Intermodal is tied up in knots. When will shippers see relief?
Record import volumes have flooded an intermodal system that moves tens of millions of containers annually. Railroads are struggling to clear the backlogs, but service disruptions continue nationwide.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
Intermodal rail service providers are experiencing a banner year, thanks to unprecedented levels of imports into America’s seaports, surging demand for capacity, and an e-commerce–driven economy that just keeps on truckin’. This confluence of events is shining a spotlight on the critical interplay between rail lines and ports, truckers, drayage providers, and warehouse operators, illuminating fundamental challenges and weaknesses that are causing record delays in moving containerized cargo over the rails.
Who’s to blame? You can spread it pretty much equally across all participants in the nation’s overwhelmed supply chains.
Railroads, which cut staffing during the pandemic, have been challenged to rehire crews and bring more mile-long intermodal trains online quickly enough to meet demand. Ports have been dealing with a record number of ship calls, which has overtaxed shoreside capacity and created backlogs at sea and on land. In early September, for example, 44 container vessels were anchored in Southern California’s San Pedro Bay waiting for a berth; once unloaded, containers at the Port of Los Angeles terminals faced peak dwell times of over five days.
Truckers have been overwhelmed as well, as they contend with critical shortages of both drivers and container chassis. And warehouses, already stacked to the rafters with forward-stocked inventory, have been pushing back container deliveries, and in some cases simply parking containers on wheels in their lots, delaying the return and redeployment of the all-important chassis.
FRUSTRATED SHIPPERS
Shippers are seeing the port/rail congestion and service delays affect their operations at different points in the supply chain, particularly the “middle mile” segment, where they are moving goods out of ports and then to distribution centers around the country.
That’s exactly what Kitchen Cabinet Distributors (KCD), a Raleigh, North Carolina-based importer of ready-to-assemble cabinetry, has encountered. Although KCD’s struggles to move freight are hardly unique to the company, they are nevertheless leaving its customers frustrated, according to Glen Wegel, vice president of operations and IT. The impact has been significant enough that KCD is rethinking its mode choices. “We are in general avoiding rail when possible due to the deterioration of services across all rail carriers,” he says. Still, he recognizes that while the rail carriers are working through backlogs “as best they can, they’re up against [the same] labor and [Covid-19] struggles as the rest of us.”
The intermodal backlogs largely originate at congested seaports. That’s one reason Wegel completely avoids the Southern California ports; instead, KCD lands most of its import containers at the Port of Virginia complex and makes “pretty heavy” use of the Port of Houston as well. Wegel notes, however, that congestion in Houston, where in late August it was taking upwards of seven days to clear vessels, is starting to feel like the congestion on the West Coast.
KCD also uses the inland port system from Savannah, Georgia, to get boxes to destinations in that state and Tennessee. There’s no relief there, either. “Inland ports are where my freight continues to get held up,” Wegel says, citing delays in some cases of six weeks to get a box on the rail and headed inland. That won’t be a problem in Florida, though. KCD has built a new DC in Orlando that will be served from the ports of Tampa, Jacksonville, and Miami, which between them have containership calls from Asia seven days a week, he notes.
Wegel sums up the situation this way: “Port congestion is costing me a boatload of money. The labor issues, congestion, and lack of trucks and chassis are making it extremely difficult to predict freight arrivals.”
Domestic intermodal is also facing service challenges, but for different reasons. “This is a super-disruptive time,” observes Rob Kemp, president and chief executive officer of Lebanon, Pennsylvania-based DRT Transportation, an asset-light logistics, trucking, brokerage, and transportation management firm that, he says, does “tens of millions of dollars a year” in business with the rails. “Since this precision railroading started, [the railroads] are just not equipped to handle the volumes they are moving.” (Under precision scheduled railroading, or PSR, freight trains operate on fixed schedules, much like passenger trains, instead of being dispatched whenever a sufficient number of loaded cars are available.)
The inconsistencies in the railroads’ service make it hard to make commitments to DRT’s customers, Kemp says. Intermodal’s capacity and service challenges are pushing the company to move more of its customers’ freight over the road, to the point where he’s added more tractors and hired more drivers. “We have always been a road-to-rail conversion company,” he observes. “We are a really big channel partner. We have a large book of business, but when volume spikes and a [rail intermodal] ramp is flooded with 100 loads, [the railroads] will take it and we kind of get lost in the shuffle.” The pricing delta between rail and truck has been painful: “The losses we have incurred in our intermodal and trucking operations due to disruption caused by the railroads is significant,” he says.
Kemp does say that not all Class 1 railroads operate that way, noting that some are “trying to live up to their commitments even in this disruptive environment.” Nevertheless, in this market, it’s a constant battle to meet shippers’ needs. “We move 20 loads a day, and when [the railroads] tell us we can only move five, what do I tell the other customers? They get delayed until I can get it on the train, or I have to move it over the road—if I can find a driver.”
He’s not optimistic about peak season and the outlook for service and capacity. “I think they are working desperately to get ready for the fourth quarter,” Kemp says. “[But] I have not seen anything that makes me [confident] that it will not turn into another disruptive event.”
RAILROADS TAKE ACTION
The Class 1 railroads say they are working hard to keep intermodal traffic moving, but they’re hampered by capacity constraints. “A railroad is a linear network, so we can only move as much into an area as we can move out of it,” commented Jeff Heller, vice president of intermodal and automotive for Norfolk, Virginia-based Norfolk Southern. He says the amount of time a container stays at a terminal has gone up because warehouses are full, and “there is no place for [it] to go.”
That also has increased the time it takes to “turn” a container and its chassis, with the longer cycle time creating additional delay. All of this causes containers to stack up at port terminals and rail yards, contributing to congestion. “The chain has slowed,” Heller says.
He provides another interesting observation: that peak season, which this year never seemed to end, has evolved into three distinct phases. “International—moving import containers—starts in August and runs through November. Domestic starts in September and runs through Thanksgiving. Then the e-commerce–driven parcel peak [for which rails provide the middle-mile service] starts at Thanksgiving and runs through the end of the year,” he explains.
“We're running pretty hard right now," Heller says. “While business will continue to move, the ability of the North American supply chain to handle it is pretty limited to the run rate we’re [at] today.”
Heller describes the challenges of the last year, and likely the remainder of this year, as “a generational event.” “I’ve never seen anything like this,” he says, adding that the Norfolk Southern, as the second-largest intermodal service provider in North America, continues to step up to the plate and “invest in our network to accommodate the throughput and support customer demand.”
Seana Fairchild, assistant vice president, marketing and sales, premium for Omaha, Nebraska-based Union Pacific Railroad (UP), agrees that lack of warehouse space, labor, and drayage capacity have all contributed to increased terminal and street dwell time and delays, particularly in Chicago. She says UP is working closely with stakeholders and has taken several actions to increase fluidity and reduce congestion.
First, in July, the railroad “hit pause on West Coast import traffic for a week,” she reports. “We temporarily reopened our Global III facility in Rochelle, Illinois, to store international containers,” which helped to alleviate port congestion and provided ocean carriers with a more efficient inland storage solution. Second, the railroad added more locomotives and railcar assets, which supported an incremental increase of approximately 150 to 200 containers per day from the Long Beach and Los Angeles marine terminals. And third, the UP marshaled the resources of its Loup Logistics subsidiary to help shippers overcome a scarcity of drayage capacity for final-mile delivery.
Those moves helped drive improvements in Chicago operations, Fairchild says, and “while things are more fluid now, candidly, we expect the entire supply chain to be stressed for the remainder of this year and into 2022.”
Similarly, the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) has made operational changes to alleviate congestion. “We recognize that strong demand is still in front of us and have taken several actions to push more volume through our network,” says Tom Williams, group vice president, consumer products. Systemwide, the BNSF has hired more staff and increased lift at all of its facilities by 20%. It has also reopened its Harvard facility in Marion, Arkansas, for intermodal service and has taken two track segments at its Logistics Park Chicago out of service and converted them to a stacked-container area, which, Williams says, helps the BNSF improve its ability to de-ramp trains and immediately stage units.
A PERFECT INTERMODAL STORM
The strains on the supply chain imposed by Covid-19 and a surging economy have presented a perfect storm of challenges, says Scott Taylor, chairman and chief executive officer of Oakland, California-based GSC Logistics. “The record import volumes have stressed every single mode,” Taylor observes. “We don’t see it ending anytime soon.”
GSC’s core competencies, according to Taylor, are transloading, deconsolidation, and local and regional trucking. The company is also one of the largest providers of local drayage services at the ports of Oakland, Seattle, and Tacoma, making GSC a fundamental link connecting ports, rails, and shippers.
One of Taylor’s biggest concerns is that increased dwell times at warehouses and unusual cargo routings have placed severe stress on the availability of container chassis. In response, GSC over the past year expanded its chassis fleet by nearly 40%, to 1,000 units. Even with that expansion, he says, “we are 95%-plus every day on chassis utilization.”
Like other port-oriented logistics service providers, GSC has seen its mix of truck versus rail loadings shift as a result of the intermodal rail capacity squeeze. “Where it used to be 60% intermodal and 40% truck, it’s flipped,” Taylor observes; now over-the-road truck makes up 60% of moves and intermodal rail accounts for 40%. The top request Taylor is getting from customers: Find me capacity, at almost any price.
WHAT LIES AHEAD
As for when the situation might ease, it’s anybody’s guess. As the fall peak season accelerates, supply chain managers remain under the gun, facing tremendous pressure to get goods out of ports, on the rails, and ultimately delivered to retail shelves (and e-commerce fulfillment warehouses) and made available to consumers. Ports again are packed with ships, containers are sitting in congested yards, and warehouses are full. Equipment to move containers from port to rail, and on rail across the country, remains capacity-constrained, with most industry executives expecting no letup until after Chinese New Year in 2022.
“There is such displacement going on in the market right now,” says GSC’s Taylor. Yet for all the turmoil, he still holds out hope that the situation can be resolved. Service providers, working together and understanding how each segment impacts the overall chain, can find workable solutions, he says. “It’s a matter of how you handle these challenges at the grassroots level. It all comes down to communication, integrity, and delivering certainty.”
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.