Trucking operators of all types are coming off a record year, benefiting from soaring demand and tight capacity brought on by the e-commerce boom. Will the party continue through 2022?
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
Truckers reaped record profits in 2021, benefiting from surging freight volumes driven by an industrial economy on the mend from the pandemic, consumers’ continuing thirst for e-commerce purchases, and supply chains waiting for freight to come off ships and clear congested ports.
Shippers are scrambling for trucking capacity at nearly any price. As 2022’s first quarter comes to a close, demand for trucking services of all types—full truckload, less than truckload (LTL), and last mile—continues to race ahead, with capacity struggling to catch up, if at all. Rates are on the rise, a function of too much freight competing for too few trucks. And then there are increasing costs for fuel, driver pay, regulatory mandates, increasingly expensive equipment, and other rising operating expenses.
To a person, trucking executives and industry analysts interviewed for this story don’t see any letup in the tight market—and its challenges—with some expecting current market conditions to extend into 2023. The primary issues: a worsening driver shortage, continued port congestion and supply chain hiccups, and the inability of tractor and trailer manufacturers to meet demand for new units.
In a somewhat counterintuitive trend, all this has occurred against a backdrop of declining shipment volumes being handled by truck lines. U.S. Bank, in its fourth-quarter 2021 National Shipments Index, reported a declinein freight shipments of 2.4% from the third quarter of 2021 and a year-over-year drop of 5.1% from the fourth quarter of 2020. Yet for the same period, the bank’s National Spend Index, which measures freight expenditures, increased 8.4% from the third quarter and surged 20.2% from the fourth quarter a year ago.
LESS FREIGHT, MORE MONEY
Why are truck lines making more money hauling less freight? It all comes down to their inability to bring on enough new drivers and new equipment to meaningfully increase capacity. They simply can’t put more trucks on the road to meet demand. That’s tightened capacity even more, exacerbating pressure on already skyrocketing rates. The result: fleets running the same or fewer trucks and getting significantly more revenue for every hundred pounds of freight they carry. They are maxing out utilization of whatever capacity they have.
Truckload carrier Schneider’s recent fourth-quarter 2021 results clearly illustrate this dynamic: The company’s average weekly revenue per truck was $4,521, up 18% from last year, while the average number of trucks operating declined 5.3%.
“[Truck lines] have certainly started off the year hot,” observes Jason Seidl, managing director at investment firm Cowen and Co. “Demand will hold, barring any macroeconomic shocks. Shippers have been and continue to be burned by [inventory] stockouts,” and as a result, Seidl says, retailers are intent on building up inventories to levels surpassing last year’s. “That will continue the demand cycle for transportation,” he notes.
WANT A DRIVER? EXPECT TO PAY
What’s the number one thing industry players are asking for? For shippers and 3PLs (third-party logistics service providers), it’s reliable capacity and warehouse space; for carriers, it’s trucks, trailers, and drivers. Seidl says industry contacts are telling him that trailers ordered now won’t be delivered until 2023. “And for certain Class 8 trucks, I had one client tell me the OEM told them its Class 8s are going to [cost] $35,000 more—but I can’t tell you when you’ll get them.” He adds, “I haven’t seen an equipment market like this in my entire career, and I started [in the industry] in 1993.”
In Seidl’s view, the biggest issue remains the driver market. “Pay will continue to go higher,” he predicts. “Some carriers last year raised pay multiple times. It’s like the old U2 song: You are running to stand still,” he remarks.
Kevin Sterling, senior market strategist at LTL carrier XPO Logistics, believes the industry is in a unique market cycle, driven by a number of factors that are underpinning solid demand that won’t weaken anytime soon. “I’ve been around the freight industry for over 20 years. I’ve never seen an environment like this in the LTL industry,” he says. “E-commerce is a tailwind, and shippers are building inventories. [They’re] focused on service and reliability, and as a result, are willing to pay a premium. So, we continue to see a firm pricing environment for LTL,” he notes.
In response, Sterling says, XPO Logistics, the nation’s third-largest LTL carrier, is investing—in expansion of dock-door capacity, its trailer fleet, and drivers. The company is “adding doors to our terminal footprint in the markets where we see higher customer demand,” with plans to add 450 doors this year and 450 more in 2023 at strategic locations across its network. Unique to its competitors, XPO also operates a company-owned trailer manufacturing facility and is “investing significantly to increase our production capacity. We expect to nearly double the number of trailers we will produce in 2022,” Sterling adds.
Lastly there is XPO’s in-house driver training school network, operating from 130 locations. Sterling says the training program takes dock workers and others who want to become drivers, “and within seven weeks, students can go from the classroom to the cab with a CDL [commercial driver’s license].” He says XPO graduated about 900 drivers from the program last year and is looking to double that in 2022.
FULL VERSUS FINAL MILE
John Hill, president of Pilot Freight Services, which is a major player in the last-mile market and is currently in the process of being acquired by containership giant A.P. Møller-Maersk, also sees little if any letup in demand for all types of trucking services. Consumers, still spending at strong levels, are driving “e-commerce that just does not stop,” he notes, adding that the marketplace continues to see more and more companies diving into online sales—and leveraging last-mile delivery to seal the deal.
While Hill thinks big e-commerce players might not match the accelerated growth rates of last year, enough new companies are coming in to pick up the slack. It seems like startup businesses today are taking a reverse approach—beginning with online sales at the outset, building a beachhead there, and then expanding into physical store sales.
E-commerce relies to a large degree on one- and two-day last-mile delivery, which to Pilot are two distinct services: full mile and final mile. Full mile is when “someone buys a canoe at an e-commerce giant. It goes from a DC in Ontario, California, to a home in Albuquerque. We pick it up at the DC, linehaul it into New Mexico, then cross-dock it for final-mile delivery to the home.”
A true final-mile shipment, in his view, is when “you buy a refrigerator at a big-box consumer appliance retailer in Oakland, then we pick it up there and deliver [and install] it in your home in San Francisco.”
Pilot also is investing to beef up its network capacity and resources, he says. The company last year bought American Linehaul, a truck line that participates in what Hill calls “the middle mile” segment. Pilot had previously outsourced that piece to another provider. “We folded that capacity into our network, so we’d have 100% control over the service,” he notes. “We’re controlling our own destiny: pricing, capacity, and visibility.”
IS THAT A BOT AT MY DOOR?
Another interesting piece of the final-mile puzzle is the emergence of autonomous delivery vehicles (ADVs), those ubiquitous little self-driving delivery carts that motor around town on their own and show up at your doorstep with a takeout order, groceries, or a prescription drug refill.
Companies like ADV manufacturer Nuro are moving into the third generation of their vehicles, testing in many U.S. cities and on college campuses, and teaming up with the likes of FedEx, Chipotle, Domino’s Pizza, and 7-Eleven. Last April, Nuro started autonomous delivery of Domino’s pizzas in Houston and with 7-Eleven in Mountain View, the heart of California’s Silicon Valley.
“We are seeing demand for on-road autonomous delivery across all types of industries,” says a Nuro spokesperson, including “food, grocery, parcels, convenience, and prescriptions.”
According to the company, its third-generation vehicle is about 20% smaller in width than the average passenger car. That smaller footprint “gives bicyclists and pedestrians more room to maneuver alongside the bot,” said the spokesperson. The vehicle can fit about 24 bags of groceries and handle almost 500 pounds. It also has modular inserts that allow for cooling down to 22 degrees F and heating up to 116 degrees F, “which means sodas stay cool and pizza stays warm,” the company noted.
Nuro started construction on a $40 million “end of the line” manufacturing plant in Nevada last November, including a “world-class closed-course test track.” The facility is expected to be fully operational later this year.
HANDICAPPING THE FED
How are the trucking markets reacting to higher inflation and the prospect of tighter credit as the Federal Reserve looks to raise interest rates? Does that foreshadow weaker volumes and softening demand?
Not likely, say most industry watchers. No matter what happens with inflation or interest rates, “we still have disruption in the supply chain all along the way, and [as an industry,] we are still short about 90,000 drivers,” notes Jim Fields, chief operating officer at LTL carrier Pitt Ohio. “We are all competing for the same people, whether drivers, dock workers, or warehouse workers, and today there just are not enough to fill the jobs we have. It’s extremely competitive.”
With inventories at all-time lows and the economy continuing to display sustained growth, Fields expects trucking demand to remain firm throughout the year. As an LTL carrier, Pitt Ohio’s drivers are home most every night, not spending weeks on the road. Fields says his focus is more on retention than recruiting new drivers.
“We are doing a lot of different things to achieve that, to be a preferred carrier. Competitive pay and benefits are important, but if you don’t back it up with a good workplace culture and communication, driver support, engagement, and respect, you’ll lose the battle. We have to take care of our employees,” he says. Shippers want responsiveness and consistency, and that comes from reliable employees who are recognized and celebrated for taking care of customers, he adds.
“It’s an extremely unique time in the trucking industry,” Fields remarks. “I’m not sure I see an end game to the current market of high demand and tight capacity [this year].”
NO SILVER BULLETS
There is no silver bullet that’s going to solve the capacity crunch, and no truck line is immune from the challenges of the driver market. The number of experienced drivers retiring continues to increase, and not enough younger drivers are entering the profession to fill the gap. By one industry estimate, some 25% of external driving schools that closed during the pandemic have not reopened.
“We’ve seen a higher-than-normal number of drivers choose early retirement during the pandemic, creating more driver openings than in recent years,” says Steve Sensing, president of global supply chain solutions for Ryder. “Wages have increased significantly, and the demand for e-commerce has created more opportunities for drivers.”
Sensing says Ryder is making additional investments in recruiting as well as taking some innovative approaches to engaging drivers. “We formed a council of our professional drivers to advise us on what is most important for recruiting and retention. We’re working with various organizations to recruit women and veterans,” he notes.
Like most carriers, Ryder also is evaluating its compensation and benefit packages to ensure they are competitive and attractive. Other initiatives include looking at flexible work schedules, routes that keep drivers closer to home, more time off, and “even things like equipment and technology designed to make the driver’s job easier and safer,” Sensing adds.
He notes as well that shippers evaluate 3PLs in terms of technology investments and “what’s going to keep them ahead of the game.” To address that need, the company launched RyderVentures, a venture capital fund that will invest $50 million over the next five years in “companies pushing the boundaries and creating solutions to the [supply chain] disruptions of today and the future,” Sensing says. The fund is focusing on technologies for e-commerce fulfillment, asset sharing, next-generation vehicles, supply chain automation, and data analytics.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."