Victoria Kickham started her career as a newspaper reporter in the Boston area before moving into B2B journalism. She has covered manufacturing, distribution and supply chain issues for a variety of publications in the industrial and electronics sectors, and now writes about everything from forklift batteries to omnichannel business trends for DC Velocity.
Demand for wireless charging is gaining steam in warehousing and logistics, largely because of the growing use of autonomous vehicles and equipment in those environments—and a resulting need to maximize uptime, minimize wear and tear, and do away with the work involved in stopping to manually charge a piece of equipment. It’s all part of a continued effort to simplify and streamline daily operations, and experts say it may have industry-changing implications.
Wireless charging—also known as inductive charging—is a way to charge batteries in electric vehicles or equipment without plugging them directly into a power socket. The equipment is placed on or near a charging pad (which is plugged into the main electrical system) so that an electrical charge can pass safely between the two. Both devices contain induction coils that create an electromagnetic field when they get near each other, allowing electricity to pass from the pad to the equipment. The method eliminates the need for mechanical charging contacts as well as rooms or spaces in a facility dedicated to charging—and it promotes opportunity charging, allowing equipment to run continuously. This cuts back on maintenance, saves time, and ultimately speeds up warehouse operations, proponents of the technology say.
“The motivation [for this technology] is robustness,” explains Matthieu Ebert, executive in charge of the U.S. office for German wireless charging technology companyWiferion, which designs charging systems for equipment that runs on electric batteries. “You don’t want unplanned downtime. Wireless charging takes away the potential failures involved. There are no contacts, no objects to crash into, no wear and tear—overall, it’s really taking away the pain points of users who require 100% robust operation of their [equipment].”
There are a handful of companies in the industrial wireless charging space today, with most focused on solutions that power autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) and automated guided vehicles (AGVs), as Wiferion’s products do. Those solutions are becoming more advanced and gaining traction industrywide, and the experts say the next step is applying wireless charging to traditional forklifts, which they agree is a more difficult nut to crack, for many reasons. Still, technology advances are creating that possibility and laying the groundwork for a more wireless future for the warehouse.
AUTONOMOUS EQUIPMENT DRIVES ADOPTION
Ebert says a wireless charging “breakthrough” has occurred in the AMR and AGV market, explaining that a growing number of end-users and equipment manufacturers are now using or testing Wiferion’s technology. To date, he says, the company has sold about 8,000 of its wireless charging systems—mostly in Europe but in the United States as well—and works with more than 150 equipment manufacturers who install the systems in their vehicles and robots. The technology provides AMRs and AGVs with an “in-process” charging solution that consists of a wall box and charging pad that can be installed in suitable locations in the warehouse (usually somewhere along the route the robot or vehicle travels), and a rechargeable power source that is contained inside the robot or vehicle. There are no contacts, plugs, or sliding connections for the charger. The AMRs and AGVs automatically start to charge when they approach the charging point, which they can do from any direction.
The lack of mechanical contacts makes the system practically maintenance-free—no oxidized plugs or broken cables to worry about.
Harold Vanasse, senior director of marketing/motive power global for Pennsylvania-basedEnerSys, agrees that lower maintenance and reduced wear and tear are driving forces behind wireless charging for industrial applications today. This is largely due to the tight labor market and a resulting need to implement systems that rely less on human labor for routine tasks. He says rising use of automated equipment like AMRs and AGVs in the warehouse creates a natural fit for wireless charging, which can be integrated into the equipment and linked to the software and control systems that power the trucks, promoting a seamless charging process that takes the human element out of the equation.
EnerSys—which provides a range of stored energy solutions for industrial equipment, including lead-acid batteries, lithium-ion batteries, thin plate pure lead (TPPL) batteries, chargers, and related accessories—launched its own wireless charging solution during the ProMat material handling show in Chicago earlier this year. The charger is chemistry-independent and capable of charging lead-acid, TPPL, and Li-ion batteries, according to Vanasse. Not surprisingly, the initial focus of the charging solution is the automated slice of the market. Like Wiferion, EnerSys is working with equipment manufacturers to integrate the charging system into AMRs and AGVs.
“You’re seeing [wireless charging] in automation because everything is programmed in. It’s an integration effort—you’re not buying a charger like you do for a flooded [lead-acid battery] product,” he says. “The allure is that this process is more reliable and doesn’t require any maintenance. If we’re talking about this at this time next year, there will be a fair amount of these on the market—and certainly in two years.”
Interest is expected to grow from there.
“Eventually—and we’re already working on this—you’ll see this move to manual vehicles,” he says.
Ebert agrees and points to the entry of EnerSys and other long-established battery makers into the market as industrywide validation for the potential of wireless charging to change the industry.
“We’ve shown that there are some very, very good use cases. If a large corporation like EnerSys jumps on the train, we are on the right path,” Ebert says, emphasizing the use cases in robotics and automated trucks. “As soon as a truck is automated, you don’t want to have humans do the charging—so [it makes sense that] deployment will happen via the automated trucks. This spread with automated lift trucks is then going to generate understanding and acceptance of the technology, and then it will circle back to traditional [equipment].”
NEXT STOP, MANUAL FORK TRUCKS
The experts say there are hurdles to applying wireless charging to traditional, manually operated forklifts, including issues like placement of the charging pads and vehicle alignment. Those challenges are easily solved in automated systems by programming stops into the vehicle’s control system, but with a human operator, much more is left to chance. At least one wireless charging company is already addressing those issues, though.
Vermont-basedResonant Link was founded in 2018 with the goal of creating wireless technology that works to seamlessly and continuously power the electronic devices that have become integrated into modern life. The company targets four key industries: medical devices, electric vehicles, consumer electronics, and industrial and material handling equipment. Its material handling efforts are focused on powering traditional and automated lift trucks, according to CEO Grayson Zulauf, who says alignment is one of the company’s key differentiators.
“For wireless charging, you need to align the two sides of the system when you park, [and] that’s the limit of the area you can charge in,” he explains. “With the other chargers in the industry, you need to park within a [roughly] two- by two-inch target area, which is really hard to line up if you’re driving a large reach truck.”
Resonant Link’s technology allows for a 10- by 12-inch charging area—about five times larger.
“That’s what … sets us apart,” he adds. “You want to park and walk away, not repark to get into this super-small area.”
Zulauf says the company has two primary goals for industrial and material handling customers: to reduce the cost of running their fleet and provide the safest charging system possible. Resonant Link’s chargers feature live and foreign object detection, and are built to work in harsh conditions, including those with uneven surfaces and wide temperature ranges. The company is working with a handful of equipment manufacturers and end-users who are testing the technology, and Zulauf says he expects to begin running pilot programs at customer sites by the end of this year, scaling up to full sites in 2024, with the technology being offered as a standard option on lift trucks in 2025.
“I think there will be an even faster adoption [of wireless charging] for automated vehicles, but there are fewer of those out there,” he says. “Right now, we are very focused on [traditional] lift trucks.”
He says he views the industry’s trajectory in three stages: First, replacing wired chargers with wireless systems for lower maintenance and a better operator experience; next, putting them in the places where vehicles are working—in racks, at the ends of aisles, and at loading docks, for example; and third, integrating wireless charging throughout a facility, making the warehouse “an integrated energy management system.”
Energy management is a key term, and one that leaders at Quebec-based forklift battery manufacturer UgoWork say is a guiding light across the industry. Company co-founder and CEO Philippe Beauchamp agrees that wireless charging for material handling is in the very early stages, but says there is a thirst for new technologies that makes this an exciting time to work in the stored energy solutions business.
UgoWork does not offer wireless charging today but rather, goes to market with an energy-as-a-service business model designed to take over battery maintenance and management for its warehousing customers so that they can focus on getting products out the door faster. It’s the same principle, he says: removing barriers, streamlining operations, and creating a more efficiently run warehouse.
“Customers everywhere want to try new things; they’re open minded, and it’s fantastic,” Beauchamp says. “UgoWork and the wireless technology companies, we’re really working on the same thing: simplifying the charging process.”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."