New “connected cab” technology promises to make truck drivers’ lives easier and the job more appealing, fleet managers say. But first they have to convince the holdouts.
Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
The dazzling array of technologies installed in commercial trucks—from smart sensors to wireless network connections to collision-avoidance systems and customized smartphones—can help fleet managers improve their oversight of day-to-day operations, whether it’s monitoring equipment location and condition or delivery performance. But the rise of the “connected cab” is proving even more valuable in another area of fleet operations: recruiting and retaining increasingly hard-to-find drivers.
If that sounds improbable, just ask Jeff Jackson. Like fleet operators everywhere, Jackson, who is executive vice president for operations, dedicated contract carriage, at Penske Logistics, says his company faces unprecedented competition for drivers. When his company goes to interview a prospective driver, “they’re really interviewing us, because they’ve got four other road tests they’re going to next,” Jackson says. “So they’re checking ‘Is the truck clean? Is the tech easy to use?’”
“We sell [ourselves by telling them] ‘We’ve got really good technology that is easy to use,’” Jackson adds.
In Penske’s case, that really good technology includes a company-developed Android-model smartphone that comes preloaded with apps that give drivers instant access to data like estimated time of arrival (ETA), including traffic and weather impacts, and that make their lives easier—for example, by providing automated arrival and departure notices, electronic proof of delivery (POD), engine fault codes,accident and breakdown reporting, and electronic driver vehicle inspection reporting. The devices also incorporate ELD (electronic logging device) capability for tracking drivers’ hours of service.
Penske issues drivers one of these smartphones at the start of their route each day and offers “dock to dock” tech support until the driver returns the handheld unit at the end of the trip.
UPPING THE TECH GAME
As for what’s driving the trend among fleets to up their technology game, part of it is the expectation among drivers, particularly younger ones, that employers will provide them with the same kinds of technologies they’re accustomed to using in their daily lives—if not substantially better.
“The driver shortage has created a vacuum that is [pulling] the next generation of drivers into the mix, and there are expectations that what they see in the cab will be [more advanced than] what the previous generation had,” says Mayank Sharma, head of the product management and user experience group at Teletrac Navman, a developer of asset management systems and fleet management software. They expect their trucks to be equipped with technology that’s at least on a par with what they have in their personal cars, Sharma adds, “so there’s ‘consumerization’ happening in fleets.”
But that’s just part of the story. In addition to helping attract members of the digital generation, today’s in-cab technologies offer important safety benefits, fleet experts say. “There’s definitely a lot of new technology in the cabs now, but that tech helps to pick up things a driver might miss,” says Andrew Blundon, a trucker with 30 years of experience and a certified driver trainer at Ryder System Inc. He cites collision-avoidance systems that can alert drivers to vehicles in their blind spot and lane-departure warning systems as two examples. “A driver has more things to do than an airline pilot. He has to make so many quick decisions, and this advanced equipment makes driving a truck easier.”
LEARNING TO LOVE THE CAMERA
Despite the demonstrable benefits, the prospect of working in a “connected cab” isn’t always an easy sell. While younger employees tend to take to the latest digital tools, they can be intimidating for some older drivers who see the technology as impinging on the independent lifestyle of a driver, says Matthew Carr, vice president of operations at CPC Logistics Inc., a company that provides drivers and services for private fleets in North America. “It’s what we need to find the workforce because they’re a connected audience and we need to engage them,” he says of the technology. “But right now it scares some people.”
Drivers tend to be particularly skeptical of the dashboard cameras that record both the traffic outside the vehicle and the actions of the driver inside. “Cameras[that are integrated] with the vehicle can be intrusive or offensive to some drivers,” Carr says. But their suspicion is unfounded, he adds. The cameras aren’t there so that fleet supervisors can micromanage drivers, he says. “In reality, they are there to support a suite of coaching tools and to protect the driver.”
To that last point, Carr notes that drivers often undergo a change in attitude about cameras once they experience those protective effects. In the event of a crash, “there’s a tendency to blame the guy in the big lumbering vehicle,” he says, “when in reality they’re the trained professionals and those around them are more likely to be driving unpredictably.” In such cases, footage from dashboard cameras can be used to demonstrate that a driver was not at fault, exonerating both the driver and the fleet, Sharma says, adding that these capabilities are leading more drivers to accept the technology.
In the never-ending effort to manage their fleets more efficiently, trucking companies are turning to many of the same technologies their drivers use in daily life. Packed into an 18-wheeler, the high-tech tools have created a connected cab that not only supports better freight visibility but also improved vehicle safety and employee satisfaction.
“When it comes down to it, we need to be able to [retain] the drivers we have and attract the ones we don’t in order to position [truck driving] as an attractive career—one [that offers] both connected technology and the independence of being a driver,” CPC’s Carr says.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."