Squeezed by a labor crunch at a time of unprecedented demand, warehouse operators are bypassing the pilot stage and jumping right into large-scale robotic installations.
Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
The warehouse automation market has been growing steadily for decades, but the pandemic year of 2021 saw some foundational shifts in the sector. Beset by labor shortages amid the e-commerce boom, desperate DC operators hit the fast-forward button on plans to roll out technologies like robotic fulfillment systems.
In the early days of warehouse robots, new customers would typically test the unfamiliar systems with limited pilot trials, installing a small number of robots in a corner of the building. If the pilot proved a success, customers would then buy a few more units, slowly building a fleet of autonomous mobile robots (AMRs), automated guided vehicles (AGVs), robotic picking arms, and other devices.
That approach was effective at controlling the risk—and expense—associated with deploying what was then a bleeding-edge technology, but it often left robotic vendors stuck in “pilot purgatory,” a dreaded state of limbo where users seemed to forever test the systems but never commit to large-scale rollouts.
Jump ahead to 2022, and no one’s complaining about pilot purgatory any more. The number of robots sold in North America set a new record in 2021, with 39,708 units sold at a value of $2 billion, a 14% increase over the previous high in 2017, according to the Association for Advancing Automation (A3).
A3 President Jeff Burnstein says the numbers reflect a surge of purchases for applications outside the automotive sector, which has historically led other users in adopting robotic technologies. “More industries recognized that robotics could help reverse productivity declines and fill repetitive jobs human workers don’t want,” Burnstein said in a release. Users are finding that it’s “no longer a choice whether to deploy robots and automation. It’s now an absolute imperative.”
A SENSE OF URGENCY
At the same time that tough business conditions created that imperative, companies were becoming less wary of the technology and more comfortable with the concept, industry sources say. Even if they hadn’t yet purchased robots for their own DCs, they saw companies all around them solving productivity problems with the devices and realizing a relatively speedy return on their investment.
Thanks to that growing confidence, customers are now buying logistics robots on a far larger scale than they were just a few years ago, says Paul Ambruso, head of product and strategy for mobile robotics at Berkshire Grey. “Pilot programs are still sort of the norm, but now it is done not as a small portion of the facility, but in the entire facility,” he says. “So there’s a tendency toward whole-facility installs and then replicating that.”
And it’s not just happening in DCs. Customers are also buying robots for use in the back of a retail store or in a “dark store”—that is, a store that’s dedicated strictly to online order fulfillment. And if they’re satisfied with the results, they add additional sites throughout the company’s network.
Buyers have shifted to the new approach because of the same labor and e-commerce pressures that are afflicting so many sectors throughout the economy, says Jim Lawton, vice president and general manager for robotics automation at Zebra Technologies, which in 2021 acquired the AMR vendor Fetch Robotics.
Those pressures are having a particular impact on fulfillment operations run bylarge third-party logistics service providers (3PLs), he adds. “They have a lot less patience now than what I’ve seen in the past. We haven’t seen as much urgency for this before,” Lawton says. “There’s no proof of concept, no kick the tires. I don’t want to say they’re not being deliberate; they are being deliberate, but they’re being deliberately fast.”
SPEEDY DEPLOYMENTS
Another change that’s driving the accelerated adoption of robots by fulfillment operations is that vendors have made them easier to configure, deploy, and maintain, Lawton says.
In Zebra’s case, the company can visit a new customer location and drive one of its robots around the site with a videogame-type controller to familiarize it with the building’s floor plan. That robot then shares its mapping data with the rest of the fleet, and the system is soon installed. “So it’s up and running in a single-digit number of days or weeks, and that’s really appealing [to customers],” Lawton says.
When it comes to large-scale warehouse robotic installations, the prospect of a speedy startup has been a major selling point, Ambruso agrees. “We used to tell people it would take eight months to [complete]a 50,000- or 60,000-square-foot installation, and some customers would say ‘I can’t wait eight months, so just do a part of the facility and we’ll call it a pilot,” Ambruso says. “But now, we’re installing the system in weeks, so we can [complete] large [projects] quickly.”
To speed up installations, Berkshire Grey runs software simulations of each site with “digital twin” models, he adds. It further streamlines the process by making use of modular designs, staging spare parts nearby to expedite necessary repairs, and handling maintenance on a “managed service” basis so clients don’t have to hire their own engineers.
TABLE STAKES FOR THE FULFILLMENT GAME
With access to all that customer support, companies are increasingly willing to jump into the automation pool with both feet instead of just dipping a toe in the water, according to A.K. Schultz, co-founder and CEO of SVT Robotics. And as more of them dive in, he adds, robots are fast becoming the ante to play the game.
“In the general market, you’re no longer treated like the Illuminati for suggesting robots. It’s now assumed that if you’re not doing it, you’re on the back side of the curve,” Schultz says. “So there’s a shift in risk; from the risk of burning your capital to the risk of doing nothing and going out of business.”
As they come under increasing pressure to automate, many companies are concluding it would take nearly as much corporate effort to conduct a pilot as to put a full-blown project in motion, he says. “So instead of spending $100,000 or $500,000, we’re seeing people going straight for the $1 million project, then upgrade to $10 million, so everyone’s sliding up the scale.”
As the trend toward larger robotic deployments sweeps through the logistics industry, vendors say they’re only scratching the surface of the total market opportunity. Just a small portion of warehouses currently have automated systems in place, and with e-commerce growth expected to maintain its frenetic pace, robot providers can expect demand for their products to continue to soar.
“This market is huge; there’s more than enough room here for all of us that are currently playing,” Zebra’s Lawson says. “We’re collectively educating the market, and a rising tide lifts all boats.”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.