Intermodal is tied up in knots. When will shippers see relief?
Record import volumes have flooded an intermodal system that moves tens of millions of containers annually. Railroads are struggling to clear the backlogs, but service disruptions continue nationwide.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
Intermodal rail service providers are experiencing a banner year, thanks to unprecedented levels of imports into America’s seaports, surging demand for capacity, and an e-commerce–driven economy that just keeps on truckin’. This confluence of events is shining a spotlight on the critical interplay between rail lines and ports, truckers, drayage providers, and warehouse operators, illuminating fundamental challenges and weaknesses that are causing record delays in moving containerized cargo over the rails.
Who’s to blame? You can spread it pretty much equally across all participants in the nation’s overwhelmed supply chains.
Railroads, which cut staffing during the pandemic, have been challenged to rehire crews and bring more mile-long intermodal trains online quickly enough to meet demand. Ports have been dealing with a record number of ship calls, which has overtaxed shoreside capacity and created backlogs at sea and on land. In early September, for example, 44 container vessels were anchored in Southern California’s San Pedro Bay waiting for a berth; once unloaded, containers at the Port of Los Angeles terminals faced peak dwell times of over five days.
Truckers have been overwhelmed as well, as they contend with critical shortages of both drivers and container chassis. And warehouses, already stacked to the rafters with forward-stocked inventory, have been pushing back container deliveries, and in some cases simply parking containers on wheels in their lots, delaying the return and redeployment of the all-important chassis.
FRUSTRATED SHIPPERS
Shippers are seeing the port/rail congestion and service delays affect their operations at different points in the supply chain, particularly the “middle mile” segment, where they are moving goods out of ports and then to distribution centers around the country.
That’s exactly what Kitchen Cabinet Distributors (KCD), a Raleigh, North Carolina-based importer of ready-to-assemble cabinetry, has encountered. Although KCD’s struggles to move freight are hardly unique to the company, they are nevertheless leaving its customers frustrated, according to Glen Wegel, vice president of operations and IT. The impact has been significant enough that KCD is rethinking its mode choices. “We are in general avoiding rail when possible due to the deterioration of services across all rail carriers,” he says. Still, he recognizes that while the rail carriers are working through backlogs “as best they can, they’re up against [the same] labor and [Covid-19] struggles as the rest of us.”
The intermodal backlogs largely originate at congested seaports. That’s one reason Wegel completely avoids the Southern California ports; instead, KCD lands most of its import containers at the Port of Virginia complex and makes “pretty heavy” use of the Port of Houston as well. Wegel notes, however, that congestion in Houston, where in late August it was taking upwards of seven days to clear vessels, is starting to feel like the congestion on the West Coast.
KCD also uses the inland port system from Savannah, Georgia, to get boxes to destinations in that state and Tennessee. There’s no relief there, either. “Inland ports are where my freight continues to get held up,” Wegel says, citing delays in some cases of six weeks to get a box on the rail and headed inland. That won’t be a problem in Florida, though. KCD has built a new DC in Orlando that will be served from the ports of Tampa, Jacksonville, and Miami, which between them have containership calls from Asia seven days a week, he notes.
Wegel sums up the situation this way: “Port congestion is costing me a boatload of money. The labor issues, congestion, and lack of trucks and chassis are making it extremely difficult to predict freight arrivals.”
Domestic intermodal is also facing service challenges, but for different reasons. “This is a super-disruptive time,” observes Rob Kemp, president and chief executive officer of Lebanon, Pennsylvania-based DRT Transportation, an asset-light logistics, trucking, brokerage, and transportation management firm that, he says, does “tens of millions of dollars a year” in business with the rails. “Since this precision railroading started, [the railroads] are just not equipped to handle the volumes they are moving.” (Under precision scheduled railroading, or PSR, freight trains operate on fixed schedules, much like passenger trains, instead of being dispatched whenever a sufficient number of loaded cars are available.)
The inconsistencies in the railroads’ service make it hard to make commitments to DRT’s customers, Kemp says. Intermodal’s capacity and service challenges are pushing the company to move more of its customers’ freight over the road, to the point where he’s added more tractors and hired more drivers. “We have always been a road-to-rail conversion company,” he observes. “We are a really big channel partner. We have a large book of business, but when volume spikes and a [rail intermodal] ramp is flooded with 100 loads, [the railroads] will take it and we kind of get lost in the shuffle.” The pricing delta between rail and truck has been painful: “The losses we have incurred in our intermodal and trucking operations due to disruption caused by the railroads is significant,” he says.
Kemp does say that not all Class 1 railroads operate that way, noting that some are “trying to live up to their commitments even in this disruptive environment.” Nevertheless, in this market, it’s a constant battle to meet shippers’ needs. “We move 20 loads a day, and when [the railroads] tell us we can only move five, what do I tell the other customers? They get delayed until I can get it on the train, or I have to move it over the road—if I can find a driver.”
He’s not optimistic about peak season and the outlook for service and capacity. “I think they are working desperately to get ready for the fourth quarter,” Kemp says. “[But] I have not seen anything that makes me [confident] that it will not turn into another disruptive event.”
RAILROADS TAKE ACTION
The Class 1 railroads say they are working hard to keep intermodal traffic moving, but they’re hampered by capacity constraints. “A railroad is a linear network, so we can only move as much into an area as we can move out of it,” commented Jeff Heller, vice president of intermodal and automotive for Norfolk, Virginia-based Norfolk Southern. He says the amount of time a container stays at a terminal has gone up because warehouses are full, and “there is no place for [it] to go.”
That also has increased the time it takes to “turn” a container and its chassis, with the longer cycle time creating additional delay. All of this causes containers to stack up at port terminals and rail yards, contributing to congestion. “The chain has slowed,” Heller says.
He provides another interesting observation: that peak season, which this year never seemed to end, has evolved into three distinct phases. “International—moving import containers—starts in August and runs through November. Domestic starts in September and runs through Thanksgiving. Then the e-commerce–driven parcel peak [for which rails provide the middle-mile service] starts at Thanksgiving and runs through the end of the year,” he explains.
“We're running pretty hard right now," Heller says. “While business will continue to move, the ability of the North American supply chain to handle it is pretty limited to the run rate we’re [at] today.”
Heller describes the challenges of the last year, and likely the remainder of this year, as “a generational event.” “I’ve never seen anything like this,” he says, adding that the Norfolk Southern, as the second-largest intermodal service provider in North America, continues to step up to the plate and “invest in our network to accommodate the throughput and support customer demand.”
Seana Fairchild, assistant vice president, marketing and sales, premium for Omaha, Nebraska-based Union Pacific Railroad (UP), agrees that lack of warehouse space, labor, and drayage capacity have all contributed to increased terminal and street dwell time and delays, particularly in Chicago. She says UP is working closely with stakeholders and has taken several actions to increase fluidity and reduce congestion.
First, in July, the railroad “hit pause on West Coast import traffic for a week,” she reports. “We temporarily reopened our Global III facility in Rochelle, Illinois, to store international containers,” which helped to alleviate port congestion and provided ocean carriers with a more efficient inland storage solution. Second, the railroad added more locomotives and railcar assets, which supported an incremental increase of approximately 150 to 200 containers per day from the Long Beach and Los Angeles marine terminals. And third, the UP marshaled the resources of its Loup Logistics subsidiary to help shippers overcome a scarcity of drayage capacity for final-mile delivery.
Those moves helped drive improvements in Chicago operations, Fairchild says, and “while things are more fluid now, candidly, we expect the entire supply chain to be stressed for the remainder of this year and into 2022.”
Similarly, the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) has made operational changes to alleviate congestion. “We recognize that strong demand is still in front of us and have taken several actions to push more volume through our network,” says Tom Williams, group vice president, consumer products. Systemwide, the BNSF has hired more staff and increased lift at all of its facilities by 20%. It has also reopened its Harvard facility in Marion, Arkansas, for intermodal service and has taken two track segments at its Logistics Park Chicago out of service and converted them to a stacked-container area, which, Williams says, helps the BNSF improve its ability to de-ramp trains and immediately stage units.
A PERFECT INTERMODAL STORM
The strains on the supply chain imposed by Covid-19 and a surging economy have presented a perfect storm of challenges, says Scott Taylor, chairman and chief executive officer of Oakland, California-based GSC Logistics. “The record import volumes have stressed every single mode,” Taylor observes. “We don’t see it ending anytime soon.”
GSC’s core competencies, according to Taylor, are transloading, deconsolidation, and local and regional trucking. The company is also one of the largest providers of local drayage services at the ports of Oakland, Seattle, and Tacoma, making GSC a fundamental link connecting ports, rails, and shippers.
One of Taylor’s biggest concerns is that increased dwell times at warehouses and unusual cargo routings have placed severe stress on the availability of container chassis. In response, GSC over the past year expanded its chassis fleet by nearly 40%, to 1,000 units. Even with that expansion, he says, “we are 95%-plus every day on chassis utilization.”
Like other port-oriented logistics service providers, GSC has seen its mix of truck versus rail loadings shift as a result of the intermodal rail capacity squeeze. “Where it used to be 60% intermodal and 40% truck, it’s flipped,” Taylor observes; now over-the-road truck makes up 60% of moves and intermodal rail accounts for 40%. The top request Taylor is getting from customers: Find me capacity, at almost any price.
WHAT LIES AHEAD
As for when the situation might ease, it’s anybody’s guess. As the fall peak season accelerates, supply chain managers remain under the gun, facing tremendous pressure to get goods out of ports, on the rails, and ultimately delivered to retail shelves (and e-commerce fulfillment warehouses) and made available to consumers. Ports again are packed with ships, containers are sitting in congested yards, and warehouses are full. Equipment to move containers from port to rail, and on rail across the country, remains capacity-constrained, with most industry executives expecting no letup until after Chinese New Year in 2022.
“There is such displacement going on in the market right now,” says GSC’s Taylor. Yet for all the turmoil, he still holds out hope that the situation can be resolved. Service providers, working together and understanding how each segment impacts the overall chain, can find workable solutions, he says. “It’s a matter of how you handle these challenges at the grassroots level. It all comes down to communication, integrity, and delivering certainty.”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."