Squeezed by a labor crunch at a time of unprecedented demand, warehouse operators are bypassing the pilot stage and jumping right into large-scale robotic installations.
Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
The warehouse automation market has been growing steadily for decades, but the pandemic year of 2021 saw some foundational shifts in the sector. Beset by labor shortages amid the e-commerce boom, desperate DC operators hit the fast-forward button on plans to roll out technologies like robotic fulfillment systems.
In the early days of warehouse robots, new customers would typically test the unfamiliar systems with limited pilot trials, installing a small number of robots in a corner of the building. If the pilot proved a success, customers would then buy a few more units, slowly building a fleet of autonomous mobile robots (AMRs), automated guided vehicles (AGVs), robotic picking arms, and other devices.
That approach was effective at controlling the risk—and expense—associated with deploying what was then a bleeding-edge technology, but it often left robotic vendors stuck in “pilot purgatory,” a dreaded state of limbo where users seemed to forever test the systems but never commit to large-scale rollouts.
Jump ahead to 2022, and no one’s complaining about pilot purgatory any more. The number of robots sold in North America set a new record in 2021, with 39,708 units sold at a value of $2 billion, a 14% increase over the previous high in 2017, according to the Association for Advancing Automation (A3).
A3 President Jeff Burnstein says the numbers reflect a surge of purchases for applications outside the automotive sector, which has historically led other users in adopting robotic technologies. “More industries recognized that robotics could help reverse productivity declines and fill repetitive jobs human workers don’t want,” Burnstein said in a release. Users are finding that it’s “no longer a choice whether to deploy robots and automation. It’s now an absolute imperative.”
A SENSE OF URGENCY
At the same time that tough business conditions created that imperative, companies were becoming less wary of the technology and more comfortable with the concept, industry sources say. Even if they hadn’t yet purchased robots for their own DCs, they saw companies all around them solving productivity problems with the devices and realizing a relatively speedy return on their investment.
Thanks to that growing confidence, customers are now buying logistics robots on a far larger scale than they were just a few years ago, says Paul Ambruso, head of product and strategy for mobile robotics at Berkshire Grey. “Pilot programs are still sort of the norm, but now it is done not as a small portion of the facility, but in the entire facility,” he says. “So there’s a tendency toward whole-facility installs and then replicating that.”
And it’s not just happening in DCs. Customers are also buying robots for use in the back of a retail store or in a “dark store”—that is, a store that’s dedicated strictly to online order fulfillment. And if they’re satisfied with the results, they add additional sites throughout the company’s network.
Buyers have shifted to the new approach because of the same labor and e-commerce pressures that are afflicting so many sectors throughout the economy, says Jim Lawton, vice president and general manager for robotics automation at Zebra Technologies, which in 2021 acquired the AMR vendor Fetch Robotics.
Those pressures are having a particular impact on fulfillment operations run bylarge third-party logistics service providers (3PLs), he adds. “They have a lot less patience now than what I’ve seen in the past. We haven’t seen as much urgency for this before,” Lawton says. “There’s no proof of concept, no kick the tires. I don’t want to say they’re not being deliberate; they are being deliberate, but they’re being deliberately fast.”
SPEEDY DEPLOYMENTS
Another change that’s driving the accelerated adoption of robots by fulfillment operations is that vendors have made them easier to configure, deploy, and maintain, Lawton says.
In Zebra’s case, the company can visit a new customer location and drive one of its robots around the site with a videogame-type controller to familiarize it with the building’s floor plan. That robot then shares its mapping data with the rest of the fleet, and the system is soon installed. “So it’s up and running in a single-digit number of days or weeks, and that’s really appealing [to customers],” Lawton says.
When it comes to large-scale warehouse robotic installations, the prospect of a speedy startup has been a major selling point, Ambruso agrees. “We used to tell people it would take eight months to [complete]a 50,000- or 60,000-square-foot installation, and some customers would say ‘I can’t wait eight months, so just do a part of the facility and we’ll call it a pilot,” Ambruso says. “But now, we’re installing the system in weeks, so we can [complete] large [projects] quickly.”
To speed up installations, Berkshire Grey runs software simulations of each site with “digital twin” models, he adds. It further streamlines the process by making use of modular designs, staging spare parts nearby to expedite necessary repairs, and handling maintenance on a “managed service” basis so clients don’t have to hire their own engineers.
TABLE STAKES FOR THE FULFILLMENT GAME
With access to all that customer support, companies are increasingly willing to jump into the automation pool with both feet instead of just dipping a toe in the water, according to A.K. Schultz, co-founder and CEO of SVT Robotics. And as more of them dive in, he adds, robots are fast becoming the ante to play the game.
“In the general market, you’re no longer treated like the Illuminati for suggesting robots. It’s now assumed that if you’re not doing it, you’re on the back side of the curve,” Schultz says. “So there’s a shift in risk; from the risk of burning your capital to the risk of doing nothing and going out of business.”
As they come under increasing pressure to automate, many companies are concluding it would take nearly as much corporate effort to conduct a pilot as to put a full-blown project in motion, he says. “So instead of spending $100,000 or $500,000, we’re seeing people going straight for the $1 million project, then upgrade to $10 million, so everyone’s sliding up the scale.”
As the trend toward larger robotic deployments sweeps through the logistics industry, vendors say they’re only scratching the surface of the total market opportunity. Just a small portion of warehouses currently have automated systems in place, and with e-commerce growth expected to maintain its frenetic pace, robot providers can expect demand for their products to continue to soar.
“This market is huge; there’s more than enough room here for all of us that are currently playing,” Zebra’s Lawson says. “We’re collectively educating the market, and a rising tide lifts all boats.”
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
The Florida logistics technology startup OneRail has raised $42 million in venture backing to lift the fulfillment software company its next level of growth, the company said today.
The “series C” round was led by Los Angeles-based Aliment Capital, with additional participation from new investors eGateway Capital and Florida Opportunity Fund, as well as current investors Arsenal Growth Equity, Piva Capital, Bullpen Capital, Las Olas Venture Capital, Chicago Ventures, Gaingels and Mana Ventures. According to OneRail, the funding comes amidst a challenging funding environment where venture capital funding in the logistics sector has seen a 90% decline over the past two years.
The latest infusion follows the firm’s $33 million Series B round in 2022, and its move earlier in 2024 to acquire the Vancouver, Canada-based company Orderbot, a provider of enterprise inventory and distributed order management (DOM) software.
Orlando-based OneRail says its omnichannel fulfillment solution pairs its OmniPoint cloud software with a logistics as a service platform and a real-time, connected network of 12 million drivers. The firm says that its OmniPointsoftware automates fulfillment orchestration and last mile logistics, intelligently selecting the right place to fulfill inventory from, the right shipping mode, and the right carrier to optimize every order.
“This new funding round enables us to deepen our decision logic upstream in the order process to help solve some of the acute challenges facing retailers and wholesalers, such as order sourcing logic defaulting to closest store to customer to fulfill inventory from, which leads to split orders, out-of-stocks, or worse, cancelled orders,” OneRail Founder and CEO Bill Catania said in a release. “OneRail has revolutionized that process with a dynamic fulfillment solution that quickly finds available inventory in full, from an array of stores or warehouses within a localized radius of the customer, to meet the delivery promise, which ultimately transforms the end-customer experience.”
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.