Bruised and battered, post-pandemic supply chains look to 3PLs to ease the pain
Persistent inflation, bloated inventories, and shifting supply chain strategies all are conspiring to upend carefully crafted supply chains—and put fresh pressures on 3PLs to deliver solutions.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
Jeff Jackson, recently promoted to president at Penske Logistics, has spent some 30 years in the trucking and logistics business. He looks back on the past couple of years as having been among the most challenging for the industry as shippers and their third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) navigated the pandemic and all manner of once-in-a-generation issues. Demand cratered, then surged. Ports buckled under record volumes. Freight sat on docks, then inventories bulged as businesses, wary of running out of goods, over-ordered and packed warehouses to the rafters. Truckers fell into a freight recession, some closing their doors. Supply chains broke down, then struggled to keep goods flowing.
Nearly a year after the end of the pandemic, the market continues to evolve due to shifting trade patterns, geopolitical conflicts, and other fundamental challenges. Global sourcing strategies are undergoing dramatic adjustments. Shippers increasingly have focused on minimizing risk in an effort to return their supply chains to some sense of normalcy. At the same time, the costs for virtually every aspect of supply chain operations—from truck rates to warehouse leases to equipment, technology, energy, labor, and even capital for expansion—remain on the rise.
AN EVOLVING MARKET
It’s an evolving market, with new challenges and demands, yet one where today’s 3PLs have to adapt but still provide the basic blocking and tackling of storing goods, then getting them to factories and markets with as much velocity, efficiency, and accuracy as possible. And do it flawlessly.
What are shippers asking for? In many cases, they’re asking how 3PLs can help them “de-risk” their supply chains to ensure business continuity. At the same time, they’re pressing their partners to adjust their networks to better serve shifting sourcing strategies; provide deeper and ever more detailed, precise, and proactive visibility and intelligence into supply chain performance and problems; and squeeze every last dime out of logistics costs.
Some industries still are experiencing supplier disruptions, but those are diminishing, observes Jackson. Managing and mitigating risk and ensuring supply chains are effectively protected from cyberattacks are among the most pressing “asks” from shippers.
“We are asked more and more about what our business continuity plans are, and within that, how we can help shippers de-risk their supply chains,” Jackson notes. There is more bid activity, particularly in transportation, where rates remain depressed. “There is a huge spread between low [price] and value; spot rates are well below carrier costs,” he adds. In some cases, “shippers are sacrificing value for cost.”
The most intense focus, Jackson says, is on cost. “Covid came with extreme cost increases for everyone,” he notes. “Shippers are [now] in a cost-scrutinizing mode with 3PLs, trying to sift through what was really inflationary that needs to be sustained, and what was more of a margin grab opportunity that they now want to claw back.”
ACCELERATING NEARSHORING—AND RESHORING
There is no question that the pandemic and its aftermath shined an intense light on capacity, cycle times, and dependability issues from long, over-water global supply chains. That’s driving more businesses to not just think about shifting production and distribution closer to end-users, but also to actively move in that direction. By one report, more than 300 Chinese-based companies have set up manufacturing and/or distribution operations in Mexico as well as other south-of-the-border locations in the past several years. And the trend is accelerating. Another report cites some 425 companies actively pursuing setting up nearshored operations.
“We are excited about this trend,” says Daryl Knight, chief commercial officer of ProTrans International, an Indianapolis-based 3PL. “We have a significant history and presence in Mexico, and with our experience, we can help our customers enter or expand” as they look to implement nearshoring strategies.
As a 3PL, ProTrans’ goal is essentially “erasing the border” for its customers, providing a service that reduces the complexity of cross-border transportation and does it in a reliable and predictable-cost manner, Knight says.
He also stresses the importance of resiliency, noting that if this post-Covid environment taught us anything, it’s that “customers want a flexible and variable supply chain model” that can adapt quickly. “The ability to adjust and be agile with our supply chain partners enables us to react faster to issues with less disruption in the form of service and cost impacts,” he notes.
Like many 3PLs, ProTrans continues to invest in its TMS (transportation management system) “to ensure we have real-time visibility into not just trucks and trailers moving cross-border, but also the paperwork flow,” Knight says. Documents, electronic or paper, that are properly prepared and correctly address government regulations in a timely manner “are just as important as a reliable truck and driver” to smooth cross-border movement, he explains.
Yet at the end of the day, doing the basics right, day in and day out, is table stakes, says Knight. “Pick up and deliver on time. Tell me where [the shipment] is at any given time. Is there an issue, and if so, what is your plan to solve it?” Supporting effective execution of the basics is increasing demand for quality data, predictive analytics, and solid integration with multiple data sources and platforms.
The third piece, Knight says, is to “be transparent. Tell the shipper what you see about the business, good or bad, and offer insights and knowledge to help customers get better and overcome issues. There are always challenges, but it’s how you work through them, collaborate with partners, and bring solutions to the customer that defines success.”
THE DRIVE TO “ANTI-FRAGILE” SUPPLY CHAINS
“Most 3PLs will tell you that the impact of nearshoring and reshoring has shifted trade flows somewhat, and therefore 3PLs have to access new skills, networks, and services”—the traditional example being the U.S.-Mexico trade lane, says Matthew Beckett, senior director, research and advisory, at consulting firm Gartner Inc. As if to illustrate that, Mexico recently became the U.S.’s largest trading partner, surpassing China for the first time.
Manufacturing certain products closer to the customer “has made good sense for companies to ‘anti-fragile’ their supply chains,” says Beckett. “It’s certainly a trend we suspect will continue into the near future.”
He notes as well that companies are increasingly seeking to de-risk their supply chains, with the intent of putting in processes and partners who can identify and mitigate risk, and when a risk issue arises, have the resources, skills, and plans in place to resolve it quickly before it becomes disruptive.
Another trend Beckett sees gaining traction is companies consolidating services and partners across fewer 3PLs—and stressing more true partnerships. It’s an effort to “sort out the wheat from the chaff,” he notes.
“Does your [3PL] network have the ability to shift modes? Do you have the right contract structure in place, and is your 3PL incented in the right way? Do you have the right mix of services and access to networks? And are those relationships able to seize on opportunities quickly and be agile enough to take advantage of them?” Beckett asks.
Being integrated at multiple levels and across multiple technologies with your 3PL is much more important now than it was in the past, Beckett has observed. “You want your 3PLs to be risk managers and provide you with visibility and transparency into risks across all the modes and nodes of a global supply chain.” It’s something that successful 3PLs “are at the forefront of and need to be really good at. That’s changing the dynamic,” he says.”
“When you are integrating data and processes [from multiple partners and platforms], there is a lot of operational risk. It has to be done exceptionally well. You want your 3PL to be your periscope” into your supply chain.
NO MORE EXTRA STORAGE
The pandemic and the period following it created all kinds of odd issues and behaviors for 3PLs and their customers. As supply chains strive to return to some sense of normalcy, some of those issues still exist but are slowly resolving themselves.
“We have certainly seen a shift,” notes Jeff Beckham, chief executive officer of 3PL Kingsgate Logistics, which has some $500 million of freight under management and is heavily into inbound vendor management for its food and beverage and retail CPG (consumer packaged goods) clients. “Going back during the pandemic, we had clients who had upwards of 50 trailers loaded and sitting in the warehouse yard because the warehouse was full,” he recalls. “We even started looking into buying trailers because there was a shortage and so many were being used for storage.”
Late in 2022 and through 2023, Beckham saw a rightsizing begin to take hold. “Last January, we had a couple of clients in the retail space shut down receiving for a week so they could right-size their inventory,” he recalls. “Now we are seeing a bit more balance.”
One trend that Beckham says seems to have gained traction is companies putting in smaller, yet more frequent, orders for goods. “In the past, a shipment might be 20,000 pounds; now it is down to 8,000 pounds. It’s ordering less but doing so more frequently, which is a different challenge when you’re managing the transportation.”
Beckham echoes the observations of other 3PLs with respect to nearshoring, noting that Kingsgate has relationships with Mexican partners that go back to the company’s founding 37 years ago. “Those [relationships] have been instrumental in helping us proactively address customers’ needs” as they set up or expand cross-border operations.
He too has found shippers clamoring for more and deeper real-time visibility into supply chains. “We have taken it to the next level,” he says. Kingsgate continues to invest in its tech stack and now is able to provide clients with visibility not only around the status of the vehicle and purchase order (PO), but also down to the SKU (stock-keeping unit) level.
“So instead of just knowing what truck it’s on and the PO arrival time, they know sizes, colors, and quantities for each product coming in on that PO. On the retail side, that really helps with warehouse planning and optimized fulfillment into stores.”
He notes as well that particularly in the food and beverage space, where shelf life is a huge consideration, “this level of detail informs planning and scheduling with precise data about what is coming in to a manufacturing site and when. There are so many moving parts, accurate data at very detailed levels is critical to optimizing production planning.”
Lastly, Beckham shares how customers are demanding 3PLs provide not only a much deeper dive into their supply chains, but also sophisticated analytics and data security to complement it. “There is not a meeting I take where the topic does not come up,” he notes. “Eighty percent of the conversations are around data—data integration, quality, security, and analytics. In the past, data security might have been [the subject of] three or four questions in an RFP [request for proposal]. Now there are literally pages of questions.”
TO BUNDLE OR NOT TO BUNDLE?
As shippers look to rationalize their 3PL services, some are looking to break up what were once “bundled” services and instead procure them as discrete, separate services, looking for providers who specialize in a particular service as their core competency. One reason is shippers want to better understand the actual cost of each service and ensure that there hasn’t been what some call “margin creep” in those services.
The trend cuts both ways, notes Steve Sensing, president of supply chain and dedicated transportation solutions at logistics and transportation giant Ryder System Inc.
He believes the bundled approach provides the best value and most efficient method for delivering an integrated solution.
“Our strategy is to be an integrated port-to-door 3PL,” he says. “Seventy percent of our revenues come from customers who use more than one service on the supply chain side.” He notes Ryder’s teams “often know more about our customer’s business than our customers do because we have been in the industry, we have experience with others in the same business, and we know the best practices and processes [unique to that industry].”
He has watched other competitors break apart their integrated offerings and go to market differently, offering a menu of individual services. “And I think that’s good for us,” he adds.
Kingsgate’s Beckham has experienced the other side of the bundle/unbundle equation. “We had two clients where we lost the business two years ago when they decided to bundle everything,” he recalls. “Fast forward to today, those same clients are now unbundling the work, and we are getting back our part of the business, which was managed transportation.”
IS THE SUN SETTING ON THE BROKER?
Trucking is one business where brokers have been able to carve out a niche. Their business model: find a driver and a truck, match it to a load, and take a commission on the transaction or pocket the spread between what the broker is paying for the truck and what it is charging the shipper.
“You can separate logistics providers, in which I include brokers, into three camps: the good, the bad, and the ugly,” comments Satish Jindel, principal at transportation data analytics firm ShipMatrix.
He says it is important for shippers to understand the difference between a broker versus a true 3PL—and know what you’re getting.
“3PLs or brokers who are pure play and just taking a markup on the driver and truck will be of lower value and find it harder and harder to stay in business,” Jindel believes. “Where they have opportunity to be recognized and rewarded for their role in the supply chain is in helping shippers and carriers leverage capacity or empty space on the truck by matching it with different shippers.”
Most trucks running down the highway are not full, Jindel notes. Yet utilizing that capacity will require a sea change in how shippers and carriers work together, particularly when it comes to providing real-time visibility into capacity so that all parties know what is available in each other’s network. For this to happen, “you have to be willing to share that [information] with a competitor,” he says. “That will require an element of trust we don’t have today and technology that gives us visibility down to the lane and trailer level across carriers and locations in real time.”
Picture a busy DC, with manually operated forklifts, people, and pallets in constant motion. At the same time, the stationary equipment they interact with, such as conveyors and palletizers, is industriously whirring away. Together, they are performing something akin to a carefully choreographed ballet.
Now add driverless forklifts to the mix. Shuttling along without a human operator on board, they may look like they’re operating independently, but they’re not. They’re actually in constant contact with other equipment and software, making sure they perform their part in the dance at the right moment. Without that ability to communicate, the forklifts—and other warehouse operations—could come to a standstill.
Who, exactly, are driverless forklifts “talking” to, what information are they sharing, and how does that exchange happen? We asked automation experts to explain. They also shared tips on ensuring successful communication between automated lift trucks and other equipment and software.
TWO-WAY COMMUNICATION
Lift trucks that do their jobs without a human operator on board cannot “speak” directly to each other. “As it stands now, there is no peer-to-peer communication or interaction on a forklift-to-forklift basis,” notes David Griffin, chief sales officer for Seegrid, a developer of autonomous lift trucks and AMRs (autonomous mobile robots). There is, however, interaction between forklifts via a centralized fleet manager system (also referred to as a traffic management system or an automation server). This “overarching conductor of the automated system” assigns tasks to each forklift, controls the route the trucks will follow, and manages traffic flow, says Nick McClurg, a sales engineer at forklift maker Hyster Co.
The forklifts communicate with many kinds of material handling equipment, such as robotic palletizers and depalletizers, stretch wrappers, conveyors, automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RS), and dock equipment. That communication must be bidirectional, says Michael Marcum, senior director of autonomous vehicles at systems integrator Bastian Solutions, a Toyota Automated Solutions company that also makes robotic forklifts. Much of the exchange consists of messages that indicate status—whether or not the two pieces of equipment involved are ready to conduct a transaction. For example, if a forklift will be delivering a pallet to a stretch wrapper, then the wrapper has to tell that forklift, via the fleet manager system, that the load position is empty and the forklift is allowed to set a payload there, Marcum explains. After a pallet has been wrapped, the stretch wrapper will call for a pickup via the fleet manager. Once the forklift picks up the wrapped pallet, it must confirm to the stretch wrapper that it has departed; without that signal, the wrapper cannot receive its next load.
If a truck is not ready for an assigned task, it signals that status to the fleet manager, and the task will be reassigned to another nearby vehicle, says Jayce Nelson, sales manager, North America, for Kion Group’s Linde Automated Solutions, a specialist in automated forklifts and software. When the assigned forklift is ready to approach, say, the end of a conveyor to pick up a load, it uses its vision systems, such as 3D cameras, to align itself with the equipment.
With their control software, robotic forklifts also have the ability to communicate with other warehouse equipment, like fire-detection systems and automated rollup doors. “If a device is capable of sending or receiving electrical signals, then the vehicle can interact with that device via the automation host software,” McClurg says. Even a piece of mechanical equipment could be outfitted with sensors that help it interact with automated forklifts, according to Brian Markison, director of sales for Rocrich AGV Solutions, a joint venture of Mitsubishi Logisnext’s Rocla and Jungheinrich units that specializes in automated guided vehicles.
The capability to communicate with different types of devices enhances warehouse safety, Griffin says, because it enables automated forklifts to talk to safety equipment like pedestrian warning lights and intersection gates. And since the robots constantly transmit their location, the traffic control system can identify developing problems and prevent them. For example, the system will stop an autonomous forklift from entering an intersection that’s occupied by another lift truck. Once the other truck has moved on, the system will give the approaching forklift the “all clear,” he says.
Hardware isn’t the only thing driverless forklifts can talk to; they also are in continual dialogue with various types of software. “Most commercial warehouse software programs today have the capability for two-way communication, and most can be integrated with automated lift truck fleet management software,” observes John Wilkins, a sales engineer for Yale Lift Truck Technologies. The most common are warehouse management systems (WMS) and warehouse control systems (WCS); others include enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, fleet management and telematics systems, and transportation management (TMS) and order management (OMS) systems.
As for how that might work, Rocrich’s Markison gives the example of a WMS sending an order to move a pallet from one location to another. The order typically will include start and completion time, and some indication of the move’s priority. “That order can then be taken into the fleet manager, which will appropriately queue up the tasks that need to be done,” he explains. The forklift must also report completed missions back to the WMS.
HOW TO TALK TO A FORKLIFT
Communication between robotic forklifts and warehouse equipment and software happens in a number of ways. Which method is deployed depends on the equipment and software involved as well as the tasks to be carried out. Each installation is unique in some way, but there are some commonly used approaches.
Some communication protocols are more widely used than others. Examples of those in widespread use include modbus, a serial communication protocol that governs an initiating and a responding device, and CANbus (Controller Area Network), a real-time communication protocol that transmits data to networked industrial controls.
A driverless forklift’s interface with other equipment could be something electromechanical, such as a photo-eye sensor, says Jeff Kuss, product manager–automated solutions at forklift maker and intralogistics specialist The Raymond Corp. A sensor at the end of a conveyor, for instance, could detect the presence of a pallet. That triggers the sensor to create an electrical signal that it sends to a programmable logic controller (PLC). The PLC receives the electrical signal as a digital input and then transmits a message, via ethernet, to the server that controls the automated vehicles. Finally, the server sends the instructions over Wi-Fi to the closest available forklift to “pick up the pallet and take it to Location X.” (Some facilities use Bluetooth or cellular transmission instead of Wi-Fi.) Data that identify loads and trigger a task can also be acquired through IoT (internet of things) platforms, RFID (radio-frequency identification) systems, and barcode scanning.
Another option, Bastian’s Marcum says, is to use infrared-based optic couplers that share bits (binary digits, the smallest units of digital information) as inputs and outputs. When the forklift gets within a certain distance of another piece of equipment, “the two devices can talk to each other, similar to the way a TV remote works,” he explains.
Usually, though, software is a critical intermediary between driverless forklifts and other equipment. It can be complicated. In the case of a WMS, McClurg says, his company’s approach is to send a text or JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) file to the WMS; in exchange, the WMS sends a file to a folder on the localized network that can be accessed by the automation host software. The fleet manager reads the file and executes it. Once the task has been completed, a message is sent to another folder. The WMS opens it, reads it, and, based on its contents, either closes out the order or sends additional instructions.
To ensure that interfacing software programs understand the messages they receive from each other, it’s often necessary to create an application programming interface (API). An API is a comparatively simple type of middleware—or software layer—that acts as a translator, facilitating communication by reformatting messages so they will be intelligible to the receiver. In essence, they are “setting ground rules in terms of what information is passing back and forth and what it means,” Markison explains.
In some cases, more complex middleware may be needed. According to Brice Bucher, senior manager of products at software developer and systems integrator Flexware Innovation, APIs have limitations. In a presentation at the Autonomous Mobile Robotics & Logistics Conference 2024, Bucher noted that APIs don’t address data transformation, protocol conversion, or business logic integration. When each system has different data formats or requires specific protocols, middleware bridges those gaps, he said. Middleware also ensures that data moves between systems without delay, he said. For example, if an AGV completes a task, middleware can instantly trigger updates across systems, so that WMS, ERP, and other systems are aligned in real time.
CAN WE TALK?
Raymond’s Kuss notes that each communication integration will be unique in some way. That’s partly because automated forklift vendors and suppliers of fleet manager systems have proprietary interfaces. On top of that, software with some degree of customization, such as a WMS, may require modifications to the fleet manager system, he explains. What’s more, adds his colleague John Rosenberger, director, iWarehouse Gateway & Global Telematics, “even if we know the format for efficient data transfer, the content of the messages may differ depending on the forklift manufacturer, or it can be different by functionality.”
Mixed fleets with forklifts from different manufacturers present a particular challenge. Seegrid’s Griffin notes that it’s common for facilities to use robots from multiple vendors. Generally, he says, each automated solution has its own proprietary fleet manager software that understands where all units under its purview are and controls their movements. When robots of different brands cannot be confined to separate areas, it’s important that their fleet managers have the ability to communicate, so they can do things like open and close intersections where different types of robots cross paths.
While it is possible for dissimilar fleet managers to talk to each other, that’s easier said than done. “Those systems inherently are not interoperable,” Nelson says. “The need to share information like coordinates, current status, past assignments, and prioritization makes it difficult to assign travel paths.” In addition, if the forklifts are unable to communicate location information and what they are doing, that can lead to deadlock, where the vehicles simply stop—what Yale’s Wilkinson calls “the classic situation: a staring contest between two autonomous vehicles from different OEMs, neither one capable of blinking or losing.”
A solution for some facilities is third-party fleet manager software that’s designed to work in multiple brands of autonomous forklifts; examples include those offered by independent developers such as Kollmorgen, BlueBotics, Navitech Systems, and Flexware Innovation. In fact, some forklift OEMs partner with these and other providers instead of developing their own fleet managers. This opens the way for a fleet to potentially buy different robots utilizing the same control and navigation system, which will reduce complexity to some degree, Marcum says.
Communications with driverless forklifts may become simpler in the near future. VDA 5050, an open-source protocol for communication between AGVs and fleet manager systems, is currently in development. Coordinated by two German industry organizations, one for auto manufacturers and the other for material handling and intralogistics, this universal protocol promises to allow “any mobile robot, regardless of brand, [to] be seamlessly integrated into existing operations,” wrote Alfredo Pastor Tella, who runs the Europe-based AGV Network website, in a LinkedIn post. Pastor Tella wrote that Kollmorgen will introduce VDA 5050 into its robot control software in 2025, but other industry observers have noted that because the protocol’s roots are in European manufacturing and there are still technical issues to be worked out, it may be a few years before it takes hold in the forklift world. When it does, conversations with autonomous forklift fleets will likely become much less complicated to hold.
Tips for success
Want to be sure your driverless forklifts will always “get the message”? Here are some experts’ recommendations for facilitating communication with them:
Involve your IT experts early! They’ll need to identify what relevant data is currently available and where it resides. Make sure they’re comfortable that any APIs and other software meet your company’s security requirements. For cloud-based systems, verify that the vendor and systems integrator will have remote access if they need to service any of the systems or software. (Brian Markison, Rocrich AGV Solutions)
If you’re buying from different manufacturers, find out which supplier has navigation technology on the brands you’re considering and try to stay with a single system if possible. If you have a single platform, you can make a change just once and the entire fleet will receive that modification. If you have two fleet managers, segregate them as much as possible. Wherever they are separate, you’ll only have to change that one, but in shared areas, you’ll have to change both. (Michael Marcum, Bastian Solutions)
When it comes to facilitating communication, software is not always the best answer. Sometimes something simpler, like PLCs that notify equipment through very basic logic, works just fine. And it’s better to start small and integrate each function as you go, rather than try to integrate everything at once. You can tie two systems together and demonstrate the benefits from that, then use the savings to justify and help fund the next piece. (John Rosenberger, The Raymond Corp.)
Conduct testing in real-world scenarios, and make sure legacy software and communication technologies are compatible with the automation. These systems work in a dynamic environment, and a lot changes over time. Calibration tests can make sure everything still aligns correctly. And remember to inform your vendor of changes in things like throughput rates, layout, pallet sizes and configurations, products, and so on. (Jayce Nelson, Linde Automated Solutions)
In most facilities, commands and data are communicated via Wi-Fi, so connectivity and reliability are a top concern. A pre-installation survey to measure Wi-Fi signal availability and strength throughout the facility is an absolute must. Based on those findings, you may need to enhance signal strength and expand capacity and coverage. In some very large facilities, a private wireless network that uses cellular signals may be the best solution. (Deryk Powell, CEO, Velociti Inc., a provider of technology deployment, support, and integration services)
Waves of change are expected to wash over workplaces in the new year, highlighted by companies’ needs to balance the influx of artificial intelligence (AI) with the skills, capabilities, and perspectives that are uniquely human, according to a study from Top Employers Institute.
According to the Amsterdam-based human resources (HR) consulting firm, 2025 will be the year that the balance between individual and group well-being will evolve, blending personal empowerment with collective goals. The focus will be on creating environments where individual contributions enhance the overall strength of teams and organizations, and where traditional boundaries are softened to allow for greater collaboration and inclusion.
Those were the findings of the group’s report titled "World of work trends 2025: The collective workforce.” The study was based on data drawn from the anonymized responses of 2,175 global participants of the Top Employers Institute’s HR Best Practices Survey for 2025, and 2,200 organizations from its 2024 edition.
To cope with those broad trends, the report found that companies must adopt “systems thinking,” a way of understanding how different parts of a system—whether an organization or a society—are connected and influence each other. Leaders who learn that skill can design holistic strategies that align employee needs with organizational priorities and broader societal challenges, the group said.
Toward that goal, the report highlights five trends that are reshaping and impacting the global workforce for 2025. They include:
Sustainable Workplaces - integrated partnership between society and organizations. In 2025, organizations will face growing pressure to address global challenges ranging from ethical AI use in the workplace to demographic changes like declining birth rates and an aging population. These issues are no longer isolated from business; they demand an integrated partnership between society and organizations. For example, labor shortages driven by demographic changes challenge companies to rethink their workforce strategies for future sustainability; for example, family-friendly offerings have increased substantially over the last year as employers acknowledge the reality that many more people are now responsible for aging relatives as well as young children.
New belonging – networking beyond to connect with various jobs, industries, and networks. Unlike previous generations, today’s employees change jobs and careers with greater fluidity, spanning multiple organizations over relatively short periods. This shift is reshaping the traditional, company-centered sense of belonging into a more dynamic, interconnected experience. Employees no longer expect to build lasting relationships solely within a single organization, but rather they form communities that stretch across various jobs, industries, and networks, sometimes even in public coworking spaces where the people they interact with daily may not even work for the same company. However, this fluidity offers companies a unique advantage: as employees move between organizations and interact with diverse professionals in shared spaces, they bring with them fresh ideas, innovations, and relationships that generate significant value.
Transforming experiences – “new collar” jobs. In 2025, we will see a substantial blurring of the traditional categories of “white collar” jobs—typically clerical, administrative, managerial, and executive roles—and “blue collar” jobs, which are typically found in the agriculture, manufacturing, construction, mining, or maintenance sectors. The nature of jobs once considered blue-collar has changed dramatically, thanks in no small part to advancements in technology, especially AI. Post pandemic, there seems to be a much higher demand in many places around the world for skilled trades and manual labor, coupled with a growing emphasis for needed skills over formal qualifications. This shift, sometimes described as the rise of “new collar” jobs, combines the technical expertise often associated with blue-collar work with the adaptability and digital skills needed in today’s job market.
Neuroinclusion - a competitive advantage. Organizations are also increasingly recognizing the advantages of including neurodivergent individuals in the workplace, hiring people with autism, dyslexia, dyspraxia, dyscalculia, and ADHD, as well as certain mental health conditions. In addition to bringing bringing unique perspectives and capabilities, these employees are also an important part of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI). This practice often requires companies to provide accommodation, adjustments, and support, but 2025 will bring a more radical shift, as neuroinclusivity is evolving from an afterthought to a foundational principle in workplace design, culture, and HR policies.
AI-powered leadership - balance between human intuition and AI’s analytical power.
If 2024 marked AI’s disruption of highly skilled roles like software development and healthcare, 2025 will be the year AI reshapes the highest levels of leadership, bringing a new balance between human intuition and AI’s analytical power. In this evolving landscape, leadership is no longer an individual pursuit, but a collective effort changed by intelligent systems. AI is not just influencing mid-level roles; it is becoming a partner in the C-suite, helping leaders navigate complexity, understand team dynamics, and make strategic decisions that benefit the entire organization.
Keep ReadingShow less
2024 International Foodservice Distributor Association’s (IFDA) National Championship
It’s probably safe to say that no one chooses a career in logistics for the glory. But even those accustomed to toiling in obscurity appreciate a little recognition now and then—particularly when it comes from the people they love best: their kids.
That familial love was on full display at the 2024 International Foodservice Distributor Association’s (IFDA) National Championship, which brings together foodservice distribution professionals to demonstrate their expertise in driving, warehouse operations, safety, and operational efficiency. For the eighth year, the event included a Kids Essay Contest, where children of participants were encouraged to share why they are proud of their parents or guardians and the work they do.
Prizes were handed out in three categories: 3rd–5th grade, 6th–8th grade, and 9th–12th grade. This year’s winners included Elijah Oliver (4th grade, whose parent Justin Oliver drives for Cheney Brothers) and Andrew Aylas (8th grade, whose parent Steve Aylas drives for Performance Food Group).
Top honors in the high-school category went to McKenzie Harden (12th grade, whose parent Marvin Harden drives for Performance Food Group), who wrote: “My dad has not only taught me life skills of not only, ‘what the boys can do,’ but life skills of morals, compassion, respect, and, last but not least, ‘wearing your heart on your sleeve.’”
The logistics tech firm incubator Zebox, a unit of supply chain giant CMA CGM Group, plans to show off 10 of its top startup businesses at the annual technology trade show CES in January, the French company said today.
Founded in 2018, Zebox calls itself an international innovation accelerator expert in the fields of maritime industry, logistics & media. The Marseille, France-based unit is supported by major companies in the sector, such as BNSF Railway, Blume Global, Trac Intermodal, Vinci, CEVA Logistics, Transdev and Port of Virginia.
To participate in that program, Zebox said it chose 10 French and American companies that are working to leverage cutting-edge technologies to address major industrial challenges and drive meaningful transformations:
Aerleum: CO2 capture and conversion technology producing cost-competitive synthetic fuels and chemicals, enabling decarbonization in hard-to-electrify sectors such as maritime and aviation. Akidaia (CES Innovation Award Winner 2024): Offline access control system offering robust cybersecurity, easy deployment, and secure operation, even in remote or mobile sites.
BE ENERGY: Innovative clean energy solutions recognized for their groundbreaking impact on sustainable energy.
Biomitech (CES Innovation Award Winner 2025): Air purification system that transforms atmospheric pollution into oxygen and biomass through photosynthesis.
Flying Ship Technologies, Corp,: Building unmanned, autonomous, and eco-friendly ground-effect vessels for efficient cargo delivery to tens of thousands of destinations.
Gazelle: Next-generation chargers made more compact and efficient by advanced technology developed by Wise Integration.
HawAI.tech: Hardware accelerators designed to enhance probabilistic artificial intelligence, promoting energy efficiency and explainability.
Okular Logistics: AI-powered smart cameras and analytics to automate warehouse operations, ensure real-time inventory accuracy, and reduce costs.
OTRERA NEW ENERGY: Compact modular reactor (SMR) harnessing over 50 years of French expertise to provide cost-effective, decarbonized electricity and heat.
Zadar Labs, Inc.: High-resolution imaging radars for surveillance, autonomous systems, and beyond.
The deal will add the Google DeepMind robotics team’s AI expertise to Austin, Texas-based Apptronik’s robotics platform, allowing the units to handle a wider range of tasks in real-world settings like factories and warehouses.
The Texas firm joins other providers of two-legged robots such as the Oregon company Agility Robotics, which is currently testing its humanoid units with the large German automotive and industrial parts supplier Schaeffler AG, as well as with GXO. GXO is also running trials of a third type of humanoid bot made by New York-based Reflex Robotics. And another provider of humanoid robots, the Canadian firm Sanctuary AI, this year landed funding from the consulting firm Accenture.
“We’re building a future where humanoid robots address urgent global challenges,” Jeff Cardenas, CEO and co-founder of Apptronik, said in a release. “By combining Apptronik’s cutting-edge robotics platform with the Google DeepMind robotics team’s unparalleled AI expertise, we’re creating intelligent, versatile and safe robots that will transform industries and improve lives. United by a shared commitment to excellence, our two companies are poised to redefine the future of humanoid robotics.”