Market throws last-mile providers a change-up as consumers, retailers pivot
The pandemic supercharged last-mile delivery as stuck-at-home consumers ordered everything from treadmills to computers and furniture for their homes. Now with Covid subsiding, pocketbooks thinner, and inflation rising, is last-mile growth hitting a wall?
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
During the pandemic, fitness equipment for the home, computers and monitors, and furniture for newly established home offices filled the trucks of last-mile delivery providers. That, along with consumers relegated to their homes and undertaking all types of home improvement projects, drove last-mile volume growth at a 40% annual pace as over-the-threshold, “big and bulky” deliveries surged.
Fast forward a year. Consumers are still ordering goods for home delivery and installation, but often after visiting a brick-and-mortar store versus going online and filling a digital shopping cart. And while by some accounts, orders of fitness equipment and electronics have “flattened,” consumers have tossed the market a change-up, ordering goods for delivery to hybrid offices, being more selective about what they’re buying for the home, and scaling back on discretionary purchases as inflation raises the costs of virtually everything.
“What [the last-mile market] did in 2020 and ’21 was not reality,” nor was it sustainable, notes Satish Jindel, chief executive officer of shipping analytics firm ShipMatrix. “With [government stimulus payments,] everyone believed there was a Santa. But Santa is real only for children,” he quipped.
Instead, consumers are shifting much, though not all, of their spending back to services, Jindel says, adding: “People want and need human interaction, which is why you find people [doing more] eating out, spending more on travel and entertainment, and going back to the gym” while dialing back on buying big and bulky goods for the home or office.
RESIDENTIAL ON A ROLL
Estes Express Lines, as a less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier, has performed residential deliveries for years, notes Billy Hupp, the company’s executive vice president and chief operating officer. But it has been in the last five years that the company has formalized last-mile home delivery as a discrete service, investing in specialized equipment, driver training, and a complementary agent network in locations where Estes doesn’t have a significant presence.
During the pandemic, “we delivered more 65-inch TVs than the world could ever use,” joked Hupp. Estes does not itself do the “white glove” in-home delivery and installation service, instead deploying a network of agent-partners to provide those deliveries with two-person teams. The majority of Estes’ home deliveries are “to the threshold” service. “We do help get it in the house or put something in a garage or the backyard, as an accommodation if the customer requests it,” he clarifies. A dedicated customer service team for residential is there to help as well, while Estes’ tech platform provides real-time ETA updates texted to the consumer’s phone.
Like other providers, the company has seen a shift in the types of products going to homes in the past year. Where there once was a preponderance of electronics, fitness equipment, and office furniture, now it’s goods like pavers for a driveway. Patio furniture and backyard play structures. Outdoor grills. Tools and materials for home improvement projects, where the customer orders online and Estes delivers it to the home on behalf of the retailer.
Nationwide, Estes operates from 220 terminals, with a fleet of some 7,500 tractors and 30,000 trailers. As the residential business has grown, so has Estes’ investment in it. Today, Estes deploys some 2,000 lift-gate–equipped units, a combination of straight trucks and 28-foot pup trailers, and 1,000 electric pallet jacks. The carrier has also upped its game on mobile technologies and customer-facing apps that improve visibility and communication. An added benefit of these investments has been driver satisfaction, says Hupp. “Adding lift gates and providing pallet jacks is a real advantage that improves driver’s daily work experience and makes for a better customer experience as well,” he says.
He cites the company’s LTL network, which provides often-needed flexibility and capacity, as another advantage. “When a residential delivery agent gets swamped, we can swing some of that freight into LTL and vice versa,” he notes. And while the overall last-mile home delivery market has flattened somewhat, it remains an in-demand service that will continue to grow. “We’re here to stay,” he says. “We’ve equipped ourselves to be multifaceted in our approach so we can be more flexible, and that’s a competitive advantage.”
THE TOUGHEST JOB IN TRUCKING
The last-mile, big-and-bulky over-the-threshold business is one of the hardest jobs in trucking from a driver’s standpoint, observes Jeff Abeson, vice president of business development for Ryder. “You’re driving a very large vehicle in residential areas. You’re carrying heavy stuff into people’s homes, goods they’ve spent a lot of money on,” he explains. “And then you’re assembling it and sometimes taking away the old goods that are being replaced.”
Ryder operates a national network of 82 locations that serve as hubs for last-mile home deliveries. And while the market has shown signs of softening, “we are still seeing an incredible amount of volume” of last-mile business, Abeson notes. Companies are still dealing with back orders of goods, balancing and repositioning inventories, and managing through the residual supply chain effects of earlier port delays and rail congestion.
Where future demand is headed is tough to predict. Yet the fact of the matter is that the business of hard goods delivered into the home, in Abeson’s view, has not really slowed. “It’s hard to get your head wrapped around that [post pandemic] … since while many are back in an office, many more people are still working from home.” And because they’re spending so much time in the same space, that’s where they’re making their investments.
The majority of Ryder’s last-mile business is over-the-threshold, in-home deliveries, often with installation, Abeson notes. The infrastructure supporting that service is challenging. It requires systems, physical warehouse capacity, labor resources, and specialized equipment. Variability is constant in a business where “your forecast really is only as good as your customer’s forecast,” he says, adding that Ryder works diligently with its customers to flex capacity to match demand.
The biggest focus for Ryder, Abeson says, is continued material investments in technology evolving around the end consumer. “It could be as simple as scheduling a delivery and putting an appointment automatically on [the customer’s] calendar, then sending them text updates. It gives the customer confidence we’ve scheduled them and are following up,” he says. Such technologies “reduce inefficiency because we’re more predictable and we’re delivering the first time more often.” Speed to the customer also is high on the list. To enable quick deliveries, Ryder’s customers are forward-stocking fast-moving SKUs (stock-keeping units) at Ryder facilities. “We are all being conditioned in that way” to expect fast deliveries, he says.
One continuing wrench in the works, a holdover from the pandemic: supply chain delays creating partial orders. “You bought a table and six chairs, but only the table is in the warehouse,” Abeson explains. “You’re not interested in just getting the table. You want the whole order at one time. So, from an operator’s perspective, we have to account for how that affects warehouse space and labor, driver labor, and scheduling. “Many of our customers’ supply chains continue to be challenged in this way, but we just have to manage it and support our customers.”
FLAT VOLUMES, CHANGING MIX
Fernando Rabel, interim president of last mile for RXO, a digital truck brokerage that was spun off from XPO as an independent company this fall, sees two immediate effects on last mile from the post-pandemic environment. “First, the increase in operating costs has been significant and impactful. Second, high inflation has impacted the overall market for furniture and appliances.”
And while RXO’s delivery volumes remain relatively flat compared with a two-year average, “we believe we are well positioned to maintain our lead while capturing even more share within this $16 billion industry.”
From a product perspective, “we’re seeing the typical cyclicality one would expect, with appliances more resilient than bedding, furniture, and fitness equipment,” Rabel says. He cites one metric that points to continued strong growth in last mile: “By 2025, heavy and bulky penetration is expected to increase to nearly 30% of all e-commerce. We expect in the long term that this tailwind will drive continued demand for last-mile services,” he says.
He notes that RXO Last Mile covers 159 markets, with its network putting it within 125 miles of 90% of the U.S. population. The company handled more than 11 million deliveries last year.
NO MORE WHITE BOARDS AND SPREADSHEETS
Dennis Moon, chief operating officer for Roadie, a company that utilizes a crowdsourced network of drivers to make same-day deliveries and which is now part of UPS, says that shipper supply chains continue to evolve in an effort to “get product closer to the customer. That’s everyone’s holy grail.” He cites as an advantage “the scalability of our platform and its flexibility to move up and down with a customer’s volumes.” His product mix has shifted as well. “We are seeing a lot of lift in the medical area—everything from crutches to wheelchairs. Prescription and medical deliveries are one of our largest growth areas.”
The company also is doing more shipment consolidation to gain density. Before, one of Roadie’s “on the way” drivers might make one pickup and deliver it. Now through sophisticated technology, they are doing more batching and consolidating, which is good for drivers, who can make more money, and good for shippers, who benefit from a better rate.
Technology advances and innovation also are driving more responsive operations and customer service for last-mile carriers. End-user consumers want an Uber-like experience that gives them flexible delivery options, up-to-the-minute visibility into shipment status, and an immediate feedback loop post-delivery. New cloud-based, low-cost systems are rising to the challenge, bringing sophisticated tools that once were the domain of the large players to smaller operators.
Krishna Vattipalli is chief executive of software developer Fleet Enable, which provides a full-cycle platform and workstreams that help last-mile fleets wean themselves from manual workflows and drive better processes. “Many small to mid-sized operators are using at least four different systems,” including spreadsheets and even white boards, to plan and run their business, he says. Fleet Enable provides a single-source solution for last-mile delivery fleets, optimizing 16 workflows in the lifecycle of an order, including appointment scheduling, route and capacity optimization, visibility tracking and alerts, asset forecasting, payroll, and billing and invoicing.
Even with companies bringing workers back to the office, there are still many working from home or on a hybrid schedule. That’s extending demand for big-and-bulky last-mile service into B-to-B (business-to-business) markets, complementing B-to-C (business-to-consumer) deliveries. That, along with a continued demand for speed and convenience, is one reason last-mile delivery will continue to grow, Vattipalli believes. “Technology these days is no longer a differentiator; it is a basic requirement,” he says. “Carriers need to be smart about their investments in technology. That will help them achieve better margins and give them an edge to negotiate better with shippers.”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."