Keeping the supply chain moving in turbulent times
How is technology helping transportation and logistics keep up with the accelerating pace of change? Experts share their insights in this special Modex 2022 preview.
David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
Joe Wilkinson, Vice President, Consulting, enVista
During the past two years, even those who had never heard the term “supply chain” have seen—and personally experienced—just how much transportation and logistics affects our daily lives. It’s become clearer than ever that when the going gets tough, smart strategies supported by advanced technology are critical for tackling transportation and logistics challenges.
To find out what the future holds in this regard, DC Velocity Group Editorial Director David Maloney recently gathered three experts from companies participating in the DC Velocity Transportation & Logistics Theater at the upcoming Modex 2022 show in Atlanta to discuss a range of topics, including how technology can help to keep merchandise moving and provide customers with the service they want.
Q: Are there some common-sense steps shippers can take to alleviate the impact of the transportation bottlenecks the industry is experiencing?
Joe Wilkinson – enVista: The most common strategy for easing capacity constraints (and cost pressure) is carrier diversification. While there can be an initial hard-dollar cost to implementing carrier diversification, those initial investments pay dividends in the future and serve as insurance when capacity shrinks and more options are needed. Spreading volumes across modes is another option. Positioning inventory in stores via truckload/LTL store replenishment can, in some cases, enable ship-from-store fulfillment. This needs to be enabled by technology, staff, and facilities. But where it can be achieved, pressure can be relieved in the first and middle miles.
Raj Patel – Blue Yonder: One thing we have learned is that supply chain disruptions are a constant, and they seem to be happening more often. Take a look at last year’s Suez Canal situation or the Port of Yantian closure. To succeed, organizations need to have visibility into all aspects of their supply chain. Without this end-to-end visibility, how can they get ahead of issues in a timely manner and properly address them? Organizations also need to learn how to leverage that visibility to anticipate future issues and deduce solutions.
I have hope that this surge will stabilize over time and allow companies to catch their breath, because this system isn’t sustainable the way it’s currently operating. In the meantime, using labor management tools can help forecast shortages on the horizon and ensure employees are engaged and incentivized in their day-to-day work, which will help keep goods flowing. In the case of another three- to six-month global shutdown, extensive government involvement would be needed to keep manufacturing and the supply chain moving.
Q: What are the most significant changes you’ve seen in your industry over the past 20 years?
Raj Patel – Blue Yonder: The first is going from a “push” supply chain to a customer-centric supply chain. Consumers are in control now. They dictate what they want, where they want it, how they want it, and the price they are willing to pay. This is very different from 20 years ago, when retailers would use planning and forecasting to predict what they thought customers were looking for and then pushed that product out.
The second is the change in technology strategy. Twenty years ago, it was all about a single vendor/provider ecosystem, on-premise deployment, and long-lasting relationships. Then it went to “best of breed,” but still on-premise and with shorter relationships. Today, you are looking at going back to a single vendor in most cases, but in a cloud/SaaS model, and with shorter contract terms, as the cost to change is lower than for on-premise.
Q: Has the rise of e-commerce significantly changed transportation?
Joe Wilkinson – enVista: The rise of e-commerce is not a new phenomenon. Each year, experts make what seem to be wildly aggressive projections about peak volumes, and each year, the market surprises to the upside.
E-commerce has driven down transit time expectations dramatically. In the ’70s and ’80s, catalog order delivery times were measured in weeks. Now, we’re at a two-day standard, with same-day delivery expected in a lot of metro areas. All of this while residential deliveries have driven delivery densities down and drive time between stops up. This has had the effect of making shippers’ delivery times a big part of their brand identity and has forced transportation teams to continually optimize their processes to protect the brand’s reputation.
Q: How can real-time shipment information improve the customer experience?
Don DeLash – SICK: As the pandemic has continued to accelerate e-commerce and same-day delivery demands, the evolution of logistics technologies and processes has also accelerated to keep pace. An emerging trend is the implementation of data-capture and information technologies that support dynamic real-time package routing and routing adjustments. By integrating unique package identifiers, whether in the form of package or label data, 1D or 2D bar codes, or RFID, shippers gain the ability to make in-transit decisions about package delivery destinations.
For example, if a retailer ships a parcel from Pittsburgh to an online customer in Seattle, but while in transit that item becomes available from a facility (such as a store or warehouse) locally [in the Seattle area], the retailer can re-route that package to a customer who ordered the same product in Columbus, Ohio, or to a store in Detroit that is low on inventory of that item. When this type of dynamic transportation management is implemented across a network, the substantial improvement in customer experience becomes evident.
Raj Patel – Blue Yonder: Increased use of technological solutions like control towers provides real-time data and visibility, allowing companies to better control product flow. In a world of constant disruptions and crises, this technology offers early detection of problems and quick corrective actions that help keep products in stock and customer experiences positive.
All in all, companies will be leveraging data more than ever to determine what to make for consumers, where to manufacture and at what cost, and what service it or its third-party logistics providers (3PLs) can afford to offer. Preparation starts with what technology you have, and determining whether the data is being shared across the enterprise and decisions are being made holistically and in real time versus in silos. Those that have figured that out will succeed and continue to prosper, while others will struggle to make daily tactical decisions that will impact bottom lines.
Q: As you’ve just noted, customers expect quicker deliveries now. Can warehouse technology speed truck turns at facilities?
Don DeLash – SICK: Companies in the supply chain continue to look for ways to speed trailer loading and unloading at warehouses and distribution centers. Existing, proven methods, such as inbound product ID and destination labeling, support cross-dock and automated storage and retrieval systems. These technologies lead to greater agility and improved customer satisfaction. With the broader adoption of robotics in warehouse operations, automated methods for trailer loading and unloading using robotics are being designed and tested at an increasing pace.
Raj Patel – Blue Yonder: Deploying warehouse management and labor management technologies was a growing strategy before the Covid-19 pandemic, but that seems to have accelerated even further since the pandemic began. These technologies allow employers to consider engineering standard constraints and other warehouse-related constraints when they incentivize, monitor, and schedule their workforce. More efficient workforces lead to quicker turns, shorter wait times at docks, and more efficient transportation.
Q: What are some ways to improve the visibility of goods in transit?
Don DeLash – SICK: Asset-tracking technologies coupled with cloud-based access to information provide the platform from which visibility of goods in transit can be achieved at increased levels of specificity in terms of timeliness and accuracy. Underlying data-capture and analytics systems can provide specific information about products and items in terms of identification and condition. Proven sensing technology provides information about package or freight condition, movement, temperature, handling, and other characteristics. When all this data sits on a cloud-based analytics and user interface platform, visibility and efficiency can be greatly enhanced.
Raj Patel – Blue Yonder: Control towers are central to unlocking deep real-time visibility into goods in transit. They centralize visibility across companies’ entire global networks, making it possible to see where shipments are sitting, whether they’ll be delayed, and even at which specific ports and warehouses they are.
Q: Can good transportation management improve cubing and utilization?
Joe Wilkinson – enVista: Tier 1 transportation management systems (TMS) have the ability to create a blueprint for how to effectively load your trailer or container. This requires very accurate data for eaches, cases, pallets, and so forth. But you do not have to go this route in order to increase your trailer utilization. With accurate skid, cube, or weight data, you can analyze your lane volume and determine your trailer-utilization percentage. This will allow you to see the delta from your acceptable threshold and begin working to improve your bracket pricing, load scheduling, and product allocation in order to capitalize on the opportunity.
Q: How will artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning affect the future design of transportation systems?
Joe Wilkinson – enVista: The two key areas where AI or machine learning can have the quickest impact on transportation management systems are data recognition and exception management. Being able to have the TMS recognize bad or missing data, and then know how to correct it or who to notify, has a direct impact on service and labor costs.
Exception management is the key to a successful transportation operation, and increasing your ability to predetermine which shipments will be late or might be missing will be a differentiator in the marketplace. Being able to link past carrier, lane, seasonal performance, and other data to accurately depict transit and on-time estimates allows for better decision-making and the ability to be proactive.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."