Last-Mile Roundtable: The nitty-gritty on the all-important last mile
Where do parcel and last-mile operations stand today? How will advances in artificial intelligence and visibility technology change the delivery game? And, perhaps most importantly, what can shippers do to ensure their parcel carriers consider them “shippers of choice”? To get some answers, we asked leading experts from companies participating in DC Velocity’s Last-Mile Theater at Modex 2024. Here’s what they had to say.
David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
Q:How would you describe the current state of the last-mile and parcel markets?
Kevin Reader: Today we consider last-mile logistics to be the movement of goods from a transportation hub to the final delivery destination. Quantified precisely, the last-mile market is valued at around $131.5B (2021) at a CAGR 8.13%, from 2021–2031, and will reach around $288.9B by 2031. Last-mile delivery accounts for more than 53% of total shipping cost, according to FarEye.com, and is most widely used in the food, e-commerce, retail, and pharmaceutical industries. Current drivers of these costs include increased use of the internet and expansion of the e-commerce industry in general. We expect that the courier, express, and parcel market is really (or will become) a subset of this market.
Tim Kraus: Demands for fast deliveries and increased service levels (such as delivering inside a garage or car trunk instead of at the door) increase complexity and further justify the need to find ways to reduce costs wherever possible in last-mile operations. This has led to innovations in the automation of last-mile sortation facilities to quickly get parcels in the building, sorted, and back out as fast as possible.
Chirag Modi: Four major parcel carriers in North America (USPS, UPS, FedEx, and Amazon) are moving forward with their infrastructure improvements with an aggressive, forward-looking view. Amazon is already the largest parcel delivery carrier and continues to widen the gap. UPS is the next biggest in this space.
Throughout the industry, there is an acute need for improved economics in the last- or final-mile space. While drone and robot deliveries are gaining traction, industrywide change remains elusive. Without Amazon aggressively changing consumer behavior with respect to store or locker pickups (much like what they did with Prime, two-day free shipping, lockers, and other innovations), there is little [prospect] for cost improvements in this space.
Q:E-commerce grew this year but slowed somewhat as shoppers returned to stores. What will it take to get e-commerce shipping back on the high-growth track?
Fernando Rabel: Following a 17.1% growth rate surge in 2021, the global e-commerce market is expected to sustain a minimum growth rate of 8% in the coming years. In the United States, the third quarter of 2023 witnessed a 7.8% increase in e-commerce sales compared to the same quarter in 2022. We are back on trend for long-term growth.
Chirag Modi: As expected, e-commerce has slowed this year in comparison to during Covid-19. The biggest difference is that a good portion of those e-commerce sales are now being fulfilled out of stores. There is a feeling of saturation with store pickups versus e-tailers like Amazon. Both brick-and-mortar stores and e-tailers have had to adapt to new realities of physical store presence and have learned to co-exist. There will be intense market share competition between Wal-Mart, Amazon, Target, and a few top retailers, but it will be a zero-sum game when we look at growth in the entire e-commerce channel for some time to come.
Tim Kraus: One could surmise that faster deliveries and lower prices would both encourage e-commerce growth again. One way to improve both metrics is by investing in automated last-mile processing to quickly get parcels in, sorted, and back out quickly.
Q: How can technologies improve the visibility of goods in transit?
Kevin Reader: Courier, express, and parcel services (CEP) players are well positioned to control the core steps in the transportation process—capacity management, route optimization, planning, and sorting. Physical control of these parcels also gives these companies control of the associated data, but there are a few technology companies, such as Knapp, that have innovation underway in these areas.
Chirag Modi: Technologies are changing dramatically every day. Cloud computing has changed the real-time data availability exponentially in terms of quality, affordability, and quantity. As a result, the amount of data we collect on this planet now doubles every five years.
More technologies are being added to make sense of the data being collected. And control towers are now a standard industry term and soon will be a standard offering with current solutions like transportation management and will [enable] a real-time feedback loop into the supply chain planning and inventory management process (versus batch processes).
Tim Kraus: Every time a package is scanned, it creates another data point that could be used to help track the parcel’s progress before the final home delivery. Automated sortation solutions in last-mile facilities require scanning and inherently bring that extra data point. So, compared to a facility that is not automated, this can be an important data point to improve visibility that is essentially free.
Q: When will we start to see electric delivery vehicles significantly impacting last-mile operations?
Fernando Rabel: In the second half of 2024, we will start to see EVs make a significant impact in last-mile deliveries. Over the next six to nine months, RXO will have a fully electric operation in New York City and 15 to 20% of our hub markets will have at least one EV making deliveries. With the federal and state investments in charging infrastructure, more affordable and available vehicles, and customers looking to decrease their carbon footprint, EV deliveries will continue to grow throughout the year.
Kevin Reader: We are already seeing this trend, and we can expect that it will continue. Look for a more robust effort by the commercial vehicle (CV) players between 2025 and 2030 in the areas of last-mile delivery, since they are well positioned to operate autonomous delivery fleets and they have routing expertise.
Why do we think that the CEP market lacks the maturity and vision today? There are essentially two reasons. The first is that over the last several years, only 5% targeted new technology for M&A efforts, and the second is that their new patent activity has been quite low in the area of last-mile technology.
Chirag Modi: Quality and affordability will drive the adoption of these vehicles. Right now, they are a novelty and scoring some points on customer perception. Without fast-charging infrastructure outside of densely populated urban areas and federal subsidies, adoption at scale will be slow to take off. We anticipate by 2030 the industry and infrastructure will be in a better position to put the flywheel effect into motion for EV delivery.
Q: How might artificial intelligence influence the design of software for managing deliveries?
Chirag Modi: Generative AI technology is improving constantly. More and more companies (including Blue Yonder) are exploring options to do this in a responsible manner. At the pace at which physical infrastructures, digital infrastructures, and deregulatory environments are changing, it is imperative to work in a collaborative environment to design any solution with AI. In addition, the type of talent available in the market to build these solutions using AI is currently limited. These combined factors are influencing and limiting the current use of AI.
Kevin Reader: This is quite a broad subject. Let’s just consider one business case where customer expectations are rising, resources are less available, and the cost to deliver and routing (i.e. last-mile cost) is volatile and high. This is an ideal example for an AI application that is constantly evaluating these factors (among others), reducing cost to serve and optimizing performance, while still meeting customer expectations—and doing so in real time.
Q: What can shippers do to be “shippers of choice” with their parcel carriers?
Fernando Rabel: To be a shipper of choice, a shipper must adhere to the volume estimates the parcel carrier based its pricing on, provide great communication so the parcel carrier understands when business requirements change, and provide easy access to facilities for the parcel drivers.
Chirag Modi: The basics have not changed, and mainstays such as quality of service, affordability, and continuous innovation/improvement remain. Service providers have always been judged based on these three factors. At the same time, the weight of each of these varies from one client to another (e.g., low-margin/low-growth industries may put more emphasis on cost and service, while high-growth industries might place a higher priority on innovative services).
Q: How can third-party service providers help shippers meet customer demands?
Fernando Rabel: Third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) enhance shippers’ ability to meet customer demands through their expertise in logistics management and advanced technology use. They offer cost-effective, scalable services, leveraging their networks for efficient shipping and compliance. 3PLs ensure timely and reliable deliveries, improving customer service with real-time tracking and effective return management.
They also adeptly handle risk management and contribute to sustainability efforts. By optimizing shipping strategies, managing inventory, and mitigating supply chain disruptions, 3PLs provide shippers with the flexibility and efficiency needed to adapt to market changes and maintain customer satisfaction.
Tim Kraus: Investing in automated solutions can help third-party providers minimize delivery time, for one. Automated solutions can also minimize dependence on temporary labor, which can be a huge operational risk. An automated solution also helps to minimize human error, which can lead to missed delivery promises, which diminishes customer satisfaction. Finally, an automated solution can reduce the cost per package in last-mile logistics.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."