Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

In tough times, Gartner recommends adopting an “offset strategy”

Unconventional approaches to supply chain management can help companies compensate when facing unfavorable conditions beyond their control, analyst group says.

Screen Shot 2022-06-06 at 8.29.35 PM.png

When faced with accelerating change, an unending series of disruptions, and urgent challenges, supply chain executives should consider adopting an “offset strategy,” says Ken Chadwick, vice president and analyst at Gartner. Chadwick used this unconventional advice to kick off Gartner’s annual Supply Chain Symposium in Orlando, Florida, on Monday.

An offset strategy involves compensating for a disadvantage by changing the circumstances under which you are competing or by implementing an unconventional approach. You use it to counteract a force you cannot control when you cannot win using traditional strategies, according to Chadwick.


“An [offset] strategy changes your position to a more favorable footing that enables the application to strengths to a problem that is otherwise vexing,” explained Chadwick during the opening keynote address. “[It] seeks to deliberately change an unattractive proposition to one that is more advantageous.”

According to Chadwick, to implement an offset strategy, you need to first be able to sense the changes and problems happening in the environment around you. Then you need to shift to an untried or unconventional strategy, different from the approach you might typically use. That unconventional strategy helps to steer your future response.

Chadwick said that an offset strategy is essential for responding to five key challenges that supply chain executives are facing today: worker cognitive overload, evolving customer expectations, technology change, supply chain cyber risk, and energy instability.

Cognitive overload: According to Gartner’s research, 83% of the workforce feels overwhelmed, as the supply chain and business environment continues to become increasingly complex. One strategy for offsetting this complexity is to deliberately simplify the decision-making process. This can be accomplished by using technology such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate some decisions or to constrain some of the elements of decision making, such as the number of escalations allowed, the number of people involved, the information gathered, or the time allotted to make the decision.

Evolving customer expectations: Customer needs are rapidly evolving with many consumers indicating that in the future they expect to see more customized products and solutions and more ethically and sustainably built products, even if they cost more. To meet these changes, companies will need to shift from strategies that prioritize cost reduction and efficiency to those that center the customer. Chadwick labeled this shift as moving from “just-in-time” to “just the customer.” This shift might, for example, involve changing sourcing priorities from driving down costs to delivering greater value to the customer.  

Technology change: According to Chadwick, supply chain organizations do not have a good track record when it comes to getting the most out of their technology. To prove his point, the analyst cited Gartner research that shows that 88% of companies say they have made significant investments in technology to leverage data, but 83% say decision making has not improved significantly as a result. To buck this trend, supply chain leaders must focus less on the technology itself and more on embracing and adopting the technology. This requires not just integrating new technology into the current process but thinking about how technology can be used revolutionize the process.

Supply chain cyber risk: With 80% of companies reporting that they have experienced a significant cyber security incident, it’s clear that the risks of cyber threats are rapidly increasing. Chadwick says that a cyber security strategy that focuses on compliance and following guidance from the IT department is no longer good enough. Instead, supply chain leaders need to take a more proactive role in in creating a cybersecurity strategy for the supply chain. Additionally, cybersecurity considerations need to be baked into business decisions, such as the supplier selection process.

Energy instability: Power outages caused by the ice storms in Texas in 2021 and the more recent outages in China due to coal shortages illustrate the weaknesses inherent in the traditional, centralized approach to energy distribution. Gartner urges companies to offset this instability by taking a more distributed, diversified approach to energy management, which may include renewables, microgrids, and battery storage.

“The five chosen areas are ripe for offset, ripe for underinvested or unconventional approaches that will change your competitive position,” Chadwick concluded. “Success in one will feed success in all, and the cumulative impact of all these offsets will change the game.”

The Latest

More Stories

screen display of GPS fleet tracking

Commercial fleets drawn to GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video

Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.

Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

forklifts working in a warehouse

Averitt tracks three hurdles for international trade in 2025

Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.

Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.

Keep ReadingShow less
legal scales and gavel

FMCSA rule would require greater broker transparency

A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.

According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.

Keep ReadingShow less
chart of trucking conditions

FTR: Trucking sector outlook is bright for a two-year horizon

The trucking freight market is still on course to rebound from a two-year recession despite stumbling in September, according to the latest assessment by transportation industry analysis group FTR.

Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.

Keep ReadingShow less
chart of robot use in factories by country

Global robot density in factories has doubled in 7 years

Global robot density in factories has doubled in seven years, according to the “World Robotics 2024 report,” presented by the International Federation of Robotics (IFR).

Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.

Keep ReadingShow less