Struggles ahead for truckers as market softens, pricing power swings back to shippers
The last two years have invigorated the bottom lines of the nation’s trucking fleets. As inflation powers ahead, consumers switch spending from goods to services, and supply chains remain disrupted, is the trucking profit party about to end?
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
The U.S. economy, whipsawed by high inflation and persistent supply chain disruptions yet still with unemployment in the low single digits, is signaling a shift for truckers. After two full years of strong demand and tight capacity driving higher freight rates, some leading indicators are foreshadowing softer demand and the prospect of muted freight volumes that could swing the pricing pendulum back in favor of shippers—and potentially send some truckers reeling into bankruptcy.
Are the ominous dark clouds of a freight recession just over the horizon, or are we seeing only a passing thunderstorm as the market adjusts and finds its way back to a new form of normal? For the nation’s trucking services, that depends on which part of the freight sandbox you’re playing in.
“We are clearly seeing a [truckload] market normalization in process,” says Avery Vise, vice president of trucking at freight consultancy FTR Transportation Intelligence. “So far it is pretty stable. Earlier this year, we started to see contract players finally get enough capacity to bring down tender rejections and handle a lot more of the volume [under contract rates]. And that’s led to spot rates coming down.”
Vise thinks the market still has “an elevated level of spot-market volume relative to the norm.” He sees that as a shift with some legs, citing the maturation of digital brokerage technology and the proliferation of digital freight platforms that can quickly and accurately find and book available capacity—and keep truckers rolling.
“That allows intermediaries to have access to and manage capacity like an asset-based carrier, so they can compete for contract freight,” he says. “I’m not sure the terms ‘spot’ and ‘contract’ have the same meaning anymore,” he adds.
And while he believes “[truckload] spot rates have a lot more softening to do,” he says he doesn’t see “a lot of [early] relief for shippers on contracts. Not a whole lot of carriers are receptive to [price reductions] at this point, especially since their expenses are through the roof. Freight continues to be very strong even with inflation.”
Nevertheless, Vise sees spot rates through the latter part of this year and into next year experiencing “low double-digit declines.” He expects contract rates to eventually follow next year but “not really what I would call precipitous,” estimating low single-digit declines with 2023 contract bids.
RISING COSTS PUT PRESSURE ON RATES
Yet even as the market appears to soften, some truckload carriers are still rejecting hundreds of loads a week. A case in point is North American truckload operator CFI. “There are pockets out there that are a bit looser than they have been in the past, but overall, we’re not strained for load count,” says Greg Orr, executive vice president of U.S. truckload for TFI and president of CFI, which has 93% of its business under contract. “We are being told by our customers they expect to have a normal third- and fourth-quarter push. No one is telling us anything that says red flags are being thrown up.”
He notes that for CFI, with its heavy emphasis on contract shippers, rates are holding steady, and the carrier is securing increases. “From my perspective, shippers are willing to take some type of modest increase to lock in that committed capacity instead of playing the spot market,” he says.
Orr adds that shippers well recognize that operating costs for truck lines continue to escalate, with little relief in sight. “Not only diesel fuel, but think of all the other petroleum products used in a truck, and costs for maintenance, servicing, tires, and other parts,” he says, noting that some vendors have increased prices three and four times over the past 12 months. Costs for new trucks and trailers continue to climb incrementally year over year.
And the cost inflation doesn’t stop there. “Then there is investing in our employees,” Orr adds. “We increased driver pay to ensure we compete effectively for qualified drivers. And we just rolled out a 10-plus percent increase for our independent contractor program to secure supplemental capacity.”
AS COSTS RISE, A FOCUS ON SERVICE
For the less-than-truckload (LTL) side of the business, the story is similar in some respects, particularly with respect to rising operating costs. “There is nothing in our business that is not inflationary,” noted Fritz Holzgrefe, president and chief executive officer of LTL carrier Saia. Yet the demand picture remains relatively strong in LTL. Some 65% to 70% of Saia’s business is industrial-oriented versus retail. In the second quarter, shipments at Saia were up 1.8%, while tonnage per workday was up 2.2%.
Pricing remains firm as well. Holzgrefe says that contract renewals in the second quarter came with an average 11% increase. “Customers … see many of the same things we do; they respect and understand the inflationary pressures,” he notes. Asking for a rate increase is never easy, but Saia’s focus on quality and service helps temper the discussion, Holzgrefe says. “We recognize that for the customer, it’s hard to absorb a rate increase,” he notes, “but let’s talk about what your claims ratio is and your on-time service. That’s where we excel, and it makes the pricing conversation not quite as challenging.”
He added that Saia continues to invest to build out its network. The carrier already has opened five new terminals this year, added two more in August, and will open another five to seven over the balance of the year.
Looking out at the remainder of the year, Holzgrefe says the focus for Saia is to “continue to take care of the customer and execute our business plan. As we grow, regardless of the economic environment, the customer has to have a great experience.” He believes that as supply chains continue to recover and overcome disruption, “the middle mile will be pretty critical and LTL benefits from that. We’re in a good place.”
TURNING CHALLENGES INTO OPPORTUNITY
It’s a similar story at LTL competitor Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL). “We still characterize demand as strong,” says Adam Satterfield, ODFL’s chief financial officer. And while ODFL’s July’s tonnage was down slightly compared with last year, it likely represented a swing back to traditional seasonal trends where freight volumes tend to soften in July and August before picking up again in September. “[July] was more likely a reflection of what’s going on with the economy and demand for our customers’ products,” Satterfield said. “Feedback we are hearing is all positive with respect to their needs from us.”
As for the rate environment, “it continues to hold steady [and] has been favorable for some time in LTL,” he noted. That’s been crucial in a market where cost inflation is chipping away at margins. “We have to make our best efforts to operate efficiently and keep cost inflation per shipment as low as we can to make sure pricing is somewhat in line with the market,” Satterfield explained.
That also supports ODFL’s aggressive strategy of “expanding capacity in a meaningful way that resonates with our customers,” he said. Over the past 10 years, ODFL has invested some $2 billion to grow its service center network, increasing door capacity just over 50% during that timeframe. Its capex (capital expenditure) budget for 2022 is running at about $835 million, with $300 million allocated for real estate (service centers) and $485 million for equipment, including rolling stock.
Currently, ODFL’s network of 255 service centers has about 15% to 20% excess capacity, Satterfield notes. “Our target is 25%, so we want to continue adding capacity consistently, regardless of what the macro environment looks like.”
Going forward, Satterfield points to the eventual normalization of supply chains—and the opportunities that presents for LTL carriers. “Practically every customer I speak with talks about supply chain challenges they continue to face,” he notes. Parts and components needed to finish products on backlog. Inventories in the wrong place at the wrong time that need to be rebalanced. “That helps us in a way,” he says, noting that even as the economy slows, those challenges become opportunity for LTL carriers. “That’s why more importance is placed on service quality, and there is no other carrier in LTL that offers the level of service we do.”
THE TECH EDGE
Other trucking markets are dealing with different realities. One example is the flatbed market. “Post pandemic, we saw an absolute deluge of freight. It really elevated things for flatbed and was a very robust environment,” recalled Evan Pohaski, founder and CEO of JLE, which operates a 380-truck flatbed fleet in North America.
Flatbed is particularly sensitive to changes in the housing and construction markets. Pohaski saw things begin to shift as spring turned to summer this year. “We’ve got this really squirrely situation where there is the war in Ukraine, interest rates going up, and consumers making the transition from buying goods for the home back into services. That’s taking the wind out of the sails for flatbed,” he says, noting in particular that as interest rates rise, that puts a damper on freight volumes for housing and industrial shippers. All of which is driving a retrenchment in demand.
Yet based on conversations with customers, Pohaski says he’s confident that as the economy moves into the back half of the year, “there will be a floor on rate compression because the structural costs of the business have gone up for everyone.” And while 90% of his business is longer-term contract customers versus “you call/we haul” spot moves, it’s a much faster-paced market where agility and flexibility coupled with accurate, timely capacity and pricing information is key. That’s an area where Pohaski believes JLE has an edge.
Today’s shippers are armed with better technologies, and carriers have to match that in the systems and platforms they use to rate, route, and run the business. It’s where JLE has heavily invested and built its own proprietary tools, Pohaski says. As a result, “we are more confident in engaging with a more fluid and dynamic rating structure. We have contract customers changing rates sometimes on a daily basis. [Our systems] represent the fair market value in any given lane at any given time. That provides our drivers (80% of whom are independent contractors) with that level of timeliness and transparency they need. That’s one of our biggest value propositions.”
DISPATCHES FROM THE DRAY AREA
Another subset of the trucking market is container drayage. Trac Intermodal is the nation’s largest provider of marine chassis, deploying nearly 200,000 chassis at over 600 locations that provide drayage of marine containers to and from ports to intermodal yards, warehouses, and other locations. Trac does not operate the chassis itself; it provides procurement, fleet management, maintenance and servicing, and leasing of chassis to end-users.
Trac will set up a private chassis pool in a dedicated commercial arrangement with an ocean carrier or beneficial cargo owner. It also operates other pools where an independent trucker can pick up a chassis and use it for as little as a day or a week.
The key for chassis pool operators is getting as many “turns” per week or month as possible. A chassis dwelling on the street for a week or more means it can’t be returned and reissued. Congestion at the ports, delays at intermodal railyards, and shippers keeping boxes on chassis at warehouses too long are the biggest challenges chassis fleet operators face in keeping the chassis supply chain flowing smoothly, notes Val Noel, Trac’s executive vice president and chief operating officer.
“We have seen an uptick in both long-term terminal and street dwell,” he says. Chassis are sitting for an extended time out on the street, saddled with containers left unloaded due to labor and capacity issues at warehouses. He adds that shippers who have embraced “just in case” stocking practices have created inventory surpluses, which also impacts chassis return and reuse. “You don’t want to have product due in the store in November sitting in a container in June,” he notes.
One solution has been working with ports to establish “off terminal” distribution yards, which gets chassis out of ports and makes them available to more users in a central place. Trac established three such yards with the Port of New York & New Jersey. That allowed the chassis “to be used exclusively for pickup and delivery of cargo, not trapped in the marine terminal,” while supporting “better asset availability and utilization,” said Noel. That interoperability and flexibility to move any type of container “checked a lot of boxes people in our industry are clamoring for around change,” he noted.
If anything, the second half of the year will be a period that demands patience and perseverance as a shifting economy, inflation, rising interest rates, and other factors impact trucking operators. The biggest challenge? “If you are a small trucker, it’s staying alive,” says Jason Seidl, managing director at investment firm Cowen & Co. “If you have made it this far, you are battered and bruised. If you are a large trucker, the challenges are what they have always been: How do you ultimately maximize profit and grow?”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."