Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly, and a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
As peak season swings into full gear, the consensus among industry players for how shippers—and consumers expecting cheap, on-time deliveries—will fare in a struggling parcel express market can be summed up in one succinct phrase:
“It’s going to be gnarly.”
That prediction, as well as other more colorful versions along the same theme, is the consensus of shippers, carriers, and various industry analysts. All expect a record year—and record challenges—for parcel express carriers.
Logistics and warehouse managers are seeing their carefully crafted just-in-time supply chains and parcel shipping strategies snarled by a host of factors, many of which are beyond their direct control. And the volumes keep on coming. By one FedEx estimate, the industry benchmark of 100 million parcel packages per day, once expected in 2026, is already here. In its last quarterly report, UPS cited a 13% increase in average daily volume to some 20 million packages per day. Most of that increase came from e-commerce shipments and rising residential deliveries.
The continuing surge in e-commerce is a testament to how deeply, quickly—and permanently—consumer buying habits have changed, points out Dick Metzler, chief executive officer of Austin, Texas-based Lone Star Overnight (LSO), a regional parcel carrier serving Texas, Oklahoma, and parts of Arkansas. “I think Covid went on long enough to convince even the most ardent mall junkie that e-commerce and home delivery is a better way to spend your money and your time,” he says.
“It’s going to be more than the usual Black Friday mess,” says Rock Magnan, president of Silicon Valley-based RK Logistics Group, which handles e-commerce orders for clients shipping digital sound systems, home appliances, and other consumer goods, of the upcoming holiday season. Shippers and their 3PLs (third-party logistics service providers) will need to be more creative, agile, and flexible than ever before. “Plans and solutions needed to be in place a month ago” to have some relative assurance of parcel capacity, he notes.
One alternative strategy that avoids the parcel carrier for last mile, Magnan notes, is store-door pickup. In this instance, manufacturers are forward-stocking more products at retailers like The Home Depot, Walmart, Kohl’s, or Lowes. When a consumer orders a product online, instead of it going into the parcel carrier’s network for delivery, the buyer is given the option to pick it up at their local store. “So, if you are ordering your DeWalt miter saw for Christmas, you pick it up yourself locally,” he says. “That avoids potential service delays and costs from already-strapped parcel networks.”
BEING A “SHIPPER OF CHOICE”
One executive who can speak to the need for advance planning is John Janson, senior director of global logistics at Issaquah, Washington-based SanMar, a producer of logoed apparel, caps, and other merchandise. Janson directs an operation with 10 national distribution centers and over 5 million square feet of warehouse space—and tenders hundreds of thousands of parcel shipments annually.
“We started to plan for peak season months ago,” he notes. “If you haven’t already done [your planning] and secured capacity, you’re too late.”
He shares a comment made by a UPS executive at the recent CSCMP (Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals) conference, where the executive projected that during the height of this peak season, there will be 4.5 million packages per day that the parcel express industry will not have capacity to handle. “If you extrapolate that out, that is 100 million packages [that won’t get picked up] over the entire peak season,” Janson notes.
That projected capacity crunch aligns with what he’s hearing from regional parcel carriers, who are advising customers they’re not taking on any new business until 2022. “That’s a real sign of the pressure that’s on in the residential delivery world,” he notes.
Janson, who works with UPS as his primary carrier, has long championed the concept of being a “shipper of choice,” collaborating with carriers to make his freight as efficient as possible for them to handle. In tight times, that strategy pays off, he says. “We focus on being a good steward of their assets and their employees. If you have high pickup and delivery density, and [the parcel carrier] does not have to touch your product a ton, that makes you an attractive customer.”
PREPARING FOR THE PEAK
In the meantime, parcel carriers are working hard to step up to the challenge. FedEx, in its earnings call for the fiscal 2021 fourth quarter, said it “expects to substantially increase capacity for this peak by investing in FedEx Ground’s infrastructure,” adding 16 new automated facilities and implementing nearly 100 expansion projects at existing facilities. FedEx’s average daily volume grew across all of its customer segments, with U.S. small and medium-sized clients leading the way with 32% year-over-year growth.
Brie Carere, FedEx’s executive vice president, chief marketing and communications officer, described the U.S. domestic parcel market as “flourishing.” From a pricing perspective, Carere said, FedEx “continue[s] to evaluate changes that we need to make based on demand and capacity,” adding that “we believe that peak surcharges are kind of the new normal and that we have to align our pricing to our costs.”
Josh Dinneen, chief commercial officer for Vienna, Virginia-based regional parcel carrier LaserShip, notes that his company also has invested in expansion, last May adding service into Tennessee, Arkansas, and Mississippi, as well as five additional cities in the current network. That extended LaserShip’s service territory into 22 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, reaching as far west as Arkansas, south into Florida, and into New England.
Shippers started coming to him as early as March wanting to plan for peak season. “This is the first year I ever received a peak forecast in March. That’s never happened,” he notes.
Among the biggest challenges for carriers, says Dinneen, is hiring. “Everyone is battling the labor issue. It’s been tough this year with stimulus payments and Amazon offering higher wages. Everyone from restaurants to retail has struggled,” he says.
To help mitigate the need for more workers, LaserShip has invested heavily in automation, notably at its largest sort center in South Brunswick, New Jersey. That has not displaced any labor, but it has reduced the need for new hiring, according to Dinneen. Going into peak, LaserShip operated sort centers in Nashville, Tennessee; Columbus, Ohio; Charlotte, North Carolina; Orlando, Florida; and South Brunswick.
As peak season progresses and capacity tightens, Dinneen is redoubling communications with shippers to confirm capacity needs. “We have to know from our side if you are going to use [your capacity commitment],” he says. “If you can’t use it, you’re going to lose it.”
Like Dinneen, Jason Shaw, senior director of transportation procurement for Ryder System Inc., emphasizes the importance of keeping lines of communication open. “The most productive step [shippers can take] is providing transparency with [their] parcel provider portfolio, with rolling forecasts and soliciting input on where they expect bottlenecks,” he says. “Having flexibility … for providers to pick up product in off-peak hours or weekends is becoming increasingly valuable. Shippers should also evaluate their packaging to determine if it creates manual handling issues through a carrier’s network.”
Still, the big elephant in the room remains the nearly 100 containerships at anchor at ports on the U.S. West, Gulf, and East coasts. The equivalent of some 7 million parcels per day are sitting on the ocean, representing “back-ordered items and [goods for] inventory replenishment,” notes Scott Lord, president of parcel services for 3PL AFS Logistics, adding that inventory-to-sales ratios remain at historic lows.
Lord says that AFS’s $4 billion of freight spend under management helps it gain insights into trends and the true impact of parcel pricing policies and surcharges, what is changing in the market, and how that impacts shippers. “It can be difficult to understand what you are actually paying [in rates and fees] to FedEx and UPS, and we help them unpack that,” he says.
As carrier volumes shift from fewer business-to-business shipments to more (and more costly) business-to-consumer home deliveries, Lord suggests that shippers maintain an open dialogue with carriers, which can be the key to resolving problems when freight isn’t picked up or delivered according to service commitments. Relationships do matter, he says.
TECH TO THE RESCUE
In his experience, companies that do the best managing peak season have invested strategically in enabling technologies, such as dynamic rate shopping, multicarrier parcel management, and visibility platforms, notes Bart De Muynck, vice president, supply chain research at Gartner Inc. “Those companies have the tools to collaborate with other shippers, share available capacity, and ship or cross-dock together. These digital platforms can drive efficiencies and better optimization of parcel volumes, which helps both the shipper and carrier,” he notes.
The next area where technology will help influence shipper behavior: understanding the impact of shipping decisions on sustainability. He foresees a time in the near future where consumers can choose shipping options based on carbon impact.
“That is where technology really can help drive consumer behavior [to benefit sustainability] and deprogram the Amazon mindset that we can have it tomorrow and for free,” De Muynck emphasizes. “That only increases the cost of transportation and makes the sustainability situation worse.”
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.