After years of fits and fumbles, Congress is finally getting serious about the nation’s crumbling infrastructure, moving forward with a $1 trillion funding package. What’s at the top of the list, and where do truckers and logistics service providers fit in?
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
For the past several years, the running joke in Washington was that “infrastructure week” basically was a collection of PR stunts: White House meetings and congressional hearings that got a lot of press coverage but accomplished little; industry advocacy groups making recommendations that went unheeded; and officials inside and outside the Beltway warning of impending doom from the state of America’s critical infrastructure, which the nation’s top engineers graded overall as a C-.
Yet as we enter the fall of 2021, a $1 trillion infrastructure policy package—with $550 billion in new funding for transportation programs—has successfully cleared the U.S. Senate, passing with a solid 69–30 bipartisan vote on Aug. 10, and is now headed to the U.S. House of Representatives for deliberation. If passed by the House, the more than 2,000-page measure will go to President Biden’s desk for signature.
For trucking and logistics service providers, it’s a sign that the nation’s infrastructure, particularly roads and bridges, is finally getting the attention—and new investment—it deserves.
Within what would be the largest infrastructure investment package since the U.S. Interstate Highway System was created in the 1950s are some $110 billion for roads and bridges, $39 billion for public transit, $66 billion for freight and passenger rail, $46 billion for projects related to improving resilience to severe-weather events, and $55 billion for projects to upgrade and expand clean water resources and manage wastewater. Also included are billions in funding for airports and seaports, electric vehicle charging stations, and the expansion of broadband internet.
Among the trucking-specific components of the bill are sections requiring automatic emergency braking systems on new commercial vehicles, improved rear underride guards on freight trailers and studies on side underride guards, and the establishment of a truck-leasing task force. The bill also would mandate a Department of Transportation review analyzing the cost and effectiveness of electronic logging devices (ELDs) and a review of processes to protect personally identifiable ELD data, and, in an effort to address the driver shortage, establish a CDL (commercial driver’s license) apprenticeship pilot program for CDL holders under 21 years of age.
ADDRESSING THE BACKLOG
The package has garnered praise for its scope, if not its scale. “The breadth and depth [of the legislation] is very encouraging,” observes Brian Tynan, corporate vice president of government relations for Aecom, one of the nation’s largest engineering and construction firms with experience across virtually all elements of infrastructure. “The strength of it is that it’s a comprehensive package that addresses roads, bridges, transit, freight and passenger rail, electrification, resiliency, clean drinking water, and broadband. It’s an opportunity for a generational investment.”
However, Tynan is quick to point out that it shouldn’t be seen strictly as an infrastructure expansion package; much of the funding will go toward the decidedly less-glamorous work of shoring up existing roads and bridges. The biggest challenge today is dealing with the severe backlog of aging infrastructure “that is living beyond its useful life,” he says. “We have to get rid of this backlog as well as continue to upgrade and expand our capacity” across all major infrastructure categories. “This is about … having an infrastructure that a growing economy can operate on.”
Troy Rudd, Aecom’s chief executive officer, has been actively advocating for critical infrastructure improvement and making it more resilient as well. In testimony before Congress earlier this year, Rudd stated: “Pursuing more resilient infrastructure is an important area … where government can make a significant impact. In 2020 alone, the United States faced 22 natural-disaster events with losses exceeding $1 billion each—the highest number ever in a single year.”
Rudd went on to say that building resilient infrastructure and unlocking innovation not only can yield significant benefits, “[but also] plays to American ingenuity and a bipartisan spirit in supporting transportation infrastructure that keeps our country moving forward.”
SET CLEAR OBJECTIVES, FIX WHAT’S FAILING FIRST
From a trucking company perspective, executives welcomed the bill’s progress but cited the need for clear objectives and echoed the emphasis on building in more resiliency and addressing the backlog of deficient, pothole-ridden highways and overtaxed bridges—all of which slow the nation’s truckers, increase greenhouse gas emissions, create delays, and raise costs for everyone.
“Traffic is increasing every year; there are more vehicles on the road than ever before,” notes Greg Orr, president of truckload carrier CFI, adding that CFI, whose trucks run some 200 million miles annually, is willing to pay its fair share toward highway repair, improvement, and expansion.
Then there’s the impact of Amazon and the pandemic-induced explosion of e-commerce shipments. Truckers are hauling more goods more often over shorter routes, and there are more cargo vans on the road making more residential deliveries than ever. “And we’re doing it dealing with congested, 50-year-old roads and bridges that stress out our drivers, beat up our equipment, and stifle productivity,” says Orr.
To illustrate, he cited the average speed for a truck on a 1,500-mile run. “Even with route optimization technology and doing all we can to avoid poor roads and congested areas, we’re hitting an average speed of 48 miles per hour,” reflecting the impact of construction delays and heavy traffic over longer periods of the day. Five years ago, that average was 51 mph, Orr notes.
“There is no doubt that congestion is the enemy of on-road productivity in parcel, LTL (less-than-truckload), and truckload,” says Dick Metzler, president and chief executive officer of regional parcel carrier LSO. That’s especially true as the use of crowdsourced drivers for last-mile deliveries increases, he says. And it’s a factor in the overall shortage of qualified truck drivers. “No driver finds sitting in traffic to be a great lifestyle, be it in a parcel cargo van or a Class 8 rig,” he notes.
One benefit of renewed infrastructure investment over time, Metzler believes, is more efficient supply chains and better transportation networks to support them, potentially forestalling significant ongoing increases in trucking rates. There is much debate over how to pay for improvements, but at the end of the day, “You pay me now, or pay me [a lot more] later,” he says.
SOLVING THE FUNDING RIDDLE
As Metzler’s comment suggests, financing has long been a sticking point in discussions surrounding infrastructure. “The key question is how does [infrastructure improvement] get funded,” notes Michael Regan, cofounder and chief of relationship development for transportation spend management software company TranzAct Technologies and chair of the advocacy committee of NASSTRAC (National Shippers Strategic Transportation Council), an association for transportation and logistics professionals who manage freight across all modes. “We were given a gift in the ’50s when the Eisenhower administration built the Interstate Highway System. But we have not [substantially] built upon it since.”
He cites overwhelming support among NASSTRAC members and other colleagues in transportation for infrastructure initiatives—and paying their fair share. Yet the primary funding mechanism—a federal tax on diesel and gasoline fuels—has not been updated since 1993. That tax generates revenues for the Highway Trust Fund, which finances the maintenance and construction of the nation’s roads and bridges. Without additional resources, the Highway Trust Fund is projected to run out sometime next year.
The gas tax “is based on a model that clearly is not relevant today,” says Regan. While more vehicles are on the roads now, gas tax receipts have not kept up. The reason: More-efficient vehicles and improvements in fuel mileage with today’s commercial vehicles and passenger cars, causing less fuel to be consumed (a good thing for the environment). Then add to that the impact of gas/electric hybrids and the proliferation of all-electric vehicles, which use the nation’s highways the same as a fossil-fueled car but pay nothing into the Highway Trust Fund.
Regan suggests several alternative or additional funding methods that could be considered, such as a vehicle-use or “mileage traveled” tax, or even a tax at the “barrel level” on crude oil. He also points to the potential for technology—such as automatic toll collection tags that work in multiple states—to ease the funding challenge. “I use my Illinois I-Pass in at least five states,” Regan says.
“The immediate return [on infrastructure improvements] is fundamentally making sure our road systems are upgraded to a point where they are safe and effective,” says Brent Hutto, chief relationship officer at freight marketplace operator Truckstop.com and a member of NASSTRAC’s advocacy committee. “If Covid taught us anything, it’s that we need trucks as consistently and frequently as possible.”
He also believes an increase in the gas tax is long overdue. “How much is a nickel or 10 cents going to make in a person’s decision [to buy] fuel?” he asks. “It’s not a rational position. You have to be able to pay for [infrastructure]. It’s an investment, not a cost.”
WELCOME PROGRESS
The legislation’s recent progress is a welcome and positive development, notes Darren Roth, vice president of highway policy for the American Trucking Associations (ATA). Between rising congestion and the 60,000 bridges around the country that are either deficient or closed, trucks are running more miles and traveling on the highways for longer than ever before. The current bill’s allocation of about $7.5 billion for new bridge grants as well as provisions to streamline environmental review into a two-year path (down from seven) all will help address and resolve bottlenecks.
“We are generally supportive of the bill moving forward,” says Sean McNally, the ATA’s vice president of public affairs and press secretary. “It’s not perfect, but we are ready to help whoever is at the table to get this across the finish line.”
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.