Warehouse managers are sharpening their focus on the batteries, chargers, and forklifts they are running in light of escalating energy costs—and suppliers are at the ready with solutions designed to maximize productivity and reduce expenses.
Victoria Kickham started her career as a newspaper reporter in the Boston area before moving into B2B journalism. She has covered manufacturing, distribution and supply chain issues for a variety of publications in the industrial and electronics sectors, and now writes about everything from forklift batteries to omnichannel business trends for DC Velocity.
Rising energy costs are taking a toll on consumers and businesses alike, and in the warehouse, that means companies are placing a sharper focus on the systems and equipment they are running as well as the power those systems consume. This is especially important when it comes to the forklifts traversing warehouse floors nationwide. As warehouse managers seek ways to get more out of that equipment or upgrade to energy-efficient and productivity-enhancing solutions, they are increasingly turning to equipment suppliers to learn about the latest technologies and automation strategies that can reduce costs.
“[Inflation and higher costs] are accelerating some trends we’ve seen in the industry for a few years now—[especially] demand for automation and new power systems,” explains Bill Pedriana, chief marketing officer for material handling equipment manufacturer Big Joe Forklifts. “[There is a] huge appetite out there for both of those things. In some cases, there is an appetite for both at the same time. Labor costs, power costs, all costs are going up, [and] companies are scrambling for a more efficient means of moving things through their supply chains.”
For many, those strategies begin on the warehouse floor, with new battery technologies, upgraded equipment, and in-depth analyses that can boost equipment performance and deliver data that can help managers make more-informed decisions. Here’s a look at what some battery and equipment makers are doing to help customers reach their energy- and cost-savings goals.
ENERGY-AS-A-SERVICE
Leaders at Quebec-based lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery company UgoWork set out to help industrial customers get a better handle on their energy usage in the warehouse seven years ago, when the company’s founders recognized a common problem in warehouse logistics: Forklift battery maintenance and energy management were taking too large a share of warehouse managers’ time—time that would be better spent focusing on ways to get products in and out of the facility faster and more efficiently. UgoWork’s leaders were confident that switching from traditional lead-acid batteries to Li-ion solutions would solve that problem for many companies—especially those running large fleets—but the higher cost of Li-ion batteries was too much for many customers to swallow.
So UgoWork developed a subscription-based model that removed the upfront costs of purchasing Li-ion batteries and chargers, giving customers a more affordable way to make the switch. For a recurring monthly fee, users get a Li-ion battery and charging station along with access to UgoWork’s cloud-based software system that monitors and manages the battery. The program is similar to subscription-based software-as-a-service (SaaS) programs designed to help companies outsource IT needs.
“The whole idea behind UgoWork and energy-as-a-service [is to] provide a sole supplier for everything related to energy—with the mission to really change how the industry operates,” explains Jean-François Marchand, the company’s director of marketing. “With the energy-as-a-service option, there is no [capital expenditure]. It is a pure subscription model that removes that problem of adoption—because you eliminate the upfront equipment costs.”
The model is gaining steam as companies attempt to manage today’s higher energy costs—largely because it gives them a partner that manages their energy use and makes sure they’re getting the most out of their equipment. Marchand offers an example: A UgoWork customer was using 20 forklifts in one area of its warehouse. Switching to trucks powered by Li-ion batteries improved uptime by reducing the amount of charging time required for the equipment—a standard savings when switching from lead-acid to lithium, according to Marchand. But UgoWork was able to dig deeper into the equipment’s usage—via its energy-as-a-service monitoring system—ultimately discovering that the customer could do the same work with fewer forklifts. In the end, the customer removed seven trucks from that particular section of the warehouse, reallocating them to other areas.
“That’s huge in terms of cost savings,” Marchand said. “It’s one example of what data can bring in terms of real-life savings.”
Using energy-as-a-service also helps customers maintain a more predictable energy budget, according to UgoWork.
“By using a subscription model, they know their fee will be stable, or at least proportional to their energy usage,” Marchand explains.
INSIGHT AND ANALYSIS
For years, battery and equipment makers have provided power consumption studies designed to give warehouse managers a look at just how well their equipment is performing. Such studies—which can be conducted on all types of batteries and equipment—evaluate warehouse workflows as well as examine how much energy a particular forklift, or an entire fleet, is using. The feedback can lead to solutions for better equipment usage and energy management. Pedriana, of Big Joe Forklifts, says he’s seen a renewed interest in such studies as energy costs rise.
“Workflows are central to material handling … direction, flow, quantity, speed of goods through a facility—they are all important,” he explains. “[Customers] are looking at all of that with fresh eyes: How much energy is being consumed? What’s the best sequence of workflows from a power-consumption basis?”
Battery management systems (BMS) also help by continuously monitoring batteries in the warehouse. These electronic devices monitor and regulate the charging and discharging of batteries, tracking factors such as battery type, voltage, temperature, capacity, state of charge, power consumption, and remaining operating time. And increasingly, such systems are tied in with forklift telematics, which collect and analyze interactions between the fork truck and the battery, generating data that can help users adjust workflows and operating conditions to improve efficiency and reduce costs.
“[The data could reveal] where charger placement might be advantageous, for example,” Pedriana explains. “Or, if we’re running [equipment] at peak hours, can we reduce costs by changing when we operate trucks? There are so many tools people can use to really drive down their operating costs.”
LONG-TERM PLANNING
In addition to rising costs, other market developments are complicating warehouse leaders’ efforts to manage their energy needs—particularly, longer leadtimes for new or replacement equipment, according to Trevor Bonifas, general manager of sales, motive power, for material handling equipment manufacturer Crown Equipment. E-commerce and other trends have boosted the volume flowing in and out of warehouses over the past two years, and many warehouse managers are taking the opportunity to add equipment or upgrade to new, energy-efficient systems to handle that volume. Supply chain disruptions and materials shortages mean they could wait a year or more for that new equipment—and in the interim, they have to figure out how to address both current and future demands for power.
“[Customers are telling us], ‘I need to get something new today, but I need something that will work with my equipment that will be replaced a year or two from now,’” Bonifas explains.
He offers an example: If a customer replaces a charger or charging system to boost equipment performance today, that customer wants to make sure that whatever charger it buys will work with any new equipment that arrives in a year. Bonifas says he spends a lot of time figuring out how to best address that problem.
“Ultimately, we go in and talk about how they are using power today, how they expect to use it tomorrow, and we put a device on the equipment to see what they are consuming and what solutions make the most sense today or a year from now,” he says.
That could mean a new charger, an entirely new truck, or even a replacement piece or part that will make the equipment more efficient. For customers using lead-acid batteries today but who plan to switch to Li-ion in a year or two, Crown Equipment offers a flexible solution designed to address both needs—a charger that can charge both types of equipment with the switch of a DC cable and connector.
“Across the entire industry, leadtimes are at historically long levels because of the growth in demand [for new forklifts],” he says. “We have the ability to put in a lead-acid charging solution that has the capability to switch to lithium when the equipment comes in. … That allows some flexibility for those customers who need something today, but say ‘What do I do a year from now?’”
Customers’ growing interest in these and other energy-saving solutions is a sign of the times—and a concern Bonifas and other industry professionals say is here to stay for those on the warehouse floor.
“With the rise in costs, for anything, it comes with a thirst for more data and knowledge,” Bonifas says. “Customers are saying, ‘I’m paying more for this, so I want to make sure I’m getting what’s right.’”
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.