InPerson interview: Alicemarie Geoffrion of DHL Supply Chain
In our continuing series of discussions with top supply-chain company executives, Alicemarie Geoffrion discusses the advantages of a holistic packaging strategy.
David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
Alicemarie Geoffrion is president of packaging for DHL Supply Chain in North America, where she leads a team that helps customers increase the return on their packaging investment through a holistic, integrated approach. Previously, Geoffrion worked in DHL’s strategy group and was also the head of global solutions for DHL’s former Williams Lea Tag division. Prior to joining DHL Supply Chain, she worked at Capemini Consulting and was vice president of eCommerce/Business Solution for IMS, an Omnicom Group company. Geoffrion holds both a bachelor’s degree in management science and an MBA from Case Western Reserve University.
Q: What is the current state of our supply chains?
A: Supply chains are facing immense pressure to enhance their agility, flexibility, and cost efficiency. To meet these demands, companies are increasingly turning to digital technologies and automation to shape the future of supply chain management.
Specifically, packaging supply chains face a distinct challenge when it comes to flexibility. The ability to quickly create new product configurations and SKUs through late-stage customization and postponement solutions is essential for companies to remain competitive in the market. Because of this, packaging supply chains must be able to quickly and accurately adapt and reconfigure to accommodate changing demands, new configurations, and ever-evolving promotion-based SKUs.
While automation is crucial, manual processes still hold significance in packaging supply chains. Human intervention is often required for tasks that demand creativity, problem-solving, and decision-making. Manual processes also allow for a higher degree of adaptability, as human operators can quickly adjust to unforeseen circumstances and make informed decisions on the spot. Achieving the right balance between automation and manual processes is essential to optimize efficiency and flexibility.
Q: How does DHL Supply Chain fit into the DHL network, and does being part of a large supply chain and transportation company provide benefits and synergies for your clients?
A:DHL Supply Chain is a critical component of the larger DHL Group, providing comprehensive logistics solutions that include warehousing, distribution, and integrated logistics services as well as value-added services such as packaging.
This division significantly benefits from the extensive transportation and logistics capabilities of the DHL network. Being part of this larger network provides several advantages for clients. Firstly, DHL’s global reach allows it to provide services in various parts of the world, offering clients the ability to scale their operations as needed. Secondly, the integrated services offered by the DHL Group mean clients can access multiple services from a single source. This simplifies logistics and transportation needs, as a client might use DHL Supply Chain for warehousing and distribution, and then utilize DHL Express for final delivery. Finally, DHL’s experience across many sectors means DHL Supply Chain can effectively cater to specific industry needs, providing expert solutions tailored to each client’s unique requirements. These synergies ensure clients receive a comprehensive, reliable, and efficient service that addresses all aspects of their supply chain needs.
From a packaging standpoint, DHL Supply Chain places great emphasis on collaboration with our Global Packaging Team to ensure the consistent implementation of solutions, integrated technology, and automation across regions. This approach proves particularly advantageous considering that a significant number of our packaging customers operate on a global scale.
Furthermore, our global Packaging Community fosters a culture of knowledge-sharing and continuous improvement. Through this community, best practices are exchanged and collective efforts are made to drive automation and innovation initiatives. This collaborative approach allows us to stay at the forefront of industry advancements and deliver the most effective and efficient packaging solutions to our customers worldwide.
Q: What is the advantage for companies to work with a third-party logistics service provider (3PL), such as DHL Supply Chain?
A:DHL’s specialization in warehousing, fulfillment, and core products like packaging provides a distinct advantage for companies working with 3PLs like us. While customers may not prioritize supply chain solutions as their core business, 3PLs can focus on these activities, offering expertise and resources that they may not have. For example, our end-to-end packaging supply chain solution benefits from a robust materials supplier network, enabling us to leverage our project management, sourcing, and purchasing capabilities. By aggregating spend across our customer base, we can negotiate better pricing, which customers with limited supply networks and spend would struggle to achieve. Moreover, we invest in technologies, automation, and innovation specifically tailored to supply chain packaging operations, an area that customers often consider secondary to their own businesses. As a 3PL, we have the ability to monitor industry trends, respond quickly to market changes, and make strategic investments. This is particularly valuable for customers who lack the time, resources, or funding to address their own supply chain challenges.
Q: As president of packaging operations, you support the “in-DC” packaging model. Can you describe what that is and how it benefits operations?
A: In-DC packaging solutions offer customers the flexibility to create new sellable SKUs at a later stage in the process. Traditionally, if a customer wanted to repack items, configure new displays for promotions, or create custom product mixes, they would need to remove inventory from the distribution center, transport it to a separate copacker facility, have the copacker perform the required tasks, and then ship the newly formed SKUs back to the DC for distribution. This process was time-consuming, incurred additional transportation costs, resulted in higher carbon emissions, and required additional handling of all products.
With an in-DC solution, the DC can efficiently customize, repack, bag, and perform other necessary tasks on the product without the need for external transportation. The product can then be returned to inventory for final distribution quickly—via a forklift alone. This approach leverages a single inventory management system, eliminates the need for loading/unloading the products, reduces transportation requirements, and significantly shortens timelines.
Q: In-DC packaging allows for more customization. Can you describe a few of the strategies you’re using to enhance flexibility in both packaging and distribution?
A:The ability to quickly modularize and set up packaging lines is crucial in the contract packaging industry. Flexibility is essential to meeting the demands of customers who must quickly respond to market changes and customize their packaging to gain the loyalty of end-consumers. Achieving this requires finding the right balance between automation and manual solutions. At DHL, we have implemented a combination of simple and standardized automation across most of our sites. This allows us to automate repetitive and standardized tasks while maintaining a flexible workforce capable of adapting to the ever-changing packaging requirements within our operations.
Furthermore, our integrated systems play a vital role in enabling flexible packaging operations. By having access to all relevant information in real time, we can efficiently manage the entire packaging supply chain, from materials management to final distribution. This access to end-to-end data empowers us to make informed decisions and manage solutions in the most flexible and effective way possible.
Q: How do you help your clients reduce their dependence on labor in their packaging operations?
A:First and foremost, our packaging operations are driven by our proprietary integrated technology platform. This platform grants us real-time access to crucial data, including inventory, production-line information, and production rates. This enables us to efficiently plan projects and allocate labor resources.
Secondly, we have implemented automation for standard tasks within our packaging operations to eliminate labor constraints. By automating repetitive and labor-intensive activities, such as waste removal at the end of production lines, we can minimize the need for manual labor and reduce our customers’ reliance on it. In certain operations, we have deployed robotic arms to systematically fill and package products, further reducing labor dependency.
As previously mentioned, striking the right balance between labor and automation is key. This approach not only safeguards our customers but also provides them with the most agile and flexible packaging solutions available.
Q: What steps has DHL taken to make its packaging operations more sustainable?
A: Being as sustainable as possible starts at the beginning of the packaging supply chain with demand planning. By employing integrated technology that manages packaging operations and seamlessly integrates with the warehouse, accurate planning becomes achievable. Improved planning leads to the procurement of appropriate packaging materials in the right quantities, thereby minimizing waste, particularly from obsolete packaging materials.
Throughout the packaging operation, the utilization of systems to monitor every aspect of the production line further reduces scrap and contributes to more sustainable practices for our customers. Leveraging solutions such as carton optimization and box-on-demand technology ensures that packaging materials are used efficiently, avoiding unnecessary waste and void spaces. By producing appropriately sized boxes on demand, the need for obsolete inventory is eliminated.
Within our packaging operations, each site implements a sustainability action plan, encompassing various aspects ranging from efficient lighting to the implementation of proper recycling processes. Lastly, the in-DC packaging solution promotes sustainability by eliminating the transportation previously required to send products to third-party copackers for packaging before returning them to the DC for distribution. To achieve a comprehensive and sustainable solution, it is essential to assess multiple activities across the entire packaging supply chain. By adopting sustainable practices at each stage, we can drive overall sustainability and minimize our environmental impact.
Q: Are there other benefits to a good packaging strategy that you can share?
A:A crucial aspect of ensuring a successful packaging supply chain lies in taking a holistic view of the entire supply chain and understanding the total cost of ownership associated with it. This encompasses the planning, sourcing, and procurement of all packaging materials, as well as the actual packaging, bagging, display filling, and other related activities.
It is important to recognize that even small changes in material specifications can have a significant impact on downstream productivity during the packaging process. Therefore, examining the end-to-end supply chain and effectively managing the total cost of ownership, even when different departments within a customer’s organization handle different segments of the supply chain, is vital for achieving the most optimal packaging supply chain.
By considering the entire lifecycle of the packaging process and understanding the interdependencies between various stages, organizations can identify opportunities for improvement and cost optimization. This holistic approach ensures that decisions made in one part of the supply chain are aligned with the overall objectives and efficiency of the packaging process. Ultimately, managing the total cost of ownership leads to an optimized and successful packaging supply chain.
Most of the apparel sold in North America is manufactured in Asia, meaning the finished goods travel long distances to reach end markets, with all the associated greenhouse gas emissions. On top of that, apparel manufacturing itself requires a significant amount of energy, water, and raw materials like cotton. Overall, the production of apparel is responsible for about 2% of the world’s total greenhouse gas emissions, according to a report titled
Taking Stock of Progress Against the Roadmap to Net Zeroby the Apparel Impact Institute. Founded in 2017, the Apparel Impact Institute is an organization dedicated to identifying, funding, and then scaling solutions aimed at reducing the carbon emissions and other environmental impacts of the apparel and textile industries.
The author of this annual study is researcher and consultant Michael Sadowski. He wrote the first report in 2021 as well as the latest edition, which was released earlier this year. Sadowski, who is also executive director of the environmental nonprofit
The Circulate Initiative, recently joined DC Velocity Group Editorial Director David Maloney on an episode of the “Logistics Matters” podcast to discuss the key findings of the research, what companies are doing to reduce emissions, and the progress they’ve made since the first report was issued.
A: While companies in the apparel industry can set their own sustainability targets, we realized there was a need to give them a blueprint for actually reducing emissions. And so, we produced the first report back in 2021, where we laid out the emissions from the sector, based on the best estimates [we could make using] data from various sources. It gives companies and the sector a blueprint for what we collectively need to do to drive toward the ambitious reduction [target] of staying within a 1.5 degrees Celsius pathway. That was the first report, and then we committed to refresh the analysis on an annual basis. The second report was published last year, and the third report came out in May of this year.
Q: What were some of the key findings of your research?
A: We found that about half of the emissions in the sector come from Tier Two, which is essentially textile production. That includes the knitting, weaving, dyeing, and finishing of fabric, which together account for over half of the total emissions. That was a really important finding, and it allows us to focus our attention on the interventions that can drive those emissions down.
Raw material production accounts for another quarter of emissions. That includes cotton farming, extracting gas and oil from the ground to make synthetics, and things like that. So we now have a really keen understanding of the source of our industry’s emissions.
Q: Your report mentions that the apparel industry is responsible for about 2% of global emissions. Is that an accurate statistic?
A: That’s our best estimate of the total emissions [generated by] the apparel sector. Some other reports on the industry have apparel at up to 8% of global emissions. And there is a commonly misquoted number in the media that it’s 10%. From my perspective, I think the best estimate is somewhere under 2%.
We know that globally, humankind needs to reduce emissions by roughly half by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 to hit international goals. [Reaching that target will require the involvement of] every facet of the global economy and every aspect of the apparel sector—transportation, material production, manufacturing, cotton farming. Through our work and that of others, I think the apparel sector understands what has to happen. We have highlighted examples of how companies are taking action to reduce emissions in the roadmap reports.
Q: What are some of those actions the industry can take to reduce emissions?
A: I think one of the positive developments since we wrote the first report is that we’re seeing companies really focus on the most impactful areas. We see companies diving deep on thermal energy, for example. With respect to Tier Two, we [focus] a lot of attention on things like ocean freight versus air. There’s a rule of thumb I’ve heard that indicates air freight is about 10 times the cost [of ocean] and also produces 10 times more greenhouse gas emissions.
There is money available to invest in sustainability efforts. It’s really exciting to see the funding that’s coming through for AI [artificial intelligence] and to see that individual companies, such as H&M and Lululemon, are investing in real solutions in their supply chains. I think a lot of concrete actions are being taken.
And yet we know that reducing emissions by half on an absolute basis by 2030 is a monumental undertaking. So I don’t want to be overly optimistic, because I think we have a lot of work to do. But I do think we’ve got some amazing progress happening.
Q: You mentioned several companies that are starting to address their emissions. Is that a result of their being more aware of the emissions they generate? Have you seen progress made since the first report came out in 2021?
A: Yes. When we published the first roadmap back in 2021, our statistics showed that only about 12 companies had met the criteria [for setting] science-based targets. In 2024, the number of apparel, textile, and footwear companies that have set targets or have commitments to set targets is close to 500. It’s an enormous increase. I think they see the urgency more than other sectors do.
We have companies that have been working at sustainability for quite a long time. I think the apparel sector has developed a keen understanding of the impacts of climate change. You can see the impacts of flooding, drought, heat, and other things happening in places like Bangladesh and Pakistan and India. If you’re a brand or a manufacturer and you have operations and supply chains in these places, I think you understand what the future will look like if we don’t significantly reduce emissions.
Q: There are different categories of emission levels, depending on the role within the supply chain. Scope 1 are “direct” emissions under the reporting company’s control. For apparel, this might be the production of raw materials or the manufacturing of the finished product. Scope 2 covers “indirect” emissions from purchased energy, such as electricity used in these processes. Scope 3 emissions are harder to track, as they include emissions from supply chain partners both upstream and downstream.
Now companies are finding there are legislative efforts around the world that could soon require them to track and report on all these emissions, including emissions produced by their partners’ supply chains. Does this mean that companies now need to be more aware of not only what greenhouse gas emissions they produce, but also what their partners produce?
A: That’s right. Just to put this into context, if you’re a brand like an Adidas or a Gap, you still have to consider the Scope 3 emissions. In particular, there are the so-called “purchased goods and services,” which refers to all of the embedded emissions in your products, from farming cotton to knitting yarn to making fabric. Those “purchased goods and services” generally account for well above 80% of the total emissions associated with a product. It’s by far the most significant portion of your emissions.
Leading companies have begun measuring and taking action on Scope 3 emissions because of regulatory developments in Europe and, to some extent now, in California. I do think this is just a further tailwind for the work that the industry is doing.
I also think it will definitely ratchet up the quality requirements of Scope 3 data, which is not yet where we’d all like it to be. Companies are working to improve that data, but I think the regulatory push will make the quality side increasingly important.
Q: Overall, do you think the work being done by the Apparel Impact Institute will help reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the industry?
A: When we started this back in 2020, we were at a place where companies were setting targets and knew their intended destination, but what they needed was a blueprint for how to get there. And so, the roadmap [provided] this blueprint and identified six key things that the sector needed to do—from using more sustainable materials to deploying renewable electricity in the supply chain.
Decarbonizing any sector, whether it’s transportation, chemicals, or automotive, requires investment. The Apparel Impact Institute is bringing collective investment, which is so critical. I’m really optimistic about what they’re doing. They have taken a data-driven, evidence-based approach, so they know where the emissions are and they know what the needed interventions are. And they’ve got the industry behind them in doing that.
The global air cargo market’s hot summer of double-digit demand growth continued in August with average spot rates showing their largest year-on-year jump with a 24% increase, according to the latest weekly analysis by Xeneta.
Xeneta cited two reasons to explain the increase. First, Global average air cargo spot rates reached $2.68 per kg in August due to continuing supply and demand imbalance. That came as August's global cargo supply grew at its slowest ratio in 2024 to-date at 2% year-on-year, while global cargo demand continued its double-digit growth, rising +11%.
The second reason for higher rates was an ocean-to-air shift in freight volumes due to Red Sea disruptions and e-commerce demand.
Those factors could soon be amplified as e-commerce shows continued strong growth approaching the hotly anticipated winter peak season. E-commerce and low-value goods exports from China in the first seven months of 2024 increased 30% year-on-year, including shipments to Europe and the US rising 38% and 30% growth respectively, Xeneta said.
“Typically, air cargo market performance in August tends to follow the July trend. But another month of double-digit demand growth and the strongest rate growths of the year means there was definitely no summer slack season in 2024,” Niall van de Wouw, Xeneta’s chief airfreight officer, said in a release.
“Rates we saw bottoming out in late July started picking up again in mid-August. This is too short a period to call a season. This has been a busy summer, and now we’re at the threshold of Q4, it will be interesting to see what will happen and if all the anticipation of a red-hot peak season materializes,” van de Wouw said.
The report cites data showing that there are approximately 1.7 million workers missing from the post-pandemic workforce and that 38% of small firms are unable to fill open positions. At the same time, the “skills gap” in the workforce is accelerating as automation and AI create significant shifts in how work is performed.
That information comes from the “2024 Labor Day Report” released by Littler’s Workplace Policy Institute (WPI), the firm’s government relations and public policy arm.
“We continue to see a labor shortage and an urgent need to upskill the current workforce to adapt to the new world of work,” said Michael Lotito, Littler shareholder and co-chair of WPI. “As corporate executives and business leaders look to the future, they are focused on realizing the many benefits of AI to streamline operations and guide strategic decision-making, while cultivating a talent pipeline that can support this growth.”
But while the need is clear, solutions may be complicated by public policy changes such as the upcoming U.S. general election and the proliferation of employment-related legislation at the state and local levels amid Congressional gridlock.
“We are heading into a contentious election that has already proven to be unpredictable and is poised to create even more uncertainty for employers, no matter the outcome,” Shannon Meade, WPI’s executive director, said in a release. “At the same time, the growing patchwork of state and local requirements across the U.S. is exacerbating compliance challenges for companies. That, coupled with looming changes following several Supreme Court decisions that have the potential to upend rulemaking, gives C-suite executives much to contend with in planning their workforce-related strategies.”
Stax Engineering, the venture-backed startup that provides smokestack emissions reduction services for maritime ships, will service all vessels from Toyota Motor North America Inc. visiting the Toyota Berth at the Port of Long Beach, according to a new five-year deal announced today.
Beginning in 2025 to coincide with new California Air Resources Board (CARB) standards, STAX will become the first and only emissions control provider to service roll-on/roll-off (ro-ros) vessels in the state of California, the company said.
Stax has rapidly grown since its launch in the first quarter of this year, supported in part by a $40 million funding round from investors, announced in July. It now holds exclusive service agreements at California ports including Los Angeles, Long Beach, Hueneme, Benicia, Richmond, and Oakland. The firm has also partnered with individual companies like NYK Line, Hyundai GLOVIS, Equilon Enterprises LLC d/b/a Shell Oil Products US (Shell), and now Toyota.
Stax says it offers an alternative to shore power with land- and barge-based, mobile emissions capture and control technology for shipping terminal and fleet operators without the need for retrofits.
In the case of this latest deal, the Toyota Long Beach Vehicle Distribution Center imports about 200,000 vehicles each year on ro-ro vessels. Stax will keep those ships green with its flexible exhaust capture system, which attaches to all vessel classes without modification to remove 99% of emitted particulate matter (PM) and 95% of emitted oxides of nitrogen (NOx). Over the lifetime of this new agreement with Toyota, Stax estimated the service will account for approximately 3,700 hours and more than 47 tons of emissions controlled.
“We set out to provide an emissions capture and control solution that was reliable, easily accessible, and cost-effective. As we begin to service Toyota, we’re confident that we can meet the needs of the full breadth of the maritime industry, furthering our impact on the local air quality, public health, and environment,” Mike Walker, CEO of Stax, said in a release. “Continuing to establish strong partnerships will help build momentum for and trust in our technology as we expand beyond the state of California.”
That result showed that driver wages across the industry continue to increase post-pandemic, despite a challenging freight market for motor carriers. The data comes from ATA’s “Driver Compensation Study,” which asked 120 fleets, more than 150,000 employee drivers, and 14,000 independent contractors about their wage and benefit information.
Drilling into specific categories, linehaul less-than-truckload (LTL) drivers earned a median annual amount of $94,525 in 2023, while local LTL drivers earned a median of $80,680. The median annual compensation for drivers at private carriers has risen 12% since 2021, reaching $95,114 in 2023. And leased-on independent contractors for truckload carriers were paid an annual median amount of $186,016 in 2023.
The results also showed how the demographics of the industry are changing, as carriers offered smaller referral and fewer sign-on bonuses for new drivers in 2023 compared to 2021 but more frequently offered tenure bonuses to their current drivers and with a greater median value.
"While our last study, conducted in 2021, illustrated how drivers benefitted from the strongest freight environment in a generation, this latest report shows professional drivers' earnings are still rising—even in a weaker freight economy," ATA Chief Economist Bob Costello said in a release. "By offering greater tenure bonuses to their current driver force, many fleets appear to be shifting their workforce priorities from recruitment to retention."