The latest yard management systems are using computer vision and mobile apps to marshal incoming trucks and trailers into an orderly parade, then move them through the yard efficiently and get drivers right back on the road.
Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
A warehouse yard can be a messy, raucous place. Trucks loaded with freight sometimes arrive earlier or later than expected. New arrivals may have to wait their turn if all of the dock doors are occupied. Facilities sometimes lack enough workers to unload the trucks and reload them with outbound freight due to the nationwide labor shortage. And there may not be any space to slot the incoming goods if operations inside the distribution center are backed up.
Those complications happen every day, but the right yard management system (YMS) can bring order to the chaos, creating an optimized flow of goods that minimizes backups and wasted time. And that’s good news for all three parties with a stake in the operation: the truck drivers hauling the goods, the warehouse operators handling them, and the retailer or manufacturer who owns the inventory and is eagerly waiting for it to reach its destination.
There’s more than one way to get the job done. Just as a judge might pick a gavel of a specific size or shape to restore order to a fractious court, DCs can choose from a variety of YMS products with differing capabilities.
TECH TO THE RESCUE
A key tool for taming the chaos of a warehouse yard is vision sensor technology, according to supply chain software developer Blue Yonder. The company recently introduced its own YMS product—one that’s enabled with outdoor cameras, computer vision technology, and machine learning—and announced that Penske Logistics had become the software’s first user.
As a logistics service provider (LSP), Penske was looking for a way to track and monitor the trailers and containers in its yards, as part of its overall mission to work with shippers and carriers to optimize shipments, reduce miles, cut transportation costs, and improve asset utilization, according to the company.
Blue Yonder’s computer vision-based YMS supports those goals by automatically checking in trucks as they arrive at the gate and identifying the incoming trailers so users know what shipments are in the yard and where the trailer or container is parked. The YMS also automatically checks the trailers out as they leave the yard, providing time stamps to record their exit time.
Automating the process provides benefits on many levels, according to Ann Marie Jonkman, vice president for industry strategies at Blue Yonder. For starters, the system eliminates manual errors, logs precise times instead of estimates, helps mitigate detention fees, and improves safety by reducing the need for employees to walk around the yard searching for missing trailers, she says. It also boosts freight processing speed by coordinating trailer movements with orders in the facility’s warehouse management system to determine which trucks to unload first.
And crucially, adopting that kind of data-based approach strengthens accountability, heading off the disputes that can arise when, say, a DC claims a truck arrived late but the driver insists it was on time.
“It’s like when an e-commerce order is delivered to your home, and your doorbell camera records the time,” Jonkman says. “[With our YMS,] you get driver accountability: ‘What time did they arrive, when did they leave, was there idle time?’”
PLAYING WELL WITH OTHERS
Like Blue Yonder, software developer Manhattan Associates considers tracking and monitoring to be key capabilities for any YMS. But the company believes there’s more to it than that, arguing that it’s also critical that the yard management platform be able to orchestrate with other software products. For that reason, Manhattan sells its YMS only in combination with its warehouse management system (WMS) or transportation management system (TMS), not as a standalone product, says Blake Coram, the company’s director of product management.
“Our edge is [that we offer] a unified solution. That allows each component to inform and be informed by the others. We see the yard as a great opportunity for that approach because it’s the physical contact point between WMS and execution,” Coram says.
Instead of using automated cameras to record truck arrivals, Manhattan Associates relies on a mobile app that generates a quick response (QR) code that truck drivers can show to the guard when they enter and exit the yard. “The mobile app is scan-and-go, so when [truck drivers] arrive, they theoretically don’t even have to say anything to the gatekeeper,” Coram notes. “They just hold up their phone and the guard scans it.”
Among other advantages, the scanning system forestalls disputes over the yard’s recordkeeping practices. “The possibility of detention fees can be contentious; drivers might ask, ‘When did you start the clock?’ or ‘Why did you start the clock?’” Coram says. But with an automated system, that’s not an issue. “The TMS ‘informs’ the process by tracking the carrier, the trucker, the shipment, the [purchase order], and the shipment pickup. So there are fewer lookups by guardhouse or clerical staff.”
The integrated system also helps minimize drivers’ “time on yard” to get them in and out as swiftly as possible. It does that by making dynamic decisions based on real-time arrival estimates sent when trucks are still on the road to ensure that a warehouse door is available when they arrive.
Because it’s linked to the WMS, the system can also speed up truck turnarounds by directing each trailer to the dock door closest to where its cargo needs to go inside the building. “You need put-away optimization because everything you unload off the trailer needs to be put away. And the YMS can do that because it has access to data on the SKUs [stock-keeping units], quantities, and license plates [identifying numbers assigned to each pallet or containment unit]. Then that is fed into the WMS, which knows the location of the inventory,” Coram says. “So then we can turn more trailers overall, and therefore, get the drivers out faster and increase throughput at the dock.”
THERE’S AN APP FOR THAT
Getting drivers in and out of the yard quickly is key to maintaining peak yard efficiency, agrees Scott Hebel, solutions director at software developer Kaleris, which also offers a YMS product.
To help streamline drivers’ journey through the yard, Kaleris’s YMS app includes a “driver pre-check-in” feature that allows drivers to use their mobile phones to notify a facility they’re on their way, enabling the warehouse to prepare for their arrival.
“As the driver completes app check-in, the YMS reserves a dock door or parking spot and queues drivers for arrival appointments to reduce gate congestion, which is understandably a major source of frustration for drivers. The driver then receives a QR code to scan for entry at the gate, along with in-app instructions on how to proceed to their assigned location,” Hebel says.
Kaleris says its app reduces check-in time by over 80%, which accelerates gate velocity. And because the app supports two-way communications, drivers can remain safely in their cabs and receive regular status updates from the facility.
“Once a driver is in the gate, the clock is ticking [to ensure that drivers have] a wonderful experience [at the facility]. The best shippers strategically plan operations to avoid putting drivers in ‘hurry up and wait’ [mode],” Hebel says. “YMS technology fills in the gaps created by manual operations. Those gaps—lack of communication, safety issues, unclear instructions, and long wait times—negatively impact the driver experience and yard efficiency. The great news for today’s shippers is that these challenges are easily solved with a YMS.”
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."
Businesses are cautiously optimistic as peak holiday shipping season draws near, with many anticipating year-over-year sales increases as they continue to battle challenging supply chain conditions.
That’s according to the DHL 2024 Peak Season Shipping Survey, released today by express shipping service provider DHL Express U.S. The company surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to gauge their holiday business outlook compared to last year and found that a mix of optimism and “strategic caution” prevail ahead of this year’s peak.
Nearly half (48%) of the SMEs surveyed said they expect higher holiday sales compared to 2023, while 44% said they expect sales to remain on par with last year, and just 8% said they foresee a decline. Respondents said the main challenges to hitting those goals are supply chain problems (35%), inflation and fluctuating consumer demand (34%), staffing (16%), and inventory challenges (14%).
But respondents said they have strategies in place to tackle those issues. Many said they began preparing for holiday season earlier this year—with 45% saying they started planning in Q2 or earlier, up from 39% last year. Other strategies include expanding into international markets (35%) and leveraging holiday discounts (32%).
Sixty percent of respondents said they will prioritize personalized customer service as a way to enhance customer interactions and loyalty this year. Still others said they will invest in enhanced web and mobile experiences (23%) and eco-friendly practices (13%) to draw customers this holiday season.