As pandemic concerns resurface, industry professionals sharpen their focus on risk mitigation and supply chain visibility to manage peak-season challenges.
Victoria Kickham started her career as a newspaper reporter in the Boston area before moving into B2B journalism. She has covered manufacturing, distribution and supply chain issues for a variety of publications in the industrial and electronics sectors, and now writes about everything from forklift batteries to omnichannel business trends for DC Velocity.
The supply chain disruptions that have characterized the past year and a half have put a sharp focus on risk management, a theme that was intensifying as the supply chain prepared for peak shipping season over the summer. Pandemic concerns resurfaced with the spread of the Covid-19 delta variant, further straining an already stressed global supply chain and causing experts from all corners of the industry to warn of capacity constraints, bottlenecks, and the challenges of accelerating e-commerce activity.
“I think what everyone is starting to think about is, what is going to be the impact of delta?” Bill Thayer, co-founder and co-CEO of logistics-as-a-service platformFillogic, said in August as companies were gearing up for peak-season shipping activity. “We were already going into a very difficult third and fourth quarter. Delta will just make that worse.”
Logistics technology companies like Fillogic—which helps retailers manage their middle- and last-mile deliveries through its mall-based microdistribution network—are witnessing the problem firsthand, and they report a growing awareness among shippers, carriers, and logistics services providers alike about the need to manage risk in the face of rising disruptions. Leveraging technology investments, rethinking inventory strategies, and getting a better handle on the last mile remain key tasks as supply chain companies head into the busiest season of the year, they say.
PUTTING TECH TO WORK
Mark Stanton, general manager of asset management solutions providerPowerFleet agrees that one of the most worrisome risks heading into peak season is the delta variant and its potential impact on global supply chains. As of late summer, delta had already been blamed for slowdowns in Asia, where outbreaks shuttered operations at factories in China and Vietnam, and temporarily closed a major terminal at China’s Ningbo container port. Although such shutdowns have had varying impacts on global supply chains depending on their location and length, they are a reminder of how supply chain vulnerabilities have been exacerbated since the onset of the coronavirus pandemic.
“There is a huge amount of backlog” in the supply chain, Stanton explains, pointing to the compounded effect of the pandemic on seasonal supply chain stresses such as back-to-school and holiday shipping demand. “Every link in this supply chain … is really being stretched, and has been stretched.”
Technology is one tool that can help address some of those problems, especially by improving visibility across the supply chain.Stanton says companies such asPowerFleet—which provides telemetry solutions for over-the-road vehicles and material handling equipment, including electronic logging devices (ELDs) and asset-tracking and condition-monitoring devices—can help provide some of that insight. PowerFleet’s equipment can be used in the field—on trucks, vans, containers, chassis, and the like—as well as in the warehouse, where it can be used on forklifts, in storage containers, and on other equipment. Data derived from such technology can help companies collaborate and communicate more effectively, improving their ability to react and respond to disruptions. Incremental gains in productivity and efficiency add up as well.
“Anyone in this space is being asked to be more efficient,” Stanton explains, adding that companies have been much more attuned to this need since the pandemic hit and, as a result, are more focused on implementing new technology and using it to its fullest potential. “I think there’s a lot more focus on risk mitigation and trying to plan for the future. And there’s been more emphasis on making sure that whatever the technology platform is, you are getting the most out of it.”
Stanton says customers are asking what more they can do with technology tools and whether or not they can get added value out of the information gleaned from them. As an example, he cites the case of a prospective customer that was looking to improve management of its refrigerated tractor trailers: The customer had recently lost a trailerload of seafood due to delays that resulted in the load’s spoiling before it reached its destination. The loss to the customer was about $177,000, a figure that multiplies when you factor in the ripple effect of that loss through the entire supply chain.
“What did that do to the supply chain when that product didn’t get where it was supposed to be? It’s not just $177,000; it could be hundreds of thousands more, even millions in lost sales because that product didn’t get there,” he notes, adding that greater visibility into the trailer and improved monitoring can help fleet managers avoid such situations—and learn from them. “Customers want to know, ‘How do I manage my risk so that doesn’t happen next time?’ There really is a great deal more emphasis today on the technology that will help them get to where they need to be and beyond.”
Thayer agrees, and points to warehousing capacity constraints and a resulting need for alternative fulfillment strategies. Demand for logistics real estatecontinues to outpace supply, and Fillogic is one company that is benefiting from the trend. As of late summer, its tech-enabled microdistribution hubs were coordinating e-commerce fulfillment and delivery activities for retailers at five locations nationwide, with plans to add another 22 locations by the end of the year.
“Logistics networks are overwhelmed,” placing additional stress on e-commerce fulfillment networks, he explains. “Everyone is looking for an alternative.”
SHIFTING STRATEGIES
Spencer Shute, a consultant with supply chain and procurement consulting firmProxima Group, agrees that there is a growing appreciation for the tools and strategies required to better manage supply chain risk. As one example, Shute says more companies will be focused on switching from a just-in-time inventory model this peak season to a just-in-case or hybrid method that allows them to store more inventory close to where it’s needed. Executing on those tasks will require an innovative mindset, he says.
“That could mean changing the processes that we do today, or it could mean implementing new software,” Shute explains, emphasizing the need to take steps that expand visibility throughout the supply chain. “As we move forward, that’s going to need to be a part of risk management. You need visibility into your supply chain to assess risk.”
You can’t eliminate all risk, Shute adds, but you need to be able to see it in order to deal with it. Companies that have spent the past couple of years investing in tools to improve visibility are in the best position to weather the current storm—especially when it comes to dealing with accelerating e-commerce activity, which is expected to reach record levels again this holiday season.
“If they haven’t been putting in the work to make their networks more e-commerce friendly, [companies] will be behind the eight ball,” Shute warns. “The biggest risk is [around] customer promises and customer expectations; meeting those will be challenging for all shippers.”
Shute says businesses will adapt their shipping strategies to deal with those challenges, moving away from free, fast shipping toward strategies that place more conditions on free shipping—such as spending minimums, early orders, and slower shipping routes.
“Those are things retailers will have to consider,” Shute says. “Retailers are going to start passing more of that cost on to customers—but in more creative ways.”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."