Toward a circular economy for lithium-ion batteries
Lithium-ion power is gaining traction in the material handling market, just as the supply chain is stepping up with recycling services and sourcing initiatives that support a greener energy landscape.
Victoria Kickham, an editor at large for Supply Chain Quarterly, started her career as a newspaper reporter in the Boston area before moving into B2B journalism. She has covered manufacturing, distribution and supply chain issues for a variety of publications in the industrial and electronics sectors, and now writes about everything from forklift batteries to omnichannel business trends for Supply Chain Quarterly's sister publication, DC Velocity.
If you’ve transitioned some of your forklifts to lithium-ion (li-ion) battery power recently, you may be wondering what happens to those batteries at the end of their life. Sure, they’ve likely got years before you have to worry about it, and the manufacturer will take them back when they reach their end point, but what happens next? An increasingly environmentally conscious business world wants to know, driven by companies’ desire to meet internal sustainability goals and address supply chain sourcing concerns. Recycling can help address both issues, but until recently there hasn’t been much activity, and the lithium-ion recycling business remains in its infancy.
“What’s missing is that there wasn’t a huge business case [for recycling these products] a few years back,” explains Vincent Caron, director of legal affairs forUgoWork, a Quebec City-based provider of lithium-ion batteries and energy-management solutions. He points to the growing popularity of li-ion batteries for use in automotive and material handling applications as a catalyst for change. “Now, it’s a very, very huge market. Recyclers are trying to capture that.”
A long and successful history of recycling forklift batteries, especially the lead-acid variety, is also a factor. All forklift batteries are large and chemically complex, and they can’t just be thrown in the trash when their useful life ends. Rules and regulations surrounding lead-acid have given way to a circular economy for those products; they are virtually 100% recyclable today. As demand for li-ion builds, so do expectations for recycling them, and Caron says a growing number of companies are trying to get ahead of that demand as more of the products enter the market—some researchers predict double-digit growth in li-ion battery use over the next five to seven years. As a result, battery makers and end-users are beginning to form partnerships with recyclers to make the circular economy a reality for these increasingly popular products.
As the process unfolds, here are three things to know about li-ion battery recycling.
1. THE BUSINESS CASE IS GROWING
Demand for li-ion recycling has been intensifying over the last 10 years or so, driven by the proliferation of personal electronics and, more recently, electric vehicles, all of which rely on advanced battery technology, according to Peter Geantil, special projects manager for li-ion battery makerFlux Power, based in San Diego. But the process for recycling li-ion batteries can bedifficult and expensive.
There are several reasons for that. For one thing, the design of some batteries can make it tough to access and extract the lithium and other elements inside. For another, it requires finding a recycler that handles that particular battery’s type of “chemistry.” There are different battery chemistries that fall under the li-ion umbrella, and manufacturers choose which to produce based on how well they work for a particular application. (Nickel manganese cobalt, or NMC, and lithium iron phosphate, LFP, are two examples of common chemistries used in material handling applications.) Recyclers don’t always handle the gamut of chemistries on the market, making it difficult to find the right partner for the type of battery you want to recycle.
“[Because] you have these different chemistries, you have to find a recycler that can take any lithium-ion battery and extract whatever valuable materials it can from it,” Geantil explains, adding that such sources are beginning to emerge. “As lithium began to be deployed throughout our economy, people realized they needed to figure out how to recycle it. Initial recycling rates were low—they weren’t even capturing the lithium. Nowadays, they are getting more out of it.”
Also complicating the issue is that li-ion batteries for material handling are one part of a larger system that includes electronic components, steel, wires, and other elements, all of which are involved in the recycling or repurposing process, according to Marcio Oliveira, vice president for global quality and sustainability at battery and energy systems makerEnerSys, based in Reading, Pennsylvania.
“The recycling process will require deconstructing the batteries,” he explains. “The real point, though, when it comes to [sustainability], is that the opportunity is much bigger than just the li-ion battery portion and [actually extends to] the recycling of all the other materials that are part of the whole system.”
Like other battery makers, EnerSys is working with recyclers to handle the various aspects of the process and looking to develop partnerships down the road. Oliveira says the company has not yet had to take back any of its li-ion forklift batteries—they were recently launched and are all still in service—but is working with local recyclers to handle the scrap generated from the production process, another aspect of the growing li-ion recycling market.
And like Geantil and Caron, he agrees that the growing volume of li-ion batteries in automotive and industrial applications is helping to drive the business case for change.
“The cost of recyclability is dependent both on the volume to be recycled and also the chemistry used in the batteries,” Oliveira says. “The more those business segments increase [their use of li-ion technology], the easier it will be for the recyclability to become a net positive.”
2. INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IS UNDERWAY
The global lithium-ion battery market was valued at $32.9 billion in 2019 and is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13% from 2020 to 2027, according toa 2020 market report from research firm Grand View Research. Investors are digging in to capture a piece of that pie, and many are helping to lay the groundwork for a lithium-ion recycling infrastructure.
Canadian firmLi-Cycle is a key part of that growing infrastructure. Launched in 2016, the company aims to make li-ion batteries a circular and sustainable product; the firm has developed technology that can recover the resources in any type of li-ion battery chemistry and produce battery-grade li-ion chemicals for use in new products. Li-Cycle recycles thousands of tons of li-ion batteries every year and claims it can recover 95% of all critical materials inside them. The company announced plans to go public earlier this year through a merger with Peridot Acquisition Corp., a publicly traded special purpose acquisition company (SPAC). The deal was expected to close in the second quarter.
Li-Cycle operates two facilities in North America, with a third planned to open early next year. The firm’s expansion illustrates the growing market for li-ion recycling as well as larger goals for creating that circular economy, according to Geantil.
“We should have a closed ecosystem,” Geantil says, pointing to the growing number of li-ion batteries in the market. “Everyone knows there are valuable materials in them. The economics are there, the desire is there. We’re already doing it; it’s just that we’re getting better and better. People are focusing on it now.”
A host of other projects underscore the growing infrastructure. Earlier this year,Ultium Cells LLC, a joint venture between General Motors andLG Energy Solution, formed apartnership with Li-Cycleto recycle up to 100% of the material scrap from battery cell manufacturing.Redwood Materials, a recycling startup led by former Tesla executive J.B. Straubel, is also making headlines,recently announcing the triplingof its operations in Nevada to scale up recovery of lithium, cobalt, nickel, and other metals it then sells to makers of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles. And earlier this year, Canada-basedLithion Recyclingannounced a partnership with Hyundai Canadato recover and recycle high-voltage batteries from its hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicles. Lithion Recycling is one of UgoWork’s recycling partners, according to Caron.
[subhead] 3. A HOLISTIC APPROACH RULES THE DAY
Battery makers are quick to point out that recycling is just one part of the larger drive toward decarbonization, and that li-ion battery technology plays a big role in that process.
“We really believe that the main challenge in lithium-ion is how to get the industry to the broader transition to lower carbon [emissions],” EnerSys’s Oliveira explains. “Lithium technology will be part of this decarbonization process.”
Caron and his colleague, Director of Marketing Jean-Francois Marchand, agree and point to other considerations when developing a green energy strategy, such as the logistics and transportation issues around both sourcing and end-of-life processes.
“If we want to limit the carbon footprint, does it make sense to send huge battery packs [for recycling] all over the continent and [create] a lot of transportation and carbon-dioxide emissions? We need to optimize the supply chain logistics,” Caron says, adding that some recyclers are tackling this issue by creating local collection options where they crush the lithium into “black mass,”a mixture that contains a blend of all the battery materials from which recyclable metals can be extracted and then sold back to the battery makers for use in new products. This is what Li-Cycle and others do. “If we have clients in Texas, Washington, and all over Canada, we’re looking for someone able to support our various locations in a way that’s environmentally friendly.”
And, increasingly, that’s what end-users tell battery makers they want as well.
“More and more, [sustainability] is one of the top priorities of our customers,” says Marchand, adding that how UgoWork handles end-of-life for its products is “definitely one of [customers’] decision criteria. One thing, though, is they don’t know how to handle this. They don’t want to take care of it themselves. We anticipate that this [will become] a trend, and that more customers will be concerned about this issue and will ask about it.”
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.