David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
Mark Duncan, Marketing Manager of Material Handling Industry OEM North America Operations, Schneider Electric
Evan Kaiser, Industry Director of Warehousing and Logistics, Rockwell Automation
Divya Prakash, Director of Business Consulting, Industry 4.0, SICK Inc.
Sebastian Titze, Manager of Digital Transformation, Beumer Group
The complexity of today’s distribution centers is increasing rapidly due to new technologies and higher demands from consumers. Conveyors and sortation systems within those facilities can help provide users with a competitive advantage by leveraging technologies to improve throughput, accuracy, and efficiency.
DC Velocity Group Editorial Director David Maloney recently gathered five experts who are all members of MHI’s Conveyor and Sortation Solutions Group (CSS)—an industry body that promotes the effective use of conveyor and sortation systems in manufacturing and distribution operations—for a deeper dive into the benefits of these new technologies. What follows are excerpts from their discussion.
Q: What has changed in recent years that allows companies to leverage big data more effectively than in the past?
Sebastian Titze – Beumer: For quite some years, we have been able to collect a lot of data, but what has changed is the infrastructure to stream large amounts of data to structure them in real time—or near real time—and in that way, make them usable for companies. We are not just collecting data, but have also made the leap to actually generating insights that allow companies to analyze their operations and make decisions based on what they know, not what they think or assume.
Q: What types of issues do we see with conveyors and sortation systems that could benefit from better data analytics and predictive analysis?
Mark Duncan – Schneider Electric: Any type of conveyor and sortation equipment maintenance begins with the motor. If the motor is not functioning properly, nothing else is going to work. In addition to that, we see misalignment with the belt, belt slippage, tension control. Sometimes, the rollers would seize up or you would have blockages or jams due to package interference or motor failure due to bearings, windings, or rotors.
Q: The idea of Industry 4.0 is promising, but real-world examples of successes have been limited. Why are companies struggling to achieve the results that are promised by Industry 4.0 solutions?
Evan Kaiser – Rockwell Automation: A lot of times, customers are trying to take on the world with data instead of being more specific and focused on a particular problem where the information can be utilized to drive a particular result. They do more than what they should out of the gate and then end up frustrated because there is so much complexity in what they’re trying to implement that it doesn’t get the result they’re driving toward. The biggest successes I have seen are companies that have focused on a particular point in the operation that could really benefit from analytics and then scale up from there.
Q: What data from conveyors and sortation systems should be monitored and analyzed?
Dan Barrera – Carter Intralogistics: That depends on what the ultimate goal is. We initially can say speed, current, torque, position, temperature, faults, and whether the system is on or off. All of these variables allow us to make decisions and understand more of what production looks like. It also allows us to understand where the bottlenecks are. However, a lot of these variables are going to depend on the business model you are developing that will be part of your digital transformation. In some cases, it comes down to just keeping the system up and running, and minimizing the disruption.
Q: How do you see digital transformation being carried out within DCs?
Divya Prakash – SICK: Digital transformation has to be a business driver. The distribution center really is going through hyper-acceleration, with e-commerce forcing companies to change their fulfillment strategies and find a perfect omnichannel model. Getting the raw data is not an issue because every sensor is getting smarter, but getting the raw data and applying analytics to it is what digital transformation is all about. There are a lot of disruptive technologies coming into the whole DC area, so it is not just investing in conveyors. There is automation, drones, 5G, robotics, autonomous vehicles, AMRs, AgVs. I mean, there is a lot of stuff coming in that’s transforming the whole distribution center.
Q: What are some of the risks of data analytics?
Sebastian Titze – Beumer: I think many companies perceive the risk to be fairly high, although if you think about it, data analytics really just accesses data from the machine and the sensors, so there is really a very low risk to the machine’s operation. Of course, there is always the risk of data security. But if you consider how many companies nowadays store their emails in the cloud and so on, that risk [from machine data] is not much higher than other business risks. I don’t want to downplay that risk; however, the potential of data analytics and the opportunities it brings greatly outweigh those risks.
Q: What are the real consequences when conveyor and sortation systems go down?
Mark Duncan – Schneider Electric: I have seen statistics indicating that 46% of unplanned downtime is due to hardware failure and malfunction. We heard recently that 80% of companies have experienced some type of downtime over the past three years, and 70% of those are unaware that their assets need maintenance or an upgrade. The material handling equipment in the average distribution center or warehouse is 15.6 years old. That sets up a legitimate business case to put in some analytics to prevent downtime. We have seen customers show us that [the cost of] downtime can average up to $160,000 an hour if it is unplanned, so the impact of downtime is significant, especially in e-commerce and other facilities that run 24/7.
Q: Can you define the term “digital twin” and explain what value and benefits this technology can unlock?
Evan Kaiser – Rockwell Automation: A digital twin is a virtual rendering of the real world. It is a new way of engineering because you can move into this virtual world and test things and experiment with different scenarios. You can manipulate a design very easily without needing any physical investments in material. The digital twin can enable error reductions, improve your time to market, and reduce commission time for complex systems. A digital twin scales very well and can be applied to a specific machine or across the entire operation.
Q: What are some of the benefits of interfacing your conveyors and sorters with other technologies?
Dan Barrera – Carter Intralogistics: This is what management is going to be looking for, right? When we talk about digital transformation, utilization, and cloud computing, they are all thinking about return on their investment. The goal is to increase productivity based on data. This will lead to improved quality, increased uptime, and decreased cost. From this, we can also create value or benefits not only on the production side but also on the engineering side of the system, all the way down to the after-sale support.
Q: What disruptive technology do you see impacting DC operations in the future?
Divya Prakash – SICK: Down on the distribution floor, decisions have to be made much faster as conveyors are moving at higher speeds, but there is often a lag between the cloud and the shop floor. Modern-day sensors have microchips and a lot more computing power. The sensors are not just sensing but also thinking. You will see smart sensors eliminating some of the latency and bringing some of the computing power down to the edge. You’ll see these sensors directly doing analytics and some kinds of computing, providing you with alerts or even predictive analyses.
Editor’s note:MHI’s Conveyor and Sortation Systems (CSS) industry group is an independent authority for end-users and suppliers on market trends, technology developments, and applications. The group consists of over 30 leading companies in the conveyor and sortation systems market with experience from thousands of projects. For more information on the group’s work and a list of CSS members, visit www.mhi.org/css.
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.