Fleet managers grapple with host of challenges as pandemic’s impact persists
Truck fleets continue to navigate an unprecedented market, applying lessons learned as issues old and new complicate operations in a historic capacity crunch.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
Rounding the bend into year two of the Covid pandemic, fleet managers see hopeful signs as businesses reopen, albeit at an uneven state-by-state pace; vaccinations gain traction among more of the population; and a strengthening economy gradually puts more people back to work.
Yet no one is willing to claim the trucking industry is fully back on its feet. An e-commerce–driven surge in freight has sucked up capacity as stay-at-home consumers ratchet up online buying of everything from essential food and household supplies to home-office equipment, appliances, and home-improvement goods.
Equipment manufacturers, who just a year ago faced a tidal wave of cancellations for new truck and trailer orders, now are near fully booked, with few if any build slots available until 2022. A rise in volumes from big-box retailers—and their demand for drop trailers—is stressing operations planning as fleets struggle to get equipment returned and back in their networks.
At the same time, thanks to Covid-imposed closures of driver schools, 2020 saw 40% fewer new CDL (commercial driver’s license)-credentialed drivers enter the industry than the year before, exacerbating the shortage of qualified professional drivers. And the new federal Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse has shunted some 50,000 drivers to the side of the road, with less than 15% completing return-to-duty requirements.
WHERE ARE THE PARTS?
Going into the spring, fleet managers are faced with yet another challenge: getting enough parts and supplies to keep trucks serviced and on the road, as well as delayed deliveries of new equipment to replace aging, less-efficient trucks.
“The [parts] supply chain is very stressed,” observes Dave Bates, senior vice president of operations for Thomasville, North Carolina-based less-than-truckload carrier Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL). “We are finding shortages in everything from lug nuts to semiconductors for computers in the trucks. Everything is behind,” he says. New tractor deliveries for ODFL expected in March were delayed to April. Trailer deliveries expected in April were pushed out to May or later. And everything seems to come with a 4% to 5% higher price tag, Bates notes.
All that has changed how Bates plans fleet replenishment for ODFL. “We are holding onto everything until new equipment comes online and we can assess our needs,” he says. “We don’t really want to get rid of old equipment too quickly when it still has some useful life for us.”
GETTING DEDICATED
Rewriting the operations playbook for pandemic times
One of the pandemic's unexpected developments was how it affected the beverage business. Beverages are one of the most fleet-intensive local-delivery operations in transportation.
For Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, responding first to an initial collapse in business and then a rapid uptick in demand from stay-at-home consumers stocking up on wine and spirits, while effectively managing its fleet resources and ensuring employees were protected, meant rewriting the operations playbook.
Based in Miami and Dallas, Southern Glazer's is the nation's largest distributor of beverage alcohol. The privately held, family-owned company handles about 32% of alcoholic beverages sold in the U.S. With over $21 billion in revenue, Southern Glazer's deploys a fleet of some 4,000 trucks operated by over 3,000 drivers, delivering around 180 million cases of beverages annually from 41 distribution centers. Its mostly straight-truck fleet typically delivers to restaurants, bars, grocery and liquor stores, and other retail shops selling wine and spirits.
It's a business where drivers typically interact with a dozen or more customers a day, making inside deliveries, and stocking backrooms and sometimes retail shelves.
"The biggest challenge was protecting our employees," says Ron Flanary, the company's senior vice president of national operations. "[Our drivers] go into retail accounts, facing the public all day long every day," he explains. Job one was "putting the controls in place to protect them and make them feel safe," Flanary says. That required adjusting how it operated, dictated by social distancing and disinfecting needs for trucks and facilities, and acquiring and providing sufficient personal protective gear to drivers and warehouse workers.
"We went to stop-and-drop operations," Flanary says. "Instead of taking the product inside the store, to limit contact we brought it to the back door, checked it in, and stopped there," he notes, adding that the change protected drivers by preventing close contact with store employees. And while initially, the pandemic reduced delivery volumes, for the most part, fleet operations weathered the storm and were able to adjust and adapt.
Southern Glazer's serves both on-premise and off-premise accounts, Flanary explains. During the heat of the pandemic, business with on-premise accounts, like bars and restaurants, "essentially went away," he notes. At the same time, volume with off-premise retail accounts went up some 35%. "It was just a shift in mix," Flanary says. The company was able to effectively redeploy resources idled by closed restaurants and bars to serve surging retail accounts like grocery and liquor stores.
Yet from a broader fleet-management perspective, even during the pandemic, the overall objectives remained the same: "How do you operate as safely as possible, support your drivers, and get the most productivity and utility out of your fleet," Flanary says. "How do you optimize operations to run the fewest miles, get the best stop density, and ensure a consistent level of quality service?"
Another trend over the past year and continuing in 2021 has been shippers and transportation managers embracing more dedicated operations as a way to reduce supply chain risk and lock in increasingly scarce trucking capacity.
Greg Orr, senior vice president, U.S. truckload for TFI International, is seeing accelerated demand for “dedicated committed fleet resources, where [shippers] are willing to pay substantially more or close the loop to make sure they have capacity for their business,” he notes.
Among the operations he oversees is Eagan, Minnesota-based truckload carrier Transport America, whose business mix typically is 75% for-hire over the road (OTR), and 25% dedicated. In the first quarter of this year, “the [demand] for dedicated versus OTR was about 50-50. It has never been that high,” Orr says.
Dedicated is a different conversation from spot market or for-hire negotiations, Orr stresses. Whether it’s taking over a private fleet or establishing a dedicated solution, “we really try to walk them through the commitment and the equipment and capital involved,” he explains, adding that in most cases, starting a new dedicated account means buying or leasing new equipment in the short term.
“We don’t want to be stripping [equipment] from one side of the business to [use in] another. So we try to take them through all the [staffing, asset, and operating needs] of [establishing a dedicated fleet],” he says.
Because of the market’s volatility and the resulting drastic swings in capacity, “the shippers we serve [have] become more creative than ever in terms of finding and capturing any and all capacity to support their networks,” notes Mark Sitko, vice president of dedicated sales for Van Buren, Arkansas-based truckload carrier USA Truck.
With rates at historic highs, some shippers have been reluctant to enter into longer, multiyear dedicated fleet deals, instead opting for “pop-up fleets.” These shorter-term dynamic capacity arrangements “get the capacity to the areas of the network [where] shippers need” immediate support, says Sitko.
In any case, creating a dedicated solution for each customer requires more than a cookie-cutter approach, notes Billy Cartright, senior vice president of dedicated operations at Chattanooga, Tennessee-based Covenant Logistics Group.
“One of our value adds is helping the customer optimize its network,” he says. “How does its [existing] network layer into ours, where can we find synergies?” He notes that in some cases, as part of a dedicated solution, his company will do backhauls and revenue shares, utilizing freight from one customer to fill empty lanes with another, essentially leveraging relationships among its customers to deploy available, unused capacity and increase utilization for all.
The strategic objective for the fleet manager or shipper’s VP of transportation should be “how do you take out cyclicality to have more predictability [with capacity] and understanding of what [transportation costs] will do to your P&L,” Cartright says.
It’s also important for the shipper to understand how operating structure and processes in its warehousing and manufacturing plants—which are to be supported by the dedicated fleet—can impact rates and costs in fleet operations, and where collaboration with its fleet provider can provide productivity gains and new efficiencies for both.
KNOW WHAT YOU ARE GOOD AT
Thomas Regan, vice president of operations for dedicated transportation at Miami-based Ryder System Inc., makes a similar point about dedicated’s growing momentum. His group is seeing especially strong demand, he says.
“Prior to Covid, there were some secular trends driving transition of private fleets to dedicated,” Regan recalls. “Insurance was a big factor,” with some operators saddled with “50% to 100% increases [in insurance rates], depending on the type of business and incident rates,” he notes.
The primary decision factors for shippers seeking more dedicated deals: risk avoidance, committed capacity, and a predictable cost for transportation. And offloading the ever-more-difficult challenge of finding and keeping professional drivers.
“When Covid hit, it made people [operating private fleets] really take a step back,” says Regan. He recalls a lot of shippers having conversations like “My insurance is going up. Technology in trucks is getting more complex. I don’t have the right visibility platform. Can I grow [my fleet] on my own at the pace—and within the cost—that my business needs?”
At the same time, trying to gain reliable capacity in the common carrier market was just as stressful. You either couldn’t find enough, or the cost was exorbitant and service unpredictable.
All that has created an inflection point that’s tipping the scales increasingly to dedicated in 2021, says Regan. He notes that Ryder offers not just dedicated solutions, but also complementary resources and capabilities, all of which can be mixed and matched to help shippers establish stable transportation operations with secure capacity at a reliably budgeted cost.
The point he makes to shippers and transportation managers contemplating private versus dedicated fleet operations: know what you are good at.
“Some have been running private fleets for years; they have good, deep talent and technology to make it successful,” Regan notes. “Others realize they need some help on the transportation side, so they [choose to] focus on the core aspects of their business” and contract with a dedicated fleet provider for whom such services are a core competency.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."