Full disclosure: Carbon reporting mandates set to kick in
Pending regulations will soon require companies to track, and disclose, their greenhouse gas emissions—including those created by their carriers and logistics service providers. Compliance won’t be easy, but tech developers are rolling out tools to help.
Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
Some of the hottest buzzwords heard in boardrooms lately have to do with sustainability, rather than just operations and profits. Terms like “carbon footprint,” “net zero,” “green fuels,” and “environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policies” crop up in every quarterly earnings call and appear in every annual report.
Today, many companies are adopting sustainability initiatives voluntarily, usually as a way to trim costs, burnish the corporate reputation, or become better citizens of the planet. But government regulationsthat will come online over the next couple of yearswill increase the urgency by putting mandates in place. Fromthe state of California tothe European Union (EU) to theU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), various entities will soon require companies within their purview to disclose the precise amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions they create. That’s not to say all businesses will be affected, however. For example, the California law applies to corporations with more than $1 billion in gross revenue, while the EU directive covers those that meet two of three conditions: $43 million in revenue, $21 million in assets, or 250 or more employees.
The goal of the new mandates is to give investors and consumers a way to compare vendors, suppliers, and service providers based on their climate impact, not just their business performance. And part of the premise is that companies that have to quantify and disclose their carbon footprints will be better equipped to shrink them. After all, as the management consultant Peter Drucker famously said, “You can’t manage what you don’t measure.”
However, these new carbon disclosure rules could present serious challenges to shippers, fleet operators, and logistics service providers (LSPs). That’s because carbon dioxide is invisible—not just literally but also figuratively, since many sources of pollution are located far outside a company’s own walls. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), a full carbon accounting includes“Scope 1” emissions—those created directly by a company’s own facilities or vehicles; “Scope 2” emissions—those created indirectly by the electricity or other energy that powers them; and“Scope 3” emissions—those created by a company’s suppliers and contractors through activities like transportation and distribution.
THE CHALLENGE OF “COUNTING” CARBON
Each “scope” category includes a multitude of individual inputs known as “point sources,” so adding it all up may require companies to hire a trained carbon-accounting specialist or contract with an outside consulting firm. Either way, the path forward is anything but clear for both companies and regulators, says Bridget McCormick, principal consultant at Proxima, a supply chain and procurement consulting firm.
“In the U.S., there aren’t firm laws in place nationwide yet that require reporting and [establishing of] emissions targets, so organizations are able to say they are working to improve their sustainability but aren’t being held accountable,” McCormick says. Scope 3 reporting, in particular, will be no small undertaking, she adds. “Measuring Scope 3 [emissions] is challenging and time-consuming. To influence your suppliers, you need to also educate your team and adapt to current policies, processes, and ways of working with suppliers in a way that supports your carbon reduction goals. All of this requires an investment—whether that be of time, people, technology, external resources, etc.”
Fortunately for shippers and logistics service providers,the new requirements will not hit all at once, says Pat Dillon, chief financial officer at Flock Freight, a logistics tech firm that operates a “freight carpooling” platform that combines small shipments into a single, more efficient truckload. For instance, California’s version—known as SB 253—will roll out over a period of years, with mandatory Scope 1 and Scope 2 reporting beginning in 2026 and Scope 3 reporting starting in 2027.
“Scope 3 is the most relevant for Flock Freight and the role we play, because it covers emissions from each company’s entire logistics footprint, including trucks you don’t own that are carrying products and raw materials, both inbound and outbound,” Dillon says. “So the question is how to collect the data, how to standardize it, how to track different types of emissions. … And there’s a cottage industry of consultants and auditors growing up around that.”
Likewise, the EU’s version, known as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), won’t take effect until June. And the SEC’s version is still in the draft stage,according to the consulting firm Deloitte.
NEW TOOLS TO TALLY EMISSIONS
Those government mandates are still on the horizon, but various logistics industry players are already developing tools to measure greenhouse gas emissions from every possible source. But it’s still the Wild West out there when it comes to the tools and methods used. “There are not yet codified gold standards [for this type of reporting]. There is some variability. But as they get nearer, we’ll start to see the universe start to coalesce around certain standards,” Dillon says.
For instance, Flock Freight tracks emissions today through its FlockDirect service. But that’s just one of many options. Other tracking tools on the market include Banyan Technology’s CarbonTrax & Offset feature in its Live Connect software; Pledge’s emissions measurement platform for freight forwarders; and cloud-based platforms to keep track of it all,such as tools from Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Digital freight-matching platform Uber Freight has also launched an emissions dashboard that calculates users’ carbon impact, according to Illina Frankiv, the company’s head of sustainability. “This is one centralized view; users can see their emissions across the network, so it is also a tool to reach whatever their sustainability goals might be. That means not only knowing their baseline, but how to improve,” she says. “For example, they could make efficiency improvements through continuous optimization, they could switch to intermodal, or they could look at their network and tell if it’s feasible and profitable to use electric trucks.”
Of course, many shippers today use more than one broker or carrier. To accommodate these users, Uber Freight allows companies to upload their external carbon data to its dashboard as well, Frankiv says.
“It’s very hard to find an emissions platform that would provide a truly global view, even within a single company. But we give you visibility into the Uber Freight-managed part of your network, and we give you the opportunity to upload the rest of your data, too. [Transportation] networks tend to get broken up into dedicated, owned, brokered, etc. But as a company, what you need to know is your total transportation emissions across all modes and geographies,” she says.
As companies gain the ability to track their total carbon emissions, they will also be able to compare themselves against other shippers. In fact, Uber Freight says it plans to offer an “industry peer comparison reporting” feature in a future release of its emissions dashboard. Using anonymized data, the tool will assign each user a percentile rank showing how it stacks up against other players in its sector.
“Companies are curious about how they compare,” Frankiv says. “But emissions reporting is a relatively young [science]. So there are not yet benchmarks to assess the performance of your transportation network. It depends on modes, distance, range. … Then the follow-up question is how to improve. So we’re enabling our customers to [factor] sustainability into their operating decisions, instead of just cost and service.”
As a result of pending carbon disclosure regulations, companies throughout the logistics community will soon have a much fuller picture of their operations. But how they use that data remains to be seen. While some might use it simply to satisfy regulatory requirements, others may leverage it in new and interesting ways—like advancing their efforts to protect natural resources, make their operations greener than their competitors’, and perhaps even win new customers.
It’s probably safe to say that no one chooses a career in logistics for the glory. But even those accustomed to toiling in obscurity appreciate a little recognition now and then—particularly when it comes from the people they love best: their kids.
That familial love was on full display at the 2024 International Foodservice Distributor Association’s (IFDA) National Championship, which brings together foodservice distribution professionals to demonstrate their expertise in driving, warehouse operations, safety, and operational efficiency. For the eighth year, the event included a Kids Essay Contest, where children of participants were encouraged to share why they are proud of their parents or guardians and the work they do.
Prizes were handed out in three categories: 3rd–5th grade, 6th–8th grade, and 9th–12th grade. This year’s winners included Elijah Oliver (4th grade, whose parent Justin Oliver drives for Cheney Brothers) and Andrew Aylas (8th grade, whose parent Steve Aylas drives for Performance Food Group).
Top honors in the high-school category went to McKenzie Harden (12th grade, whose parent Marvin Harden drives for Performance Food Group), who wrote: “My dad has not only taught me life skills of not only, ‘what the boys can do,’ but life skills of morals, compassion, respect, and, last but not least, ‘wearing your heart on your sleeve.’”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
DAT Freight & Analytics has acquired Trucker Tools, calling the deal a strategic move designed to combine Trucker Tools' approach to load tracking and carrier sourcing with DAT’s experience providing freight solutions.
Beaverton, Oregon-based DAT operates what it calls the largest truckload freight marketplace and truckload freight data analytics service in North America. Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but DAT is a business unit of the publicly traded, Fortune 1000-company Roper Technologies.
Following the deal, DAT said that brokers will continue to get load visibility and capacity tools for every load they manage, but now with greater resources for an enhanced suite of broker tools. And in turn, carriers will get the same lifestyle features as before—like weigh scales and fuel optimizers—but will also gain access to one of the largest networks of loads, making it easier for carriers to find the loads they want.
Trucker Tools CEO Kary Jablonski praised the deal, saying the firms are aligned in their goals to simplify and enhance the lives of brokers and carriers. “Through our strategic partnership with DAT, we are amplifying this mission on a greater scale, delivering enhanced solutions and transformative insights to our customers. This collaboration unlocks opportunities for speed, efficiency, and innovation for the freight industry. We are thrilled to align with DAT to advance their vision of eliminating uncertainty in the freight industry,” Jablonski said.