Victoria Kickham started her career as a newspaper reporter in the Boston area before moving into B2B journalism. She has covered manufacturing, distribution and supply chain issues for a variety of publications in the industrial and electronics sectors, and now writes about everything from forklift batteries to omnichannel business trends for DC Velocity.
Talk of automating a distribution center (DC) can mean different things to different people, but in the end, it’s all about making DC operations run more smoothly and efficiently. At its most basic level, material handling automation helps free employees from mundane, manual tasks and allows them to focus on value-adding work or jobs where only the human touch will do. This has become an increasingly important advantage in the labor-challenged post-pandemic supply chain, and one that is changing the look and feel of the distribution center.
A recent Gartner survey points to a growing supply chain trend toward “flexible” automation solutions in particular, predicting that three-quarters of large companies will have adopted some form of “smart” robots for warehouse and DC operations by 2026. These are advanced robots or robotic systems that use intelligence, guidance, or sensors to operate independently or with and around humans. Examples include autonomous mobile robots (AMRs), autonomous forklifts, and similar solutions that require little or no infrastructure investment. Essentially, they’re not bolted to the floor, as traditional systems are.
Many companies are already testing the waters, however, and are racking up labor-savings and productivity improvements as they go. Here are two ways flexible robotics are changing the look and feel of the DC.
CHANGING THE LANDSCAPE
Automation strategies are having a considerable effect on the logistics real estate market, both in terms of facility design and location. With respect to design, today’s DCs require increased power capacity and higher-speed internet connections to power systems and charge equipment—and some may even require extra space to store charging equipment or higher ceilings to accommodate automated vertical storage systems, vehicles, and other types of machinery, according to Ben Harris, senior managing director of the logistics and industrial team for commercial real estate firm Cushman & Wakefield.
Research from real estate services provider Savills Industrial Practice Group, released late last year, highlights those trends as well. The company said it expects more facilities to be retrofitted or designed to accommodate investments in automated technologies in 2022. The report noted that the average clear height for large warehouses has already increased by 23% to 37 feet since 2000, and that heights will grow as advances in robotics allow tenants to take greater advantage of vertical storage.
When it comes to location, flexible robotic solutions are giving companies a wider playing field for developing their distribution networks.
“Automation is enabling greater choice” in where DCs can be located, Harris explains. “Most types of automation can be incorporated into any modern facility we have, [but] the automation solutions with the highest chance of adoption are those that are more flexible, more mobile, and less tied to the physical characteristics of the buildings than they were in the past.”
As an example, Harris says flexible, smart automation has allowed some companies to expand their DC operations into regions with limited labor pools by reducing their reliance on people—robot-assisted picking is one example. This can be helpful for companies looking to locate distribution and fulfillment operations in important, but less densely populated, markets, for one.
“Before, the labor situation [in some regions] could be so bad that a company couldn’t consider a particular location for a warehouse or distribution center. But automation addresses that problem for some,” he says. “It allows some companies to enter markets they never thought possible.”
On the flip side, the use of AMRs and similar labor-saving devices can open up opportunities in urban markets where labor is more plentiful but competition for talent is stiff and employees are expensive—such as New York City. The automation advantage can be especially helpful for e-commerce businesses looking to improve their final-mile logistics operations.
“Automation is allowing some companies to unlock infill [sites located in mostly built-out markets] in urban locations where labor costs have been major hurdles,” Harris adds. “Near metro environments, we’re seeing even more automation, because the need for speed is that much higher within those geographies. Additionally, the options for labor become much more constrained; you’re competing with totally different industries [for talent] in those markets.”
GETTING CREATIVE
Flexible automation is also pushing creative boundaries in the DC, as technology providers and customers work together to find new and unique applications or “use cases” for technology—especially robots.
“Feedback we hear from customers is ‘We don’t just want the robot; we want a solution,’” says Stefan Nusser, senior director of robotics automation for Zebra Technologies, which develops autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) and collaborative robots for industrial applications. Increasingly, such solutions are being driven from within, he adds. “When you go into a site, you’ll see many opportunities for robots. Often, customers will say ‘Isn’t this cool; look at what we made them do.’ And that kind of thing happens organically, from the bottom up.”
A case in point: Zebra Technologies’ Fetch Robotics autonomous recycling removal solution, which was developed in conjunction with a third-party logistics service provider (3PL) that had adopted Fetch AMRs to help streamline operations in one of its DCs. [Fetch Robotics became part of Zebra Technologies in a 2021 acquisition.] The 3PL had a problem that was piling up: Empty boxes and excess packing material were accumulating in aisles and at the ends of pick stations faster than employees could safely transport them to a separate recycling area within the DC. Looking to clear floorspace for both workers and the robots moving throughout the facility, the employees programmed the AMRs to pick up the boxes and packing material and take it to the recycling area—a task that was previously done manually.
“We have a robot that, essentially, has the ability to move a cart from one location to another,” Nusser says, explaining that the employees put collection bins on top of the AMR-compatible carts, set them up at a handful of collection points throughout the DC, and then used the accompanying AMR software to tell the robots what to do. “Every half hour, the robot grabs [the carts] and brings them to the recycling area, then brings them back.”
The easy-to-configure software allows employees to change the frequency of removal, if needed, as well as add locations or containers. What used to require multiple employees doing nothing but recycling removal all day is now automated, freeing up those workers for more value-adding work.
“In a way, it’s the perfect solution,” Nusser says, adding that the process has opened the floodgates of ingenuity, as associates think of ways to apply the labor-saving technology to other tasks as well. “Many times, what you do with the AMR is just as hard a question to answer as how do you make the technology work. For [the customer], this is now another tool in their toolbox.”
A simple, tech-driven tool that has changed the way the DC works, for the better.
The Gartner survey likewise points to the adaptive nature of such tools, noting that other common uses for flexible robots include transporting pallets of goods, delivering items to a person, or carrying out piece-picking tasks. Those applications will only increase, contributing to an even more dynamic DC.
“They [flexible robots] can more readily and inexpensively be implemented, and can be easily scaled to better manage extremes in peaks and troughs of demand,” according to the Gartner report. “Because of the adaptive nature of intralogistics smart robots, companies can pilot use cases for low, upfront investment and continue to test new and varying use cases as they become more familiar with the technologies.”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."