David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
For supply chain professionals, 2022 turned out to be a classic good news/bad news kind of year. On the up side, the well-publicized port backlogs cleared up, inventory shortages started to ease, and the transportation capacity headaches all but vanished. On the down side, there were the macro-economic woes: runaway inflation, rising interest rates, a slowdown in economic output, and, of course, the prospect of recession.
So it’s no surprise that the question on everybody’s mind is, How will 2023 play out? Will the Fed manage to pull off a soft landing? Will the employment picture improve? Can we get inflation under control?
Members of the supply chain community most likely have a few additional questions: Will we get inventories back in balance? Where are freight rates headed? And is this the year long-delayed material handling projects finally get off the ground?
To get some insight into these and other questions, we turned to someone who’s uniquely qualified to weigh in on such matters. Gary Master, publisher of DC Velocity and COO of Agile Business Media, has an extensive background in business economics and more than 30 years’ experience in supply chain/logistics. As an executive at a supply chain-centered media company, he keeps close tabs on the economy in general and the supply chain/logistics market in particular.
As 2022 drew to a close, Group Editorial Director David Maloney sat down with Gary to get his take on what lies ahead. Here’s what he had to say:
Dave: 2022 was certainly a roller coaster ride for most supply chains. As we look ahead to 2023, what is the general health of our supply chains and the material handling industry?
Gary: If you start at the 30,000-foot view, material handling and supply chain are doing very well. The general economy has taken some lumps but overall is pretty healthy, too. We broke records for Amazon and for online retail spending over the Black Friday holiday. Retail is still pretty strong, even though consumer confidence is showing some signs of weakening. And that is good for material handlers and good for the supply chain. Right now, you’ve got a lot of material handling companies that still have backlogs for a lot of reasons, which means they’ve got the cash to invest in further research and development, and to fund their operations and keep them strong.
Dave: As you mentioned, consumers continue to spend and online sales remain brisk. Although consumer confidence is starting to wane, the strong holiday sales were good news for retailers trying to work down excess inventory and normalize things.
Gary: I am glad you brought up inventory because that is a hot button issue right now. We couldn’t get certain things for so long. There are still some things we can’t get. We continue to have that whole idea of a scavenger-hunt economy, but as retailers and some manufacturers stocked inventory, they stocked it across the board. Now they have inventory that they’ve got to burn off.
Dave: Unemployment remains below 4%, which is quite low historically. However, recent Labor Department job reports show job losses in transportation and warehousing. Do you foresee layoffs in those sectors even though it’s still difficult to find workers for frontline jobs?
Gary: It is really interesting because you have the Amazons of the world and others that have said they’re laying off several thousand people. However, a recent study showed that there are 0.52 workers for every frontline supply chain job. That means that with the labor market as tight as it is, there is going to be a continued need for automating and for reducing touches in fulfillment operations. So, supply chain and logistics is very well positioned for continued strength.
I would say you’re going to continue to see layoffs across some of the high-tech companies and across some upper management positions. But the individuals being laid off tend not to be the frontline workers in supply chain.
Dave: Those continuing labor constraints bode well for the material handling and automation sectors in 2023. Could you talk a little bit about what you see coming up this year?
Gary: Anything that can limit your exposure to the labor ups and downs will continue to be hot this year. Whether we’re in a recession or not, there’s no indication that the shortage of frontline workers will ease anytime soon. DC leaders have to make up the difference somewhere, and it has to be through productivity gains achieved through automation and advanced technology.
Dave: In the last couple of years, many automation projects were delayed due to parts shortages, shipping problems, and other factors, with timelines stretching out as much as two years. Is the situation easing, and do you think things will be better in 2023 for people who want to tackle automation projects?
Gary: I think that the situation with some of the critical components you need for a highly automated system is getting better, but it hasn’t gotten better yet in some areas, and that is a topic for its own discussion. But overall, there are still backlogs in the material handling industry. While normally a backlog is a bad thing, it is now becoming a good thing because it is going to fund and fuel further growth in our space.
The only real downside risk, Dave, is that companies may decide that, since they’ve already waited two years for their systems and may now have to wait another year, their original designs are becoming outdated and they need to go back to the drawing board to redo them. That is the only thing that concerns me there.
Dave: Do you have any predictions as to when those system availability problems might be resolved and the situation might begin to normalize?
Gary: July 11, 2023. No, just kidding, Dave. That is a great question. I would say you’re going to see more normalization in the middle of the year. I do believe we will have a mild recession, but I also think it will start to balance some things out. I think the chip situation is going to get much better and that supplies of other components will continue to improve, and that is going to allow us to get back to more-normalized supply chains across the board.
Dave: What do you see for the transportation industry? We’ve already seen some consolidation, and the industry continues to feel pressure from interest rates, capacity fluctuations, truck driver availability, and the price of fuel.
Gary: The transportation side is a lot murkier. Given the current global unrest, transportation could be in for a rocky 2023 as it adjusts to the new normal after the post-Covid rush.
Dave: So, prediction time: Where do you think the economy is going in 2023, and what does the future hold for the supply chain sector specifically?
Gary: Well, let’s start with the overall economy. We had two consecutive quarters of GDP recession, which means we were in a recession. But when the Q3 numbers came out, they showed positive GDP growth, breaking the streak. But are we going to have a couple of more soft decelerations in GDP growth in 2023? We probably will in Q1 and Q2, and maybe in Q3.
I think that folks have to be realistic about where we’re at right now. I think if you look at it, we have some things that are really going well for us. During some of the previous recessions, we had some bad things happening around the recession itself. In this particular economy, the housing market remains strong. And when I say housing market, I’m not just talking about pricing—the pricing is holding its own. Some of the heat is coming out of it, yet the credit ratings of the individuals who have purchased houses are much better than they were in past recessions. That is a good thing for us.
The backlog with material handling equipment manufacturers is a very, very good thing for us. We had record online sales for the recent holiday. So, Dave, I think that 2023 is going see a slight recession, but I think our industry is going to have a healthy year. The rate of growth is going to be lower than it has been, but we are coming off a record year. It is good news, bad news. The growth is going to be slower, but it is still going to be a great year in my opinion.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.