In our continuing series of discussions with top supply-chain company executives, Geoff Muessig discusses the less-than-truckload market, choosing a carrier partner, and his company’s sustainability initiatives.
David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
Geoffrey Muessig is executive vice president and chief marketing officer for Pitt Ohio, a Pittsburgh-based regional trucking firm that specializes in less-than-truckload (LTL) carriage. Muessig has more than 34 years of experience in the transportation industry and has been with Pitt Ohio since 1988, when he started his career as a sales representative. In addition to leading Pitt Ohio’s sales and marketing efforts, he serves as chairman of the LTL Digital Council. Muessig holds an M.A. in history from the University of Chicago and an MBA from the University of Pittsburgh.
Q: The trucking industry has gone through a lot of change this year. What is the current state of the market and how is Pitt Ohio reacting?
A: Year-over-year demand for domestic surface transportation services has declined. It is well documented that the pandemic created a surge in demand for goods, which benefited every mode of U.S. transportation. In the pandemic’s aftermath, the American consumer has pivoted toward spending more money on services.
Demand for surface transportation services has declined from the pandemic’s peak years. However, it is important to note that most trucking companies are handling more shipments and tonnage post-pandemic than they did pre-pandemic.
Furthermore, the structure of the LTL and TL [truckload] freight markets differ. The 20 largest LTL carriers handle the preponderance of LTL shipments, while the 20 largest TL carriers handle a much smaller percentage of TL shipments. In the face of a shipment decline, the structure of the LTL market works to promote price stability, while the structure of the TL market promotes much more price volatility.
Pitt Ohio is focused on improving our value proposition for our customers. We are working to reduce our administrative expenses by digitizing the exchange of information with shippers, 3PLs, and partner carriers. Furthermore, we have expanded our coverage area to include upstate New York, and we have successfully launched an express three-day service to California [from the carrier’s core Mid-Atlantic territory]. In the third quarter of 2023, Pitt Ohio’s Supply Chain business unit will deploy a freight forwarding solution.
Q: As a leading regional carrier specializing in LTL, what are the most important reasons for your company’s growth and success?
A: Pitt Ohio’s success is built on the consistent hard work and effort of our employees. We message to our employees and our customers that “our employees come first and our customers come a close second.” Pitt Ohio works hard to create a strong business culture that promotes employee engagement.
More than 75% of our drivers and dockworkers tell us in companywide surveys that they would highly recommend Pitt Ohio to their friends and family members as a good place to work. Higher employee engagement translates into less absenteeism and more attention to detail, which leads to better on-time delivery service and fewer freight claims. Better service and fewer freight claims lead to increased customer loyalty, growth, and success. In short, happy employees create happy customers.
Q: What should shippers look for in partnering with an LTL carrier?
A:All LTL carriers handle LTL shipments, but all LTL carriers are not interchangeable. Pitt Ohio focuses on fit when we seek to partner with a shipper. Shippers should be able to clearly articulate their priorities to their existing and potential carrier partners.
Coverage area, service performance, and price are important determinants, but niche needs—like the ability to perform liftgate and residential deliveries or safely transport hazardous material, high-value shipments, or fragile goods—determine whether one carrier is a good fit and another carrier is not.
Shippers should also consider the delivery profile of their customers. Some LTL carriers focus on serving the retail market, while other carriers focus more of their time and attention on serving industrial customers. Service expectations and equipment requirements vary between these market segments.
All shippers should focus on the days to pay their carrier. More than 70% of an LTL carrier’s costs are paid each week since an LTL carrier pays its drivers weekly and buys their fuel daily. Cash flow is significant for even the best-capitalized and best-operating LTL carriers.
Q: What is the one thing that shippers could do to better prepare their LTL shipments?
A:The shipper should communicate their shipping plan early in the day. Early communication allows the carrier to plan and execute its work with fewer errors and less cost. The shipper should update the carrier during the course of the day if the shipping plan were to change. Digital API/EDI communication is preferred to phone calls and emails.
LTL carriers’ costs are driven by time, distance, and space. A shipper should prepare each LTL shipment handling unit to maximize the pounds per cubic foot of the shipment, while minimizing the amount of space that the shipment occupies in the trailer. The extra time and expense that is spent improving the density of a shipment handling unit is more than offset by the reduction in the carrier’s cost and the price that will be charged to the shipper.
Providing shipment handling dimensions in addition to the weight for each LTL shipment will enable carriers to reduce their costs and their prices while also reducing carbon emissions on a per-shipment basis.
Q: Pitt Ohio has an extensive sustainability program. Why is this important to your company and what do you hope to achieve?
A:In 2013, Pitt Ohio initiated a sustainability strategy with a focus on people, planet, and purpose. Over the years, we have engaged our employees to take many small actions that collectively make a big difference. In the past five years, Pitt Ohio’s carbon emissions per shipment have declined by 6.1%. Pitt Ohio’s sustainability strategy has enabled the company to differentiate itself in a crowded marketplace. The sustainability strategy has enabled the company to strengthen our work culture, improve our efficiency, grow our business, and give back to the communities where we operate.
Pitt Ohio gets a lot of attention for using energy generated by our terminals’ onsite wind turbines and solar panels to power our buildings and some of our equipment. However, the vast preponderance of Pitt Ohio’s carbon emissions come from our trucks. Pitt Ohio’s strong work culture has galvanized our drivers and mechanics to improve fuel efficiency and reduce carbon emissions each and every day.
These daily small actions involve the successful execution of business basics: Fully utilize the cubic capacity of trailers, put the right-size shipment on the right-size truck, reduce empty miles, accelerate and brake gradually, and ensure that all of the tires on the trucks in our fleet are properly inflated. Proper execution of these business basics has enabled Pitt Ohio to boost its fleet’s mpg performance by 8% in the past five years. Less fuel is consumed, less carbon is emitted, and more dollars are saved.
Pitt Ohio’s sustainability initiative enables the company to position itself as an employer of choice. We find that some drivers are interested in driving new electric vehicle trucks. We also find that employee candidates want to work for a company that is focused on reducing emissions and giving back to local communities.
Q: You are the chairman of the LTL Digital Council. Would you describe the work of this group and its significance for the industry?
A: Over time, freight rates increase due to rising labor, equipment replacement, insurance, and toll costs. Successful carriers look to other areas to offset these rising costs. The LTL trucking industry has been slow to automate administrative processes. Today, most LTL shipments are tendered to a carrier with a paper bill of lading.
An LTL carrier’s costs will decrease and its service will improve when it digitizes the exchange of information between shippers, 3PLs, and carriers. Today, most shippers manage their customer orders in a digital format. However, when the shipper picks, packs, and creates an LTL shipment, this digital information is converted to a paper bill of lading. Then the carrier needs to pay an employee resource to transpose this information back into a digital format so that the shipment can be managed in the carrier’s operating system. Small-package orders have been digitally transmitted between shippers and carriers for more than 20 years.
The creation of a standard LTL billing-of-lading API [application programming interface] simplifies the process for LTL shippers, 3PLs, and carriers to move to digital communication. Digital communication will reduce cost and improve service.
The good news is that the LTL industry has made significant progress in the area of digitalization in 2023. Eight carriers have fulfilled the pledge to build an API to the NMFTA’s [National Motor Freight Traffic Association] digital bill-of-lading standard. They represent 37% of LTL industry revenue. Combined with all carriers that have pledged, they represent 72% of industry revenue.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."