3PL customer satisfaction levels drop by 7%, says annual report
More than 80% of shippers would describe their 3PL relationship as “successful,” down from 90% in 2022, according to the "2023 Third-Party Logistics Study."
Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
Traditionally, third-party logistics providers (3PLs) and their customers have enjoyed close relationships and high satisfaction levels. But the supply chain disruptions and economic volatility of the last year have put a strain on even the tightest partnerships.
The “2023 Third-Party Logistics Study,” which was released today at the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) annual EDGE conference, found that shippers’ satisfaction with their 3PL relationship has declined by 7% from last year. While the vast majority of shipper respondents (83%) still view their 3PL relationship as “successful,” that percentage has historically hovered at 90% or more, according to the report.
According to one of the report’s authors, Sylvie Thompson of NTT Data Services, this drop occurs at the same time that demand for third-party logistics services has increased significantly and that many 3PLs have more work than they can handle. Part of the change in satisfaction level may be a reflection of this shift in power dynamics and that 3PLs may be differentiating their customer service levels, she said in an interview.
“There’s also been a macroeconomic shift, particularly in terms of wages,” added Andy Moses, senior vice president of global products for Penske Logistics, a sponsor of the study. “3PLs can’t insulate their customers from these macroeconomic shifts, and there may be some tension there.”
The report was founded 27 years ago by John Langley, currently the Clinical Professor of Supply Chain Management at Penn State University to provide an in-depth look at the trends and developments in 3PL market. This year’s report—which is now also authored by NTT Data Services and sponsored by Penske Logistics—details a market that has had to deal with unexpected challenges at the same time that customer expectations have grown.
In spite of the slip in overall satisfaction level, the report indicated that 71% of shippers believe that their 3PL has contributed to improving customer service, and 71% have also found that 3PLs provide new and innovative ways to improve logistics effectiveness. It is perhaps not surprising then, that slightly more than half of all shippers (55%) are increasing their use of outsourced logistics services. However, 71% are considering consolidating the number of 3PLs used.
In addition to reviewing the current state of the market, this year’s study also delved deep into three key themes: the talent crisis, reverse logistics, and seven basic principles that the researchers believe are essential to supply chain success.
The scramble for talent
The report paints a picture of a supply chain sector feeling the effects of the current labor shortages. According to survey results, 56% of 3PLs and 78% of shippers said labor shortages have impacted their supply chain operations, with many respondents seeing the labor shortages as a long-term crisis.
According to survey respondents, the hardest positions to fill are certified licensed hourly workers, such as truck drivers and equipment operators, as well as pickers and packers. Interestingly the study found that 3PLs are better able to fill hourly worker positions than shippers. According to the report, 49% of 3PLs say they take less than a month to fill an hourly position, compared to 32% of shippers. Perhaps in acknowledgement of this fact, 73% of 3PLs and 46% of shippers report that companies are seeking out 3PL partners to offset labor shortages.
“This is an area of fanatic focus for 3PLs that they have no choice but to navigate,” said Penske’s Moses. “It’s one of the reasons why shippers choose to outsource to a 3PL, because they can’t have the same fanatic focus.”
Going in reverse
Another trend in the logistics field is the growing importance of reverse logistics, particularly as e-commerce sales increase.
To take a closer look at this segment of the supply chain, the report divided shippers into two groups: those that accept both consumer and business returns and those that only accept business returns. A significant majority (61%) of consumer-facing shippers expect their returns volume to grow in the next three years, while only 43% of business-exclusive shippers expect them to grow. However, high percentages of both groups (65% for consumer-facing shippers and 60% of business-exclusive shippers) said that their customers’ expectations for the returns process is growing.
In spite of this growth, the majority of shippers are handling reverse logistics operations in house as opposed to outsourcing to a 3PL. Furthermore, only about a third expect to outsource a greater portion of their reverse logistics operations over the next three years. According to Thompson, many 3PLs struggle to provide shippers with a viable reverse logistics solution given the fact that the focus of reverse logistics often involves reducing losses as opposed to adding value. Additionally reverse logistics and returns management processes are often highly category-specific making it difficult to provide a single solution.
7 success principles
Finally, the report authors highlight what they call the “Seven Immutable Laws of Supply Chain Success,” which include
Customer focus
Supply chain relationships
Data and analytics
Innovation and transformation
Survivability and sustainability
Talent, and
End-to-end supply chain
The authors felt that this “back to basics” section serves as good reminder to both 3PLs and shippers on the building blocks of a good supply chain partnership. The report did find that there are some difference among 3PLs and shippers on which of these principles are perceived to be the top priority and how mature the companies are in each area. Shippers, for example, rank data and analysis as most important, while 3PL rated innovation and transformation is as the top principle.
The study and past versions are available for download at www.3PLStudy.com.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."