Shippers back in the driver’s seat as parcel market growth softens
A number of factors are conspiring to tap the brakes on two years of accelerated, pandemic-driven growth in parcel volumes. That means that unlike last year, shippers in 2022 are finding ample capacity and competition for their parcels.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
For those who remember the original Monday Night Football broadcast crew of Frank Gifford, Howard Cosell, and Don Meredith, when one team got so far ahead there was no doubt they’d win the game, Meredith would break into that old Willie Nelson favorite “Turn out the lights … the party’s over.”
Well, for the parcel express market, as pandemic-driven demand wanes, the 2022 peak season staggers to a close, and an uncertain 2023 looms on the horizon, that classic lyric seems to have found a new home.
Led by FedEx reporting an unexpectedly large miss in its September earnings call, the nation’s parcel express carriers are adjusting to a new post-pandemic reality. They’re dealing with an uncertain economy, persistent inflation, higher energy costs, shifting consumer spending priorities, and weaker-than-expected e-commerce traffic—all of which are driving slower growth and creating excess capacity.
THE TABLES HAVE TURNED
As the upshot of all that, “this year’s peak season put the shipper back in the driver’s seat,” says Satish Jindel, president of consulting and parcel data analytics firm ShipMatrix. Using ShipMatrix’s demand-supply model, Jindel predicted in September that this year’s peak season demand would hit 92 million parcels per day. Yet as peak season moves along, he’s scaling back those projections, noting that it now appears the market would be hard pressed to reach 90 million.
Some carriers continued to add capacity going into the peak, including the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), which upped its capacity to 60 million parcels per day from 53 million. Collectively, Jindel’s analysis estimated that the industry had excess capacity for this peak season of some 18 million parcels per day, leading to financial challenges for carriers—and a potential windfall for savvy shippers.
“The tables have turned,” Jindel notes, adding that the new status quo will require some adjustment on the part of shippers. “Because shippers have not been in the driver’s seat for two-plus years, they will face new challenges driving a new car, because the car is different now in numerous ways.”
By different, he means market practices and other changes that shippers need to consider. Among those: the impact of carriers assessing multiple additional surcharges; the shifting of some fuel surcharge amounts into base pricing; the rise of alternative parcel carrier options to the “Big Two”; and an aggressive Postal Service working to rationalize its operations and capture more parcel market share.
Jindel cites one other factor that has influenced peak volumes, especially late in the season: Amazon Prime Day.
“Amazon already had a Prime Day in October,” he notes. “That pulled forward retail sales into October from the normal peak. Consumers will already have spent that money,” partly because they are ordering earlier to avoid late-season missed deliveries like last year’s, he says.
“Those orders, along with other retailers who have advanced holiday sales offerings even earlier in response, will blunt retail sales later in the year,” Jindel believes. “And with most of those packages moving in Amazon’s network, that will further impact peak volumes for FedEx, UPS, and USPS’s door-to-door services. So they will feel the pain from those e-commerce sales being sucked into October instead of happening later in the year.”
ONE TREADMILL IS ENOUGH
Helane Becker, a long-time industry analyst for Cowen & Co. who covers the airlines and parcel carriers, recalls how in 2020 and 2021, cargo company executives were talking about how they were dealing with volume levels once projected for 2025.
Not anymore. “So, by definition, if you pulled forward four to five years’ worth of growth [into one or two years], at some point, it is going to slow. It’s inconceivable that you are going to see 40% growth every year,” she says. Becker notes as well that consumers seem to have “kept their wallets in their pockets,” as more of their weekly paycheck goes to increasingly expensive food, fuel, and utilities, and as other spending once devoted to discretionary goods shifts to services.
“Once you have your treadmill or stationary bike or whatever you bought for your home during the pandemic, you really don’t need to buy another one,” she notes.
As for parcel carrier strategies for dealing with a shifting market, she observes that coming into peak season, “FedEx invested in and prepared for a level of volume” that did not arrive. In response, FedEx is “hitting the pause button, focusing on consolidating operations and cutting costs, then allowing [slower] growth to catch up to the facilities [it] has.”
UPS, on the other hand, has been focusing on “revenue quality” and, in Becker’s view, has been sounding the alarm on a slowing parcel market since earlier this summer.
In her experience covering both companies for many years as an industry analyst, Becker has observed that “FedEx has always thought of investing to stay ahead of growth. UPS always invested to catch up with growth.”
REGIONAL PARCEL OPTIONS EXPAND
Market makeup and capacity dynamics also are shifting due to the impact of Amazon’s now operating its own parcel delivery network, along with the rise of regional parcel carriers. They provide an often-attractive option to shippers, who are increasingly carving out some of their parcel volumes to give to regional players instead of putting all their package freight into one or two big national buckets.
One example can be found in two of the largest regional parcel network operators: East Coast-based LaserShip and West Coast-based OnTrac. Last year, LaserShip agreed to acquire OnTrac in a $1.3 billion deal. Now the two companies are in the process of expanding operations as well as launching connecting transcontinental services among points in their two primary regions, says Josh Dinneen, LaserShip’s chief commercial officer.
While it’s not at the level of the past two years, Dinneen says, 2022 definitely is experiencing a peak season. “No one is canceling Christmas.” But is demand softer? “All signs point to yes,” he says.
Nevertheless, he believes that there is excess capacity for “millions of packages,” which is providing shippers with better options for securing capacity at competitive rates.
Dinneen emphasizes that there is still profitable growth to be had in the parcel business, particularly within the regional markets, citing their lower cost structure and the ability to provide consistently good service. And despite weakening demand, LaserShip and OnTrac haven’t put the brakes on plans to invest in their network.
Dinneen says they are spending more than $100 million this year on expansion. The company in July launched transcontinental service between major hubs in Southern California; New York City; Columbus, Ohio; and Reno, Nevada. It just finished construction on a new automated sort center in Columbus. It will soon open a new, fully automated sort center in New Jersey, doubling its capacity to serve Eastern Seaboard customers.
Lastly, by year’s end, LaserShip will have moved into new, larger facilities in Charlotte, North Carolina, and Nashville, Tennessee. A Texas expansion with new sort hubs opening in Dallas, Austin, San Antonio, and Houston is on the drawing board for 2023.
The market, however, remains in a somewhat fragile state, facing pressures and challenges from all sides.
“Everyone’s cost of labor has increased materially,” Dinneen notes. “Amazon has announced another warehouse labor wage increase. The challenges will be labor inside the four walls, the costs of moving packages, securing sufficient rate increases, and keeping a consistent balance between capacity and demand.”
SHIPPER TACTICS GETTING MORE SOPHISTICATED
At the same time, shippers, out of necessity, are becoming more sophisticated about their parcel tactics and strategies, leveraging access to inexpensive, powerful new technology tools; better, more timely data; and far more accurate visibility into costs and alternatives.
“Talking to our clients, they want more reliability and more speed,” says Gaston Curk, chief executive officer of e-commerce shipping specialist OSM Worldwide. “Amazon has changed the experience for the end consumer. Customers want more predictability, [enhanced] visibility, better tracking.” He notes that shippers are concerned about market disruption going on today, from a slowing economy to a potential recession and other issues on the horizon, including “UPS entering negotiations with the Teamsters next year on a new labor contract. They’re afraid to put all their eggs in one basket,” he says.
He also cites the evolution of the U.S. Postal Service, “which is transforming as we speak,” Curk notes. “Traditionally, they were a letter carrier. Now they are evolving to become more competitive [in parcels and packages] with UPS and FedEx, as a more reliable and cost-effective option.”
GIRDING FOR THE LONG TERM
Adds ShipMatrix’s Jindel: “Keep in mind that the Postal Service has a monopoly on first-class mail and that gives them a monopoly on your mailbox”—and it’s a federal crime for anyone else to use that consumer’s mailbox. “They can deliver a letter and package at the same time,” and most of the time, they don’t have to take a package all the way up to the front door or porch, like other parcel carriers. “A letter carrier can make up to 300 stops a day. On average, UPS and FedEx can get to 200 stops a day. That’s a huge cost advantage for the Postal Service.”
The softer market and demand/supply imbalance is not a short-term phenomenon, Jindel believes. “It’s not temporary; it will continue well into 2023.” Shippers, he says, “should leverage this opportunity for more reasonable prices and for reliable capacity and consistent service. The [pricing] pendulum has swung back to the shipper. Enjoy it while you can.”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."