Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
There’s no question that robots have eased many logistics headaches of the pandemic age. They’ve helped distribution centers in every sector handle a surging tide of e-commerce orders with greater speed, efficiency, and accuracy than “old-fashioned” manual operations ever could.
Yet as impressive as those achievements may be, users say they fail to tell the whole story. Sure, robotic systems can help handle inventory, but they can also boost another crucial metric—worker retention rates—by creating a better workplace for the human employees around them, several recent case studies show.
Experts say adding robots to the warehouse floor can allow companies to balance the need for speed with the need to retain the pickers, packers, and drivers who keep e-commerce operations flowing. A DC with robots offers benefits like shorter walking distances, lighter lifting loads, and digital dashboards that show progress toward goals. In that environment, workers tend to stay with an employer longer, companies say. And with industry watchers forecasting it will be decades before warehouses become truly “lights out” operations that require no human intervention, human labor will remain critical for logistics at every level.
MAKING PICKING EASIER
For an example, just look to Liberty Hardware Mfg. Corp., a High Point, North Carolina-based company that makes products like bath hardware, shower doors, and cabinet hardware. The business sells its home décor products through home centers as well as mass retail and direct-to-consumer channels.
In 2019, Liberty saw its e-commerce volumes begin to explode—a trend that extended through the pandemic year and into 2021. At the same time, customers were becoming more demanding, first pushing for 24-hour deliveries (in place of the standard 48 hours) and later, for same-day service, says Miles Poole, Liberty’s vice president for operations and planning.
To meet the rising demand, the company increased staffing at its 680,000-square-foot DC in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, which operates three shifts a day, seven days per week. But that wasn’t enough. So it turned to 6 River Systems, an autonomous mobile robot (AMR) vendor that is a division of e-commerce platform Shopify Inc. In March, the retailer began using 16 of 6 River’s “Chuck” model collaborative robots, or cobots, to help it handle e-commerce direct-to-consumer orders. Liberty says the switch from manual processes to “Chuck”-assisted operations has allowed it to ship more of its orders the same day they are received while keeping up with the demands of rising order volumes.
Oh, and one more thing: Turnover at Liberty’s DC has plummeted to 3% from 25% since the robots arrived, the company says. In a video about the project, warehouse workers report that the Chuck bots save them time and energy because the robots automatically sort order lists by picking zones, prioritize rush orders, and move inventory carts with motors, instead of worker muscle. As a bonus, worker training can now be completed in 30 minutes—a major improvement over the multiple-day training sessions required in the past.
RING FOR THE BUTLER
A similar story is playing out in Goodyear, Arizona, a Phoenix suburb where contract logistics services provider GXO Logistics Inc. is preparing to open a 715,000-square-foot distribution center that will serve as the West Coast operations hub for clothing retailer Abercrombie & Fitch Co. once it becomes fully operational late this year.
According to GXO, the new facility will house e-commerce, omnichannel, and product returns operations for the retailer. It also says the highly automated facility will feature automated carts, artificial intelligence (AI)-based analytics, and goods-to-person robots from automation specialist GreyOrange. The robots, GreyOrange’s “Butler” model, will be paired with “mobile stocking units” (MSUs)—portable shelves about four feet high that are loaded with multiple SKUs (stock-keeping units)—which the bots will ferry to workers waiting at fulfillment stations.
Based on GXO’s experience at other distribution centers, this combination of technologies can boost fulfillment speeds and volumes while simultaneously taking pressure off the people working alongside the machines.
“Before these robots were available, employees had to get trained on location, kind of like how you learn your way around a grocery store, and then they had to learn how to pick, and then how to get efficient at it. So, it could take a couple of months to go from ‘good’ to ‘top efficiency,’” says Bill Fraine, GXO’s chief commercial officer. “But the cobot already knows where all the inventory is; workers just scan their ID card and it takes them for a walk. And it requires less labor because in the past, they would be manually pushing a cart, which would get heavier as they moved through their pick path. The automated carts are much easier.”
In addition to cutting training time and boosting efficiency, GXO believes the robots will help create a more satisfying work environment, thereby reducing turnover, according to Fraine.
“In today’s world, we focus on how to maintain a long-term workforce, because turnover causes inefficiency and mistakes. We need to stay ahead of that,” he says. “Our [aim] is to be the employer of choice. You have to be a great employer, not just an employer that pays well. You have to make the work enjoyable, rewarding, and fulfilling, because they have choices; workers can go anywhere tomorrow and get a different job.”
As for GXO’s choice of robots, Fraine notes that his company doesn’t see the GreyOrange robots it selected for the Goodyear site as a “one size fits all” solution. Rather, the company works with clients to determine which technologies best match their specific needs, he says. He notes that at its other facilities, GXO might install robots from any of four or five other cobot vendors in its stable or choose from even-newer products it is still testing in pilot programs.
“It’s all about finding the right automation and the right process,” Fraine says. “Coming in and automating a bad process just means you have robots running around doing inefficient work. So we work with customers before applying technology solutions, whether it’s omnichannel, returns, or e-commerce.”
ROBOTS RIDE THE ECONOMIC WAVE
Inspired by robots’ performance to date, more companies are looking to warehouse technology as a way to stay afloat in an era of soaring e-commerce demand and chronic labor shortages. That interest has spurred an uptick in new orders for robots, analysts say. For example, robot orders in the second quarter of 2021 were up 67% over the same period in 2020, indicating that demand for automation is returning to pre-Covid levels as North American companies get back to business, according to the Association for Advancing Automation (A3).
“With the big increases in automation sales and favorable economic conditions in the U.S. manufacturing sector throughout much of 2021, it’s clear users have accelerated their orders for robotics and other forms of advanced technologies,” A3 President Jeff Burnstein said in a release. “While companies have long realized that automation increases efficiencies, expands production, and empowers human employees to do more valuable tasks, the pandemic helped even more industries realize those benefits. By automating—either for the first time or expanding on how they use automation—companies will be better prepared to handle any upcoming issues that [could] impact their business.”
And as more companies integrate robots into their operations, they’re finding the bots’ value isn’t limited to their goods-handling capability. It also lies in their ability to create a better workplace—thereby helping to define a future where workers and cobots complement each other’s strengths.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."