When temperatures rise, so do the risks of hazardous heat exposure in the workplace. OSHA’s Pamela Barclay discusses what employers can do to safeguard workers in their warehouses and DCs.
David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
As the calendar turns to June and temperatures across North America start to climb, millions of U.S. workers face increasing risk of heat stress in the workplace. Warehouses, distribution centers, manufacturing plants, and transload facilities often lack good climate control. In buildings without air conditioning, temperatures can easily top 100 degrees with high humidity—conditions that raise the risk of heat stroke and heat fatigue for those working inside. In addition to the safety risks, heat exposure has economic implications: Overall productivity can suffer when workers are stressed by high temperatures.
To learn more about how rising temperatures can affect the health and productivity of workers, we turned to Pamela Barclay, a health scientist with the Directorate of Standards and Guidance at OSHA. She focuses on safety and health programs at the agency and coordinates the Safe + Sound and Heat Illness Prevention campaigns.
Barclay graduated from the University of Michigan with a Master of Public Health degree in environmental health and risk analysis, and a Master of Science degree in behavior, education, and communication.
Q: Why are summer months more dangerous for workers in industrial settings?
A: It does not have to be extremely hot for a worker to develop heat illness. Performing physical labor in a warm environment can be enough to trigger heat illness. Heat exposure can happen indoors (in manufacturing plants, restaurants, bakeries, etc.) or outdoors (in agriculture, construction, and the like) and can occur during any season if the conditions are right, not only during heat waves.
A number of factors can contribute to heat stress in workers. They include high temperature and high relative humidity, which makes it difficult for the body to cool itself through sweating; radiant heat from sunlight; artificial heat sources such as furnaces; and poor air circulation. Some job-related risk factors include strenuous physical activity and heavy or non-breathable work clothes that reduce the body’s ability to dissipate excess heat.
Q: Why is it important to pay special attention to new and returning workers?
A: Research suggests that almost half of heat-related deaths occur on the worker’s first day on the job. While heat exposure can put any worker at risk, it’s important for employers to acclimatize new and returning workers to allow them to adjust to working in the heat. This can be done by gradually increasing workloads and allowing workers to take more frequent breaks during the first week as they build their tolerance.
Q: What are some of the signs that a person is being affected by heat stress?
A: Employers and workers should become familiar with the symptoms of heat illness. These symptoms include (but are not limited to) headaches, nausea, heavy sweating, hot dry skin, elevated body temperature, thirst, and decreased urine output. It’s especially critical that they be trained to recognize symptoms that indicate a medical emergency. These include abnormal thinking or behavior, slurred speech, seizures, and loss of consciousness.
Do not try to diagnose what type of heat illness is occurring (heat exhaustion, heat stroke, etc.). Diagnosing types of heat illness is often difficult because symptoms of multiple heat-related illnesses can occur together. Time is of the essence. These conditions can worsen quickly and result in fatalities. Cool the worker and call 911.
Q: You mention cooling the worker. What actions should be taken if heat illness is suspected?
A: When heat illness symptoms are present, employers and co-workers should promptly provide first aid. This includes actions like taking the worker to a cooler area, either with A/C or in the shade; immersing the worker in cold water or an ice bath; removing outer layers of clothing, especially heavy protective clothing; placing ice or cold wet towels on the head, neck, trunk, armpits, and groin; and using fans to circulate air around the worker.
Workers showing any signs of heat illness should never be left alone. When in doubt, call 911.
Q: What should employers do to mitigate the risk of heat stress within their facilities?
A: Under the OSH Act [the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970—the law that created OSHA], employers are responsible for protecting workers from known hazards, including heat. To mitigate the risk of hazardous heat, employers should plan ahead.
At a minimum, employers should have protocols in place to ensure the availability of water, rest breaks, and shade. This means providing cool drinking water, scheduling rest breaks, and providing a shaded or cool area for workers to recover from the heat when they take those breaks.
Q: You mentioned planning ahead. What should this entail?
A: Establishing a heat injury and illness prevention plan is vital to keeping workers safe. When developing a plan, there are various elements that employers should consider. These include determining who will provide insight on a daily basis, identifying steps [for acclimating] new and returning workers so they will gradually develop heat tolerance, and [developing strategies for protecting] people at the worksite who may be at increased risk.
Employers should also ensure that their protocols for responding to heat illness are effective. This should include implementing the appropriate controls to reduce heat exposure, outlining how to respond to a heat advisory or heat warning in the area, and having daily on-site monitoring of environmental conditions and signs of heat illness regardless of job shift.
Workers should also be trained to recognize the risks and signs of heat illness. This training is key to prevention and should underscore the importance of water, rest, shade, and first aid for heat illness.
Q: What can workers themselves do to minimize their risk of developing heat illness?
A: Heat illnesses can affect anyone, regardless of age or physical condition. However, some workers may handle heat stress less effectively than others. There are many factors that have a role in creating a heat-stress risk to workers. These include health conditions like heart disease, high blood pressure, obesity, and diabetes. They also include physical characteristics, such as age, level of physical fitness, pregnancy, and how acclimatized an individual is to the heat.
In addition, some medications, like diuretics, may make workers more susceptible to heat illness. Furthermore, certain health behaviors such as low water intake and the use of alcohol or illicit drugs—like opioids, methamphetamine, and cocaine—are risk factors for heat illness. When in doubt, workers should talk to their health-care provider about whether they can work safely in the heat.
Employers should recognize that not all workers tolerate heat the same way. When heat hazards are present, workers should receive training from their employers about personal factors that can make them more susceptible to heat-related illness, and employers should enact workplace controls that focus on making jobs safe for all of their workers.
Q: Are there OSHA regulations that cover workplace heat stress that companies should be aware of?
A: Under the OSH Act, employers are responsible for providing workplaces free of known safety and health hazards. In October 2021, OSHA published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) for Heat Injury and Illness Prevention in Outdoor and Indoor Work Settings. The ANPRM announced that OSHA is initiating the rulemaking process to consider a heat-specific workplace standard.
The next step in the rulemaking process will be to convene a Small Business Advocacy Review Panel, in accordance with the requirements of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA), to hear comments from small-entity representatives on the impacts of any heat-specific standard. Updates on the rulemaking process will be provided on OSHA’s heat rulemaking web page.
Some states have also promulgated their own standards covering heat stress. Currently, these states are California, Colorado, Minnesota, Oregon, and Washington. These regulations vary, so we encourage employers in these states to review their state’s regulation and reach out to their state or OSHA Region to ensure they are meeting the requirements for their respective standard.
Q: What are the penalties for failure to comply with OSHA regulations for assuring a safe work environment?
Q: How can employers stay up to date on OSHA’s occupational heat hazard-related efforts?
A: Check out OSHA’s Heat Illness Prevention Campaign for resources that can help! Sign up for the monthly e-newsletter, “The Heat Source,” to stay up to date on new materials and ways to prevent heat illness at work. Your readers can find this information and more on OSHA’s website.
Our newest opportunity for stakeholders to engage is by participating in OSHA’s “Beat the Heat” contest, which is designed to raise awareness about the hazards of heat exposure in indoor and outdoor workplaces. The contest is open to stakeholders (businesses, unions, educational institutions, government entities, and individuals) nationwide. Participants must create an awareness tool, such as an infographic, training curriculum, poster, or logo, for workplaces to increase heat hazard recognition among employers and workers. The contest is open now! To learn more about the competition, visit the OSHA website. The deadline for entries is June 9.
Even as a last-minute deal today appeared to delay the tariff on Mexico, that deal is set to last only one month, and tariffs on the other two countries are still set to go into effect at midnight tonight.
Once new U.S. tariffs go into effect, those other countries are widely expected to respond with retaliatory tariffs of their own on U.S. exports, that would reduce demand for U.S. and manufacturing goods. In the context of that unpredictable business landscape, many U.S. business groups have been pressuring the White House to pull back from the new policy.
Here is a sampling of the reaction to the tariff plan by the U.S. business community:
American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA)
“Tariffs are taxes,” AAPA President and CEO Cary Davis said in a release. “Though the port industry supports President Trump’s efforts to combat the flow of illicit drugs, tariffs will slow down our supply chains, tax American businesses, and increase costs for hard-working citizens. Instead, we call on the Administration and Congress to thoughtfully pursue alternatives to achieving these policy goals and exempt items critical to national security from tariffs, including port equipment.”
Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA)
“We understand the president is working toward an agreement. The leaders of all four nations should come together and work to reach a deal before Feb. 4 because enacting broad-based tariffs will be disruptive to the U.S. economy,” Michael Hanson, RILA’s Senior Executive Vice President of Public Affairs, said in a release. “The American people are counting on President Trump to grow the U.S. economy and lower inflation, and broad-based tariffs will put that at risk.”
National Association of Manufacturers (NAM)
“Manufacturers understand the need to deal with any sort of crisis that involves illicit drugs crossing our border, and we hope the three countries can come together quickly to confront this challenge,” NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons said in a release. “However, with essential tax reforms left on the cutting room floor by the last Congress and the Biden administration, manufacturers are already facing mounting cost pressures. A 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico threatens to upend the very supply chains that have made U.S. manufacturing more competitive globally. The ripple effects will be severe, particularly for small and medium-sized manufacturers that lack the flexibility and capital to rapidly find alternative suppliers or absorb skyrocketing energy costs. These businesses—employing millions of American workers—will face significant disruptions. Ultimately, manufacturers will bear the brunt of these tariffs, undermining our ability to sell our products at a competitive price and putting American jobs at risk.”
American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA)
“Widespread tariff actions on Mexico, Canada, and China announced this evening will inject massive costs into our inflation-weary economy while exposing us to a damaging tit-for-tat tariff war that will harm key export markets that U.S. farmers and manufacturers need,” Steve Lamar, AAFA’s president and CEO, said in a release. “We should be forging deeper collaboration with our free trade agreement partners, not taking actions that call into question the very foundation of that partnership."
Healthcare Distribution Alliance (HDA)
“We are concerned that placing tariffs on generic drug products produced outside the U.S. will put additional pressure on an industry that is already experiencing financial distress. Distributors and generic manufacturers and cannot absorb the rising costs of broad tariffs. It is worth noting that distributors operate on low profit margins — 0.3 percent. As a result, the U.S. will likely see new and worsened shortages of important medications and the costs will be passed down to payers and patients, including those in the Medicare and Medicaid programs," the group said in a statement.
National Retail Federation (NRF)
“We support the Trump administration’s goal of strengthening trade relationships and creating fair and favorable terms for America,” NRF Executive Vice President of Government Relations David French said in a release. “But imposing steep tariffs on three of our closest trading partners is a serious step. We strongly encourage all parties to continue negotiating to find solutions that will strengthen trade relationships and avoid shifting the costs of shared policy failures onto the backs of American families, workers and small businesses.”
Businesses are scrambling today to insulate their supply chains from the impacts of a trade war being launched by the Trump Administration, which is planning to erect high tariff walls on Tuesday against goods imported from Canada, Mexico, and China.
Tariffs are import taxes paid by American companies and collected by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Agency as goods produced in certain countries cross borders into the U.S.
In a last-minute deal announced on Monday, leaders of both countries said the tariffs on goods from Mexico will be delayed one month after that country agreed to send troops to the U.S.-Mexico border in an attempt to stem to flow of drugs such as fentanyl from Mexico, according to published reports.
If the deal holds, it could avoid some of the worst impacts of the tariffs on U.S. manufacturers that rely on parts and raw materials imported from Mexico. That blow would be particularly harsh on companies in the automotive and electrical equipment sectors, according to an analysis by S&P Global Ratings.
However, tariff damage is still on track to occur for U.S. companies with tight supply chain connections to Canada, concentrated in commodity-related processing sectors, the firm said. That disruption would increase if those countries responded with retaliatory tariffs of their own, a move that would slow the export of U.S. goods. Such an event would hurt most for American businesses in the agriculture and fishing, metals, and automotive areas, according to the analysis from Satyam Panday, Chief US and Canada Economist, S&P Global Ratings.
To dull the pain of those events, U.S. business interests would likely seek to cushion the declines in output by looking to factors such as exchange rate movements, availability of substitutes, and the willingness of producers to absorb the higher cost associated with tariffs, Panday said.
Weighing the long-term effects of a trade war
The extent to which increased tariffs will warp long-standing supply chain patterns is hard to calculate, since it is largely dependent on how long these tariffs will actually last, according to a statement from Tony Pelli, director of supply chain resilience, BSI Consulting. “The pause [on tariffs with Mexico] will help reduce the impacts on agricultural products in particular, but not necessarily on the automotive industry given the high degree of integration across all three North American countries,” he said.
“Tariffs on Canada or Mexico will disrupt supply chains beyond just finished goods,” Pelli said. “Some products cross the US, Mexico, and Canada borders four to five times, with the greatest impact on the auto and electronics industries. These supply chains have been tightly integrated for around 30 years, and it will be difficult for firms to simply source elsewhere. There are dense supplier networks along the US border with Mexico and Canada (especially Ontario) that you can’t just pick up and move somewhere else, which would likely slow or even stop auto manufacturing in the US for a time.”
If the tariffs on either Canada or Mexico stay in place for an extended period, the effects will soon become clear, said Hamish Woodrow, head of strategic analytics at Motive, a fleet management and operations platform. “Ultimately, the burden of these tariffs will fall on U.S. consumers and retailers. Prices will rise, and businesses will pass along costs as they navigate increased expenses and uncertainty,” Woodrow said.
But in the meantime, companies with international supply chains are quickly making contingency plans for any of the possible outcomes. “The immediate impact of tariffs on trucking, freight, and supply chains will be muted. Goods already en route, shipments six weeks out on the water, and landed inventory will continue to flow, meaning the real disruption will be felt in Q2 as businesses adjust to the new reality,” Woodrow said.
“By the end of the day, companies will be deploying mitigation strategies—many will delay inventory shipments to later in the year, waiting to see if the policy shifts or exemptions are introduced. Those who preloaded inventory will likely adopt a wait-and-see approach, holding off on further adjustments until the market reacts. In the short term, sourcing alternatives are limited, forcing supply chains to pause and reassess long-term investments while monitoring policy developments,” said Woodrow.
Editor's note: This story was revised on February 3 to add input from BSI and Motive.
Businesses dependent on ocean freight are facing shipping delays due to volatile conditions, as the global average trip for ocean shipments climbed to 68 days in the fourth quarter compared to 60 days for that same quarter a year ago, counting time elapsed from initial booking to clearing the gate at the final port, according to E2open.
Those extended transit times and booking delays are the ripple effects of ongoing turmoil at key ports that is being caused by geopolitical tensions, labor shortages, and port congestion, Dallas-based E2open said in its quarterly “Ocean Shipping Index” report.
The most significant contributor to the year-over-year (YoY) increase is actual transit time, alongside extraordinary volatility that has created a complex landscape for businesses dependent on ocean freight, the report found.
"Economic headwinds, geopolitical turbulence and uncertain trade routes are creating unprecedented disruptions within the ocean shipping industry. From continued Red Sea diversions to port congestion and labor unrest, businesses face a complex landscape of obstacles, all while grappling with possibility of new U.S. tariffs," Pawan Joshi, chief strategy officer (CSO) at e2open, said in a release. "We can expect these ongoing issues will be exacerbated by the Lunar New Year holiday, as businesses relying on Asian suppliers often rush to place orders, adding strain to their supply chains.”
Lunar New Year this year runs from January 29 to February 8, and often leads to supply chain disruptions as massive worker travel patterns across Asia leads to closed factories and reduced port capacity.
That changing landscape is forcing companies to adapt or replace their traditional approaches to product design and production. Specifically, many are changing the way they run factories by optimizing supply chains, increasing sustainability, and integrating after-sales services into their business models.
“North American manufacturers have embraced the factory of the future. Working with service providers, many companies are using AI and the cloud to make production systems more efficient and resilient,” Bob Krohn, partner at ISG, said in the “2024 ISG Provider Lens Manufacturing Industry Services and Solutions report for North America.”
To get there, companies in the region are aggressively investing in digital technologies, especially AI and ML, for product design and production, ISG says. Under pressure to bring new products to market faster, manufacturers are using AI-enabled tools for more efficient design and rapid prototyping. And generative AI platforms are already in use at some companies, streamlining product design and engineering.
At the same time, North American manufacturers are seeking to increase both revenue and customer satisfaction by introducing services alongside or instead of traditional products, the report says. That includes implementing business models that may include offering subscription, pay-per-use, and asset-as-a-service options. And they hope to extend product life cycles through an increasing focus on after-sales servicing, repairs. and condition monitoring.
Additional benefits of manufacturers’ increased focus on tech include better handling of cybersecurity threats and data privacy regulations. It also helps build improved resilience to cope with supply chain disruptions by adopting cloud-based supply chain management, advanced analytics, real-time IoT tracking, and AI-enabled optimization.
“The changes of the past several years have spurred manufacturers into action,” Jan Erik Aase, partner and global leader, ISG Provider Lens Research, said in a release. “Digital transformation and a culture of continuous improvement can position them for long-term success.”
Women are significantly underrepresented in the global transport sector workforce, comprising only 12% of transportation and storage workers worldwide as they face hurdles such as unfavorable workplace policies and significant gender gaps in operational, technical and leadership roles, a study from the World Bank Group shows.
This underrepresentation limits diverse perspectives in service design and decision-making, negatively affects businesses and undermines economic growth, according to the report, “Addressing Barriers to Women’s Participation in Transport.” The paper—which covers global trends and provides in-depth analysis of the women’s role in the transport sector in Europe and Central Asia (ECA) and Middle East and North Africa (MENA)—was prepared jointly by the World Bank Group, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ), the European Investment Bank (EIB), and the International Transport Forum (ITF).
The slim proportion of women in the sector comes at a cost, since increasing female participation and leadership can drive innovation, enhance team performance, and improve service delivery for diverse users, while boosting GDP and addressing critical labor shortages, researchers said.
To drive solutions, the researchers today unveiled the Women in Transport (WiT) Network, which is designed to bring together transport stakeholders dedicated to empowering women across all facets and levels of the transport sector, and to serve as a forum for networking, recruitment, information exchange, training, and mentorship opportunities for women.
Initially, the WiT network will cover only the Europe and Central Asia and the Middle East and North Africa regions, but it is expected to gradually expand into a global initiative.
“When transport services are inclusive, economies thrive. Yet, as this joint report and our work at the EIB reveal, few transport companies fully leverage policies to better attract, retain and promote women,” Laura Piovesan, the European Investment Bank (EIB)’s Director General of the Projects Directorate, said in a release. “The Women in Transport Network enables us to unite efforts and scale impactful solutions - benefiting women, employers, communities and the climate.”