Prepare, prevent, and protect: interview with Greg Vecchi
It’s the scenario no one wants to think about: an active shooter on the premises. But statistics show that businesses are the second most common site for such attacks to occur. Former FBI special agent Greg Vecchi shares how to mitigate the risk of a workplace shooting and what to do if the unthinkable happens.
David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
Hardly a week goes by when we don’t hear about a mass shooting somewhere in America. And while businesses are statistically among the most common sites for shootings to occur, most companies don’t have the security protocols in place to prevent a motivated person from entering a facility and committing violent acts. They simply assume it could never happen to them.
But when it comes to dealing with attacks, prevention and preparation are a better bet than denial. That’s where Gregory Vecchi comes in. As director of training at the crisis management firm SafeDefend LLC, he develops and deploys training programs for threat assessment, prevention, and response, with the end goal of helping businesses thwart attackers or at least mitigate the harm they can do.
Vecchi, who holds a Ph.D. in conflict analysis and resolution from Nova Southeastern University in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, is a retired supervisory special agent and former chief of the FBI Behavioral Science Unit. During his career, he investigated Russian organized crime, international drug trafficking, international and domestic terrorism, and violent crime, and gained extensive experience assessing and interacting with violent offenders.
Vecchi also has a great deal of experience in teaching and training. He is currently a professor of criminal justice, criminology, and homeland security at Keiser University in Fort Lauderdale, where he develops and teaches courses at the master’s and doctoral levels. In addition, he conducts advanced law enforcement training in threat assessment, crisis negotiation, firearms, and defensive tactics and has served as an instructor at the FBI National Academy in Quantico, Virginia.
Vecchi spoke recently to DC Velocity Group Editorial Director David Maloney about workplace violence, including steps businesses can take to mitigate the risk and what to do in the case of an attack.
Q: We hear of mass shootings nearly every day in the news. Are these incidents actually on the rise or are they simply receiving more media attention than in years past?
A: I think it’s a combination of both, actually, and it is important to understand how these incidents happen. What we learned in the FBI is that every offender is a little bit different, and you have to understand the offender in order to best prepare yourself to deal with that offender. You’re trying to prevent violence, or you’re trying to respond to a very specific type of violence. It’s essentially a predator who is targeting other people or institutions in retaliation for a perceived wrong.
Q: DC Velocity focuses on warehousing, distribution, and manufacturing operations. Can you point to any incidents in these types of facilities?
A: There have been a number in your area of commerce. In fact, businesses are the second most probable location where one of these attacks is going to happen. Open spaces are number one, and schools are number three.
These attacks are obviously the worst type of violence. It’s workplace homicide, and it has increased 11% since 2014. In 2008, there was a plastics factory killing that took place in Kentucky. One of the plant’s current employees had a disagreement with a supervisor over wearing safety glasses and using a phone while on the job. He came in to work and killed the supervisor. Then he turned around and shot a coworker with whom he’d had a previous dispute in the back of the head. I think in total there were about nine or 10 people killed in that manufacturing plant. So yes, it happens.
Q: What motivates these folks to walk into a facility and begin shooting? Is it related to personal disputes between people? Is it a gripe that a worker has against the company? Or is it just spilling over from other kinds of violence, and it just happens to end at the facility?
A: It’s all of the above, but you’re dealing with a specific type of predator—someone who is preying on other people. There are three general types of predators that come to mind. The first is the process predator. This is the serial-killer-type person, the one who likes to kill people and enjoys violence. More than likely, that’s not going to be your guy in these facilities. The second is the resource predator, such as a bank robber who’s looking to take something that’s valuable. That’s also typically not what you deal with in these facilities.
Mostly, what you’re going to deal with in your context is what I like to call the grievance predator. This is someone who feels they were wronged by a person or maybe by the business itself. It’s someone who feels persecuted, isolated, or bullied—perhaps because of a difference in ideology. And almost always, there’s some significant loss in their life.
Q: Are there warning signs employers should look for?
A: Yes, there are specific warning behaviors. And actually, this is really the centerpiece of a prevention program in this regard. You know, there’s the bumper sticker slogan—“See something, say something”—and it really does point to what you need to do. One thing you have to realize is that these attacks don’t just happen on the spot. There’s no “snap effect.” If you look at the case after the attack, you’ll find that almost always, the person has a grievance that reaches a crisis stage, where they’re no longer able to cope with the situation.
You’ll probably see that they’ve tried to remedy the situation, and that it wasn’t remedied, and that the crisis escalated to the point where they saw violence as the only answer. It typically results in homicidal violence against the person they feel has wronged them, or maybe even the whole organization itself. So, everyone could be a target.
Q: What happens once they determine in their mind that violence is the only way to resolve the issue?
A: They then move on to researching and formulating a plan. They collect maps, they figure out the best time and place to target the person or persons who wronged them. And then they select their weapons. They might create hit lists. And finally, they actually get the gun or the knife or the ammo. They may also do feasibility checks or dry runs before actually launching the attack.
There’s essentially something like 10 steps in there, of which eight take place before the attack. Understand that these types of offenders are almost always current or former employees—someone you know, oftentimes someone you liked very much—but they are people who are in crisis. When someone reaches a crisis state, their behavior changes. Their normal behavior—the behavior that you see every single day—is going to change, and you will see anomalies or things that don’t quite fit.
Q: From what you just said, it seems that most of these attacks are planned with a lot of forethought, as opposed to somebody who just grabs a gun out of the car and comes in and starts shooting. It seems to be rather deliberate?
A: It is absolutely deliberate. Almost every single time, they prepare and they consider their plan. And they really do try to fix the problem for themselves first. In 2018, there was an incident at the Capital Gazette newspaper in Maryland. The guy’s grievance was that they had published something that made him look bad.
The story he objected to had been published around 2012. He initially tried to address the situation by writing letters to the editor, calling the writer, calling the police, trying to sue the paper for defamation, and all this stuff. It was six years before he finally decided he couldn’t take it anymore. And then he planned and carefully executed his attack on the newsroom, which resulted in five deaths.
Q: Are there basic preventive measures we can take to better secure our facilities?
A: There’s a lot you can do. First and foremost is to establish a threat assessment team. These are people at the HR level—or it could be at a supervisory level—who have special training to identify someone who might be on that pathway to violence and intervene. They understand how to make sense of these warning behaviors to hopefully get in front of it before anything happens.
Another thing you can do is to conduct a vulnerability and risk assessment, which entails looking at which buildings are vulnerable, and what are the most likely days and times for an attack to occur. And then, of course, there are mitigation and physical security measures, such as door locks, visitor controls, and things like that.
Q: What should employees do if there’s an active shooter on the premises?
A: Of course, we can’t prevent all incidents. And so, when it does happen, you should have a system in place to notify authorities and other workers. You should also train your employees on how to evade and escape the offender, as well as how to engage the offender.
Notification is important, but not more important than safety. Obviously, you want to try to call 911 and try to get help. The problem there is that the notification is almost too late, because the attack is already underway. Maybe you hear gunfire or people screaming. If that happens, the most important thing to do is to look after your own safety and the safety of others. The way we break it down is run, hide, and fight.
Q: Can you describe those actions in more detail?
A: Yes. So, the way I look at it is to have a Plan A, Plan B, and Plan C. Plan A is “escape.” You want to move yourself away from the offender. First and foremost, you have to know your workplace. You have to know where the escape routes and alternate exits are. Then before you try to escape, you have to look around to make sure the way is clear and that you’re not walking or running into danger. If you’re going to leave, leave everything behind, have nothing in your hands, put your cell phone and keys in your pocket, and leave as quickly and as quietly as possible.
Statistically, if you can keep at least eight feet of distance between you and the attacker and move in a zigzag pattern, rather than running away from the attacker in a straight line, your chances of survival go way up. And, of course, once you get outside, you want to keep moving until you find a safe location. It’s not like a fire drill where you go out in the parking lot and gather in a group, because there could be a second offender out there.
If you’re moving out, make sure that you don’t stop to help wounded people. If you stop to help someone, it could result in injury or death to you and that wounded person or anyone else you’re trying to help.
Q: What if you’re not able to escape. What are the options then?
A: If you can’t escape, then you go to Plan B, and that’s evasion, barricading, and lockdown. The most important thing here is to have a door that locks from the inside. We have found no reported cases of an active shooter hurting or killing someone who successfully locked themself inside a room and moved away from the door.
Next, you want to move heavy things in front of the door as an additional barricade and also as cover in the event he starts shooting, since there is no guarantee that the bullets won’t go through the door or through a window. You want to cover the windows, move off to the safest area away from the door, which really depends on the location. You should turn off the lights and silence your phones.
And remember the difference between cover and concealment. Cover is protection from gunfire, and concealment is protection from observation.
Q: And if you can’t escape or hide, what do you do then?
A: If Plan B doesn’t work, you have Plan C, and that’s the last-ditch effort, where you have to fight and engage the attacker. We would never expect an employee to go after an attacker. That’s not their job. But let’s say you were barricaded and the door didn’t lock or the attacker got through the door and started to enter the room. We’re talking about protecting the threshold of the door—or the window, if they’re trying to enter that way. You want to stay as far away as possible, but be prepared to engage. And that’s when you would employ your protection tools.
Ideally, you want to have things like pepper spray and a baton, and maybe a strobe flashlight to blind him. But really anything could work—coffee cups, fire extinguishers, heavy tools, or blunt objects. You essentially need to have a plan. If there are five people in the room, everyone should be assigned a job before the attacker enters. Someone’s going to take the hand with the gun, another takes the head, someone takes the other hand, and someone takes the groin. The idea is that if any body part or weapon crosses that threshold, you do everything you can to stop it and you don’t stop until that threat has ended.
Q: How does your company, SafeDefend, help companies prepare for what they hope will never happen?
A: SafeDefend has a singular focus on notifying and protecting people, both in schools and in workplaces. We prepare them with the protection necessary to deal with an active shooter—an active killer situation. SafeDefend is like a fire alarm system for active shooters. And like a fire alarm, it’s hardwired with biometric readers and is solely focused on that type of an attack.
When a threat occurs, an authorized person in the system places a finger on the biometric reader. It automatically notifies 911 within seconds and also provides notification through email and text to everyone in the building—all employees, contractors, custodians, administrators, whoever you want to be notified. It tells everybody in the building not only who set off the alarm, but also where the alarm is located, such as the room number, the floor number, and the nearest exit, which provides police with a starting point when they arrive.
Since I came to SafeDefend, I’ve been building not just a better response piece, but also bringing in my threat assessment experience on how to identify potential offenders before they get violent, based on behavior. And that’s the kind of the end-to-end piece that I bring to SafeDefend and that I’m most proud of.
The New York-based industrial artificial intelligence (AI) provider Augury has raised $75 million for its process optimization tools for manufacturers, in a deal that values the company at more than $1 billion, the firm said today.
According to Augury, its goal is deliver a new generation of AI solutions that provide the accuracy and reliability manufacturers need to make AI a trusted partner in every phase of the manufacturing process.
The “series F” venture capital round was led by Lightrock, with participation from several of Augury’s existing investors; Insight Partners, Eclipse, and Qumra Capital as well as Schneider Electric Ventures and Qualcomm Ventures. In addition to securing the new funding, Augury also said it has added Elan Greenberg as Chief Operating Officer.
“Augury is at the forefront of digitalizing equipment maintenance with AI-driven solutions that enhance cost efficiency, sustainability performance, and energy savings,” Ashish (Ash) Puri, Partner at Lightrock, said in a release. “Their predictive maintenance technology, boasting 99.9% failure detection accuracy and a 5-20x ROI when deployed at scale, significantly reduces downtime and energy consumption for its blue-chip clients globally, offering a compelling value proposition.”
The money supports the firm’s approach of "Hybrid Autonomous Mobile Robotics (Hybrid AMRs)," which integrate the intelligence of "Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs)" with the precision and structure of "Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs)."
According to Anscer, it supports the acceleration to Industry 4.0 by ensuring that its autonomous solutions seamlessly integrate with customers’ existing infrastructures to help transform material handling and warehouse automation.
Leading the new U.S. office will be Mark Messina, who was named this week as Anscer’s Managing Director & CEO, Americas. He has been tasked with leading the firm’s expansion by bringing its automation solutions to industries such as manufacturing, logistics, retail, food & beverage, and third-party logistics (3PL).
Supply chains continue to deal with a growing volume of returns following the holiday peak season, and 2024 was no exception. Recent survey data from product information management technology company Akeneo showed that 65% of shoppers made holiday returns this year, with most reporting that their experience played a large role in their reason for doing so.
The survey—which included information from more than 1,000 U.S. consumers gathered in January—provides insight into the main reasons consumers return products, generational differences in return and online shopping behaviors, and the steadily growing influence that sustainability has on consumers.
Among the results, 62% of consumers said that having more accurate product information upfront would reduce their likelihood of making a return, and 59% said they had made a return specifically because the online product description was misleading or inaccurate.
And when it comes to making those returns, 65% of respondents said they would prefer to return in-store, if possible, followed by 22% who said they prefer to ship products back.
“This indicates that consumers are gravitating toward the most sustainable option by reducing additional shipping,” the survey authors said in a statement announcing the findings, adding that 68% of respondents said they are aware of the environmental impact of returns, and 39% said the environmental impact factors into their decision to make a return or exchange.
The authors also said that investing in the product experience and providing reliable product data can help brands reduce returns, increase loyalty, and provide the best customer experience possible alongside profitability.
When asked what products they return the most, 60% of respondents said clothing items. Sizing issues were the number one reason for those returns (58%) followed by conflicting or lack of customer reviews (35%). In addition, 34% cited misleading product images and 29% pointed to inaccurate product information online as reasons for returning items.
More than 60% of respondents said that having more reliable information would reduce the likelihood of making a return.
“Whether customers are shopping directly from a brand website or on the hundreds of e-commerce marketplaces available today [such as Amazon, Walmart, etc.] the product experience must remain consistent, complete and accurate to instill brand trust and loyalty,” the authors said.
When you get the chance to automate your distribution center, take it.
That's exactly what leaders at interior design house
Thibaut Design did when they relocated operations from two New Jersey distribution centers (DCs) into a single facility in Charlotte, North Carolina, in 2019. Moving to an "empty shell of a building," as Thibaut's Michael Fechter describes it, was the perfect time to switch from a manual picking system to an automated one—in this case, one that would be driven by voice-directed technology.
"We were 100% paper-based picking in New Jersey," Fechter, the company's vice president of distribution and technology, explained in a
case study published by Voxware last year. "We knew there was a need for automation, and when we moved to Charlotte, we wanted to implement that technology."
Fechter cites Voxware's promise of simple and easy integration, configuration, use, and training as some of the key reasons Thibaut's leaders chose the system. Since implementing the voice technology, the company has streamlined its fulfillment process and can onboard and cross-train warehouse employees in a fraction of the time it used to take back in New Jersey.
And the results speak for themselves.
"We've seen incredible gains [from a] productivity standpoint," Fechter reports. "A 50% increase from pre-implementation to today."
THE NEED FOR SPEED
Thibaut was founded in 1886 and is the oldest operating wallpaper company in the United States, according to Fechter. The company works with a global network of designers, shipping samples of wallpaper and fabrics around the world.
For the design house's warehouse associates, picking, packing, and shipping thousands of samples every day was a cumbersome, labor-intensive process—and one that was prone to inaccuracy. With its paper-based picking system, mispicks were common—Fechter cites a 2% to 5% mispick rate—which necessitated stationing an extra associate at each pack station to check that orders were accurate before they left the facility.
All that has changed since implementing Voxware's Voice Management Suite (VMS) at the Charlotte DC. The system automates the workflow and guides associates through the picking process via a headset, using voice commands. The hands-free, eyes-free solution allows workers to focus on locating and selecting the right item, with no paper-based lists to check or written instructions to follow.
Thibaut also uses the tech provider's analytics tool, VoxPilot, to monitor work progress, check orders, and keep track of incoming work—managers can see what orders are open, what's in process, and what's completed for the day, for example. And it uses VoxTempo, the system's natural language voice recognition (NLVR) solution, to streamline training. The intuitive app whittles training time down to minutes and gets associates up and working fast—and Thibaut hitting minimum productivity targets within hours, according to Fechter.
EXPECTED RESULTS REALIZED
Key benefits of the project include a reduction in mispicks—which have dropped to zero—and the elimination of those extra quality-control measures Thibaut needed in the New Jersey DCs.
"We've gotten to the point where we don't even measure mispicks today—because there are none," Fechter said in the case study. "Having an extra person at a pack station to [check] every order before we pack [it]—that's been eliminated. Not only is the pick right the first time, but [the order] also gets packed and shipped faster than ever before."
The system has increased inventory accuracy as well. According to Fechter, it's now "well over 99.9%."
IT projects can be daunting, especially when the project involves upgrading a warehouse management system (WMS) to support an expansive network of warehousing and logistics facilities. Global third-party logistics service provider (3PL) CJ Logistics experienced this first-hand recently, embarking on a WMS selection process that would both upgrade performance and enhance security for its U.S. business network.
The company was operating on three different platforms across more than 35 warehouse facilities and wanted to pare that down to help standardize operations, optimize costs, and make it easier to scale the business, according to CIO Sean Moore.
Moore and his team started the WMS selection process in late 2023, working with supply chain consulting firm Alpine Supply Chain Solutions to identify challenges, needs, and goals, and then to select and implement the new WMS. Roughly a year later, the 3PL was up and running on a system from Körber Supply Chain—and planning for growth.
SECURING A NEW SOLUTION
Leaders from both companies explain that a robust WMS is crucial for a 3PL's success, as it acts as a centralized platform that allows seamless coordination of activities such as inventory management, order fulfillment, and transportation planning. The right solution allows the company to optimize warehouse operations by automating tasks, managing inventory levels, and ensuring efficient space utilization while helping to boost order processing volumes, reduce errors, and cut operational costs.
CJ Logistics had another key criterion: ensuring data security for its wide and varied array of clients, many of whom rely on the 3PL to fill e-commerce orders for consumers. Those clients wanted assurance that consumers' personally identifying information—including names, addresses, and phone numbers—was protected against cybersecurity breeches when flowing through the 3PL's system. For CJ Logistics, that meant finding a WMS provider whose software was certified to the appropriate security standards.
"That's becoming [an assurance] that our customers want to see," Moore explains, adding that many customers wanted to know that CJ Logistics' systems were SOC 2 compliant, meaning they had met a standard developed by the American Institute of CPAs for protecting sensitive customer data from unauthorized access, security incidents, and other vulnerabilities. "Everybody wants that level of security. So you want to make sure the system is secure … and not susceptible to ransomware.
"It was a critical requirement for us."
That security requirement was a key consideration during all phases of the WMS selection process, according to Michael Wohlwend, managing principal at Alpine Supply Chain Solutions.
"It was in the RFP [request for proposal], then in demo, [and] then once we got to the vendor of choice, we had a deep-dive discovery call to understand what [security] they have in place and their plan moving forward," he explains.
Ultimately, CJ Logistics implemented Körber's Warehouse Advantage, a cloud-based system designed for multiclient operations that supports all of the 3PL's needs, including its security requirements.
GOING LIVE
When it came time to implement the software, Moore and his team chose to start with a brand-new cold chain facility that the 3PL was building in Gainesville, Georgia. The 270,000-square-foot facility opened this past November and immediately went live running on the Körber WMS.
Moore and Wohlwend explain that both the nature of the cold chain business and the greenfield construction made the facility the perfect place to launch the new software: CJ Logistics would be adding customers at a staggered rate, expanding its cold storage presence in the Southeast and capitalizing on the location's proximity to major highways and railways. The facility is also adjacent to the future Northeast Georgia Inland Port, which will provide a direct link to the Port of Savannah.
"We signed a 15-year lease for the building," Moore says. "When you sign a long-term lease … you want your future-state software in place. That was one of the key [reasons] we started there.
"Also, this facility was going to bring on one customer after another at a metered rate. So [there was] some risk reduction as well."
Wohlwend adds: "The facility plus risk reduction plus the new business [element]—all made it a good starting point."
The early benefits of the WMS include ease of use and easy onboarding of clients, according to Moore, who says the plan is to convert additional CJ Logistics facilities to the new system in 2025.
"The software is very easy to use … our employees are saying they really like the user interface and that you can find information very easily," Moore says, touting the partnership with Alpine and Körber as key to making the project a success. "We are on deck to add at least four facilities at a minimum [this year]."