Victoria Kickham started her career as a newspaper reporter in the Boston area before moving into B2B journalism. She has covered manufacturing, distribution and supply chain issues for a variety of publications in the industrial and electronics sectors, and now writes about everything from forklift batteries to omnichannel business trends for DC Velocity.
Business leaders are looking at all aspects of their operations to find ways to become more environmentally friendly these days, from energy and water usage in their facilities, to fuel consumption in their transportation networks, to the types of paper and packaging they consume across their operations. Experts say packaging is an especially hot topic, and they point to the growing ranks of businesses seeking sustainable solutions for product transport—the boxes, trays, pallets, and containers used to move products through their supply chains.
Demand for reusable transport packaging (RTP), as it’s known, increased 66% in 2020 and was expected to rise 88% in 2021 on its way to even higher levels this year, according to the Reusable Packaging Association (RPA), which published its first annual “State of the Industry” report on RTP in late 2020 and plans to release new data later this year. Consumers’ concern for the environment and the growing use of automated equipment throughout the supply chain were driving forces cited at the time, and they continue to be key motivators, according to Norm Kukuk, president of reusable packaging manufacturer Orbis and a member of RPA, which represents both suppliers and users of reusable packaging.
“We are seeing more interest, absolutely,” says Kukuk, emphasizing the increased demand for reusables in the food, medical, and pharmaceutical industries, which have also been major adopters of automated material handling equipment. “Our plastic packaging is high tolerance [so it can be used more easily] on conveyors and in automation. Because of that, [plastic] pallets and handheld totes are seeing more demand.”
But plastic isn’t the only reusable getting attention. Metal and wood factor into it as well, according to RPA, which defines reusable transport packaging solutions as those made from durable materials designed for multiple uses in rigorous operations and logistics systems. They stand in contrast to “one-way” packaging solutions, such as corrugated boxes and containers, which are designed for a single use before being recycled or tossed in a landfill. Reusable transport packaging represented a little more than 20% of the total global packaging market in 2020, also according to RPA, a figure that is rising as business customers and consumers alike seek to become part of the circular economy.
“These packaging products are designed for lasting use in a system that ensures their effective recovery and return for continuous purpose,” according to RPA. “Reusable transport packaging products are largely designed for business-to-business applications, although the growth of e-commerce and home delivery applications is opening opportunities for the effective use of reusable packaging for transporting merchandise to households” as well.
MAKING A ROUND TRIP
The goal of reusable transport packaging is to replace one-way solutions with those that can be used multiple times. Pallets are a case in point. Both wood and plastic pallets can be reused, and increasingly, the plastic variety are being used over and over again in food and beverage operations, often because they are easy to clean and are less prone to contamination, according to Kukuk. Third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) are investing more in this type of reusable packaging as well, he says.
“Our goal is to replace limited-use with high-volume-reuse packaging,” says Kukuk, adding that Orbis’ plastic pallets, in particular, are designed for the circular economy—where they’re used as many times as possible. It’s all part of a broader effort to develop a “circular supply chain,” in which the reusables are returned to the point of origin to be refilled and sent out again. In other models, reusables are managed by a third party that pools pallets, containers, and other reusables and then readies them for reuse by other partners in the pooling system.
The frequency of reuse varies. Pallet lifespan, for instance, largely depends on how the unit is used, and manufacturers of both the plastic and wood varieties tout the virtues of whichever type they make. Kukuk says one of Orbis’ plastic pallets recently underwent testing at the Virginia Tech Center for Packaging and Unit Load Design and was found to have a lifespan of more than 400 cycles, for instance. Meanwhile, experts at the National Wooden Pallet & Container Association note that wood is the only 100% renewable and recyclable reusable product available, and that wooden pallets still dominate the market. But no matter where a company stands on the issue, both products fit the bill as reusable transport packaging and can become part of a company’s environmental sustainability story—especially as environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives gain prominence in supply chains.
“Our customers have ESG [objectives] that they are committed to, [and] we are helping them understand how reusable packaging can help them meet those goals,” Kukuk explains, noting that Orbis recently hired a sustainability director to advance those efforts.
A separate industry study on the demand for returnable transport packaging underscores those sentiments. A March 2023 report from the market research firm Future Market Insights estimated that the returnable transport packaging market would hit nearly $28 billion this year and rise to nearly $46 billion over the next 10 years, primarily due to an increased focus on reuse and recycling worldwide, ongoing demands to reduce waste, and a push to reduce the utilization of single-use packages in favor of the round-trip variety. The report cites the retail, food and beverage, logistics, chemicals, and building and construction sectors as key market drivers.
A CASE IN POINT
A recent sustainable packaging project by the materials science company W.L. Gore & Associates illustrates the ways in which companies are trying to reduce their environmental impact by rethinking the way they transport goods. Gore—which is best known for its waterproof, breathable Gore-Tex fabrics—switched from using single-use cardboard containers to transport large, bulky rolls of one of its products to using reusable metal racks. Ken Staz, the company’s U.S. regional logistics operations leader, presented details of the project at the recent annual meeting of the Warehousing Education and Research Council (WERC), a warehouse industry trade group.
Staz explained that the previous shipping method required customers to either discard or recycle the cardboard boxes once the product was received—taking the disposal decision out of Gore’s hands. To gain more control over the process, Gore built a prototype of a reusable metal shipping rack that could accommodate the 240-pound rolls of product. Once the product has been removed, the racks can be broken down at the customer location and shipped back for re-use. Today, Gore is using the racks for international shipments, which are handled by the company’s third-party logistics service provider. The 3PL manages the labeling and tracking of the racks for shipping as well as sorting, inspecting, and restocking the racks at Gore’s facilities after they’ve been returned.
Staz told attendees the project will achieve a return on investment (ROI) in just over three years and has yielded annual cost savings as well.
Above all, he says, it reinforces the company’s desire to be kinder to the environment and demonstrates its willingness to take on projects aimed at meeting that goal.
“Today, sustainability is more front of mind than it has been historically,” he told attendees.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."