David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
To say that retailers are facing unprecedented challenges might be an understatement. After surviving the pandemic shutdowns, retailers met the challenge of surging consumer demand only to run up against a whole new set of obstacles: supply chain disruptions; runaway inflation; skyrocketing fuel and transportation costs; new, highly contagious strains of Covid; and a looming economic recession. All of this comes at a time when they are entering peak season. Many have stocked up on merchandise already, but are they the right products?
For some answers, we turned to Zac Rogers, an assistant professor of operations and supply chain management at Colorado State University. His primary research interests include the financial impact of supply chain sustainability, emerging logistics technologies, supply chain cybersecurity, and purchasing and logistics issues. He is also a researcher and co-author of the monthly Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, which tracks trends and developments in the industry.
Rogers earned his B.S. and MBA degrees at the University of Nevada, Reno, and his Ph.D. in supply chain management from Arizona State University. He recently spoke with DC Velocity Group Editorial Director David Maloney.
Q: We have seen how even the smallest disruption can ripple throughout our supply chains, leading to shortages and delays. There are so many things that could potentially go wrong this peak season. What do you think is going to happen?
A: Yes, we are in a funny place going into peak season. We have seen inventories climb at an unprecedented rate over the last six months. What that really has to do with is the fact that supply chains are so long-tailed—longer tailed now than they really should be because of things like shutdowns at Shanghai, congestion at ports, and overcrowded warehouses. Everything is moving more slowly. What I keep hearing from folks is that whatever your normal leadtimes are, you can expect them to essentially triple—so that what would typically take 90 days to produce now takes 270 days. These are really long leadtimes, and the inventories that we see now reflect an economy that no longer exists. They reflect the economy of 2021, when we had really hot consumer spending.
Q: Prices are high, and we’re seeing record inflation. What are retailers’ expectations this holiday season with such high inventories? Will consumers see many pre-holiday sales as a result?
A: Yes, I think there will be some sales.
The other thing, ironically, is that we already have some holiday inventories, as some of the things that arrived here in February and March were supposed to get here last November in time for the 2021 holiday selling season. Some companies actually held onto winter coats or apparel. We are already seeing some pretty aggressive selldowns at some retailers.
Another thing that often gets lost in the discussion is that a lot of the inventory we have isn’t ready to go. It is “work in process” inventory. For instance, there was a Wall Street Journal article about GM in the first week of July that talked about 95,000 units that weren’t going to be delivered on time. There is a lot of inventory like that, and it represents a significant investment. We are seeing a similar bottleneck with lithium batteries and things like that that tend to come from Russia and Ukraine. So, we have a lot of inventory that is not even sellable.
Q: What kinds of goods will consumers look to purchase this holiday season? Are we looking at durable goods, consumables, or entertainment and escapism as we have in the past couple of years?
A: I think entertainment and escapism will be a big piece of it. If you look at spending on services relative to durable goods, it has really shifted toward services in the last few months, partially because the lockdown is over. People can go on vacations. They can go to sporting events, concerts, and movies.
I would also anticipate some demand for electronics. People had a really hard time getting laptops, phones, and videogame systems during the last few years because of the semiconductor shortage.
Q: Although we want to be done with Covid, Covid is not done with us, and we could see more surges and shutdowns in places like China. What effect would shutdowns have on peak season?
A: Well, it would be pretty tough if we had another shutdown in China. I don’t really think we’re going to see widescale shutdowns in the United States partly because of the midterm elections this fall—I just don’t think that anyone is going to want to be the “shutdown guy,” honestly. With China, we have already had huge disruptions, and, honestly, we haven’t really seen the tail end of the spring 2022 shutdowns yet. We were still feeling the aftereffects of the 2020 shutdowns at the end of 2021, and then we pivoted right into more shutdowns in early 2022 in China. It is going to take us a while to work through those.
One of the things that have become clear over the last year is that supply chains are not something you can just turn on and off quickly. They take a long time to get moving again. When I used to work in a warehouse, everyone would go to lunch for a half hour, and once everybody got back, it still took 20 to 30 minutes for things to get moving again because you need goods flowing through the process. It’s the same with supply chains. It takes a while for them to get turned back on, and the sort of “stop, start, stop, start” pattern we’ve seen is terrible for us. If we keep seeing that, then we are going to continue to have big disruptions.
Q: Speaking of warehouses, the industry is still struggling with a severe labor shortage as peak season gets underway and the amount of inventory that needs to be shipped out starts to grow. What do you foresee for the labor situation, and is that going to present problems with delivering goods on time?
A: You are absolutely right about inventories. In our Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) “inventory level” metric, we were in the 70s for five of the first six months of 2022. Anything above 70 we would consider to be significant rates of growth because anything over 50 indicates expansion. Once you hit 70, you are really seeing a high level of growth. Before 2022, I think we were only in the 70s with inventory twice. It is moving really, really quickly.
That is also reflected in our “warehousing capacity” metric. With warehouse capacity, we have the same rules—anything over 50 indicates expansion and anything under 50 is contraction. We have been in the 30s or 40s now every single month since September of 2020. For almost two years, we have seen pretty significant rates of contraction in available space. That is due to the shift of warehouses, even though there are so many more warehouses now.
If you look at the warehouse absorption from 2021, a plurality of that was warehouses smaller than 100,000 square feet. Those tend to be urban warehouses. That is something that I think is often missed in discussions about warehouse labor issues. Yes, we have more warehouses than we’ve ever had, and there is more inventory moving through them, and it is more stressful than it has ever been, but they are also in a different place geographically. They are tending to go toward places where wages are higher.
Adding to that, the cost of living is rising at the fastest rate in 40 years. That is one of the things that are really driving the push toward automation in warehouses. We are seeing a huge boom in demand right now for fulfillment automation, any sort of robotic systems that can help supplement labor.
Q: Let’s take a moment to talk about trucking and the freight markets. CSCMP’s latest “State of Logistics Report” predicts a slowdown in these markets. We’ve even heard from some quarters that there may be a truck market collapse because of a buildup of capacity that now may not be needed. What is the near-term outlook for trucking and freight?
A: Well, peak season will be a godsend for some of the players—especially the smaller truckers. I know a lot of people are saying that 2022 might be like 2019, when we saw a virtual wipeout of the trucking industry. We had 3,000 carriers go out of business in 2019 and 2020. I don’t know that it’s going to be that severe, and there are a couple of reasons for that.
In 2017 and 2018, the economy was hot, and we had these huge orders for big Class 8 trucks. Plus, going into 2019, we essentially had an unlimited capacity to overbuild. We also had big orders for Class 8 trucks in 2020 and 2021. The difference is that because of the semiconductor bottleneck, we weren’t able to produce trucks nearly as fast as we wanted to. In some ways, the semiconductor shortage saved the trucking industry from itself.
As for transportation capacity, we tracked that metric in the Logistics Managers’ Index and again, any number over 50 indicates growth and anything under 50 indicates contraction. We had contraction in transportation capacity from July 2020 to March 2022, and then after March 2022, the diesel [price] shock happened and suddenly, capacity went positive. What is interesting, though, is that in June, capacity growth was lower than it was in May. So, the rate of growth was slowing down—to 61 in June. If you compare that to 2019, we are still not even close. In 2019, we saw the transportation capacity growth rate number go as high as 72, which indicated really significant rates of growth.
And then pivoting over to the metric of price for transportation: I think in June, we got down to 61.3 for transportation price, which is important because transportation rate growth is now lower than capacity, and when that happens, it usually means that something is going on economically.
As for what’s ahead, I do anticipate a lot of pain for smaller carriers. I think in the last week of June, the spread between wholesale and retail prices for diesel was about 73 cents per gallon. Smaller carriers don’t have the volume to buy diesel at wholesale prices. Their costs are much higher than big fleets’ costs. Also, the big fleets saved a ton of cash over the last two years because times were so good, they were able to put cash away. We are already seeing the big players start to absorb many of these smaller owner-operators. It is just not a level playing field.
Q: How do the higher fuel prices, capacity issues, and other factors affect shippers?
A: Every month we ask our respondents to do a future prediction: What do you think is going to happen across all of our different metrics? It is interesting. Over the next 12 months, our respondents predicted a growth rate of 59.6, so about 60 for transportation price, and that represents moderate, steady growth. This is the type of growth that we would consider sustainable. What that tells us is that prices are going to continue to go up, but at a mild and sustainable pace—one that won’t have us pulling our hair out the way we have for the last two years. In some ways, it could be sort of a relief.
Now, that growth rate probably reflects a move toward more contract carriers and less spot-market stuff, which again is harder for the little guys in the margins who are really relying on spot markets. But for the industry as a whole, what it seems like is that we are moving back toward equilibrium.
Q: How will rising interest rates affect our peak season?
A: I think some people have been hoping the Fed will ride in to save the day with inflation, but there is a great new tool out from the San Francisco Federal Reserve that individually tracks demand-driven and supply-driven inflation and helps to explain what’s going on. Supply-driven inflation is when price is going up really quickly, but supply is not going up quickly, like oil. Demand-driven inflation is when price goes up but then supply goes up, like apparel or footwear. If you look at the last three or four months, the vast majority of the inflation right now is coming from the supply side. It’s not that prices are just going up because consumers are spending money like crazy. Prices are going up because there is not enough supply to meet demand.
Now, back in March, April, and May of 2021, it was very much demand-driven. That was right when the stimulus checks came out, and the inflation we saw in early 2021 was really the result of consumers spending money on elastic goods.
The drivers that we’re seeing now are fuel and groceries. It is really the headline inflation that is supply-driven. People are not going to stop buying gas or food, so if the Fed raises interest rates, there will be some demand destruction, but it is going to be demand destruction of the things that weren’t really driving inflation anyway. That will make it even more difficult, I think, for companies to run down their inventories as quickly as they’d like because those goods sitting in inventory would be demand-driven goods that are being targeted by the Fed.
Seventeen innovative products and solutions from eleven providers have reached the nomination round of the IFOY Award 2025, an international competition that brings together the best new material handling products for warehouses and distribution center operations.
The nominees this year come from six different countries and will compete head-to-head during a Test Camp that will be held March 26 and 27 in Dortmund, Germany. The Test Camp allows hands-on evaluation and testing of products based on engineering and operational design. In contrast to the usual display of products at a trade show, The Test Camp also allows end-users and visitors to the event the opportunity to experience these technologies hands-on as they would operate in a facility.
Award categories include integrated solutions, counter-balanced forklifts, warehouse forklifts, mobile robotic solutions, other warehouse robotics, intralogistics software, and specialized solutions for controlling operations. A startup of the year is also recognized.
The finalists include entries from aluco, EP Equipment Germany, Exotec, Geekplus Europe, HUBTEX, Interroll, Jungheinrich, Logitrans, PLANCISE, STILL and Verity.
In the “IFOY Start-up of the Year” spin-off award, Blickfeld, ecoro, enabl and Filics are in the running. These finalists were selected from all entries following six weeks of intensive work by the IFOY organization, test teams, and a jury composed of journalists who cover the logistics market. DC Velocity’s David Maloney is one of the jurors, representing the United States. Winners will be recognized at a gala to be held July 3 in Dortmund's Phoenix des Lumières.
While Christmas is always my favorite time of the year, I have always been something of a Scrooge when it comes to celebrating the New Year. It is traditionally a time of reflection, where we take stock of our lives and make resolutions to do better. I’ve always felt that I really didn’t need a calendar to remind me to kick my bad habits in favor of healthier routines. If I was not already doing something that was good for me, then making promises I probably won’t keep after a few weeks is not really helpful.
But as we turn the calendar to 2025, there is a lot to consider this new year. The election is behind us, and it will be interesting to see how supply chains react to the new administration. We’ve been told to expect sharp increases in tariffs, like those the president-elect issued in his first term. Will these cause the desired shift away from goods made in China?
What we have actually seen so far is a temporary surge in imports that began in late fall in anticipation of higher tariffs. This bump will be short-lived, however, unless consumer confidence remains unusually high.
Of course, the new administration’s aim with tariffs is to encourage companies to bring production back to America. Will we see manufacturing surge at home? Probably not. It took us decades to send our manufacturing to parts of the world where production was cheaper. I imagine it will take decades to bring it back, if it can ever really be fully brought back. We’ve become accustomed to those lower labor costs. So take your pick—higher tariffs or higher labor costs. Regardless of which route businesses choose, it will probably drive prices higher.
Labor itself will be interesting to watch this year. As I write this, the three-month extension of the master agreement between dock workers and East and Gulf Coast ports is due to expire in a few weeks—on Jan. 15, to be precise. While the two sides have resolved their wage disputes, the issue of automation remains a major sticking point, with the workers resisting the widescale implementation of automated systems.
And of course, we still have two wars raging overseas that have disrupted supply chains. Will we see peace this year, or will other trouble spots flare up?
And here at home, we’ve now been in a trucking recession for two years. What will happen in that sector in 2025? Hopefully, better days are ahead, but only ifconsumers keep spending, demand increases, fuel prices continue to drop, and capacity levels out. That’s a lot to ask.
Whatever this year holds for our supply chains, it is definitely setting up to be very interesting, to say the least.
Shannon Curtis – Raymond: Consumers are clamoring for innovation in the food supply chain sphere in 2025. From a greater emphasis on convenience to a renewed desire for operational efficiency and security, new preferences call for a shift from tried-and-true procedures to innovative business models that champion modernization—the adoption of which can help organizations stand out as technological and cultural leaders in the new year and beyond.
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: I think it is still a strong and viable market—[there are] always new opportunities. When the new additional tariffs come in, we shall see how that affects the total market. I think the demand for used equipment will go up. Users will have X amount of dollars to invest in equipment, and if the Chinese, Canadian, and/or Mexican product [costs] gets pushed higher, the user does not necessarily have more money available. I am not sure sales of American-made lift trucks will increase.
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: It’s safe to say the industrial lift truck market has been somewhat volatile the last five years, with the market reaching all-time highs during the pandemic years, [then experiencing] massive swings downward these past two. While most lift truck OEMs enjoyed the spike in sales, the enormous demand put a significant strain on the supply chain, pushing leadtimes out to unprecedented levels while simultaneously driving up costs. The significant market decline is something no CEO in this industry would boast about. The fall we are experiencing today is better viewed as a normalization or correction to a market that was way overinflated.
With all the pent-up demand from the excessive orders due to the elongated pandemic leadtimes, we are now experiencing an abundance of stock on hand at both the OEM and distribution levels. On the surface, a market that’s quickly becoming half of what it was two years ago looks catastrophic. However, when you compare it to what’s happened over the past 15 years, today’s market still looks relatively healthy.
Q: WILL 2025 AND THE HOPES OF LOWER INTEREST RATES SPUR INVESTMENTS IN NEW INDUSTRIAL TRUCKS?
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: It will not hurt, but I do not think interest rates hinder sales. One point [in the interest rate] in either direction has a small impact on the payment. A rate reduction can be used as a marketing tool, though. If rates decline, dealers can go back over their outstanding quotes, refigure the payments, and present a new monthly cost to the user.
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: There are many factors, including interest rates, that play a role in the level of investment in industrial truck fleets. Most significant of those factors is consumer confidence. Logically, when consumers are confident, they buy more, which means manufacturers will have to make more and lift trucks will have to move more.
While inflation and high interest rates have surely stifled consumer confidence these past four years, there are signs that a new, more business-friendly administration will work in conjunction with lower interest rates to help drive up consumer confidence. Lower interest rates will work hand in hand with that resurgence in consumer confidence to help drive more investment in industrial equipment.
Q: WILL THE NEW ADMINISTRATION’S PROPOSED TARIFFS HURT OR HELP YOUR BRANDS?
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: The industrial lift truck market is one that is very global in nature, with a complex supply chain and operations scattered throughout the world. The tariffs that are being proposed on countries like Canada, Mexico, and China will undoubtedly have an impact on the industrial market, depending on the manufacturer. All lift truck manufacturers will experience varying levels of impact due to the tariffs, but tariffs are designed to incentivize companies to re-evaluate their supply chains and bring more manufacturing capacity back to the United States, which is a good thing.
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: As we represent a Chinese manufacturer, the tariff increase will have an effect. We are currently paying 25%. An additional 10% (as of the last reports) is manageable. It is a world economy. Adding the tariff just adds cost to the product here in the U.S. China does not pay it; the dealers do. We have no choice but to pass on this added cost. To reduce the costs of tariffs, manufacturers will move production to a country that does not have a tariff. Even though labor costs will be higher, it will not add more than the proposed tariff to the cost of the machine.
The factory will look for new countries to manufacture in as well. If tariffs had come in at 60% per campaign promises, it would have been disastrous. We probably would have moved manufacturing to Vietnam or another Asian country immediately.
Q: THE MARKET HAS BEEN MOVING TO ELECTRIC VEHICLES IN RECENT YEARS. DO YOU THINK THIS WILL CONTINUE, OR WILL THE ADVENT OF A MORE FOSSIL FUEL-FRIENDLY ADMINISTRATION DRIVE MORE DEMAND FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION (IC) TRUCKS?
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: The states have a bigger say in this than the federal government. Look at California as an example. With the advent of lithium as a safe and effective power solution, and with the price of lithium batteries coming down, I think [the use of] electric vehicles will continue to expand. Total cost of ownership is already much lower on electric when compared to IC product.
We continue to see electric product increasing every year. It is more sustainable, and it has now reached a point where cost is not a barrier to entry. Power and force have been overcome; we produce an electric rough-terrain lift truck that has a 50-degree gradeability.
Users will look at their own requirements, costs, etc., before deciding on IC or electric. I do not think the new administration will be able to justify the additional cost needed to use IC products. Electric is the future of material handling.
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: As anyone involved with the industrial lift truck market knows, California has been the driving force behind the electrification of the market, forcing organizations that operate in that state away from lift trucks that run on fossil fuels. While there have been no changes in the stringent regulations being imposed by the California Zero Emission Forklift Initiative, which essentially prohibits the sale of most spark-ignited internal combustion forklifts starting in 2026, there are many that expect an easing of such regulations.
Yet, aside from the legislative pressures, there continues to be a strong value proposition for making the switch to electric. Technological advancements in lift truck systems, battery technology, and charging platforms have all combined to make moving to electric more feasible than ever before; we are one of the only westernized nations who still use combustion engine equipment indoors. This is a welcome change for both warehouse employees and the environment.
Shannon Curtis – Raymond: The industry is embracing alternative fuel and energy sources. One viable option is lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) with certification from Underwriters Laboratories. While lithium-ion technology is already a proven solution in the industry, offering superior performance and longer life spans than traditional lead-acid batteries, The Raymond Corporation sees UL-compliant LIBs playing a pivotal role in meeting new regulatory standards. These batteries not only help reduce emissions but also improve the operational efficiency of the material handling, manufacturing, and warehousing industries.
Q: LIFT TRUCKS ARE USED FOR MANY TASKS, BUT ARE THERE ANY APPLICATIONS THAT ARE OF PARTICULAR INTEREST TO CUSTOMERS?
Shannon Curtis – Raymond: Today, organizations are aiming innovations in lift truck technologies to increase uptime, improve speed and mobility, streamline diagnostic procedures, and lower operating and energy costs—dramatically cutting consumption without reducing productivity. And it’s not just the forklift technologies that are evolving. The systems that warehouse managers rely on to manage and maintain their trucks—including operator-assist and data collection technologies—are also growing increasingly advanced.
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: E-commerce has fueled growth in the last few years. I believe it is here to stay. If anything, it will expand. All these products come from warehouses that need material handling machines. Every product we touch, including food, is probably moved at one point by a lift truck. We need to move products from one location to another, and trucks must be loaded and then unloaded at their destination. Lift trucks perform this function.
We are seeing continued expansion of Class III product [electric hand trucks and hand/rider trucks]. Walkie products move material but cannot stack it. Companies are realizing most of their need is for movement. For example, [a company may] have always used three lift trucks [that can both move and stack product] in its warehouse, when it only needs to have one truck [that’s capable of both moving and stacking product] along with two trucks [that just] move material, which includes loading and unloading at the dock.
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: Labor constraints today have been a significant challenge for operations that require the use of lift trucks. With the massive movement to e-commerce, there is a much higher need for lift truck operators in warehousing and distribution environments. The lack of skilled labor has really pressured companies to invest in technologies that help operations accomplish more with less. As a result, more and more operations are looking to [incorporate] various levels of automation into their industrial lift truck fleets.
Q: DO YOU SEE ROBOTICS SOLUTIONS AS COMPETITIVE WITH FORKLIFTS OR COMPLEMENTARY TO THEM?
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: For many years, the industrial lift truck manufacturers viewed automation and AGV [automatic guided vehicle] companies as competitors, but we’ve experienced a significant change in thinking over the past decade. What was a threat has now become a strength for the lift truck manufacturers. Almost all lift truck manufacturers today have expanded their technology capabilities to such a level that they are now able to offer automated versions of their standard equipment with improved ROI [return on investment] calculations.
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: They are complementary. Most AGV solutions are based on a forklift of some type. We will just be building different types of forklifts. The goal of robotics is to take out the labor cost of the driver. The operator is by far the most expensive component of material handling.
Support of your AGV will determine the success of the project. Dealer networks will be the key here. There are more and more companies getting into the AGV market, but can they support it after the sale?
Repetitive moves or long distances are the easiest [places] to remove the driver from the equation. If the unit goes down because of programming or mechanics, you must be able to get it back up operating as soon as possible. Dealer network and aftersales support should be a major component of the decision to take advantage of the benefits of AGV material handling.
Shannon Curtis – Raymond: Robots have been used in warehouses for decades, but in recent years, “cobots” have become even more complementary in the warehouse and instrumental in providing great levels of efficiency. From improved security and increased productivity to increased accuracy and lower costs, cobots are becoming an increasingly important part of warehouse operations.
Q: TODAY’S INDUSTRIAL TRUCKS OFFER MORE SAFETY FEATURES THAN EVER BEFORE. WHAT DO YOU SEE AS THE MOST SIGNIFICANT SAFETY DEVELOPMENTS OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS?
Shannon Curtis – Raymond: One of the most significant advancements in warehouse operations involves the implementation of virtual reality (VR) simulators. The technology can help new forklift operators develop the skills they need to succeed on the warehouse floor without impacting day-to-day operations, while also serving as a reinforcement tool for experienced operators. VR simulators serve as flexible, scalable teaching tools that rely on advanced technology to help workforces become more efficient and expand operator skills, creating optimized conditions for all employees.
In addition, training reinforcement offerings—like integrated equipment detection and notification systems and operator tether systems—can similarly help warehouse operators improve their work environment. Systems like these use intelligent speed limitations, real-time object detection, operator notifications, and more to improve employee awareness of their environment even in high-traffic areas.
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: With advancements in technology, all lift truck manufacturers are playing their part in developing new technologies that allow for the safe operation of their equipment. While there are various means in which manufacturers have applied these technologies, there is no substitute for a sound operator safety training program. [Ensuring that your operators receive the proper training] will always be the number-one way to reduce the likelihood of workplace incidents involving lift trucks. In addition to having fully trained operators, many manufacturers offer optional operator-assistance systems that may improve workplace safety for both the operator and those working around lift trucks.
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: When I started in this business, we were selling used trucks without overhead guards. They were produced without them. The load backrest was not a given. Seat belts were nonexistent.
There have been so many great advancements in safety, it is hard to pick just one. We are incorporating AI [artificial intelligence] into our equipment now. This will recognize a person in the area and warn the driver. Besides changing the physical attributes of the lift truck to make it safer for the operator, we will see more and more technology and AI in the pursuit of making it safer for the pedestrian.
Q: WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES OF LEASING VERSUS BUYING FOR COMPANIES LOOKING TO ACQUIRE NEW TRUCKS?
Loren Swakow – Noblelift: This is an age-old question. It really depends on the user. It is a function of cash flow and cash balances in each company. Leases can be expensed, while purchases need to be capitalized. Not only are we looking at the cash position, but we also now need to review our profit position. The user needs a lift truck, but does he need to capitalize it because profit is low, or does he need to expense it to decrease his profit and reduce the taxes on the company?
Every company is different, [but either way,] you will have outflow of cash and a new lift truck on the floor producing for you. The question is which method benefits the organization the most.
Shannon Curtis – Raymond: Today’s electric forklifts offer performance that meets the needs of the most common lift truck applications, but with dramatically reduced maintenance requirements and with data collection capabilities that are quickly becoming essential to facility and resource optimization. Although the total cost of ownership of electric products is typically lower than for internal combustion products, the higher upfront initial purchase cost of switching to electric-powered equipment may have been a barrier in the past. Currently available governmental incentives and supplier programs, like leasing, make battery power—specifically, the traditionally more expensive lithium-ion power—even easier to justify.
Martin Boyd – Big Joe: When it comes to the lease vs. buy decision, each organization needs to evaluate several factors when considering what’s right for their application and company.
In leasing, you enjoy a lower cost per month and can be flexible on the terms of the lease. If you have a high-use environment, where you may need to renew equipment more often, leasing clearly has its advantages. In addition, a lease is often treated as an operating expense on the income statement, while a financed forklift is considered an asset on the balance sheet with depreciation expense recorded each period.
On the other hand, if you are using the asset less often and plan to keep it over the life of a typical lease (five years), then the benefits of a straight purchase or finance would outweigh those of a lease.
That is important because the increased use of robots has the potential to significantly reduce the impact of labor shortages in manufacturing, IFR said. That will happen when robots automate dirty, dull, dangerous or delicate tasks – such as visual quality inspection, hazardous painting, or heavy lifting—thus freeing up human workers to focus on more interesting and higher-value tasks.
To reach those goals, robots will grow through five trends in the new year, the report said:
1 – Artificial Intelligence. By leveraging diverse AI technologies, such as physical, analytical, and generative, robotics can perform a wide range of tasks more efficiently. Analytical AI enables robots to process and analyze the large amounts of data collected by their sensors. This helps to manage variability and unpredictability in the external environment, in “high mix/low-volume” production, and in public environments. Physical AI, which is created through the development of dedicated hardware and software that simulate real-world environments, allows robots to train themselves in virtual environments and operate by experience, rather than programming. And Generative AI projects aim to create a “ChatGPT moment” for Physical AI, allowing this AI-driven robotics simulation technology to advance in traditional industrial environments as well as in service robotics applications.
2 – Humanoids.
Robots in the shape of human bodies have received a lot of media attention, due to their vision where robots will become general-purpose tools that can load a dishwasher on their own and work on an assembly line elsewhere. Start-ups today are working on these humanoid general-purpose robots, with an eye toward new applications in logistics and warehousing. However, it remains to be seen whether humanoid robots can represent an economically viable and scalable business case for industrial applications, especially when compared to existing solutions. So for the time being, industrial manufacturers are still focused on humanoids performing single-purpose tasks only, with a focus on the automotive industry.
3 – Sustainability – Energy Efficiency.
Compliance with the UN's environmental sustainability goals and corresponding regulations around the world is becoming an important requirement for inclusion on supplier whitelists, and robots play a key role in helping manufacturers achieve these goals. In general, their ability to perform tasks with high precision reduces material waste and improves the output-input ratio of a manufacturing process. These automated systems ensure consistent quality, which is essential for products designed to have long lifespans and minimal maintenance. In the production of green energy technologies such as solar panels, batteries for electric cars or recycling equipment, robots are critical to cost-effective production. At the same time, robot technology is being improved to make the robots themselves more energy-efficient. For example, the lightweight construction of moving robot components reduces their energy consumption. Different levels of sleep mode put the hardware in an energy saving parking position. Advances in gripper technology use bionics to achieve high grip strength with almost no energy consumption.
4 – New Fields of Business.
The general manufacturing industry still has a lot of potential for robotic automation. But most manufacturing companies are small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which means the adoption of industrial robots by SMEs is still hampered by high initial investment and total cost of ownership. To address that hurdle, Robot-as-a-Service (RaaS) business models allow enterprises to benefit from robotic automation with no fixed capital involved. Another option is using low-cost robotics to provide a “good enough” product for applications that have low requirements in terms of precision, payload, and service life. Powered by the those approaches, new customer segments beyond manufacturing include construction, laboratory automation, and warehousing.
5 – Addressing Labor Shortage.
The global manufacturing sector continues to suffer from labor shortages, according to the International Labour Organisation (ILO). One of the main drivers is demographic change, which is already burdening labor markets in leading economies such as the United States, Japan, China, the Republic of Korea, or Germany. Although the impact varies from country to country, the cumulative effect on the supply chain is a concern almost everywhere.
Cargo theft activity across the United States and Canada reached unprecedented levels in 2024, with 3,625 reported incidents representing a stark 27% increase from 2023, according to an annual analysis from CargoNet.
The estimated average value per theft also rose, reaching $202,364, up from $187,895 in 2023. And the increase was persistent, as each quarter of 2024 surpassed previous records set in 2023.
According to Cargonet, the data suggests an evolving and increasingly sophisticated threat landscape in cargo theft, with criminal enterprises demonstrating tactical adaptability in both their methods and target selection.
For example, notable shifts occurred in targeted commodities during 2024. While 2023 saw frequent theft of engine oils, fluids, solar energy products, and energy drinks, 2024 marked a strategic pivot by criminal enterprises. New targets included raw and finished copper products, consumer electronics (particularly audio equipment and high-end servers), and cryptocurrency mining hardware. The analysis also revealed increased targeting of specific consumable goods, including produce like avocados and nuts, along with personal care products ranging from cosmetics to vitamins and supplements, especially protein powder.
Geographic trends show California and Texas experiencing the most significant increases in theft activity. California reported a 33% rise in incidents, while Texas saw an even more dramatic 39% surge. The five most impacted counties all reported substantial increases, led by Dallas County, Texas, with a 78% spike in reported incidents. Los Angeles County, California, traditionally a high-activity area, saw a 50% increase while neighboring San Bernardino County experienced a 47% rise.