As the omnichannel revolution sweeps through the retail world, fashion brand Levi Strauss is embarking on bold new initiatives to keep up with the times. It’s Torsten Mueller’s job to ensure Levi’s has the right supply chain foundation in place to support them.
David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
Levi Strauss & Co. may have made its mark on the fashion world with denim work clothes, but it has continuously moved with the times, updating and expanding its product line to reflect changing consumer tastes. Founded in San Francisco in 1853, Levi’s today manages a worldwide supply chain that, due to Covid-19, recently had to adapt to changes in customer shopping preferences as well. Sales remained strong during the pandemic—after all, homebound consumers still needed comfortable clothes—but the shift from store-based sales to online purchasing led the company to enhance its omnichannel distribution capabilities and accelerate its digital transformation.
Overseeing that transition while managing distribution for a large swath of the world is Torsten Mueller, the company’s vice president of distribution and logistics for Europe and South Asia-MEA. Mueller has been responsible for the operational and strategic development for all assets in the EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa) region since 2017. Last year, he was given additional responsibility as managing director, Levi Strauss Supply Chain Services & Operations GmbH.
An accomplished senior executive officer with international expertise across three continents, Mueller leads distribution projects, develops logistics strategies, and manages Levi Strauss’s European network strategy. He recently spoke with DC Velocity Group Editorial Director David Maloney about the company’s transformation and provided an inside look at its new automated distribution center in Germany that’s scheduled to open in November 2023.
Q: Levi Strauss is a 168-year-old company. How do you continue to reinvent the company and develop products that are relevant to consumers?
A: We continue to lead the industry through product, innovations, and bold marketing, putting the customer at the center of everything we do and placing us at the forefront of retail innovation. We are driving deeper connections to our consumers than ever before through our products, marketing, and digital and physical experiences. We are seeing increased demand for our iconic products, while building new icons and establishing denim trends. We continue to build out our omnichannel capabilities to make the shopping experience more seamless, convenient, and safe. We are leveraging AI [artificial intelligence] to continue to accelerate our digital transformation within the direct-to-consumer channel. We still have plenty of opportunity to amplify our reach and grow our share across geographies, categories, genders, and channels, increasing our flexibility and resilience.
Q: How do you view the current apparel market?
A: Our second-quarter performance was better than we expected, reflecting broad-based strength across our business as we continue to see recovery from the pandemic. In addition to seeing strong denim and casualization trends, we are also benefiting from the ongoing execution of our strategic initiatives. And we are excited to see consumers returning to our stores as markets reopen, with sequentially improving traffic trends.
Q: Many retail stores closed or operated on a limited basis during the pandemic lockdowns. How did that affect your customers’ buying patterns?
A: While the pandemic continues to impact our business, we are encouraged by accelerated revenue recovery in the quarter, with all regions and channels growing versus the prior year.
We are ready to serve our consumers where and when they want to connect with us, and we continue to build out our omnichannel capabilities to make the shopping experience more seamless, convenient, and safe.
E-comm growth rates accelerated sequentially from Q1, reaching 42% versus the second quarter of fiscal 2020. Net revenues through all digital channels grew 75% versus the second quarter of fiscal 2020. This was driven by strong performance across all regions. And our digital penetration as a percentage of total sales was approximately 23%.
Q: Higher e-commerce sales mean higher online returns. How have you addressed that in your operation?
A: We have made significant progress in optimizing our return capabilities in both Europe and the United States. As consumers are increasingly expecting a seamless returns process between online and offline, we are working to meet consumers where they are, ensuring they have the best experience end-to-end with our brand.
We launched a “Happy Returns” program that allows consumers to return merchandise at more than 2,500 drop-off locations without any packaging or packing slips required. We also piloted several other initiatives. A contactless returns initiative enables consumers to skip the line and return products with minimal interaction with our store teams. We also piloted a local pickup program in the Bay Area using [the post-purchase e-commerce platform] Narvar. It allows for consumers to schedule an at-home next-day pickup for a Levi.com return.
Q: Levi’s, like many companies, is undergoing a program of digitalization. How is it progressing, and can you share your priorities for that initiative?
A: We’re using digital, data, and AI to dramatically improve the consumer experience and deepen connections—leveraging every touch point to better connect and engage with our fans. Through data and AI capabilities, we've created a more cohesive and personalized consumer experience on our app and with our loyalty program.
We’re also now using AI to forecast the initial demand for each product next season. Results from our first-wave test showed that AI-driven demand forecasting improved accuracy, so scaling it should enable more precise inventory investment. It should also lead to a reduction in markdowns and clearance items, prevent waste, and enhance sustainability, all of which improve our margins. This will be powerful in combination with AI’s ongoing contribution to our pricing and promotion efforts.
Q: Have you had difficulty finding workers for your distribution facilities? What have you done to attract and retain new talent?
A: We mostly work with a 3PL [third-party logistics service provider] in Europe, who manages the staffing process. While it is an overall challenge to find good workers, we have been fortunate so far in that we have been able to meet demand and fill open positions. In general, our 3PL successfully uses a mixture of temporary contracts, full-time equivalents, and agency work staff that helps us to find the right mix.
For the Levi Strauss team, we rely on a mix of offers and tools that help us retain talent. For example, we emphasize our competitive contracts, [our stature as] a great company to work for, and [our ability to offer an] attractive career path and a chance to work on interesting and challenging projects.
We have been very fortunate with the team we have working for us in Europe and Asia/Africa.
Q: Your area of distribution responsibility spans three continents (Europe, Asia, and Africa as well as the Middle East). Do you approach distribution differently depending on the market?
A: Our approach is sometimes different, as we are trying to meet the customers’ and commercial teams’ requirements and they vary from channel to channel and from country to country—for example, with value-added services, delivery requirements, and so on.
In the meantime, we are trying to standardize as much as possible, such as with inbound freight, delivery times, etc. We are a service-driven organization, and as such, we focus on maintaining the flexibility to respond to the market’s needs.
Q: You are building a new omnichannel distribution facility in the Münsterland region of Germany. What led to the decision to build this new DC?
A: We are creating this new facility in response to Levi Strauss’s growth over the past four to five years and our need for additional capacity. We also wanted to operate a true omnichannel facility in the heart of Europe—to be precise, we wanted to be able to serve all or most of Europe from this new building, with the exception of the U.K., due to Brexit.
Our operations there are due to go live by the end of 2023. The facility will provide 1,450,000 square feet of distribution space, with the option to add another 430,000 square feet. It will have a throughput capacity of 55 million units per year.
Q: I understand the facility will be built in two phases. Can you explain why you’re doing it that way?
A: We are building in two phases so that we’ll be able to scale to demand and adjust our volumes accordingly. We also wanted to be able to leverage the experience [gained in] phase one when we go to choose the material handling systems for phase two.
Q: What technologies will be used in the new facility, and why were they chosen?
A: We will be using goods-to-person equipment [TGW’s FlashPick order fulfillment system], as all of our research indicated that this would be the most flexible equipment for the truly omnichannel facility we’re looking to build. Furthermore, we will be using a mix of shuttles and cranes to “flex” volume as needed. The design includes equipment that will be RFID-enabled to help us keep up with developments in the market and realize efficiency gains.
Q: Why did you select TGW as your design and material handling partner?
A: We went through a very stringent and months-long review and bidding process. Of all the offers we reviewed, TGW’s was the clear and convincing winner.
With TGW, we found a partner that offered the best technical and performance-driven solution. It also provided competitive pricing and the best cost/benefit equation. TGW has a great team to work with, one with lots of expertise. Plus, the company’s corporate values align with Levi’s.
Q: This facility has been designed with sustainability in mind. Can you tell us why that’s important to Levi’s and describe some of the eco-friendly features that were incorporated into the design?
A: Levi Strauss has been, and will continue to be, a leader in sustainability across all functions. With a project like this, we have a unique opportunity to make a statement about the importance of sustainability to our business. We will be applying for LEED [Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design] platinum certification for the facility.
As for sustainable design features, the facility will include geothermal heating and green roofing, and will be built in accordance with cradle-to-cradle construction principles by a developer from the Netherlands.
We are not only looking at sustainability, but also at employee well-being, and we will be applying for WELL certification for this new building. [The WELL building standard is a roadmap developed by the International WELL Building Institute for creating and certifying “healthy” buildings.] Our goal is that our associates will really like coming to work because this is a good place to work and a place to be proud of.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.