Emerging from the pandemic, transportation management enters its next phase
As shippers and carriers adjust and adapt to a post-pandemic world, technology providers face a fast-changing market full of new entrants and fresh demands as well as old challenges.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
There is no question that two years of pandemic-induced chaos upended the freight and logistics markets, unleashing challenges both familiar and new to the industry. Across the supply chain, the major players—shippers, 3PLs (third-party logistics companies), brokers, and capacity providers—struggled to adjust and find solutions to unprecedented issues. Those encompassed everything from goods delayed in China to congested ports and rail yards to capacity constraints, sky-high freight rates, rocketing fuel costs, and a remarkable surge in last-mile deliveries powered by stuck-at-home consumers embracing e-commerce like never before.
At the forefront of the battle were providers of transportation management systems (TMS)—the repositories, connecting pipes, and critical pumps of logistics and transportation data and information upon which efficient supply chain flows depend. Such systems, used in one form or another by virtually every node of the supply chain, were not immune to pandemic-fueled disruptions. Like others, they had to adapt and, in some cases, reinvent themselves faster than ever.
If anything, the TMS landscape has become more complex and fragmented at the same time, notes John Janson, director of global logistics for SanMar, one of the nation’s largest providers of wholesale branded apparel, bags, and caps. More than ever today, TMS platforms “have to connect and work with my current systems, my existing data sources, and connect me quickly with new data sources and apps,” he says, adding “I’m not buying a McLaren sports car. I need a partner that does the [freight management] blocking and tackling flawlessly and can adapt as my business changes—[a solution that] covers 80% of my needs, then I can modify for the rest.”
SanMar is a major consumer of ocean, rail intermodal, truckload, less-than-truckload (LTL), and especially parcel delivery services. It manufactures in 24 countries, is a top 75 U.S. importer, has 10 distribution centers in North America, and pushes out “somewhere north of 100,000 parcel shipments a night,” Janson reports.
He currently uses a homegrown TMS platform coupled with parcel-audit and freight-payment partners to plan and execute transportation and manage his spend. In his view, the biggest hurdle to overcome in a TMS selection decision: “for [TMS providers] to boil it down to a credible, defendable ROI that I can take to my IT steering committee and say with confidence this is the value we will get out of this investment.”
SHIFTING NETWORKS, CHANGING STRATEGIES
The past two years of shippers and 3PLs scrambling to find capacity at any cost and piecemealing together transportation networks are over. Now the focus is on how TMS resources can support more effective and actionable business intelligence, quickly and easily connect disparate partners and data sources, provide real-time analytics, enable process automation, and support networks with high-quality carriers, notes Tom Curee, executive vice president at 3PL Kingsgate Logistics.
That network analysis relies heavily on “TMS and the large responsibility they have for acquiring and storing data,” he says. “That’s probably one of the most important things they are doing now.”
Kingsgate employs a blended, or “hybrid,” approach to its TMS solution, using a base in-house capability complemented by and integrated with third-party best-of-breed apps that support specific functions, like shipment tracking, real-time capacity visibility, and predictive freight matching, in this case, with software provider Trucker Tools.
“Flexibility is a huge ask nowadays,” observes Curee. “The days of rigidity in systems are gone.” The other big ask, he says, is access to more data and the ability to effectively cleanse, incorporate, and apply it in a distributed management ecosystem, as new data sources are emerging all the time.
Transportation management systems play an important role in providing the “connective tissue” and serving as a reliable, common “repository of record” for accurate, clean supply chain data, he notes. Third-party service providers are “consumed with how we leverage all [the data], organize it where it makes sense, and apply it to running the business—and serving customers better,” Curee says.
Especially in a technology environment where powerful third-party apps are seemingly popping up every day, the pressure is on for TMS providers to “be faster to integrate and leverage innovation,” he says. “Integration skill and capability is a huge need today,” Curee adds. And not just innovation in what the TMS has built itself, “but [also] being able to incorporate literally dozens of other niche best-of-breed providers that are carving out a market and providing a piece of the puzzle shippers want to use.”
VERY LITTLE HANGOVER
As the saying goes, Mark Cubine, vice president of marketing and enterprise systems for McLeod Software, one of the largest providers of TMS solutions for carriers and 3PLs, has “been around the block” a few times. Two decades of experience in TMS software will provide that perspective. “The pandemic had very little hangover in our industry for 3PLs and carriers,” he’s observed.
“The [TMS] issues we were dealing with going into the pandemic are pretty much the same ones coming out.” He describes it as “a volatile period” but notes that, “at the end of the day, the problems facing the industry are little changed.” He cites issues such as fuel costs, driver recruiting and retention, truck parking, driver hours of service, and the bane of every trucker’s existence: excessive detention at pickup or delivery docks. Coupled with these are pricing decisions, lane and customer analysis, and optimally managing network capacity.
In Cubine’s view, the number one focus of any fleet-oriented TMS should be how it helps carriers and 3PLs “set up drivers for success.” It’s something “that the better carriers are being more mindful of,” he says. That requires trip-planning tools that can effectively match loads to driver availability and capability, recognize and account for the required HOS (hours-of-service) rest breaks, recommend optimal routes, create reasonable appointment windows, find the lowest-cost fuel, and identify available overnight parking and then adjust when exceptions or issues occur.
With electronic logging devices now ubiquitous across the industry, providing 24/7 accurate real-time location and time-on-task data, “we should never dispatch a driver on a load if they don’t have the hours to do it or if they can’t physically accomplish it,” Cubine emphasizes. “It’s all about keeping your promises to drivers” in terms of pay, working miles, operating safety, and maximizing hours of service and home time. “You have to know when you are not meeting that commitment to the driver and what you need to do to get back on plan,” he says, which is what today’s modern, integrated TMS platforms are designed to do.
Among the biggest challenges to keeping those promises: unwarranted or excessive driver detention. “A driver sitting at a dock waiting excessively for an unload is capacity wasted,” Cubine notes. TMS platforms have vastly improved their ability to track and quantify detention—and its costs—down to a single plant or warehouse. That data enable truckers and their shipper customers to know in real time when detention exceeds allowable limits and notify consignees what continued delays will cost them. And since the shipper pays the detention fees, they need to know nearly immediately when a consignee is failing to get that trucker out on time.
Cubine says that carriers also will use detention data to “blacklist” repeat offenders in order to avoid scheduling loads into facilities that consistently waste driver time. “Detention is the enemy of capacity, and of drivers earning what they deserve for their time and service,” he concludes.
SPEED, FLEXIBILITY, AND AGILITY
If the pandemic had any lasting impact on transportation management systems, it was creating the demand among customers that TMS providers become more resilient, agile, and adaptable, notes Steve Blough, chief innovation officer and cofounder of TMS provider MercuryGate, which runs some $93 billion worth of customer freight spend through its products annually.
“It’s not a ‘within the four walls’ operation anymore,” Blough says. “We have to allow people to collaborate and work in ways we never thought of before,” which means building out tools that support remote work; integrating with a raft of new application programming interfaces (APIs), whose ranks grow every week; continuing to enable decades-old electronic data interchange (EDI) connections; and allowing for mobile app access and data capture, among others.
“The speed of change is much faster than it has ever been, and it extends across a larger application ecosystem, from first to final mile,” Blough notes. “You have to adapt without waiting for code changes or software updates,” he adds. That means building out TMS offerings where workflow changes and user configuration are easily enabled, are more flexible, and can be accomplished and implemented in a fraction of the time previously required.
“The holy grail now is actionable intelligence, with systems that pull together multiple … apps, platforms, and data streams into a central repository,” he says. Getting the integration right is the challenge; that’s the foundation for continuous delivery of accurate data that drives reliable, timely information, intelligence, and informed decisions, he explains.
MercuryGate’s offering provides planning and visibility with an execution layer, Blough notes. “So we are not just seeing things but also taking action on them—or the system recommends an action,” he says. “The goal is to have the system do as much of the heavy lifting as possible, in an efficient and accurate way based on rules and historical information,” with exception alerts flagging something that needs attention. The ultimate benefit is process automation that drastically reduces manual work and makes the most of available capacity. “We have folks running fleets with hundreds of trucks, using just two dispatchers,” Blough says. “That’s exciting to see.”
And there’s more room for improvement, he believes, as the industry drives toward more true collaboration among shippers, carriers, and 3PLs. While the number of trucks on the road continues to increase every year, the percentage of those that are running empty or underutilized—some 30%—hasn’t really changed in decades, Blough notes. Those empty miles present both challenge and opportunity—for fleets as well as technology providers. “If we don’t get into a true collaborative world with truckload, we are never going to get out of these empty hauls, and the waste and emissions impact they represent,” he says. “And that’s the ultimate holy grail.”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."