Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
No two industrial truck operators are the same. In any one facility, operators will be different ages, come from different demographic backgrounds, and have varying degrees of experience. Yet forklift safety training is sometimes treated as a one-size-fits-all affair.
Fleet managers may need to reconsider that approach as warehouses and distribution centers (DCs) continue to grapple with acute labor shortages and unprecedented rates of employee turnover. At many facilities, 50% of the warehouse staff has fewer than 90 days on the job—“a statistic I’ve heard over and over” in conversations with customers, particularly those involved in cold storage or in densely populated areas where there is strong competition for labor, reports Jim Gaskell, director of global automation and emerging technologies for Crown Equipment Corp.
Many of those newer employees may be experienced forklift operators in search of higher pay and signing bonuses. But with facilities having to work harder to recruit labor, they’re also seeing more new hires who have never been on an industrial truck before. First-timers’ lack of familiarity with the equipment, potential misconceptions about what’s actually involved in operating industrial trucks, and short tenures can be detrimental to safety, so we asked safety training experts for tips on how to work most effectively with this growing population of operators. Here are some of their recommendations.
1. Keep their attention in the classroom.Classroom training is required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), in addition to hands-on work with equipment and “road test” practicums. But a lecture-only format is unlikely to hold trainees’ attention—especially if they’re young and were raised on multimedia. Interactive computer-based “e-learning” programs and training videos that keep learners engaged and “bring the forklift owner’s manual to life” are effective teaching tools, says Evelyn Velásquez-Cuevas, director, product sales and technical training for Yale Materials Handling.
Bob Bladel, vice president, training and sales enablement for Hyster Co., is also a fan of using visuals in safety training. Photos, illustrations, and videos dramatically increase retention of information compared to reading or listening alone, he says. Importantly, they enhance trainees’ understanding when equipment and environments they have never seen are introduced in class.
The experts agree: Multimedia, while valuable, is a supplement to—not a replacement for—a skilled trainer. Effective trainers guide learners as they progress through the curriculum, keeping them attentive by asking questions and building discussions off the answers. “Don’t just lecture—engage in two-way communication. That means you also have to listen,” says Tony Parsons, regional operator training manager for the regional dealer network Wolter Inc. (Multimedia is not a substitute for on-the-floor experience, either, he adds: “You can read a book and watch YouTube, but your butt has to be in the seat to really learn.”)
2.Test as you go. It’s incumbent on the trainer to make sure students are learning what they should, says Dave Norton, vice president, customer solutions and support for The Raymond Corp. One way to do that is to confirm their understanding by testing frequently as they learn, instead of testing them on the entire curriculum at the end of the class.
Gaskell, a former training manager, recommends a method called “performance-based training,” where instructors teach one task at a time and then test each student’s knowledge and hands-on competence after they have completed a module at their own pace. Students cannot move forward until they’ve mastered each task in a specified order. Because trainees are tested individually, the trainer has ample opportunity to assess each one’s understanding and proficiency. This individualized approach leads to more competent operators than “putting everybody in a room and risking not really interacting with them individually,” he says.
3.Start them on appropriate equipment. There’s no universal “starter model” for new operators.Mike Hance, technical support manager at Equipment Depot, which represents parent company Mitsubishi Logisnext America’s Cat lift trucks, Mitsubishi forklift trucks, and Jungheinrich and UniCarriers Forklift brands, has been training operators since 1987. He favors Class 4 and 5 (internal combustion engine) sit-down forklifts to start. In his experience, new operators generally pick up skills fairly quickly because the steering, foot brake, and accelerator operate much like those in an automobile.
All agreed that narrow-aisle, stand-up electrics are harder to master. Depending on the type of equipment, operators will have to learn multiple skills, including how to pick, place, and stack in addition to scanning and using radio-frequency (RF) terminals, all while elevated; or they may have to put away pallets at great heights while using a camera system. Furthermore, most people aren’t accustomed to controlling speed with their hands, or using controls like the emergency “dead man” pedal, which stops the truck when an operator picks up their left foot. Those are completely new skills that “may feel weird” for a while, Wolter’s Parsons says. (Hance and others note that younger operators who are used to joystick controls for gaming systems typically pick up the skills for controlling stand-up trucks more quickly than senior operators who are used to sit-downs.) As several experts suggested, sit-down counterbalanced trucks and stand-up models require operators to develop very different “muscle memory”—something that’s not easy to do quickly.
Norton, meanwhile, says that many of his customers start new operators on Class 3 pallet trucks and low-height stackers because “the first steps are more like driving a car—you just drive and turn, as opposed to lifting and maneuvering a load at a significant height.” But Parsons says there can be drawbacks to that approach. “Although they may seem simple, I teach electric rider pallet jacks at the end. They are heavier than people think, and operators may be around pedestrians, which can create hazards for both.”
4.Take advantage of technology. In Parsons’ view, training technology is “a great tool to assist the trainer and student to get to the destination faster with less risk,” but it is most effective when matched to an individual student’s knowledge gap and learning style. Our experts identified three types of technology they consider especially useful with first-time operators: telematics, simulation, and sensory alerts.
Telematics systems remotely collect information about an operator’s driving speed, location, impacts and near-misses, pre-shift inspections, and more. Newer systems provide real-time alerts to operators when they are outside of pre-established safety parameters. Used in conjunction with in-person observation, the information collected allows trainers to quickly determine where new operators may need some extra coaching or reinforcement. In addition, some telematics systems can remotely control the truck’s performance, allowing trainers to start new operators at slower travel and lift speeds and increase the speeds as an operator gains more experience and proficiency.
Simulation technology includes desktop simulators, which are similar to video games, and virtual reality (VR) systems, where learners wear VR headsets while at the controls of an actual (but immobile) forklift. Both are interactive; i.e., the scenarios respond to users’ actions just as the vehicles would in real life. The trainer, who is able to see what the student is doing, can provide immediate feedback and correction, adding more complex tasks and changing the performance settings when appropriate. Another benefit of simulation is that it can expose learners to potential hazards virtually, so they can learn how to recognize and react to them. This kind of real-time feedback and scenario testing enhances learning in a safe, controlled environment, says Yale’s Velásquez-Cuevas.
Sensory alerts like travel alarms, object-detection systems, and visual warnings such as “stand clear” lighting around forklifts help new operators apply safe practices they’ve learned in class. Some training systems use techniques like brightly colored light beams or floor markings to outline where the operator should stand on the platform and provide reminders to keep hands and feet inside the truck.
Bladel of Hyster believes that end-users who aren’t leveraging today’s training technology are shortchanging new operators and could potentially be exacerbating labor turnover. “If [operators] don’t see the company investing in technology that could help make their job safer, then it’s a contradictory message. They will want to know, why aren’t you trying to keep me safe?”
5. Help them feel confident—but not too confident.Brand-new operators may become nervous or even fearful when it’s time to take their practical test or they’re starting to work on their own. Often, they are timid with the controls and frequently ask whether they are doing something right, says Jason Moore, a training and development manager at Hyster. Being too timid can actually lead to more mistakes because “that’s not how the truck is designed to operate,” he says. In those cases, it helps to go back over a specific task until the operator feels comfortable with it.
It’s important to encourage new operators to ask questions and request more practice time, and companies should allow time for that, says Velásquez-Cuevas. “We have found that younger generations want a lot of feedback, and they will usually be open to coaching and mentoring,” she adds.
Some new operators may be overconfident, though, and that can be dangerous. “Certain operators will show confidence pretty quickly,” Crown’s Gaskell notes. “Yes, they can drive, but it may not be a true test of successful training. An overconfident operator can look skilled, but if they are too confident about their capabilities, then it’s possible they will not be using their best judgment.”
Often, this applies to young trainees who “feel like they’ve been given their wings and want to take off and fly,” as Hance of Equipment Depot puts it. That’s when it’s time for a reminder about risk, like the fact that a 5,000-pound-capacity forklift weighs as much as two cars, and with a load, is as heavy as three cars. “It’s critical for them to understand the weight and forces they are dealing with, and the injuries those forces can cause,” he says.
6. Take it slow. Hance recommends against immediately placing new operators in a high-speed environment. “They need to be monitored in a controlled environment until they’ve developed skills and are proficient in dealing with things like pedestrians and dock safety,” he explains. He suggests having new operators start out in slower-paced, comparatively simple jobs; as their skills progress, they can take on more complex work like delivering to loading docks, where travel paths are not as clearly defined as they are in the aisles.
Employers may want to consider setting a probationary period with a shorter-term license than the standard three years. During this period, Wolter’s Parsons advises, a supervisor should observe new operators and intervene if they see any unsafe behavior. If all is well or has been corrected by the end of the probationary period, they can go ahead and grant the full-term license.
7. Monitor and hold them accountable.Even classroom superstars may do everything correctly when a trainer is with them but fail to follow some basic rules when they’re on their own, says Hyster’s Bladel. Accordingly, a manager or supervisor should continue monitoring new operators for some time after they receive their licenses, he says.
Proper operating practices are critical, so even the newest associates must be held accountable if they don’t maintain safe practices, says Norton of Raymond. Supervisors are responsible for “policing” the work environment, but peer-to-peer supervision can also be very effective, especially for first-timers who have been mentored by a more experienced co-worker. And while there should be consequences if new operators do not follow the rules they’ve been taught, ultimately, our experts say, the point is not to punish, but to reinforce the safe and proper way of operating.
Tips from the trainers
The forklift safety experts we spoke with for this article have many years of experience. Over the years, they’ve developed a portfolio of teaching techniques to help brand-new operators become competent and comfortable on an industrial truck. The following are a few of their “tricks of the trade”:
Once out on the floor, trainees are likely to encounter specialized terms, including industry- and facility-specific expressions or slang they won’t hear anywhere else. To prevent misunderstandings, teach them the local “language.” (Tony Parsons, Wolter Inc.)
Reinforce verbal explanations with visual props. One option is to use accurate scale models to demonstrate the impact of various load weights and operator behaviors on stability. (Evelyn Velásquez-Cuevas, Yale Materials Handling Corp.)
Ask students to describe each step of the task they’re being trained on, from start to completion. Most will say putting away a pallet requires five to seven steps, but it actually takes more than 40 steps. Thinking through a task in this way gives trainees a better appreciation of the complexities of safe forklift operation. (Tony Parsons)
Rather than let trainees handle a pallet at first, take two wooden 4x4s that are four to five feet long, place one on top of the other in a “T” shape, and have them lift the top one off and place it back on top of the other one. Because the boards are lightweight and topple easily, they help students learn to move loads gently without jerky movement. And if they do fall, they’re unlikely to damage anything. (Tony Parsons)
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."