type of extra delivery fee. “Shippers are tired of these newcomers and extra charges and are actively taking advantage of capacity being so much more [available] and switching carriers to others outside of UPS and FedEx,” Jindel says.
Looking to the remainder of the year, Jindel says he does not expect parcel market volumes to change much in Q2 “and even for Q3 and Q4 compared to prior years.” He adds that “the increase is likely to be around 3% due to continued inflationary pressure and more [consumer] spending on services and entertainment, instead of goods and physical products.”
Micheal McDonagh, president of parcel for broker AFS Logistics, which has $4 billion of parcel freight spend under management in the U.S., has a similar view. “I believe FedEx and UPS will continue to look for ways to raise revenue in a weak volume environment. There is no extra cost to them in adding fuel, special service, or other surcharges, and I see that continuing.”
He notes as well that with carrier general rate increases and rising surcharges, many customers are reexamining their shipping strategies, seeing how much they can shift to lower rate and service levels. “It’s all about elasticity of delivery, taking a much harder look at cost but balancing that against acceptable delivery times,” McDonagh says. To that end, businesses are changing shipping practices, “planning and shipping orders earlier—for example, on Tuesday, using two-day service—instead of Thursday for next-day [delivery],” he observes. “If you pay attention to your zones, shipments within 600 miles are still getting good two-day service” at much less cost, he adds.
FOLLOW THE INVENTORY
Thanks to Amazon, the consumer’s appetite for next-day and even same-day delivery has seemingly become insatiable. That mirrors a shift in supply chain practices around where sourcing occurs, warehouses are sited, and inventories staged. Basically, the last decade has seen inventory moving closer to the end-user. That has accelerated demand for more, smaller warehouses in more communities; expanded opportunities for more localized, last-mile next-day delivery; and prompted a rush of new entrants carving out specific niches in the parcel business.
One such example is last-mile delivery specialist Jitsu.
Jitsu (which recently changed its name from AxleHire) doesn’t subscribe to the “you call, we haul” model of accepting virtually any product or commodity that comes its way. Instead, it has focused strategically on a highly defined customer segment, that being “key, high-value brands who believe the delivery experience is integral to the brand value and customer satisfaction, depend on absolute on-time delivery and zero claims, and want enabling technology that provides robust visibility and analytics from start to finish,” says Raj Ramanan, Jitsu’s chief executive officer.
“We are very discerning [about] who we work with,” he says. Its customers, such as American Eagle, HelloFresh, and Nespresso, tend to be retail or e-commerce brands “with a lot of high-end, high-value retail goods, apparel, wine and spirits, meal kits, and durable medical equipment,” Ramanan explains. Deliveries can be anything from one pound up to 50 pounds, with one to five pounds being the most frequent, and 35 pounds the average.
Jitsu operates an “asset light” business. It has set up 40 warehouses in 21 major metropolitan areas, where it houses and stages customer inventories for inbound processing, cross-docking, sorting/comingling, and delivery. The company says it currently can cover 40% of the continental U.S., with 90% of its deliveries next-day and 10% same-day. Jitsu claims an on-time delivery rate of >99%.
Its delivery workforce is a combination; 60% are independent “gig” drivers (aka, the Uber or Roadie model) and 40% “Delivery Service Partners,” which are parcel trucking businesses that focus on last-mile delivery and have five to 10 trucks of their own. Forty percent of its gig drivers are women.
Driver pay is based on a combination of factors, such as number of packages and stops, distance traveled, local impacts such as congestion, and other measurements unique to a community. It’s a pay model that “continues to evolve to reflect market fairness and driver feedback,” says Ramanan.
Load planning, route assignment, optimization, and visibility software is home-grown, which Ramanan cites as an advantage. When a Jitsu driver shows up at a Jitsu warehouse or satellite hub, “they pick up an already prepared, ready to load, consolidated set of deliveries” with a recommended route and optimized delivery sequence downloaded to the Jitsu app on their phone. Customers receive text messages indicating in-route progress of their shipment as well as delivery confirmation.
“The driver experience is pretty slick,” says Ramanan. “We try to make it as painless and simple as possible for a driver to complete a route and make the most money.” For example, when a driver registers with Jitsu, the company takes note of the type, size, and capacity of their vehicle and how many packages it can take, and then plans loads accordingly. That reduces driver stress, allows for pre-planning accurate loads for the vehicle type, and maximizes the number of deliveries a driver can effectively complete during the time that driver wants to work, he explains. A driver also can log into the app the night before and see the next day’s load plan for his or her individual vehicle.
Retailers and e-commerce businesses using Jitsu also have real-time visibility into their inventories at Jitsu warehouses, with the ability to see what deliveries are scheduled for that day, how those deliveries progress during the day, delivery confirmation, and how much inventory remains.
THINK TOTAL COST, NOT JUST LOWEST PRICE
Total cost of delivery—and helping brands understand its value as a key decision-making metric—is something Jitsu works hard to educate its customers about, Ramanan says. “The cost of a bad delivery has to be considered [in the overall evaluation] as well as returns and complaints,” he emphasizes. “The delivery experience is fundamental to the overall customer experience. If you miss a delivery, or it arrives late or in partial form, you don’t blame the driver, you blame who you bought the product from. And that influences your [the consumer’s] decision to use that retailer again.”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."